Sperm DNA Fragmentation

Stamatios Karavolos

doi:10.1055/s-0041-1736261

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Table of Contents

Semin Reprod Med 2021; 39(05/06): 194-199
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736261

Review Article

Sperm DNA Fragmentation

Stamatios Karavolos

¹Department of Gynaecology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Manchester, United Kingdom

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Sperm DNA fragmentation refers to the accumulation of adducts as well as single- or double-strand DNA breaks and reflects the sperm DNA quality. Current data suggest that there are differences in sperm DNA quality among individuals with high or low fertility, and this observation has led to the idea that testing sperm DNA fragmentation could be a useful test of male fertility. However, sperm DNA fragmentation has become one of the most frequently debated topics in reproductive medicine, as there is no agreement about the optimal way to test for DNA fragmentation, the clinically significant level of sperm DNA fragmentation, as well as the best therapeutic options for infertile men. This article presents current evidence related to sperm DNA fragmentation and its role in managing male infertility.

Keywords

infertility - male - sperm DNA fragmentation

Full Text

References

References
1 Hotchkiss R. General considerations. In: Fertility in Men. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1944: 1
2 Niederberger C, Pellicer A, Cohen J. et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril 2018; 110 (02) 185-324.e5
3 Lewis SE, Agbaje I, Alvarez J. Sperm DNA tests as useful adjuncts to semen analysis. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2008; 54 (03) 111-125
4 Lewis SE, John Aitken R, Conner SJ. et al. The impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted conception and beyond: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27 (04) 325-337
5 Aitken RJ. DNA damage in human spermatozoa; important contributor to mutagenesis in the offspring. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (Suppl. 04) S761-S764
6 Simon L, Aston KI, Emery BR, Hotaling J, Carrell DT. Sperm DNA damage output parameters measured by the alkaline Comet assay and their importance. Andrologia 2017;49(02):
7 McQueen DB, Zhang J, Robins JC. Sperm DNA fragmentation and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2019; 112 (01) 54-60.e3
8 Agarwal A, Nallella KP, Allamaneni SS, Said TM. Role of antioxidants in treatment of male infertility: an overview of the literature. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8 (06) 616-627
9 Warren JS, Johnson KJ, Ward PA. Oxygen radicals in cell injury and cell death. Pathol Immunopathol Res 1987; 6 (5-6): 301-315
10 Sun JG, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Detection of deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation in human sperm: correlation with fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 1997; 56 (03) 602-607
11 Aitken RJ, Krausz C. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction 2001; 122 (04) 497-506
12 Williams H, Martins da Silva S. Semen analysis and sperm function tests. In: Stewart JA. ed. Subfertility, Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019: 48-54
13 Sakkas D, Mariethoz E, St John JC. Abnormal sperm parameters in humans are indicative of an abortive apoptotic mechanism linked to the Fas-mediated pathway. Exp Cell Res 1999; 251 (02) 350-355
14 Simon L, Emery BR, Carrell DT. Review: diagnosis and impact of sperm DNA alterations in assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 44: 38-56
15 Hsu PC, Chen IY, Pan CH. et al. Sperm DNA damage correlates with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons biomarker in coke-oven workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006; 79 (05) 349-356
16 Migliore L, Naccarati A, Zanello A, Scarpato R, Bramanti L, Mariani M. Assessment of sperm DNA integrity in workers exposed to styrene. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (11) 2912-2918
17 Hales BF, Barton TS, Robaire B. Impact of paternal exposure to chemotherapy on offspring in the rat. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005; 34 (34) 28-31
18 Anderson D, Schmid TE, Baumgartner A, Cemeli-Carratala E, Brinkworth MH, Wood JM. Oestrogenic compounds and oxidative stress (in human sperm and lymphocytes in the Comet assay). Mutat Res 2003; 544 (2-3): 173-178
19 Spanò M, Toft G, Hagmar L. et al; INUENDO. Exposure to PCB and p, p′-DDE in European and Inuit populations: impact on human sperm chromatin integrity. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (12) 3488-3499
20 Evenson DP, Wixon R. Environmental toxicants cause sperm DNA fragmentation as detected by the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA). Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005; 207 (02, Suppl): 532-537
21 Aitken RJ, Buckingham DW, Brindle J, Gomez E, Baker HW, Irvine DS. Analysis of sperm movement in relation to the oxidative stress created by leukocytes in washed sperm preparations and seminal plasma. Hum Reprod 1995; 10 (08) 2061-2071
22 Fernández JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vazquez R, Alvarez JG. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003; 24 (01) 59-66
23 Evenson DP, Tritle D. SCSA is a direct measure of sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (Suppl. 02) S174-S175
24 Sailer BL, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl 1995; 16 (01) 80-87
25 Cho CL, Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. The correct interpretation of sperm DNA fragmentation test. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6 (Suppl. 04) S621-S623
26 Simon L, Carrell DT. Sperm DNA damage measured by comet assay. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 927: 137-146
27 Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol 2004; 26 (03) 249-261
28 Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Abad C, Amengual MJ, Navarro J, Benet J. Alkaline and neutral Comet assay profiles of sperm DNA damage in clinical groups. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (03) 652-658
29 Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Fernández-Encinas A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology 2013; 1 (05) 715-722
30 Casanovas A, Ribas-Maynou J, Lara-Cerrillo S. et al. Double-stranded sperm DNA damage is a cause of delay in embryo development and can impair implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2019; 111 (04) 699-707.e1
31 Santi D, Spaggiari G, Simoni M. Sperm DNA fragmentation index as a promising predictive tool for male infertility diagnosis and treatment management - meta-analyses. Reprod Biomed Online 2018; 37 (03) 315-326
32 Høst E, Lindenberg S, Smidt-Jensen S. DNA strand breaks in human spermatozoa: correlation with fertilization in vitro in oligozoospermic men and in men with unexplained infertility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79 (03) 189-193
33 Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR. et al. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 2002; 78 (02) 313-318
34 Duran EH, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (12) 3122-3128
35 Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A. et al. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (01) 174-179
36 Yang XY, Zhang Y, Sun XP. et al. Sperm chromatin structure assay predicts the outcome of intrauterine insemination. [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2011; 17 (11) 977-983
37 Chen Q, Zhao JY, Xue X, Zhu GX. The association between sperm DNA fragmentation and reproductive outcomes following intrauterine insemination, a meta analysis. Reprod Toxicol 2019; 86: 50-55
38 Cissen M, Wely MV, Scholten I. et al. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11 (11) e0165125
39 Evenson D, Wixon R. Meta-analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation using the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12 (04) 466-472
40 Zhang Z, Zhu L, Jiang H, Chen H, Chen Y, Dai Y. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and pregnancy outcome after IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32 (01) 17-26
41 Li Z, Wang L, Cai J, Huang H. Correlation of sperm DNA damage with IVF and ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006; 23 (9-10): 367-376
42 Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril 2008; 89 (04) 823-831
43 Zhao J, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Li Y. Whether sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation has an effect on pregnancy and miscarriage after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (04) 998-1005.e8
44 Osman A, Alsomait H, Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on live birth rate after IVF or ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 30 (02) 120-127
45 Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (12) 2663-2668
46 Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ. et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (10) 2908-2917
47 Pacey AA. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with sperm DNA damage. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2010; 13 (04) 189-193
48 Salas-Huetos A, Rosique-Esteban N, Becerra-Tomás N, Vizmanos B, Bulló M, Salas-Salvadó J. The effect of nutrients and dietary supplements on sperm quality parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Nutr 2018; 9 (06) 833-848
49 Smits RM, Mackenzie-Proctor R, Yazdani A, Stankiewicz MT, Jordan V, Showell MG. Antioxidants for male subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 3: CD007411
50 Barratt CLR, Björndahl L, De Jonge CJ. et al. The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 2017; 23 (06) 660-680
51 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2015; 103 (03) e18-e25
52 Moskovtsev SI, Jarvi K, Mullen JB, Cadesky KI, Hannam T, Lo KC. Testicular spermatozoa have statistically significantly lower DNA damage compared with ejaculated spermatozoa in patients with unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (04) 1142-1146
53 Xie P, Keating D, Parrella A. et al. Sperm genomic integrity by TUNEL varies throughout the male genital tract. J Urol 2020; 203 (04) 802-808
54 Esteves SC, Roque M, Bradley CK, Garrido N. Reproductive outcomes of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection among men with high levels of DNA fragmentation in semen: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2017; 108 (03) 456-467.e1