Dear Editor,
First, we would like to congratulate the authors of the article entitled “Radiographic
Evaluation of Postoperative Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty”[1] for the interesting article. In addition, we would also like to make some comments
about the methodology used in the research.
We believe that the performance of orthostatic radiographs in the immediate postoperative
period, still during hospitalization, may have compromised the quality of the imaging
examination, considering that the intensity of pain and edema common to the immediate
postoperative period often limits the total extension of the knee, especially during
orthostatism.
The attitude in flexo and external rotation of the operated limb may have been a bias
in relation to the correct positioning of the patient and the obtainment of the images.
Radiography in the immediate postoperative period has not been shown to be beneficial,[2] and we believe, in line with Abu-Rajab et al.,[3] that the radiographic evaluation should have been performed in a later postoperative
period, at around six weeks.
Another methodological point that we thought was inappropriate was to try to infer
the location of the femoral head and the center of the ankle on short radiography.
On short radiography, the only reproducible axis to be traced is the anatomical axis
of the femur and tibia (tibiofemoral),[4] which is a good predictor of long-term alignment after total knee arthroplasty.[4]
We conclude that, methodologically, the panoramic radiographs should have been performed
in a later postoperative period to avoid a positioning bias, and that a comparison
of long and short radiography analyses could only be made taking into account the
tibiofemoral anatomical axis. Attempting to infer the mechanical axis on a short x-ray
causes an inference bias regarding the location of the femoral head and the center
of the ankle.
