Keywords
accessory fissures - anatomical variations - CT scan thorax - fissures of lung
Introduction
During embryonic development, visceral pleura invaginates the pulmonary parenchyma forming the lobes. Majority of the fissures that separate individual bronchopulmonary buds get obliterated during embryonic development except along the two planes in the right lung that form the horizontal and oblique fissure[1] and on the left, oblique fissure remains. Developmental variations can occur in the fissures. Either a complete or partial obliteration during development can lead to absence or incomplete fissure. Nonobliteration of spaces between bronchopulmonary buds can lead to accessory fissure.[1]
Fissures in the lung help easy movement of the lobes in relation to each other, so that each lobe and segment will expand properly during respiration in a uniform manner. Incomplete fissures may lead to improper expansion of lung, which may contribute to hypoxia in patients with intrathoracic diseases.[2]
Anatomical variations in fissures may lead to changes in the patterns of collapse of a lobe or segment of lung in patients with endobronchial lesions. Fissural variations may lead to atypical or abnormal appearance of pleural effusion in chest radiograph. An incomplete major fissure may lead to abnormal radiological appearance of pleural fluid encystment within the fissure. Fissural variations may also change the spread of disease within the lobes of the lung, especially in case of pneumonia and malignancy in the initial stages.[3] A proper fissure often limits the spread of pneumonia to adjacent lobes. When a fissure is incomplete or absent, pneumonia and malignancy can easily spread to the adjacent lobes.
Knowledge about the anatomical variation is also important in interpreting radiological images. Position of the normal fissures is often used as a reliable landmark for localizing intrathoracic lesions.[4] Exact anatomical localization of intrathoracic disease processes by computed tomography (CT) scan is important to determine the next optimal diagnostic investigation and treatment modality. CT scan of thorax is also useful in diagnosing lesions in the pleura and in the fissures, which could be mistaken for lung parenchymal lesions in patients with incomplete, absent, or accessory fissures. Knowledge regarding the anatomical variations in fissures and radiological identification of these variations is essential for proper localization of intrathoracic and lung parenchymal lesions, to determine the extent of the disease, and to differentiate accessory fissures from other anatomical structures or lesions.
Detection of anatomical variations in fissures by CT scan prior to surgery is important to plan lobectomy and segmental resection. Presence of incomplete fissure may lead to technical difficulty in separating the lobes and may lead to increased risk of postoperative air leak, blood loss, and bronchopleural fistula.[3] Hence, it is very important for radiologists to detect and report any anatomical abnormalities in fissures, especially in patients who have to undergo lung resection surgery.
Refinements in modern imaging techniques have led to an increase in the frequency of anatomical variations in the fissures of lung being diagnosed. Various modern techniques in the thoracic CT scan can now delineate the anatomy up to the subsegmental level in the lungs. In CT scan, accessory fissure needs to be differentiated from margins of costal cartilages, fibrotic bands, scars, collapsed visceral pleural margin of a small pneumothorax, margin of bullae, and normal fissure.[4]
So far majority of the studies conducted are cadaveric. There is paucity of studies in this aspect based on chest CT images. Hence, we undertook this study.
Aims and Objectives
-
To find anatomical variations in fissures if any, in patients undergoing CT scan thorax.
-
To compare the anatomical variations in fissures in both genders.
-
To compare the anatomical variations in fissures in both lungs.
Materials and Methods
This was a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2013 to December 2015. Data were collected from the patients undergoing CT scan thorax in the Department of Radio Diagnosis in our hospital. Patients in whom normal anatomy of lung was distorted by disease or any other pathology and cases where both lungs were not visualized completely due to disease or previous surgery were excluded from the study. Total 560 cases were included in the study.
All scans were performed using 64-Slice Volume CT Scanner, with a Light Speed 16 multidetector CT (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) using 1.25 mm collimation and 0.625 mm reconstruction interval, 120 kVp, and average 320 mA tube current with pitch of 1.375. Contrast used was 120 to 150 mL of Omnipaque 300 (GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ) nonionic intravenous (IV) contrast material, administered with a power injector at a rate of 4 mL/s through an antecubital vein. Scanning was initiated with a delay time of 30 seconds after beginning the IV contrast material injection. The subject was asked to hold the breath at the end of deep inspiration and scan was performed from lung base to the apex. Multiplanar reformation (MPR) images and axial images were obtained.
All the CT scan images were interpreted by a single radiologist who had 10 years of experience in interpretation of thoracic CT scan. The presence or absence of the normal and accessory pulmonary fissures, as well as the continuity of each fissure, was recorded by the radiologist as per the classification by Craig and Walker.[5] Specifically, the continuity, frequency, and morphology of all the visualized fissures were noted. A thorough search was made by the radiologist to find out the presence or absence of fissures. These fissures included the normal fissures, namely right major fissure, left major fissure, and right horizontal fissure. Accessory fissures include superior and inferior accessory fissures on both sides, accessory fissures between medial and lateral segments of the middle lobe on right side, accessory fissures between superior and inferior segments of the lingula on left side, accessory fissures between anterior basal and lateral basal segments of the lower lobes on both sides, left horizontal fissure, and azygos fissure.[4] Superior accessory fissure is the accessory fissure between superior and basal segment of the lower lobe. Inferior accessory fissure separates the medial basal segment from the rest of the segments of lower lobe. The left horizontal fissure is an accessory fissure that separates lingula from the rest of the left upper lobe. The azygos vein penetrates through the upper lobe of the right lung and drags the parietal and visceral pleura with it, thus creating an accessory fissure, known as the “azygos fissure,” which can have either a vertical or an oblique course. Azygos fissure occurs only on the right side.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 13) software was used for analysis of the data. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the total number of normal and accessory fissures; their presence or incompleteness was noted. Potential differences in gender and side of the lung were assessed using chi-squared test of significance. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis of grouped data. In all of the above tests, p-value of less than 0.01 was accepted as indicating statistical significance.
Results
Total 560 CT scan thorax were carefully reviewed for any variations in fissural anatomy. The study population consisted of 394 (70.4%) males and 166 (29.6%) females. Fissural variations were detected in 22.9% (n = 128) ([Table 1]). Also, 17.5% (n = 98) fissural variations were seen in males and 5.4% (n = 30) fissural variations were seen in females. Further, 54.7% (n = 70) of variations were detected in the right lung and 45.3% (n = 58) in the left lung. The most common fissural variation noted was right incomplete oblique fissure ([Fig. 1]) with a frequency of 8.4% cases (n = 47). It was seen in 7.9% (n = 31) cases in males and 9.6% (n = 16) cases in females. The second most common fissural variation was incomplete oblique fissure in the left lung ([Fig. 2]) in 6.3% cases (n = 35). It was seen in 7.9% (n = 31) of males and 2.4% (n = 4) of females in the study population ([Table 2]).
Fig. 1 Incomplete right major fissure.
Fig. 2 Incomplete left major fissure.
Table 1
Gender-wise anatomical variations in fissure distribution in right and left lungs
|
Lung
|
No. of cases
|
Percent
|
|
Right lung
|
70
|
54.7
|
|
Left lung
|
58
|
45.3
|
|
Males
|
98
|
17.5
|
|
Females
|
30
|
5.4
|
Table 2
Distribution of different fissural variations
|
Variation
|
n
|
Male
|
Female
|
|
Incomplete oblique fissure right side
|
47 (8.4%)
|
31 (7.9%)
|
16 (9.6%)
|
|
Incomplete oblique fissure left side
|
35 (6.3%)
|
31 (7.9%)
|
4 (2.4%)
|
|
Right minor fissure incomplete
|
3 (0.5%)
|
2 (0.5%)
|
1 (0.4%)
|
|
Right minor fissure absent
|
2 (0.4%)
|
2 (0.5%)
|
Nil
|
|
Accessory fissure right side
|
18 (3.2%)
|
14 (3.6%)
|
4 (2.4%)
|
|
Accessory fissure left side
|
23 (4.1%)
|
18 (4.6%)
|
5 (3%)
|
|
Total
|
128 (22.9%)
|
98 (17.5%)
|
30 (5.4%)
|
Accessory fissures were noted in 7.3% cases (n = 41). Of these, 3.2% cases (n = 18) were detected in the right lung and 4.1% (n = 23) cases were detected in the left lung. In the right lung, superior accessory fissure was detected in 6 cases, and 12 cases (66.7%) of inferior accessory fissure were detected ([Tables 3] and [4]).
Table 3
Accessory fissures
|
Accessory fissure
|
n
|
Right side
|
Left side
|
|
Superior
|
11
|
6
|
5
|
|
Inferior
|
22
|
12
|
10
|
|
Azygos
|
1
|
1
|
Nil
|
|
Minor fissure
|
7
|
Nil
|
7
|
|
Total
|
41
|
19
|
22
|
Table 4
Distribution of types of accessory fissures and their gender distribution
|
Accessory fissure present
|
Male
|
Female
|
Total
|
|
Accessory fissure right side
|
14 (36%)
|
4 (24%)
|
18 (32%)
|
|
Superior accessory fissure right side
|
4 (71.4%)
|
2 (50%)
|
6 (66.7%)
|
|
Inferior accessory fissure right side
|
10 (71.4%)
|
2 (50%)
|
12 (66.7%)
|
|
Accessory fissure left side
|
18 (4.6%)
|
5 (3%)
|
23 (4.1%)
|
|
Superior accessory fissure left side
|
5 (27.8%)
|
Nil
|
5 (21.7%)
|
|
Inferior accessory fissure left side
|
7 (38.9%)
|
3 (60%)
|
10 (43.5%)
|
|
Left side minor fissure
|
6 (33.3%)
|
1 (20%)
|
7 (30.4%)
|
Gender-wise distribution of right lung accessory fissure showed four cases of superior accessory fissure ([Fig. 3]) in males and two cases in females. Ten cases of inferior accessory fissure in males and two in females ([Table 3]) were found. Also, 4.1% (n = 18) accessory fissures were detected in left lung. Out of this, superior accessory fissures in 5 cases were seen, that is, 21.7% of accessory fissures were detected in the left lung, while 10 cases (43.5%) of inferior accessory fissure were detected in the left lung. Gender-wise distribution of left lung accessory fissure showed five cases of superior accessory fissure in males and none in female. Seven cases of inferior accessory fissure were in males and three in females ([Tables 3] and [4]).
Fig. 3 Right superior accessory fissure.
Inferior accessory fissure was the most common accessory fissure detected. Total 22 cases were detected in both lungs. Seventeen cases were in males and five in females. There were 12 cases of inferior accessory fissure in the right lung ([Fig. 4]): 10 cases in males and 2 in females. Ten cases of inferior accessory fissure were found in the left lung ([Fig. 5]): seven cases in males and three in females. Azygos fissure was seen in one case ([Fig. 6]) and minor fissure in the left lung ([Fig. 7]) was found in seven cases ([Tables 3] and [4]).
Fig. 4 Right inferior accessory fissure.
Fig. 5 Left inferior accessory fissure.
Fig. 6 Azygos fissure.
Fig. 7 Accessory left minor fissure.
Prevalence of incomplete oblique fissure was more in the right side when compared with the left side. Prevalence of accessory fissure was more in the left lung compared with the right. But these differences were statistically not significant ([Tables 5], [6]
[7]). The difference in the prevalence of incomplete oblique fissure (major fissure) in the left lung among males and females was statistically significant ([Tables 5],[6],[7).] We had two cases of absent right horizontal fissure ([Fig. 8]) and 3 cases of incomplete right minor fissure ([Figs. 9] & [10]).
Table 5
p-Value for the comparison in Table 4
|
Chi-squared test (χ
2)
|
p-Value
|
Fisher's exact test
|
Chi-squared test (χ
2)
|
p-Value
|
|
Right lung incomplete oblique fissure * GEN
|
0.476
|
0.490
|
Not significant
|
–
|
–
|
|
Left lung incomplete oblique fissure * GEN
|
5.939
|
0.015
|
Significant
|
–
|
–
|
|
Absent minor fissure right lung * GEN
|
0.399
|
0.528
|
Not significant
|
–
|
–
|
|
Accessory fissure right lung* GEN
|
0.491
|
0.483
|
Not significant
|
–
|
–
|
|
Accessory fissure left lung* GEN
|
0.718
|
0.397
|
Not significant
|
–
|
–
|
Table 6
Gender-based comparison of prevalence of right lung anatomical abnormalities (n = 560)
|
Abnormality
|
Male (%)
|
Female (%)
|
Prevalence (%)
|
p-Value
|
|
Incomplete oblique fissure
|
31 (5.5)
|
16 (2.9)
|
47 (8.4)
|
>0.05
|
|
Incomplete minor fissure
|
3 (0.5)
|
0 (0)
|
3 (0.5)
|
>0.05
|
|
Absence of minor fissure
|
1 (0.2)
|
1 (0.2)
|
2 (0.4)
|
>0.05
|
|
Presence of accessory fissure
|
14 (2.5)
|
4 (0.7)
|
18 (3.2)
|
>0.05
|
|
Superior accessory fissure
|
4 (0.7)
|
2 (0.4)
|
6 (1.1)
|
|
|
Inferior accessory fissure
|
10 (1.7)
|
2 (0.4)
|
12 (2.1)
|
Table 7
Gender-based comparison of prevalence of left lung anatomical abnormalities (n = 560)
|
Abnormality
|
Male (%)
|
Female (%)
|
Prevalence (%)
|
p-Value
|
|
Incomplete oblique fissure
|
31 (5.5)
|
4 (0.8)
|
35 (6.3)
|
<0.05*
|
|
Presence of accessory fissure
|
18 (3.2)
|
5 (0.9)
|
23 (4.1)
|
|
|
Superior accessory fissure
|
5 (0.9)
|
0 (0)
|
5 (0.9)
|
>0.05
|
|
Inferior accessory fissure
|
7 (1.2)
|
3 (0.6)
|
10 (1.8)
|
|
Azygos fissure
|
0 (0)
|
1 (0.1)
|
1 (0.1)
|
|
Left side minor fissure
|
6 (1.2)
|
1 (0.1)
|
7 (1.3)
|
Fig. 8 Absent right horizontal fissure.
Fig. 9 Incomplete right horizontal fissure.
Fig. 10 Incomplete right minor fissure.
Discussion
Refinements in the modern CT imaging techniques have led to anatomical variations in the fissures of lung being diagnosed more frequently. Most of the studies are based on cadavers.[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12] There is a paucity of studies on anatomical variations based on CT scans in Indian population.
Detection of pulmonary fissures and variations in the fissural anatomy in CT scan images is not easy because the fissures are usually very thin membrane-like structures with low contrast; they vary in intensity and partial volume effect of the fissures. Besides, fissures may get deformed or distorted due to intrathoracic diseases. High-resolution CT (HRCT) scan of thorax is essential for better visualization of fissures where it is usually seen as a thin line or as a relatively avascular region or both.[13]
In video-assisted thoracic surgery, the surgeon cannot palpate or visualize the whole lung as in the case of open thoracotomy. Hence, incomplete fissure or accessory fissure may lead to increased incidence of complications during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Prior knowledge of fissural anatomy and exact localization of the diseased part of lung in relation to the fissures will reduce the complications during video-assisted lung resection surgery.[14]
Knowing the exact fissural anatomy is important for segmental and lobar resections. If fissure is incomplete or absent, then lung parenchymal dissection needs to be done, which will increase the operative time and lead to complications like bleeding, postoperative air leak, and bronchopleural fistula.[14]
This study was conducted in our institute involving 560 subjects. It was a cross-sectional analysis of chest CT scans of 560 patients. In this study, 70.45% cases were males (n = 394) and 29.6% were females (n = 166).
Out of 560 study population, 18.92% subjects (n = 106) had variation in the fissural anatomy. The total number of fissural variations was found to be 128 in 106 subjects. The right lung had 54.7% (n = 70) variations and left lung had 45.35% (n = 58) variations in fissural anatomy. Previous studies have also showed that anatomical variations are not uncommon. Both the lungs had almost equal incidence of abnormalities in some of these studies.[13]
[15]
[16]
In our study, out of 128 variations, the most common type of anatomical variation was incomplete major fissure on the right side (36.7%, n = 47). This is comparable with a study by Heřmanová et al,[17] where a retrospective analysis of HRCT of 250 patients was conducted. In that study, incomplete right major fissure was found in 35% of cases. Another study conducted by Aziz et al[18] in 622 patients showed that incomplete right major fissure was the most common fissural variation (48%).
Incomplete left major fissure was found in 27.3% (n = 35) of cases in our study. A study conducted on 1,000 patients by Mahmut and Nishitani[19] showed the presence of an incomplete major fissure on the left side in 19.2% cases. A study by Heřmanová et al[17] reported incomplete left major fissure in 24% of cases.
Among the total number of fissural variations (n = 128), 2.3% cases of incomplete horizontal fissure and 1.56% absent horizontal fissure were detected in our study. Previous studies reported a higher incidence of absent or incomplete horizontal fissure.[20]
[21]
[22]
[23] This may be due to racial difference in incidence and different characteristics of study population.
An incomplete fissure can change the appearance of pleural effusion on chest radiograph.[24] Pleural fluid usually tracks along the fissures. In patients with incomplete fissure, pleural fluid cannot track.[23] Wherever the fissure is present, pleural fluid is free to track. This may lead to the appearance of a peripheral opacity with a sharp medial edge within the lung. When both the horizontal and the oblique fissures are incomplete in a patient with pleural effusion, the classic “middle lobe stair-step” pattern may be seen in chest radiograph.[3] This appearance is due to the pleural fluid tracking into the areas wherever the fissure is present. In patients with incomplete fissures, infection may spread easily to the adjacent parts of the lung.[25] A well-formed fissure helps to limit the spread of pneumonia to adjacent lobes as the continuity is sealed by the pleural reflection.
A study was done by Gerard J. Criner[26] for assessing the implications of integrity of fissures and lung volume reduction surgery. Patients with well-formed fissure who underwent endobronchial valve placement were found to have incremental improvements in lung function when compared with those who had incomplete fissures. This indicates fissures may help in proper and uniform expansion of the lung. A study done by Gómez-Caro and coworkers found that an incomplete fissure is a risk factor for postoperative air leakage following lobectomy and lung resection surgeries.[27]
In our study, 41 cases of accessory fissures were detected. Frequency of accessory fissure was found to be more common in the left lung (n = 23). Inferior accessory fissure (n = 22, right-12, left-10) was the most common accessory fissure detected. The second most frequent accessory fissure detected was superior accessory fissure (n = 11, right-6, left-5). A left minor fissure was found in seven cases and azygos fissure in one case.
In the majority, azygos lobe is asymptomatic. Azygos lobe sometimes may mimic a disease pattern or malignancy in chest radiograph.[28] Aneurysm of azygos vein and spontaneous pneumothorax have been reported.[29]
[30] Pneumonia or malignancy of the azygos lobe may not spread readily into adjacent lobes or segments.[31] Case reports indicate that in primary malignancy in azygos lobe, metastasis and spread to adjacent structure is often rare and delayed.
A similar study done by Ariyürek et al[13] detected 69 accessory fissures out of 443 cases. In their study, inferior accessory fissure was the most common accessory fissure that was seen in 40 patients (38 on the right side, 2 on the left side). A study by Yildiz et al[16] based on HRCT was done to find the frequency of accessory fissures in 115 patients. In this study, 44 accessory fissures were found in 115 cases. Inferior accessory fissure (12%) was the most common accessory fissure, which is comparable with our results.
Accessory fissure should be differentiated from fibrotic bands in the lung.[13] Pneumonia or malignancy of the segment having accessory fissure may not spread readily into the adjacent lobes or segments. In primary malignancy involving a segment bounded by accessory fissure, metastasis and spread to adjacent structure is often rare and delayed. So having an accessory fissure may be advantageous to contain the spread of disease within the lung.
Anatomical variations in the fissure are not uncommon. With newer imaging techniques, it is easy to identify these abnormalities. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of thoracic image include MPR, maximum intensity projection (MIP), minimum intensity projection, 3D surface-shaded display, and volume rendering (VR) images.[32] This 3D reconstruction provides all information in a single radiologic study, which is easy to understand and interpret. These images can be viewed in a variety of display formats, including standard axial images, reconstructed images in any plane, and high-quality 3D images. 3D VR images provide more accurate anatomy of intrathoracic structures. Fissures are visualized with MIP, MPR, and VR images.[14] Thus, any anatomical variation in the intrathoracic structures can be easily identified. This is essential before any thoracic surgery and is crucial before video-assisted thoracic surgery to avoid any complications.[14]
Conclusions
Anatomical variations in fissures were found to be more in the right lung than the left lung. An incomplete right oblique fissure was the most common fissural abnormality detected. An incomplete left oblique fissure was the second most common fissural abnormality. Accessory fissures were detected in higher incidence on the right lung. Inferior accessory fissure was the most common accessory fissure noted. There was no significant gender-wise difference in the incidence of incomplete and accessory fissures.
Limitations of the Study
This study had a small sample size and the study group did not represent the population sample size. A population survey of healthy young adults would be better but the ethical issue is radiation exposure.
