PDF herunterladen
Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35(02): 146-154
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742116
Review Article

Functional Outcomes after Transanal Surgery

Caterina Foppa‡   *
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
2   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Francesco Maria Carrano‡   *
2   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Antonino Spinelli
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
2   Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Transanal surgery has gained in popularity during the latter part of the last decade for both rectal cancer and benign disease. The current role for local excision of early rectal neoplastic lesions has expanded due to better understanding of risk factors for lymph node metastasis and heightened awareness for the long-term sequelae of radical surgery. Transanal resection of the rectum (both for cancer or inflammatory bowel diseases) has now been established as a successful procedure that overcomes some of the limitations of the abdominal approaches. Once the feasibility, safety, and the oncologic results of transanal minimally invasive approaches for patients with rectal cancer have been acknowledged, quality of life and functional outcomes have become increasingly important issues. This article provides an overview of the different techniques currently available for the minimally invasive transanal treatment of rectal lesions, particularly focusing on functional outcomes.

Keywords

rectal cancer - transanal endoscopic surgery - minimally invasive surgery - TaTME

* These authors contributed equally to this study.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Februar 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Plummer JM, Leake PA, Albert MR. Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer: No surgery, minimal surgery or minimally invasive surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 9 (06) 139-148
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Sevak S, Gregoir T, Wolthuis A, Albert M. How can we utilize local excision to help, not harm, geriatric patients with rectal cancer?. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46 (03) 344-348
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hompes R, Penna M. Summary of oncologic and functional outcomes. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 33 (03) 150-156
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36 (01) 77-97
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW. et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42 (12) 1525-1532
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW. et al. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (01) 9-16 , discussion 16–17
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Young DO, Kumar AS. Local excision of rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2017; 97 (03) 573-585
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Rullier E, Rouanet P, Tuech J-J. et al. Organ preservation for rectal cancer (GRECCAR 2): a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 390: 469-79.21
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Speakman CT, Burnett SJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Sphincter injury after anal dilatation demonstrated by anal endosonography. Br J Surg 1991; 78 (12) 1429-1430
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 MacDonald A, Smith A, McNeill AD, Finlay IG. Manual dilatation of the anus. Br J Surg 1992; 79 (12) 1381-1382
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Nestorović M, Galosi B, Morino M. Local excision for rectal cancer: a minimally invasive option. Minerva Chir 2018; 73 (06) 548-557
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Marinello FG, Curell A, Tapiolas I, Pellino G, Vallribera F, Espin E. Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35 (01) 51-67
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Goldenshluger M, Gutman Y, Katz A, Schtrechman G, Westrich G, Nissan A, Segev L. Long-Term Bowel Function after Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS). Isr Med Assoc J 2020 Jul;22(7):426-430. PMID: 33236567
    PubMed
  • 14 Lacy AM, Tasende MM, Delgado S. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: outcomes after 140 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221 (02) 415-423
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S. et al; TaTME Registry Collaborative. Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 2017; 266 (01) 111-117
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Maurer CA. Urinary and sexual function after total mesorectal excision. Recent Results Cancer Res 2005; 165: 196-204
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Pocard M, Zinzindohoue F, Haab F, Caplin S, Parc R, Tiret E. A prospective study of sexual and urinary function before and after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer. Surgery 2002; 131 (04) 368-372
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 2002; 89 (12) 1551-1556
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP, Yun SH. Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison. World J Surg 2014; 38 (07) 1834-1842
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery?. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18 (01) 19-36
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Araujo SE, Crawshaw B, Mendes CR, Delaney CP. Transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19 (02) 69-82
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S. et al; International TaTME Registry Collaborative. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg 2019; 269 (04) 700-711
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Penna M, Knol JJ, Tuynman JB, Tekkis PP, Mortensen NJ, Hompes R. Four anastomotic techniques following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20 (03) 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Francis N, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Carter F, Hompes R. International TaTME Educational Collaborative Group. Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (07) 2711-2719
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC. et al. Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (04) 408-415
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Rouanet P, Saint-Aubert B, Lemanski C. et al. Restorative and nonrestorative surgery for low rectal cancer after high-dose radiation: long-term oncologic and functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45 (03) 305-313 , discussion 313–315
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B. et al. A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (02) 228-233
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Pontallier A, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B, Adam JP, Celerier B, Rullier E. Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (11) 4924-4933
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Koedam TW, van Ramshorst GH, Deijen CL. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (01) 25-33
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ. et al. Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 2019; 33 (01) 79-87
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23 (08) 1623-1630
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bjoern MX, Perdawood SK. Manometric assessment of anorectal function after transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24 (03) 231-236
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Witowski J. et al. Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of transanal with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. BMC Surg 2019; 19 (01) 79
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Keller DS, Reali C, Spinelli A. et al. Patient-reported functional and quality-of-life outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 2019; 106 (04) 364-366
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Chandrasinghe P, Carvello M, Wasmann K. et al. Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis has comparable long-term functional outcomes to transabdominal approach: a multicentre comparative study. J Crohn's Colitis 2020; 14 (06) 726-733
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar