Download PDF
Kardiologie up2date 2016; 12(01): 14-20
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101593
Hotline – Herzklappenerkrankungen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Vor- und Nachteile von selbstexpandierenden und ballonexpandierbaren Prothesen zur kathetergestützten Aortenklappenimplantation

Buntaro Fujita
,
Jochen Börgermann
,
Smita Scholtz
,
Werner Scholtz
,
Nobuyuki Furukawa
,
Timm Schäfer
,
Dieter Horstkotte
,
Jan Gummert
,
Stephan Ensminger
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 March 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Different biologic prostheses are currently in use for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Recent experience has shown that balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves achieve similar clinical outcomes. In addition, numerous factors have been identified that are associated with favorable results with one or the other prosthesis type. At the same time, new prostheses with alternative stent designs and implantation techniques have been released on the market. Future research should aim at identifying further factors to ultimately enable prosthesis selection on an individual patient base

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2485-2491
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2477-2484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Yakubov SJ, Adams DH, Watson DR et al. 2-Year Outcomes After Iliofemoral Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015; 66: 1327-1334
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Reardon MJ, Adams DH, Kleiman NS et al. 2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 113-121
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann FJ, Mehilli J et al. 1-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expandable Valves: Results From the CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66: 791-800
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Seiffert M, Fujita B, Avanesov M et al. Device landing zone calcification and its impact on residual regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with different devices. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; [Epub ahead of print]
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Kuetting M, Sedaghat A, Utzenrath M et al. In vitro assessment of the influence of aortic annulus ovality on the hydrodynamic performance of self-expanding transcatheter heart valve prostheses. J Biomech 2014; 47: 957-965
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Schuhbaeck A, Weingartner C, Arnold M et al. Aortic annulus eccentricity before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding prostheses. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 1242-1248
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bekeredjian R, Bodingbauer D, Hofmann NP et al. The extent of aortic annulus calcification is a predictor of postprocedural eccentricity and paravalvular regurgitation: a pre- and postinterventional cardiac computed tomography angiography study. J Invasive Cardiol 2015; 27: 172-180
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Delgado V, Ng AC, van de Veire NR et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: role of multi-detector row computed tomography to evaluate prosthesis positioning and deployment in relation to valve function. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 1114-1123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Schultz CJ, Weustink A, Piazza N et al. Geometry and degree of apposition of the CoreValve ReValving system with multislice computed tomography after implantation in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 911-918
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Buz S et al. Annular rupture during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: classification, pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment approaches, and prevention. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2015; 8: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA 2014; 312: 162-170
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Jategaonkar SR, Scholtz W, Horstkotte D et al. Transfemoral aortic valve-in-valve implantation with the CoreValve Evolut for small degenerated stented bioprosthesis. J Invasive Cardiol 2014; 26: 291-294
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Roy DA, Schaefer U, Guetta V et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for pure severe native aortic valve regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1577-1584
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar