Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol 2016; 47(03): 220-228
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101845
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Infektionsprävention bei der Katheterdrainage der Harnblase

Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
H. Piechota
1   Klinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Urologische Onkologie, Johannes Wesling-Klinikum Minden
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 June 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Harnweginfektionen (HWI) gehören in Krankenhäusern mit einem Anteil von 22,4% neben den postoperativen Wundinfektionen (24,7%), Pneumonien (21,5%), Clostridium difficile-Infektionen (6,6%) und der primären Sepsis (6%) zu den häufigsten nosokomialen Infektionen [1]. 80% aller nosokomialen HWI (nHWI) sind dabei mit einem Katheter assoziiert, wobei zwischen 12–16% aller Krankenhauspatienten und bis zu 81,8% aller Patienten auf Intensivstationen im Verlauf ihres stationären Aufenthaltes einen Blasenverweilkatheter erhalten [2] [3]. Fundierte Kenntnisse über die Grundlagen Harnwegkatheter-assoziierter Infektionen (HKI) und der korrekte Umgang mit Harnwegkathetern haben deshalb nicht nur eine große individuelle sondern auch sozio-ökonomische Bedeutung [4] [5]. Es wird davon ausgegangen, dass bis zu 70% aller HKI durch geeignete Präventionsmaßnahmen verhindert werden können [6] [7].

Die Autorinnen Conway u. Larson haben 2012 8 englischsprachige Empfehlungen zur Prävention von HKI verglichen und eine bemerkenswerte Konstanz der Empfehlungen über 30 Jahre feststellt [8]. Zu speziellen Fragestellungen gibt es nur wenige valide Studien mit zum Teil heterogenen Ergebnissen. So sind in der SHEA (Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America) – Empfehlung aus dem Jahr 2008 nur 3 Empfehlungen und 4 Verbote enthalten, die auf mehr als einer randomisierten, kontrollierten Studie basieren [9] [10] [11].

Die gesicherten Empfehlungen zur Prävention von HKI stimmen in den folgenden Gemeinsamkeiten überein [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]:

  • Jede Anlage eines Harnwegkatheters bedarf einer gut begründeten ärztlichen Indikationsstellung.

  • Medizinisch begründete Indikationen für einen Harnwegkatheter sind bspw. die akute Harnretention, die Anwendung bei mehrstündigen Operationen mit hohem Flüssigkeitsumsatz und bei urologischen Operationen, die Notwendigkeit der Bilanzierung bei schwer kranken Patienten, eine Verbesserung der Lebensqualität bei im Sterben liegenden Patienten oder die Förderung der Wundheilung im Bereich des äußeren Genitale bei Harninkontinenz. Beispiele für unnötige Anwendungen eines Katheters sind die Verordnung nur aufgrund einer Harninkontinenz und die Verlängerung der Katheterliegedauer, z. B. nach chirurgischen Eingriffen oder nach Abschluss der intensivmedizinischen Überwachung/Bilanzierung

  • Regelmäßiges Training in der Technik beim Legen von Harnwegkathetern, bei der Katheterpflege und in der Erkennung von Katheter-assoziierten Komplikationen

  • Die Katheterisierung hat unter aseptischen Kautelen zu erfolgen.

  • Es sind nur sterile und geschlossene Harndrainagesysteme zu verwenden.

  • Harnwegkatheter sollen so früh wie möglich wieder entfernt werden.

Abstract

With a share of 22.4%, nosocomial urinary tract infections (nUTIs) are among the most frequent infections acquired in hospitals, along with surgical site infections (24.7%), pneumonia (21.5%), clostridium difficile infections (6.6%) and primary sepsis (6%) [1]. 80% of all nUTIs are associated with indwelling urinary catheters, with 12–16% of all hospitalised patients and up to 81.8% of all intensive care patients receiving an indwelling urinary catheter during their hospital stay [2] [3]. Therefore, profound knowledge about the basics of catheter-associated nUTIs and the correct management of urinary catheters are of utmost individual and socio-economic importance [4] [5]. It is estimated that up to 70% of all nUTIs occurring in Germany may be avoided by using appropriate preventative measures [6] [7].

In 2012, the authors Conway and Larson compared 8 recommendations in English language for the prevention of UTIs and noticed that they have been largely consistent over a period of 30 years [8]. Special issues have rarely been addressed in valid studies, and study results are rather heterogeneous. For example, the 2008 SHEA (Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America) guideline contains only 3 recommendations and 4 prohibitions which are based on more than one randomised controlled clinical study [9] [10] [11].

The confirmed recommendations on the prevention of UTIs are consistent in the following aspects [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]:

  • Every insertion of a urinary catheter must be based on a well-founded medical indication.

  • Well-founded medical indications include acute urinary retention, interventions lasting several hours with a high fluid turnover, surgery involving the urinary tract, the necessity to record fluid turnover especially in critically ill patients, comfort for the dying, facilitating wound healing in the external genitals in the presence of urinary incontinence. Examples of unnecessary use of urinary catheters include prescriptions based on urinary incontinence alone and prolongation of use, e. g. after surgical procedures or after intensive care monitoring/recording has been completed.

  • The insertion technique as well as catheter care and the detection of catheter-associated complications must be trained continuously.

  • Catheterisation must be performed under sterile precautions.

  • Only sterile and closed urinary drainage systems may be used.

  • Catheters must be removed as early as possible.

Schlüsselwörter

Harnweginfektion - nosokomial - Katheter - Prävention

Key words

urinary tract infection - nosocomial - catheter - prevention
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 RKI Robert Koch-Institut . Deutsche Daten im Rahmen der ersten europäischen Prävalenzerhebung zum Vorkommen nosokomialer Infektionen und zur Antibiotikaanwendung. Epidemiologisches Bulletin 2012; 26: 239-240
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Laupland KB, Bagshaw SM, Gregson DB et al. Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system. Critical care 2005; 9: R60-R65
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lewalter K, Haefner H, Lemmen S et al. Die katheterassoziierte Harnwegsinfektion – was gibt es Neues?. Krankenhaushygiene up2date 2013; 08: 25-38
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Holroyd-Leduc JM, Sen S, Bertenthal D et al. The relationship of indwelling urinary catheters to death, length of hospital stay, functional decline, and nursing home admission in hospitalized older medical patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2007; 55: 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Chant C, Smith OM, Marshall JC et al. Relationship of catheter-associatetd urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 1167-1173
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rebmann T, Greene LR. Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: An executive summary of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc, Elimination Guide. American journal of infection control 2010; 38: 644-646
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA et al. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infection control and hospital epidemiology: the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America 2011; 32: 101-114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Conway LJ, Larson EL. Guidelines to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: 1980 to 2010. Heart & Lung: the journal of critical care 2012; 41: 271-283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK et al. Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory C. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infection control and hospital epidemiology: the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America 2010; 31: 319-326
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD et al. Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2010; 50: 625-663
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Nicolle LE. Urinary catheter-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2012; 26: 13-27
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 KRINKO/RKI . Prävention und Kontrolle Katheter-assoziierter Harnwegsinfektionen – Empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) beim Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Bundesgesundheitsbl 2015; 58: 641-650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 AWMF . Arbeitskreis Krankenhaus- und Praxishygiene. Die Harndrainage. AWMF 2015; 029/007: 1-15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bernard MS, Hunter KF, Moore KN. A review of strategies to decrease the duration of indwelling urethral catheters and potentially reduce the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Urolog Nurs 2012; 32: 29-37
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Huang WC, Wann SR, Lin SL et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units can be reduced by promoting physicians to remove unnecessary catheters. Infect Contr Hosp Epid 2004; 25: 974-978
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Fakih MG, Watson SR, Greene MT et al. Reducing inappropriate urinary catheter use: a statewide effort. Archives of internal medicine 2012; 172: 255-260
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Fink R, Gilmartin H, Richard A et al. Indwelling urinary catheter management and catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention practices in Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders hospitals. American journal of infection control 2012; 40: 715-720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Geffers C, Gastmeier P. Nosokomiale Infektionen und multiresistente Erreger in Deutschland: Epidemiologische Daten aus dem Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2011; 108: 87-93
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 NRZ (Nationales Referenzzentrum für die Surveillance von Nosokomialen Infektionen) . Deutsche Daten im Rahmen der ersten europäischen Prävalenzerhebung zum Vorkommen nosokomialer Infektionen und zur Antibiotikaanwendung. Epid Bull 2012; 26: 239-240
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol 2000; 10: 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Haley RW, Hooton TM, Culver DH et al. Nosocomial infections in U.S. Hospitals, 1975–1976: estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med 1981; 70: 947-959
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wagenlehner FME, Lichtenstern C, Weigand MA et al. Urosepsis und Therapie. Urologe 2010; 49: 618-622
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hübner NO, Fleßa S, Jakisch R et al. Review of indicators for cross-sectoral optimization of nosocomial infection prophylaxis – a perspective from structurally- and process-oriented hygiene. GMS Krankenhaushyg Interdiszip 2012; 7: Doc15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 KISS (Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System 2011) . Nationales Referenz-zentrum. Im Internet: www.nrz-hygiene.de
    PubMed
  • 25 ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) . Surveillance report: point prevalence study of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals 2011-2012. Im Internet: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/healthcare-associated-infections-antimicrobial-use-PPS.pdf Stand: 15.03.2016
    PubMed
  • 26 Willen M, Holst E, Myhre EB et al. The bacterial flora of the genito-urinary tract in healthy fertile men. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996; 30: 387-393
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Brühl P. Körpereigene Abwehrmechanismen der Harnwegsinfektion. In: Hofstetter A. (Hrsg.) Urogenitale Infektionen. Heidelberg: Springer; 1999
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Hooton TM, Stamm WE. The vaginal flora and urinary tract infections. In: Mobley LT, Warren JW. (Hrsg.) Urinary Tract Infections: Molecular Pathogenesis and Clinical Management. Washington: ASM; 1996
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Garibaldi RA, Burk JP, Britt MR et al. Meatal colonization and catheter-associated bacteriuria. New Engl J Med 1980; 303: 316-318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Daifuku R, Stamm WE. Association of rectal and urethral colonization with urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling catheters. JAMA 1984; 252: 2028-2030
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Dobrindt U. Virulenzfaktoren uropathogener Erreger. Urologe 2010; 49: 598-605
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Bronsema DA, Adams JR, Pallares R et al. Secular trends in rates and etiology of nosocomial urinary tract infections at a university hospital. J Urol 1983; 150: 414-416
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Lima NL, Guerrant RL, Kaiser DL et al. A retrospective cohort study of nosocomial diarrhea as a factor for nosocomial infection. J Infect Dis 1990; 161: 948-952
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft PEG . Empfehlungen zur kalkulierten parenteralen Initialtherapie bakterieller Erkrankungen bei Erwachsenen – Update 2010. Chemother J 2010; 19: 179-255
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Heisig P. Harnwegsinfektionen und Antibiotikaresistenz. Urologe 2010; 49: 612-617
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG et al. CDC-definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16: 128-140
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Klein RS. Criteria for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1994; 3: 652-655
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Warren JW, Damron D, Tenney JH et al. Fever, bacteremia and death as complications of bacteriuria in women with long-term urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1987; 155: 1151-1158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Falkiner FR. The insertion and management of indwelling urethral catheters – minimizing the risk of infecton. J Hosp Inf 1993; 25: 79-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Warren JW. Catheter-associated bacteriuria in long-term care facilities. Infect Contr Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15: 557-562
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Lingnau W. Antimikrobielle Prophylaxe und Therapie. In: EURIDIKI . (Hrsg.) Hygienestatus an Intensivstationen. Wiesbaden: mhp-Verlag; 1997: 71-77
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 42 Chenoweth C, Saint S. Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Clinics 2013; 29: 19-32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kunin CM. Urinary Tract Infections, Detection, Prevention and Management. 5. Auflage Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 44 Jain P, Parada JP, David A et al. Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1425-1429
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Jacobsen SM, Shirtliff ME. Proteus mirabilis biofilms and cathter-associated urinary tract infections. Virulence 2011; 2: 460-465
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Niveditha S, Pramodhini S, Umadevi S et al. The Isolation and the Biofilm Formation of Uropathogens in the Patients with Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2012; 6: 1478-1482
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Saint S, Chenoweth C. Biofilms and catheter-associatetd urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2003; 17: 411-432
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Piechota H, Brühl P, Kramer A. Harnwegkatheter-assoziierte Infektionen. Chemotherapie Journal 2011; 20: 186-192
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 McPhail MJW, Abu-Hilal M, Johnson CD. A meta-analysis comparing suprapubic and transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. British J Surg 2006; 93: 1038-1044
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Healy EF, Walsh CA, Cotter AM et al. Suprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 678-687
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Niel-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ, da Silva EM. Urinary catheter policies for long-term bladder drainage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; 8: CD 004201
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Piechota H, Pannek J. Katheterdrainage des Harntrakts – Stand der Technik und Perspektiven. Urologe (A) 2003; 42: 1060-1069
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Böthig G, Geng V, Kurze I. Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie (DGU): Management und Durchführung des Intermittierenden Katheterismus (IK) bei Neurogenen Blasenfunktionsstörungen. AWMF 2014; 043/048: 1-22
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Stalder ABA, Seiler WO, Stähelin HB. Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse eines neuen Behandlungskonzeptes bei Dauerkatheterträgern. Schweiz med Wschr 1992; 122: 1325-1331
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Merguerian PA, Klein RB, Graven MA et al. Intraoperative anaphylactic reaction due to latex hypersensitivity. Urology 1991; 38: 301-304
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Piechota H, Pannek J. Katheterdrainage der Harnblase – Stand der Technik und Bedeutung für die Infektionsprävention. Hyg Med 2007; 32: 336-344
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Hesse A et al. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Inkrustationsneigung und Drainagekapazität von Silikon- und silikonisierten Latexkathetern. Urologe 1994; 34: 370-374
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Jahn P, Beutner K, Langer G. Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; 10: CD004997
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Bach D. Katheter-Inkrustation. Ursachen und Konsequenzen für die Katheterhygiene. Hyg Med 1998; 23: 404-408
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Bull E, Chilton CP, Gould CA et al. Single-blind, randomised, parallel group study of the Bard Biocath catheter and a silicone elastomer coated catheter. Br J Urol 1991; 68: 394-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Johnson JR, Kuskowski MA, Wilt TJ. Systematic review: Antimicrobial urinary catheters to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 116-126
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G et al. Types of urethral catheter for reducing symptomatic urinary tract infections in hospitalized adults requiring short-term catheterisation: multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of antimicrobial- and antiseptic-impregnated urethral catheters. Health Technology Assessment 2012; 16: 12-26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Burke JP, Riley D. Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infections. In: Mayhall CS. Hrsg. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection control. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. Sektion III 139-153
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 64 Marra AR, Sampaio Camargo TZ, Goncalves P et al. Preventing catheter associated urinary tract infections among patients in a neurological intensive care unit: a single institutions success. J Neurosurg 2011; 116: 911-920
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 65 Rosenthal VD, Todi SK, Alvarez-Moreno C et al. Impact of a multidimensional infection control strategy on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in the adult intensive care units of 15 developing countries: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Infection 2012; 40: 517-526
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Tilsworth WL, Hester J, Correia T et al. Reduction of inappropriate urinary catheter use at a Veterans Affair hospital through a multifaceted quality improvement project. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 52: 1283-1290
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Trautner BW. Management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Current opinion in infectious diseases 2010; 23: 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Andreessen L, Wilde M, Herendeen P. Preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections in acute care. J Nurs Care Qual 2012; 27: 209-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Jaggi N, Sissodia P. Multimodal supervision programme to reduce catheter associated urinary tract infections and its analysis to enable focus on labour and cost effective infection control measures in a tertiary care hospital in India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR 2012; 6: 1372-1376
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Jansen IA, Hopmans TE, Wille JC et al. Appropriate use of indwelling urethra catheters in hospitalized patients: results of a multicentre prevalence study. BMC Urology 2012; 12: 25
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Rosenthal VD, Ramachandran B, Duenas L et al. Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC), Part I: Effectiveness of a multidimensional infection control approach on catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates in pediatric intensive care units of 6 developing countries. Infection control and hospital epidemiology: the official journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America 2012; 33: 696-703
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Tambyah PA, Oon J. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Current opinion in infectious diseases 2012; 25: 365-370
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Clarke K, Tong D, Pan Y et al. Reduction in cathter-associated urinary tract infections by bundling interventions. Int J for Quality in Health Care 2013; 25: 43-49
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Krein SL, Kowalski CP, Harrod M et al. Barriers to reducing urinary catheter use. JAMA Int Med 2013; 173: 881-886
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Meddings J, Rogers MA, Krein SL et al. Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an integrative review. BMJ Quality & Safety 2014; 23: 277-289
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar