Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000060.xml
Download PDF
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2016; 66(11): 455-456
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-114008
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-114008
Fragen aus der Forschungspraxis
Nutzen und Risiken von Netzwerk-Metaanalysen
Benefits and Risks of Network-Meta-AnalysisAuthors
Further Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
08 November 2016 (online)
Netzwerk-Metaanalysen werden zunehmend verwendet, um die Ergebnisse von Interventionsstudien zusammenzufassen. Für welche Forschungsfragen sind sie besonders geeignet? Welche Vorteile besitzen sie gegenüber traditionellen Metaanalysen? Was sollte bei ihrer Anwendung und Interpretation beachtet werden?
-
Literatur
- 1 Tefikow S. Was sind Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von Metaanalysen?. Psychother Psych Med 2010; 60: 237
- 2 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011
- 3 Kriston L. Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2013; 22: 1-15
- 4 Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JPT. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 2005; 331: 897-900
- 5 Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods 2012; 3: 80-97
- 6 Kiefer C, Sturtz S, Bender R. Indirekte Vergleiche und Netzwerk-Metaanalysen. Dtsch Ärztebl 2015; 112: 803-808
- 7 Linde K, Rücker G, Schneider A et al. Questionable assumptions hampered interpretation of a network meta-analysis of primary care depression treatments. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 71: 86-96
- 8 Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 777-784
- 9 Mills EJ, Ioannidis JP, Thorlund K et al. How to use an article reporting a multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. JAMA 2012; 308: 1246-1253
- 10 Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Murad MH et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ 2014; 349: g5630