Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743118
Prospective Evaluation of Push-up Performance and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Open Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Excision in the Active-Duty Military Population
Funding None.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jws/202206/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0042-1743118_2100104cra-1.jpg)
Abstract
Background Dorsal wrist ganglia (DWG) are a common wrist pathology that affects the military population. This study prospectively evaluates push-up performance, functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes 6 months after open DWG excision in active-duty patients.
Methods Twenty-seven active-duty patients were enrolled and 18 had complete follow-up. Included patients had DWG diagnosis, unilateral involvement, and no previous surgery. The number of push-ups performed within 2 minutes was measured preoperatively and at 6 months. Range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Wrist Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were measured preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.
Results Push-up performance did not significantly change overall. Wrist flexion, extension, and radial deviation returned to preoperative ranges. Wrist ulnar deviation significantly increased from preoperative range. Grip strength deficit between operative and unaffected extremities significantly improved to 0.7 kg at 6 months from preoperative deficit of 2.7 kg. Mean scores significantly improved for the validated outcome measures—PCS from 6.3 to 0.67, VAS pain scores from 1.37 to 0.18, DASH scores from 12.8 to 4.3, and Mayo Wrist Scores from 80.3 to 89.4. No surgical complications or recurrences were reported.
Conclusions Findings suggest that almost half of active patients may improve push-up performance after DWG excision at 6 months. Significant improvements were seen in wrist pain, ROM, grip strength, and all patient-reported outcomes, which is useful when counseling patients undergoing excision.
Ethical Approval
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study and for all associated procedures.
This study was approved by our Department of Research Programs Institutional Review Board, Reference number: EDO-2019-0360, 920935. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance was maintained when completing this study and handling patient information. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Publication History
Received: 13 August 2021
Accepted: 05 January 2022
Article published online:
23 February 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Tomlinson PJ, Field J. Morbidity of hand and wrist ganglia. Hand Surg 2006; 11 (1e2): 5e8
- 2 Dias JJ, Dhukaram V, Kumar P. The natural history of untreated dorsal wrist ganglia and patient reported outcome 6 years after intervention. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007; 32 (05) 502-508
- 3 Finsen V, Håberg O, Borchgrevink GE. Surgery for wrist ganglia: one-hundred and twenty-two patients reviewed 8 years after operation. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2014; 6 (01) 5162
- 4 Balazs GC, Dworak TC, Tropf J, Nanos III GP, Tintle SM. Incidence and risk factors for volar wrist ganglia in the U.S. Military and civilian populations. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (11) 1064-1070
- 5 Balazs GC, Donohue MA, Drake ML, Ipsen D, Nanos III GP, Tintle SM. Outcomes of open dorsal wrist ganglion excision in active-duty military personnel. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (09) 1739-1747
- 6 Clay NR, Clement DA. The treatment of dorsal wrist ganglia by radical excision. J Hand Surg [Br] 1988; 13 (02) 187-191
- 7 Luchetti R, Badia A, Alfarano M, Orbay J, Indriago I, Mustapha B. Arthroscopic resection of dorsal wrist ganglia and treatment of recurrences. J Hand Surg [Br] 2000; 25 (01) 38-40
- 8 Kang L, Akelman E, Weiss AP. Arthroscopic versus open dorsal ganglion excision: a prospective, randomized comparison of rates of recurrence and of residual pain. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (04) 471e475
- 9 Kim JP, Seo JB, Park HG, Park YH. Arthroscopic excision of dorsal wrist ganglion: factors related to recurrence and postoperative residual pain. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (06) 1019-1024
- 10 Edwards SG, Johansen JA. Prospective outcomes and associations of wrist ganglion cysts resected arthroscopically. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (03) 395-400
- 11 Fernandes CH, Meirelles LM, Raduan Neto J, Fernandes M, Dos Santos JBG, Faloppa F. Arthroscopic resection of dorsal wrist ganglion: results and rate of recurrence over a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14 (02) 236-241
- 12 Abehsera E, Nedellec G, Limousin M, Fontaine C, Strouk G. Arthroscopic resection of wrist ganglia: about 30 cases. J Orthop 2019; 16 (03) 216-219
- 13 Wall BT, Dirks ML, van Loon LJ. Skeletal muscle atrophy during short-term disuse: implications for age-related sarcopenia. Ageing Res Rev 2013; 12 (04) 898-906
- 14 Mulder E, Clément G, Linnarsson D. et al. Musculoskeletal effects of 5 days of bed rest with and without locomotion replacement training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115 (04) 727-738
- 15 Kotarsky CJ, Christensen BK, Miller JS, Hackney KJ. Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength and thickness. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32 (03) 651-659
- 16 O'Driscoll SW, Horii E, Ness R, Cahalan TD, Richards RR, An KN. The relationship between wrist position, grasp size, and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (01) 169-177
- 17 Lee JA, Sechachalam S. The effect of wrist position on grip endurance and grip strength. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (10) e367-e373
- 18 Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89 (09) 1693-1700
- 19 Kim JK, Park MG, Shin SJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (08) 2536-2541
- 20 Draak TH, Pruppers MH, van Nes SI. et al; PeriNomS study group. Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies: Vigorimeter vs. Jamar. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2015; 20 (03) 269-276
- 21 Kierkegaard M, Petitclerc É, Hébert LJ, Mathieu J, Gagnon C. Responsiveness of performance-based outcome measures for mobility, balance, muscle strength and manual dexterity in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1. J Rehabil Med 2018; 50 (03) 269-277
- 22 Incel NA, Ceceli E, Durukan PB, Erdem HR, Yorgancioglu ZR. Grip strength: effect of hand dominance. Singapore Med J 2002; 43 (05) 234-237
- 23 Armstrong CA, Oldham JA. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. J Hand Surg [Br] 1999; 24 (04) 421-425
- 24 Kim JY, Lee J. Considerations in performing open surgical excision of dorsal wrist ganglion cysts. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (09) 1935-1940
- 25 Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (04) 641-649
- 26 Cooney WP, Bussey R, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 214: 136-147
- 27 Angelides AC, Wallace PF. The dorsal ganglion of the wrist: its pathogenesis, gross and microscopic anatomy, and surgical treatment. J Hand Surg Am 1976; 1 (03) 228-235