Keywords rhizarthrosis - arthroscopy - basilar thumb arthritis - Level of evidence: IV
Introduction
Rhizarthrosis, or osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint, is a common
condition. It mainly affects postmenopausal women, with a prevalence higher than 33%
in this subgroup.[1 ]
[2 ]
[3 ]
[4 ]
[5 ]
[6 ]
Although the radiological presence of signs of osteoarthritis at the TMC joint increases
with age, reaching 90% in patients older than 80 years of age,[5 ] more than 70% of the cases are asymptomatic and require no treatment.[4 ]
[7 ] Patients generally present pain at the base of the thumb, limited mobility, grip
weakness, and deformity.[8 ] These symptoms can progress, generating significant hand dysfunction and altering
daily life activities.[9 ]
Medical management is the first line of therapy, and it is usually sufficient for
adequate symptom control. Surgical treatment is indicated in patients with disabling
pain and minimal response to the medical treatment.[5 ]
[6 ]
[7 ]
[10 ]
[11 ]
Although multiple surgical techniques have been described, currently there is no consensus
on the superiority of a method to treat patients with Eaton-Littler stage-II and -III
rhizarthrosis.[6 ]
[12 ]
[13 ] Arthroscopic assistance has emerged in recent years as a tool to treat this pathology.[14 ]
[15 ]
[16 ]
[17 ]
[18 ]
The present study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients
with Eaton-Littler stage-II and III rhizarthrosis submitted to arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy
and suspension with Mini TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL, US).
Materialss and Methods
The present is a retrospective observational study of clinical and imaging records.
The inclusion criteria were adult patients with Eaton-Littler stage-II and -III rhizarthrosis
submitted to arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy with Mini TightRope suspension from January
2017 to December 2019 performed by staff surgeons from Clínica Indisa, in Santiago,
Chile. The patients should have had the condition for at least 6 months with no response
to the conservative treatment. Patients with less than 6 months of postoperative follow-up
were excluded, along with those with a history of ipsilateral surgery and evidence
of scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid (STT) joint involvement in preoperative or intraoperative
images at the time of the mediocarpal arthroscopy.
Demographic data (gender and age) were evaluated. The preoperative study consisted
of bilateral radiographs of the hand and thumb, pain assessment using the visual analog
scale (VAS), and functional evaluation with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder,
and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Kapandji score.[19 ] This evaluation was repeated six months after surgery, and the time until return
to work was assessed. The articular cartilage was analyzed intraoperatively according
to the Badia classification.[20 ]
The statistical analysis consisted of the Shapiro-Wilk test to evaluate data normality,
with negative results for the variables of age, VAS, DASH, Kapandji, and return to
work. The Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were used for non-parametric values. The
analysis was performed using the STATA (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, US) software,
version15. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Surgical technique
Patient positioning: the patient was placed in the supine position on the surgical
table with limb support on an auxiliary table. The procedure was performed under regional
anesthesia, using an ischemia cuff at 250 mmHg adjusted per the patient's blood pressure.
Vertical traction of 4 Kg was applied to the thumb using Chinese finger traps ([Fig. 1 ]).
Arthroscopic portals and diagnostic arthroscopy: the TMC joint was located through
superficial palpation. The radial portal (1R) was opened, followed by joint distension
with 5 mL of saline solution. The portal to introduce the 2.7-mm optic in a 30° angle
was opened, and the ulnar portal (1U) was prepared under arthroscopic visualization
(1U) ([Fig. 2 ]). Arthroscopy of the TMC joint confirmed the diagnosis.
Assessment of the STT joint: under full wrist traction, a radial midcarpal portal
(RCM) was established, allowing STT joint visualization and the determination of its
integrity ([Fig. 3 ]). If degenerative changes are observed in the STT, the surgical indication should
be changed to total trapeziectomy. That is why we consider this a critical stage of
the surgery.
Hemitrapeziectomy: partial trapezius resection was performed with a 2.9-mm drill in
alternating portals. A hybrid (dry and wet) arthroscopy was required for adequate
resection without risk of thermal damage from drilling, including to the instruments.
Medial osteophyte resection must be adequate, since it is highly variable among patients.Resection
of 50% of the height of the trapezius is performed because, with it, the main author
has observed the best subjective clinical outcomes in his patients; in addition, along
with osteophyte resection, this procedure decreases the rates of impingement ([Fig. 4 ]).
Mini TightRope implantation: traction was removed and, under fluoroscopy, the Mini
TightRope guide passed obliquely from the base of the first metacarpal bone through
the 1R portal towards the proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction of the second metacarpal
bone ([Fig. 5 ]). Finally, the Mini TightRope system buttons were installed, beginning with the
button at the base of the first metacarpal bone, respecting the anatomical structures
of the area, and then tying the system with the button at the level of the second
metacarpal bone. We carried out this step under fluoroscopic assistance and interposing
a curved mosquito clamp to avoid overloading the system, which would result in an
impingement as a complication ([Fig. 6 ]).
Closure and postoperative care: the portals were closed, and a bulky soft bandage
was placed with no immobilization. Limb rest with a sling was indicated. On the third
postoperative day, active and passive exercises started with directed kinesiology.
The sutures were removed at two weeks, followed by serial follow-up visits.
Fig. 1 Patient positioning.
Fig. 2 Arthroscopic portals (A ) and diagnostic arthroscopy of the trapeziometacarpal joint (B ). Abbreviations: MTC, metacarpal; Tc, trapezium.
Fig. 3 Diagnostic arthroscopy of the scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid (STT) joint using a radial
midcarpal (RCM) portal. (A ) Arthroscopic portals. (B ) Arthroscopic view of the STT. Abbreviations: S, scaphoid; Tz, trapezoid; Tc, trapezium.
Fig. 4 Arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy. (A ) Intraoperative fluoroscopic view with optics at the radial (1R) portal and burr
at the ulnar (1U) portal. (B ) Arthroscopic view of the partial resection of the trapezius with a burr. (C ) Intraoperative fluoroscopic view of the outcome of the hemitrapeziectomy.
Fig. 5 Implantation of the Mini TightRope.
Fig. 6 Assembly of the Mini TightRope system. (A ) Button implantation at the base of the first metacarpal bone. (B ) Implantation of the second button at the level of the proximal third of the second
metacarpal bone, and closure of the system with a knot at this level. (C ) Interposition of a curved mosquito clamp to avoid overload. (D ) Fluoroscopic result of the system.
Results
The mean follow-up period was of 21 months (range: 6 to 36 months). The patients were
classified according to the Eaton-Littler[16 ] classification based on preoperative radiographs; 7 patients were in stage 2, and
5 patients, in stage 3.
During surgery, the patients were classified according to the arthroscopic findings
described by Badia;[20 ] six patients were in stage II, and six patients, in stage III.
The mean preoperative pain was of 8.8 (range: 7 to 10) on the VAS, and it decreased
to 1.2 (range: 0 to 3) at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.000). The mean preoperative DASH score was of 33.3 (range, 16 to 57), which decreased
to 4.7 (range: 2 to 11) 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.000). The Kapandji score improved from an average of 3.6 (range: 1 to 6) to 8.8
(range: 7 to 10) in the postoperative period (p = 0.001). [Graphs 1 ], [2 ], and [3 ] show these results.
Graph 1 Pain according to the visual analog scale (VAS) in the pre- and postoperative periods.
* valor de p = 0,000 = *p -value = 0.00
EVA = VAS
Preoperatorio = Preoperative period
Postoperatorio (6 meses) = Postoperative period (6 months)
Graph 2 Pre- and postoperative scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand
(DASH) questionnaire.
* valor de p = 0,000 = *p -value = 0.00
DASH = DASH
Preoperatorio = Preoperative period
Postoperatorio (6 meses) = Postoperative period (6 months)
Graph 3 Kapandji score in the pre- and postoperative periods.
*valor de p = 0,000 = *p -value = 0.00
Kapandji = Kapandji
Preoperatorio = Preoperative period
Postoperatorio (6 meses) = Postoperative period (6 months)
The average time until return to work was of 9.2 weeks (range: 6 to 12 weeks); all
patients resumed their previous work activities.
There was no complication in the immediate or late postoperative periods. No surgical
reinterventions were required during the follow-up.
Discussion
In the present study, patients in stages 2 and 3 of the Eaton-Littler classification
submitted to arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy and suspension with Mini TightRope for
rhizarthrosis presented a significant decrease in pain and improved function.
The advantages of arthroscopic techniques lie in the fact that they are minimally
invasive, with lower damage to the soft tissues surrounding the joint, and higher
ability to establish an accurate diagnosis[8 ] of the actual stage of the patient. We believe that arthroscopy is critical for
a correct joint evaluation, since preoperative, conventional imaging techniques may
underestimate the presence of initial degenerative changes in both the TMC and STT
joints.[8 ]
[21 ]
[22 ]
In addition, arthroscopy enables an accurate evaluation of the STT joint, which is
deemed essential. In patients with degenerative involvement of the STT joint, the
technique proposed in the present study must be modified[17 ] because STT osteoarthritis may result in persistent postoperative pain, compromising
the clinical outcomes. The most indicated procedure for these patients is total trapeziectomy,
either in an open or arthroscopic procedure. This fact encourages us to recommend
the systematic evaluation of the STT as part of diagnostic arthroscopy, since this
step is critical for correct staging. A potential modification to the intraoperative
classification of Badia[20 ] would be the addition of a fourth stage to include patients with degenerative changes
at the level of the STT joint.
The literature reports multiple surgical techniques for this type of patient; partial
resection of the trapezius and suspension with buttons have been described in recent
years with good medium- and long-term outcomes.[17 ]
[18 ]
[23 ]
[24 ] The present series describes outcomes consistent with those found in the literature,
and the technique used is deemed reproducible and effective for pain reduction and
recovery of hand function.[17 ]
[18 ]
[23 ]
[24 ] This technique reduces the probability of subsidence, a frequent long-term complication
of total trapeziectomy, since it maintains the ligament support of the palmar and
dorsal stabilizers; in addition, it enables the structural conservation of the anterior
capsule and a thermal shortening with the shrinkage technique. The button system maintains
the height of the first metacarpal.[25 ] Suspension with Mini TightRope enables the safe maintenance of the space and stable
formation of scar fibrosis, reducing the complications associated with other similar
techniques, such as those performed with Kirschner wires.
The potential complications of this technique include excessive tension on the button
system, resulting in painful impingement, and/or the risk of narrowing the first intermetacarpal
space, which would cause a significant decrease in postoperative function and poor
clinical outcomes. This is why we interpose the curved mosquito clamp, as detailed
in the technique, to control the tension force when tying the system.
Another inherent complication of this technique is the risk of eccentric drilling,
which can lead to an iatrogenic fracture. Thus, we suggest being extremely careful
and checking the correct centralization of the guidewire over the metacarpal bones
in multiple fluoroscopic planes.
We believe that hemitrapeziectomy and suspension with Mini TightRope is a good therapeutic
alternative for patients in stages II and III of the Eaton-Littler classification,
since it enables early rehabilitation with sustained symptom resolution and few complications.
The Mini TightRope device acts as an internal suspender and avoids subsidence, enabling
early mobilization, early active rehabilitation, and a shorter time until the return
to work, which is consistent with the literature. Even so, it is important to note
that we did not evaluate the level of work activity, which would be interesting to
describe in the future.
As a limitation of the present study, since this is a retrospective series with a
small sample, we believe that it is imperative to carry out randomized prospective
studies with larger samples and long-term follow-up to make a correct clinical recommendation.
We believe that the present study shows relevant clinical outcomes because this is
a reproducible technique, and it seems to be a good option for these patients.
Conclusion
Arthroscopic suspension hemitrapeziectomy with Mini TightRope is a reproducible technique
and an effective therapeutic option to reduce pain and improve function in patients
with rhizarthrosis in Eaton-Littler stages II and III. In addition, it enables an
early return to work, with sustainable outcomes. Prospective studies with more patients
are required for a clinical recommendation.
