J Am Acad Audiol 2021; 32(09): C1-C2
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744107
JAAA CEU Program

JAAA CEU Program

The questions refer to Clinard et al, “Eff ects of Stimulus Polarity on Amplitude-Modulated Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials,” pages 588–595.

Learner Outcomes

Readers of this article should be able to:

  • Understand the eff ects of stimulus polarity on the amplitude modulated cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (AMcVEMP).

  • Understand the diff erences between conventional, transient cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and steady-state AMcVEMP.


#

CEU Questions

  1. Current clinical applications of cVEMPs focus on which of the following:

    • onset responses

    • steady-state responses

    • off set responses

  2. Which of the following describes how AMcVEMP signalto-noise ratio changes as SCM muscle increases:

    • it increases

    • it plateaus

    • it decreases

  3. AMcVEMPs are elicited by which of the following stimuli:

    • clicks

    • chirps

    • amplitude-modulated tones

  4. Which of the following was the electromyographic (EMG) target used for sternocleidomastoid muscle activation:

    • 5 μV

    • 50 μV

    • 500 μV

  5. AMcVEMPs were obtained from which of the following frequency analyses:

    • Fast Fourier transforms (FFT)

    • Spectrogram

    • Wavelets

  6. Stimulus polarity had a signifi cant eff ect on which of the following:

    • Amplitude

    • Noise

    • None of the AMcVEMP analyses

  7. What was the eff ect of stimulus polarity on phase coherence?

    • Phase coherence values were consistent across polarity.

    • Phase coherence values were greatest in the condensation condition.

    • Phase coherence values were the smallest in the rarefaction condition.

  8. What did previous reports on bone-conducted 500 Hz transient cVEMPs fi nd regarding the eff ects of stimulus polarity?

    • No eff ect, similar to the current study.

    • Signifi cant eff ect on both latency and amplitude, in contrast to the current study.

    • Signifi cant eff ect on amplitude, similar to the current study.

  9. What is the mechanism behind AMcVEMPs purported to be?

    • Nonlinear rectifi cation at the level of the otolith hair cells

    • Nonlinear rectifi cation at the level of the outer hair cells

    • Morphological polarization of vestibular hair cells on opposite sides of the striola

  10. The findings from the present study suggest which of the following are acceptable for AMcVEMP acquisition:

    • Only rarefaction polarity stimuli

    • Only alternating polarity stimuli

    • Either rarefaction, condensation, or alternating polarity stimuli


#

Publication History

Article published online:
17 February 2022

© 2022. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA