Keywords
slipped capital femoral epiphyses/complications - femur head necrosis - osteotomy
Introduction
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a relatively common condition affecting
the hip in adolescents;[1] its incidence is 11 per 100,000 people.[2] Its treatment remains controversial. For mild-to-moderate cases, it consists of
traditional in situ fixation. The treatment for severe cases includes the base of
the cervix, intertrochanteric, or subcapital osteotomy. Epiphyseal avascular necrosis
(AVN) is the most common and feared complication of these procedures, and it often
results from intracapsular osteotomies. Recently, some authors described other methods
for severe cases. Parsch et al.[3] proposed a gentle, open reduction under monitoring by palpation with the tip of
the index finger through a small anterolateral (Watson Jones) access, followed by
articular hematoma drainage and subcapital osteotomy to realign the femoral epiphysis
in a controlled hip dislocation (modified Dunn procedure).[4]
[5]
In situ fixation stabilizes the capital femoral epiphysis, resulting in physeal closure
and preventing disease progression. On the other hand, closed or open epiphyseal reduction
corrects the deformity by aligning it, potentially minimizing the progression to coxofemoral
arthrosis.
The main benefit of the modified Dunn procedure, described in Bern in 1998,[6]
[7] is to surgically restore the proximal femur anatomy with the so-called controlled
hip dislocation, often by round ligament resection. This approach uses a neck retinaculum
flap to spare the femoral epiphysis vascularization, allowing the safe performance
of a femoral neck corrective osteotomy.
Although this surgery provides an excellent SCFE correction, it is a complex procedure
requiring experience and adequate training; it also can result in complications.[8]
The most frequent complications include avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral epiphysis,
hip instability, infection, osteosynthesis material failure (breakage), and greater
trochanter pseudarthrosis.[9]
[10]
The main objective of our study was to analyze the incidence of epiphyseal AVN in
patients with SCFE treated using a modified Dunn technique. A secondary objective
was to determine the correlation of other variables with this incidence and describe
treatment complications.
Materials and Methods
The research ethics committee approved this study under number CAAE 44899021.6.0000.5225.
This is a retrospective study carried out from 2009 to 2019 in a tertiary hospital
and based on the review of medical records from patients with SCFE treated using the
modified Dunn technique.
The exclusion criteria were incomplete medical records and a follow-up time lower
than 2 years.
Evaluated epidemiological data included gender, age at disease onset, and affected
side. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis was classified per severity (mild, moderate,
severe) as proposed by Southwick,[11] time of presentation (chronic, acute, and acute on chronic) according to Fahey and
O'Brien,[12] and stability (stable or unstable) as proposed by Loder et al.[13]. In addition, we assessed the time from diagnosis (admission) to the surgical procedure
and the intraoperative perfusion of the femoral epiphysis (determined by the perforation
of the femoral epiphysis with a 1.5-mm Kirschner wire).
A comparison between patients with and without AVN tried to identify the factors influencing
AVN occurrence. Analyzed data included age of presentation (younger and older than
12 years old), gender, affected side, time until surgery (less or more than 2 days),
disease features (severity, time of presentation, and stability), and the presence
or absence of intraoperative perfusion.
Other complications included superficial and deep infection, synthesis material failure,
instability (hip dislocation), and greater trochanter pseudarthrosis. We also describe
any subsequent procedures performed to treat such complications.
The findings were presented as mean, standard deviation, and median values for quantitative
or categorical variables. A Student t-test for independent samples compared groups
with and without necrosis per age. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test analyzed the
time from diagnosis to surgery. A Fisher exact test assessed the association between
categorical variables and the probability of necrosis. Statistical significance was
set at p < 0.05. Data analysis used the Stata/SE software v.14.1 (StataCorp LLC, College Station,
TX, USA).
Results
Our sample consisted of 20 patients with severe SCFE treated by the same surgical
team with the modified Dunn procedure from 2009 to 2019. All patients were followed
up after surgery for 2 to 12 years. Eleven patients were male, and the mean age was
12.45 years (8–14 years old). Twelve procedures were performed on the left side, and
12 patients underwent in situ fixation on the contralateral side, either due to bilateral
presentation or as a prophylactic procedure. None of the patients had the proposed
surgery performed bilaterally. On average, surgery occurred 3 days after disease onset
(1–12 days) ([Table 1] and [Figures 1], [2], [3], and [4]).
Table 1
|
Year
|
Gender
|
Age
|
Side
|
Days until surgery
|
Severity
|
Loder classification
|
Fahey & O'Brien classification
|
Complication
|
AVN
|
Infection
|
Material failure
|
Dislocation
|
|
2009
|
Female
|
12
|
Left
|
2
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2010
|
Female
|
13
|
Right
|
2
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
|
2010
|
Male
|
11
|
Left
|
3
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2010
|
Male
|
14
|
Left
|
5
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Chronic
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
2011
|
Male
|
14
|
Left
|
12
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Chronic
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2012
|
Female
|
11
|
Left
|
3
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2012
|
Female
|
11
|
Left
|
1
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2012
|
Female
|
11
|
Right
|
1
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2013
|
Male
|
14
|
Left
|
2
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2014
|
Female
|
12
|
Right
|
10
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute on chronic
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2015
|
Male
|
13
|
Right
|
3
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2015
|
Male
|
14
|
Left
|
2
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
2015
|
Female
|
11
|
Right
|
2
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2016
|
Male
|
14
|
Right
|
3
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2016
|
Female
|
13
|
Right
|
2
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2016
|
Male
|
14
|
Right
|
4
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2017
|
Male
|
13
|
Left
|
3
|
Severe
|
Stable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2018
|
Male
|
14
|
Left
|
1
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2018
|
Male
|
12
|
Left
|
1
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute on chronic
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
2019
|
Female
|
8
|
Left
|
1
|
Severe
|
Unstable
|
Acute on chronic
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Fig. 1 Anteroposterior radiograph of a patient with acute, chronic, unstable slipped capital
femoral epiphysis.
Fig. 2 Immediate postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a case of acute, chronic, unstable
slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated using the modified Dunn technique.
Fig. 3 Anteroposterior radiograph of a patient 8 years after the operation of a slippage
of the proximal femoral epiphysis with an acute unstable condition on the left side,
treated by the modified Dunn technique and in situ fixation on the contralateral side.
Fig. 4 Radiograph in Lauestein of the patient 8 years after the operation of slippage of
the proximal femoral epiphysis with acute instability on the left side, treated by
the modified Dunn technique and in situ fixation on the contralateral side.
The Fahey and O'Brien system classified most of the cases (65%; 13/20) as acute on
chronic, followed by acute (25%; 5/20), and chronic (10%; 2/20). Per the Loder classification,
55% (11/20) of the cases were unstable, and the remaining 45% (9/20) were unstable.
All SCFE cases were severe, according to the Southwick classification.
The complication rate was 45% (9/20), including 5 (25%) cases of AVN, 2 (10%) cases
of deep infection, 1 (5%) case of hip joint dislocation, and 1 (5%) case of synthesis
material failure ([Table 2]).
Table 2
|
Complication
|
N
|
Presence
|
Frequency*
|
|
AVN
|
20
|
No
Yes
|
15 (75%)
5 (25%)
|
|
Infection
|
20
|
No
Yes
|
18 (90%)
2 (10%)
|
|
Material failure
|
20
|
No
Yes
|
19 (95%)
1 (5%)
|
|
Dislocation
|
20
|
No
Yes
|
19 (95%)
1 (5%)
|
When evaluating AVN-related factors, there was no difference regarding age, gender,
and affected side. In addition, there was no significant difference in presentation
time and SCFE stability. Statistically, the risk of necrosis was lower in patients
operated on up to the 2nd day of hospitalization (p < 0.008) or presenting intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion (p < 0.032). Time of presentation (according to the Fahey and O'Brien classification)
had no statistically significant influence on the necrosis risk when comparing stable
(chronic) versus unstable presentations (acute and acute on chronic) and the 2 unstable
presentations.
Subsequent procedures for the five AVN cases included two pelvic support osteotomies,
one synthesis material removal with clinical observation, one material removal with
neck osteochondroplasty, and one valgus osteotomy with osteochondroplasty ([Table 3] and [Figures 5], [6], and [7]).
Table 3
|
Variable
|
Group
|
N
|
Necrosis – n (%)
|
P*
|
|
Age group (years-old)
|
11 or 12
13 or 14
|
9
11
|
3 (33.3%)
2 (18.2%)
|
0.617
|
|
Gender
|
Female
Male
|
9
11
|
2 (22.2%)
3 (27.3%)
|
1
|
|
Admission up to surgery (days)
|
≤ 2
> 2
|
11
9
|
0 (0%)
5 (55.6%)
|
0.0008
|
|
Affected side
|
Left
Right
|
12
8
|
3 (25%)
2(25%)
|
1
|
|
Loder classification
|
Unstable
Stable
|
9
11
|
3 (33.3%)
2 (18.2%)
|
0.617
|
|
Fahey & O'Brien classification
|
Acute
Acute on chronic
Chronic
|
5
13
2
|
2 (40%)
2 (15.4%)
1 (50%)
|
–
|
|
Time of presentation
|
Acute/acute on chronic
Chronic
|
18
2
|
4 (22.2%)
1 (50%)
|
0.447
|
|
Time of presentation
|
Acute
Acute on chronic
|
5
13
|
2 (40%)
2 (15.4%)
|
0.533
|
|
Intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion
|
No
Yes
|
4
16
|
3 (75%)
2 (12.5%)
|
0.032
|
Fig. 5 Preoperative radiograph of slippage of the proximal femoral epiphysis acutely unstable
on the left.
Fig. 6 Immediate postoperative radiography of acute unstable proximal femoral epiphysis
slippage on the left, treated by the modified Dunn technique and prophylactic fixation
on the right.
Fig. 7 Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of an 8-year-old patient after synthesis
material removal and osteochondroplasty using the controlled hip dislocation technique
to treat AVN after a modified Dunn surgery.
Considering the time of the study, from 2009 to 2019, 4 of the 5 AVN cases occurred
within the first 5 years; these were also the first 10 patients operated on. Only
1 AVN case happened in the last 5 years, comprising the last 10 operated patients
([Table 4]).
Table 4
|
Year
|
Days until surgery
|
Intraoperative perfusion
|
Proposed treatment
|
|
2010
|
3
|
None
|
Pelvic support
|
|
2011
|
12
|
None
|
Valgus osteotomy + osteochondroplasty
|
|
2012
|
3
|
Present
|
Material removal + osteochondroplasty
|
|
2014
|
10
|
None
|
Pelvic support
|
|
2016
|
3
|
Present
|
Material removal
|
Discussion
The treatment of SCFE remains a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The modified Dunn
surgery gained popularity to treat moderate and severe cases. This procedure corrects
the deformity in situ, preventing a future hip joint degeneration. However, it is
technically complex, with a long learning curve for the surgeon and the team, and
complications are relatively common.
In 1964, Dunn[14] described a subcapital osteotomy technique by a posterior surgical approach with
an AVN rate of only 4%. Later studies did not reproduce this AVN rate, which reached
54%[15]
[16] due to posterior retinacular vessels stretching.[7]
Based on the studies of Gautier et al.[17] on femoral vascularization and the description of controlled hip surgical dislocation
by Ganz et al.,[18] the Bern group presented the outcomes of a so-called modified Dunn procedure, using
this approach to perform a subcapital osteotomy with a surprising AVN rate of 0%.[6]
[19] Later, in 2019, Lerch et al.,[20] also from the Bern group, analyzed the long-term outcomes of 40 cases of severe
SCFE undergoing the modified Dunn procedure, reporting a 2% incidence of osteoarthrosis,
5% of AVN, and 7% of material failure.
According to the literature, AVN incidence in patients with chronic SCFE not submitted
to reduction is close to zero. In unstable acute cases, this incidence ranges from
10 to 60% regardless of treatment.[21]
[22] Although there were no AVN cases in the initial study by Zierbath et al.,[23] performed in two institutions and referring to the outcomes of the modified Dunn
technique, other series reported incidences from 5 to 47%.[8]
[9]
[21]
[22]
[24]
In our sample, the incidence of AVN after the modified Dunn procedure was 25%, consistent
with the published literature. Here, one patient presented chronic, stable SFCE, one
patient had acute on chronic, stable SFCE, one had acute on chronic, unstable SFCE,
and two patients presented acute, unstable SFCE. However, due to the small sample
size, we could not establish a statistically significant correlation between presentation
time, stability (per the Loder classification), and AVN.
From the 5 AVN cases, the time between admission and surgery was 3 days for 3 patients,
10 days for 1 patient, and 13 days for 1 patient. Time from admission to surgery was
statistically relevant for necrosis, which did not occur in patients submitted to
the procedure on the first day of admission. Therefore, our current conduct is to
perform surgery within the first 24 hours if possible. This data is consistent with
reports from Persinger et al.[25] and Herrera-Soto et al.[26]
The intraoperative perfusion of the femoral epiphysis was also statistically significant.
Of the five patients with AVN, three had no perfusion when tested. This correlation
was not observed by Upasani et al.,[9] but confirmed by Novais et al.[27] and Aprato et al.[28]
Masquijo et al.[8] and Upasani et al.[9] correlate complications with the surgeon's learning curve and experience. Our series
had 4 AVN cases among the first 10 patients, operated on within the first 5 years,
and a single AVN case during the last 5 years. This data is consistent with previously
mentioned studies.
Two patients from our sample developed surgical site infection, successfully treated
with surgical debridement and antibiotic agents. None of them had AVN. Elmarhany et
al.[29] reported a 3% incidence of deep infection, which also did not change the procedural
outcome.
One patient (5%) presented failure of the synthesis material (bent threaded wires),
which was replaced successfully with two cannulated screws. Since this failure, we
prefer to perform epiphyseal fixation with two 7.0-mm cannulated screws. Zierbath
et al.[30] reported a 7% rate for this complication (3 cases out of 40 patients), whereas Sankar
et al.[21] observed a higher figure of 15%.
In a multicentric review, Upasani and the International SCFE Study Group[10] described a 4% rate of coxofemoral instability after a modified Dunn procedure;
all cases were severe, chronic, or acute on chronic SCFE. Among these unstable cases,
47% required further surgery, and 82% evolved with AVN, consistent with Upasani et
al.[9] findings from 2014 reporting an instability rate of 5%. Our series had 1 patient
(5%) with hip joint dislocation during the immediate postoperative period (a severe,
chronic SFCE case); treatment with reduction and immobilization with a cast from the
pelvis to the foot resulted in instability resolution, with no AVN development. Since
this intercurrence, in severe chronic SFCE, when the acetabulum is adapted to the
femoral epiphysis deformity, we prefer intertrochanteric flexor osteotomy associated
with osteochondroplasty through a controlled surgical dislocation of the hip.
Although the modified Dunn procedure is a complex surgery, its great advantage is
to restore hip anatomy by providing function preservation and preventing the onset
of osteoarthrosis. On the other hand, its learning curve is long, requiring adequate
training to minimize complications.
Currently, we indicate this procedure only for severe, acute on chronic, or unstable
cases not amenable to the Parsch et al.[3] technique, that is, more than 48 hours after SCFE onset.
As limitations of our study, we emphasize that this procedure is used in specific
situations of severe SCFE, requiring a trained, experienced surgical team. This may
partially explain our relatively small sample of 20 cases over 10 years. On the other
hand, randomized double-blind studies compared with other surgical options are needed
to better assess the incidence of complications correlating with predisposing factors.
Conclusion
Our study showed that necrosis was the most common complication. It also revealed
a close relationship with surgery delay and lack of intraoperative epiphysis perfusion,
that potentially predispose to avascular necrosis. Although there was no statistically
significant outcome, coxofemoral instability occurred in chronic SCFE, and surgical
fixation with threaded wires was less effective than fixation with a cannulated screw.
The modified Dunn procedure should be reserved for severe cases in which other techniques
are not feasible, and performed by an experienced, trained, qualified team.