J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(03): 165-170
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750125
Original Article

Optimal Timing of Delayed Microvascular Breast Reconstruction after Radiation Therapy

Aska Arnautovic*
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Sarah Karinja*
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Soley Olafsson
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Matthew J. Carty
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Jessica Erdmann-Sager
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Stephanie A. Caterson
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Justin M. Broyles
1   Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of delayed microvascular breast reconstruction after completion of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The authors evaluated whether the timing of reconstruction after PMRT completion affects the development of major postoperative complications. We hypothesize that delayed microvascular breast reconstruction can be safely performed within 12 months of PMRT completion.

Methods A retrospective chart review of microvascular, autologous breast reconstructions at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2007 to 2019 was performed. Logistic regression analysis and marginal estimation methods were used to estimate the probability of any major complication (flap compromise requiring operative intervention, hematoma formation requiring evacuation, infection requiring readmission, and flap necrosis requiring operative debridement) occurring in 2-month intervals after PMRT. Patients were classified as having undergone reconstruction 0 to 12 months after PMRT (group 1), 12 to 18 months after PMRT (group 2), or 18 to 50 months after PMRT (group 3).

Results A total of 303 patients were identified. All patients received postmastectomy radiation (n = 143 group 1, n = 57 group 2, n = 103 group 3). Mean follow-up time was 71.4 ± 38 months. Patients in group 1 were significantly younger and more likely to have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Major complications occurred in 10% of patients. There was no significant difference in the development of major complications between the three groups (p = 0.57). Although not statistically significant, the probability of any major complication peaked 2 to 6 months after PMRT completion.

Conclusion There was no significant difference in major complications among patients who underwent delayed, microvascular breast reconstruction within versus beyond 1 year of PMRT completion. These findings suggest that delayed microvascular breast reconstruction can be safely performed beginning 6 months after PMRT completion.

* These authors contributed equally to this work.




Publication History

Received: 21 December 2021

Accepted: 23 April 2022

Article published online:
17 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Lee MC, Jagsi R. Postmastectomy radiation therapy: indications and controversies. Surg Clin North Am 2007; 87 (02) 511-526 , xi
  • 2 Remick J, Amin NP. Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2019
  • 3 Barry M, Kell MR. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 127 (01) 15-22
  • 4 Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS. et al. Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (02) 313-317 , discussion 318–320
  • 5 Fosnot J, Fischer JP, Smartt Jr JM. et al. Does previous chest wall irradiation increase vascular complications in free autologous breast reconstruction?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (02) 496-504
  • 6 Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM. et al. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (06) 1617-1628
  • 7 Kung TA, Kidwell KM, Speth KA. et al. Radiation-induced skin changes after postmastectomy radiation therapy: a pilot study on indicators for timing of delayed breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (03) 209-215
  • 8 Baumann DP, Crosby MA, Selber JC. et al. Optimal timing of delayed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (03) 1100-1106
  • 9 Mull AB, Qureshi AA, Zubovic E. et al. Impact of time interval between radiation and free autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (02) 130-136
  • 10 Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C, Gautam S, Tobias AM, Lee BT. Delayed autologous breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy: is there an optimal time?. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (01) 14-18
  • 11 Dormand EL, Banwell PE, Goodacre TE. Radiotherapy and wound healing. Int Wound J 2005; 2 (02) 112-127
  • 12 U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, based on 2019 submission data. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2020. Accessed July 10, 2021 at: www.cdc.gov/cancer/dataviz
  • 13 Crisera CA, Chang EI, Da Lio AL, Festekjian JH, Mehrara BJ. Immediate free flap reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer: is it safe?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (01) 32-41
  • 14 Al-Ghazal SK, Sully L, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000; 26 (01) 17-19
  • 15 Chevray PM. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed. Cancer J 2008; 14 (04) 223-229
  • 16 DeBono R, Thompson A, Stevenson JH. Immediate versus delayed free TRAM breast reconstruction: an analysis of perioperative factors and complications. Br J Plast Surg 2002; 55 (02) 111-116
  • 17 Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL. et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: results of a multicenter prospective study. Breast 2018; 37: 72-79
  • 18 Phan R, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M, Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Hunter-Smith DJ, Ramakrishnan VV. Risk factors and timing of postoperative hematomas following microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study. Microsurgery 2020; 40 (02) 99-103
  • 19 Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA. et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (02) 195-203
  • 20 Heiman AJ, Gabbireddy SR, Kotamarti VS, Ricci JA. A meta-analysis of autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (04) 336-345
  • 21 Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, Kroll SS, Robb GL. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (01) 78-82
  • 22 Christopher AN, Morris MP, Broach RB, Serletti JM. A comparative analysis of immediate and delayed-immediate breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (06) 499-505
  • 23 Kamel GN, Nash D, Jacobson J. et al. Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy radiated patients: a comparison between delayed and delayed immediate autologous breast reconstruction in a predominantly minority patient population. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (06) 445-451
  • 24 DeBrock W, Pittelkow E, Christopher L. et al. Abstract 75. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (4, Suppl): 48-49