Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758776
Gaining Mesenteric Length following Colorectal Resection: Essential Maneuvers to Avoid Anastomotic Tension
Abstract
A surgeon must possess the knowledge and technical skill to obtain length following a left-sided colorectal resection to perform a tension free anastomosis. The distal target organ – either rectum or anus – is fixed in location, and therefore requires surgeons to acquire mastery of proximal mobilization of the colonic conduit. Generally, splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) provides adequate length. Surgeons benefit from clearer understanding of the multiple steps involved in SFM as a result of improved visualization and demonstration of the relevant anatomy – adjacent organs and the attachments, embryologic planes, and mesenteric structures. Much may be attributed to laparoscopic and robotic platforms which provided improved exposure and as a result, development or refinement of novel approaches for SFM with potential advantages. Complete mobilization draws upon the sum or combination of the varied approaches to accomplish the goal. However, in the situation where extended resection is necessary or in the case of re-operative surgery sacrificing either more proximal or distal large intestine often occurs, the transverse colon or even the ascending colon represents the proximal conduit for anastomosis. This challenging situation requires familiarity with special maneuvers to achieve colorectal or coloanal anastomosis using these more proximal conduits. In such instances, operative techniques such as either ileal mesenteric window with retroileal anastomosis or de-rotation of the right colon (Deloyer's procedure) enable the intestinal surgeon to construct such anastomoses and thereby avoid stoma creation or loss of additional large intestine.
Publication History
Article published online:
13 January 2023
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR. et al. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2015; 58 (03) 333-338
- 2 Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (03) 131-136
- 3 Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Systematic review of the technique of colorectal anastomosis. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (02) 190-201
- 4 Rosendorf J, Klicova M, Herrmann I. et al. Intestinal anastomotic healing: what do we know about processes behind anastomotic complications. Front Surg 2022; 9: 904810
- 5 Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77 (03) 549-573
- 6 Chand M, Miskovic D, Parvaiz AC. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection?. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1195-1197
- 7 Ludwig KA, Kosinski L. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection? Another view. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (11) 1198-1200
- 8 Kalady EHCaMF. Colon cancer surgical treatment: principles of colectomy. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Hyman N, Maykel JA, Read TE, Whitlow CB. eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 4th ed.. Springer; 2022: 455-462 :chap 25
- 9 Pang AJ, Marinescu D, Morin N, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M. Segmental resection of splenic flexure colon cancers provides an adequate lymph node harvest and is a safe operative approach – an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (08) 5652-5659
- 10 Horsey ML, Sparks AD, Lai D, Herur-Raman A, Ng M, Obias V. Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36 (12) 2739-2747
- 11 Degiuli M, Reddavid R, Ricceri F. et al; and Members of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CCN) Collaborative Group [A listing of all authors appears at the end of the article]. Segmental colonic resection is a safe and effective treatment option for colon cancer of the splenic flexure: a nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63 (10) 1372-1382
- 12 Chen YC, Fingerhut A, Shen MY. et al. Colorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic extended left colectomy: techniques and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22 (09) 1189-1194
- 13 Pitel S, Lefèvre JH, Tiret E, Chafai N, Parc Y. Redo coloanal anastomosis: a retrospective study of 66 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (05) 806-810 , discussion 810–811
- 14 Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Alves A, Panis Y. Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge. Surgery 2011; 149 (01) 65-71
- 15 Kontovounisios C, Baloyiannis Y, Kinross J, Tan E, Rasheed S, Tekkis P. Modified right colon inversion technique as a salvage procedure for colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2014; 16 (12) 971-975
- 16 Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S. et al. Right colon to rectal anastomosis (Deloyers procedure) as a salvage technique for low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: postoperative and long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (03) 363-368
- 17 Beatty GTAaJS. Colonic physiology. In: SR Steele TH, N Hyman, JA Maykel, TE Read, CB Whitlow, eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon Rectal Surgery. 4th ed.. Springer Nature; 2022: 29-40 :chap 2
- 18 You YN, Chua HK, Nelson H, Hassan I, Barnes SA, Harrington J. Segmental vs. extended colectomy: measurable differences in morbidity, function, and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51 (07) 1036-1043
- 19 Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T, Burns B, Cataldo PA. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think. Ann Surg 2007; 245 (02) 254-258
- 20 Isik O, Benlice C, Gorgun E. A novel approach for robotic mobilization of the splenic flexure. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21 (01) 53-57
- 21 Jeri-McFarlane S, García-Granero Á, Frasson M, Gonzalez-Argente FX. Surgical steps for splenic flexure mobilization by inframesocolic medial approach. Cir Esp (Engl Ed) 2022; 100 (06) 370
- 22 Kumamoto T, Shinohara H, Tomizawa K. et al. Inferior pancreatic approach for laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22 (01) 71-72
- 23 Lee YS. Three surgical approaches of laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilization. J Minim Invasive Surg 2019; 22 (02) 85-86
- 24 Liang JT, Huang J, Chen TC. Standardize the surgical technique and clarify the relevant anatomic concept for complete mobilization of colonic splenic flexure using da Vinci Xi® robotic system. World J Surg 2019; 43 (04) 1129-1136
- 25 Garcia-Granero A, Primo Romaguera V, Millan M. et al. A video guide of five access methods to the splenic flexure: the concept of the splenic flexure box. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (06) 2763-2772
- 26 Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Yamashita K. et al. Anatomical and embryological perspectives in laparoscopic complete mesocoloic excision of splenic flexure cancers. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (03) 1202-1208
- 27 Isik O, Sapci I, Aytac E. et al. Laparoscopy reduces iatrogenic splenic injuries during colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22 (10) 767-771
- 28 Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Wang JK, Larson DW. Anatomic mechanisms for splenic injury during colorectal surgery. Clin Anat 2012; 25 (02) 212-217
- 29 Boström P, Hultberg DK, Häggström J. et al. Oncological impact of high vascular tie after surgery for rectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 2021; 274 (03) e236-e244
- 30 Yang Y, Wang G, He J, Zhang J, Xi J, Wang F. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 52: 20-24
- 31 Bonnet S, Berger A, Hentati N. et al. High tie versus low tie vascular ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer surgery: impact on the gain in colon length and implications on the feasibility of anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55 (05) 515-521
- 32 Araujo SE, Seid VE, Kim NJ, Bertoncini AB, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Assessing the extent of colon lengthening due to splenic flexure mobilization techniques: a cadaver study. Arq Gastroenterol 2012; 49 (03) 219-222
- 33 Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Kim JG, Cho HM. How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection?. Int J Med Sci 2014; 11 (09) 857-862
- 34 Benseler V, Hornung M, Iesalnieks I. et al. Different approaches for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27 (11) 1521-1529
- 35 Kim HJ, Kim CH, Lim SW, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. An extended medial to lateral approach to mobilize the splenic flexure during laparoscopic low anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15 (02) e93-e98
- 36 Andersen BT, Stimec BV, Edwin B, Kazaryan AM, Maziarz PJ, Ignjatovic D. Re-interpreting mesenteric vascular anatomy on 3D virtual and/or physical models: positioning the middle colic artery bifurcation and its relevance to surgeons operating colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (01) 100-108
- 37 Sugarbaker PH. Progressive release of the left colon for a tension-free colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Cancer Treat Res 1996; 82: 255-261
- 38 Vargas HD, Margolin DA. Anastomotic construction. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Hyman N, Maykel JA, Read TE, Whitlow CB. eds. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Springer International Publishing; 2022: 157-187
- 39 Toupet A. Intermediate colectomy with transmesenteric angulo-sigmoid anastomosis. Presse Med 1961; 69: 2693-2694
- 40 Toupet A. Colonectomies with transmesenteric anastomosis. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1963; 89: 628-630
- 41 Hays LV, Davis DR. A technic for restoring intestinal continuity after left hemicolectomy for cancer of the distal colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1976; 131 (03) 390-391
- 42 Rombeau JL, Collins JP, Turnbull Jr RB. Left-sided colectomy with retroileal colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1978; 113 (08) 1004-1005
- 43 Campanati RG, Hanan B, Gomes da Silva R. Laparoscopic retroileal pull-through colorectal anastomosis technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65 (04) e239
- 44 Sakamoto Y, Tokunaga R, Miyamoto Y. et al. Retroileal colorectal anastomosis after extended left colectomy: application for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Today 2016; 46 (12) 1476-1478
- 45 Dunlavy P, Allan L, Raman S. Totally laparoscopic retroileal transverse colon to rectal anastomosis following extended left colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60 (11) 1224
- 46 Blank JJ, Gibson EK, Peterson CY, Ridolfi TJ, Ludwig KA. Retroileal anastomosis in hand-assisted laparoscopic left colectomy: experience at a single institution. Surg Endosc 2020; 34 (08) 3408-3413
- 47 Le TH, Gathright Jr JB. Reconstitution of intestinal continuity after extended left colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36 (02) 197-198
- 48 Kent I, Gilshtein H, Wexner SD. The retro-ileal pull-through technique for colorectal and coloanal anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24 (09) 943-946
- 49 Kream J, Ludwig KA, Ridolfi TJ, Peterson CY. Achieving low anastomotic leak rates utilizing clinical perfusion assessment. Surgery 2016; 160 (04) 960-967
- 50 Hayami S, Matsuda K, Iwamoto H. et al. Visualization and quantification of anastomotic perfusion in colorectal surgery using near-infrared fluorescence. Tech Coloproctol 2019; 23 (10) 973-980
- 51 Impellizzeri HG, Pulvirenti A, Inama M. et al. Near-infrared fluorescence angiography for colorectal surgery is associated with a reduction of anastomotic leak rate. Updates Surg 2020; 72 (04) 991-998
- 52 Lillehei RC, Wangensteen OH. Bowel function after colectomy for cancer, polyps, and diverticulitis. J Am Med Assoc 1955; 159 (03) 163-170
- 53 Deloyers L. Technic permitting the easy assurance of continuity of the colon & conservation of sphincter after excision of the left transverse hemicolon & entire left colon; possible inclusion of rectum. J Chir (Paris) 1958; 75 (02) 147-155
- 54 Mialaret. Reversal of the right hemicolon in surgery of the left colon & rectum. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1958; 84 (28-29): 878-879
- 55 Deloyers L. Suspension of the right colon permits without exception preservation of the anal sphincter after extensive colectomy of the transverse and left colon (including rectum). Technic -indications- immediate and late results. Lyon Chir 1964; 60: 404-413
- 56 Costalat G, Garrigues JM, Didelot JM, Yousfi A, Boccasanta P. Subtotal colectomy with ceco-rectal anastomosis (Deloyers) for severe idiopathic constipation: an alternative to total colectomy reducing risks of digestive sequelae. Ann Chir 1997; 51 (03) 248-255
- 57 Marchesi F, Sarli L, Percalli L. et al. Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis in the treatment of slow-transit constipation: long-term impact on quality of life. World J Surg 2007; 31 (08) 1658-1664
- 58 Roncoroni L, Sarli L, Costi R, Violi V. Caecal-rectal antiperistaltic anastomosis without torsion of the vascular pedicle. Ann Chir 2000; 125 (09) 871-873
- 59 Jouvin I, Pocard M, Najah H. Deloyers procedure. J Visc Surg 2018; 155 (06) 493-501
- 60 Garćia-Ruiz A, Milsom JW, Ludwig KA, Marchesa P. Right colonic arterial anatomy. Implications for laparoscopic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39 (08) 906-911
- 61 Okamoto K, Emoto S, Sasaki K. et al. Extended left colectomy with coloanal anastomosis by indocyanine green-guided deloyers procedure: a case report. J Anus Rectum Colon 2021; 5 (02) 202-206