Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759756
Utilization of Virtual Consultations in Facial Plastic Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Funding None.
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic affected many aspects of medical practice, particularly surgical fields. The American College of Surgery initially recommended the cancellation of all elective procedures. As a result, virtual consultations (VCs; a form of telemedicine), became widely used in the field of facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. With more facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons (FPRS) conducting both in-person and virtual visits, it is imperative to understand how VCs are utilized in practice.
Methods An electronic, anonymous survey was distributed to 1,282 electronic mail addresses in the 2018 American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery directory. The survey collected responses on various topics including demographic information and past, current, and future use of VCs.
Results The survey yielded 84 responses. Most surgeons (66.7%) were 11+ years out of fellowship. There was a significant increase in the percentage of VCs scheduled after the pandemic than before (p = 0.03). FPRS most frequently responded that VCs should always be followed by an in-person visit (48.6%). A majority of FPRS (66.2%) believe that VCs have improved the delivery of health care in at least some cases. Almost all FPRS (86.5%) plan on using VCs after the pandemic.
Conclusion Since the pandemic, VCs are more frequently used by surgeons and are mostly utilized as an initial patient visit. A majority of FPRS believe that VCs have improved health care in at least some cases, and plan on using VCs after the pandemic.
Publication History
Article published online:
26 December 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 American College of Surgery. COVID-19: Elective Case Triage Guidelines for Surgical Care. ACS. Accessed August 24, 2022, at: https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-case/
- 2 Otto L, Harst L, Schlieter H, Wollschlaeger B, Richter P, Timpel P. Towards a Unified Understanding of eHealth and Related Terms – Proposal of a Consolidated Terminological Basis. 11th International Conference on Health Informatics. 2018: 533-539
- 3 Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S. et al. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J E Health 2007; 13 (05) 573-590
- 4 Contreras CM, Metzger GA, Beane JD, Dedhia PH, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Telemedicine: patient-provider clinical engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24 (07) 1692-1697
- 5 Kang S, Thomas PBM, Sim DA, Parker RT, Daniel C, Uddin JM. Oculoplastic video-based telemedicine consultations: Covid-19 and beyond. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34 (07) 1193-1195
- 6 Salehi PP, Torabi SJ, Lee YH, Azizzadeh B. Telemedicine practices of facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons in the United States: the effect of novel coronavirus-19. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22 (06) 464-470
- 7 Federal Emergency Management Agency. COVID-19 Disaster Declarations | FEMA.gov. Accessed October 15, 2022, at: https://www.fema.gov/disaster/coronavirus/disaster-declarations
- 8 Sinha V, Malik M, Nugent N, Drake P, Cavale N. The role of virtual consultations in plastic surgery during COVID-19 lockdown. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45 (02) 777-783
- 9 Preacher KJ, Briggs NE. Interactive Fisher's Exact Test. Accessed August 24, 2022, at: http://quantpsy.org/fisher/fisher.htm
- 10 Pandya A, Waller M, Portnoy JM. The regulatory environment of telemedicine after COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2022; 10 (10) 2500-2505
- 11 Shah S, Diwan S, Kohan L. et al. The technological impact of COVID-19 on the future of education and health care delivery. Pain Physician 2020; 23 (4S): S367-S380
- 12 Smith KA, Thamboo A, Chan Y, Chin CJ, Werger M, Rotenberg B. Virtual care in rhinology. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 50 (01) 24
- 13 Choi JS, Yin V, Wu F, Bhatt NK, O'Dell K, Johns III M. Utility of telemedicine for diagnosis and management of laryngology-related complaints during COVID-19. Laryngoscope 2022; 132 (04) 831-837
- 14 Xie Y, Brenner MJ, Sand JP. et al. Adverse events in facial plastic surgery: data-driven insights into systems, standards, and self-assessment. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42 (01) 102792
- 15 Larrabee YC, Phillips DJ, Sclafani AP. Trends in nasal subunit reconstruction by facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (01) 17-19
- 16 McGuire Woods. State Governors' “Stay-at-Home” and Prohibition on Elective Procedures Orders. Accessed October 15, 2022, at: https://www.mcguirewoods.com/client-resources/Alerts/2020/10/state-governors-stay-at-home-prohibition-elective-procedures-orders
- 17 Smith A. Federation of State Medical Boards Advocacy - COVID-19. Accessed October 15, 2022, at: https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/pdf/states-waiving-licensure-requirements-for-telehealth-in-response-to-covid-19.pdf
- 18 Panet F, Tétreault-Langlois M, Morin V, Sultanem K, Melnychuk D, Panasci L. The risks associated with the widespread use of telemedicine in oncology: four cases and review of the literature. Cancer Rep 2022; 5 (07) e1531
- 19 Alam L, Alam M, Malik AM, Faraid V. Is Telemedicine our cup of tea? A nationwide cross-sectional survey regarding doctors' experience and perceptions. Pak J Med Sci 2021; 37 (05) 1319-1325
- 20 Butaney M, Rambhatla A. The impact of COVID-19 on urology office visits and adoption of telemedicine services. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32 (02) 152-157