RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-109236
Endoscopic removal of an eroded magnetic sphincter augmentation device
Corresponding author
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
30. Mai 2017 (online)
Magnetic sphincter augmentation with the LINX device (Torax Medical, Shoreview, Minnesota, USA) is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). It is associated with shorter operating time and lower rate of gas bloat [1]. Erosion is estimated to range from 0.1 % to 1.2 %; it may be higher with the smaller device. The most common method for device removal involves a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic approach [2] [3]. Endoscopic removal using a bipolar grasping device has also been reported [4]. We report the first case of LINX erosion in the United Kingdom and its endoscopic removal using Olympus loop cutters.
A 57-year-old woman with GERD underwent LINX implantation in April 2013 ([Fig. 1]). She did not have a hiatus hernia and manometry was normal. Good reflux control was achieved. In February 2017, the patient experienced acute intermittent dysphagia and chest pain. Endoscopy showed device erosion. Under general anesthesia, the LINX device was divided at two points using a loop cutter (Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan), and was extracted endoscopically using a grasper with the application of rotational traction. The mucosal defects in the esophagus were closed with two Olympus QuickClips ([Video 1]). The patient was discharged with proton pump inhibitors on postoperative Day 1 after a normal oral contrast swallow study ([Fig. 2]).


Video 1 Seven steps for removal of an eroded magnetic sphincter augmentation device (LINX; Torax Medical, Shoreview, Minnesota, USA) from the esophagus. 1) Identification of LINX erosion. 2) Endocut of visible LINX wire. 3) Initial retrieval with forceps. 4) Endocut of anchor bead. 5) Final extraction of LINX device. 6) Basket retrieval. 7) Mucosal defect closure with endoclips.
Qualität:


Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AH_2AH
Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
#
Competing interests
None
-
References
- 1 Zhang H, Dong D, Liu Z. et al. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 3684-3690
- 2 Lipham JC, Taiganides PA, Louie BE. et al. Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 2015; 28: 305-311
- 3 Asti E, Siboni S, Lazzari V. et al. Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: surgical technique and results of a single-center cohort study. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 941-945
- 4 Bauer M, Meining A, Kranzfelder M. et al. Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3806-3810
Corresponding author
-
References
- 1 Zhang H, Dong D, Liu Z. et al. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 3684-3690
- 2 Lipham JC, Taiganides PA, Louie BE. et al. Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 2015; 28: 305-311
- 3 Asti E, Siboni S, Lazzari V. et al. Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: surgical technique and results of a single-center cohort study. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 941-945
- 4 Bauer M, Meining A, Kranzfelder M. et al. Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3806-3810



