Download PDF
Zahnmedizin up2date 2018; 12(01): 91-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-110497
Prothetik
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

CAD/CAM-gefertigte Einzelzahnrestaurationen: Empfehlungen zur Materialauswahl

Sven Rinke
,
Ila Davarpanah
,
Holger Ziebolz
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 February 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Die Herstellung von Einzelzahnrestauration im digitalen Workflow kann heute mit einer vergleichbaren Präzision wie bei analoger Fertigung erfolgen. Aus der Vielzahl der zur Verfügung stehenden Materialien sind derzeit insbesondere monolithische und teilverblendete Zirkonoxidkeramiken sowie monolithische Restaurationen aus hochfesten Glaskeramiken durch klinische Studien abgesichert. Auch für die Hybridkeramik Vita Enamic liegen erste Daten aus klinischen Beobachtungen vor, die eine klinische Anwendung rechtfertigen. Die Gruppe der industriell polymerisierten Hochleistungskomposite ist vor allem für die Chairside-Anwendung interessant, bislang fehlen jedoch noch Daten, die Aussagen zur klinischen Bewährung erlauben.
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015; 24: 313-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F. et al. Assessment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: A review of the literature. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7: 96-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zaruba M, Mehl A. Chairside systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent 2017; 20: 123-149
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO. et al. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 836-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P. et al. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review. J Prosthodont 2016; DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12527.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Khraishi H, Duane B. Evidence for use of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions for obtaining full-arch digital impressions is insufficient. Evid Based Dent 2017; 18: 24-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Kriterien für die Auswahl rekonstruktiver Materialien. Quintessenz Zahntech 2013; 39: 462-470
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Boldt J, Vuck A, Horvarth S. Digitaler Workflow bei Implantat-Einzelzahnversorgungen. Implantologie 2017; 25: 147-161
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D. et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 84-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wendler M, Belli R, Petschelt A. et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 99-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P. et al. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.001.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M. et al. Werkstoffkunde-Update: Zirkonoxid und seine Generationen von verblendet bis monolithisch. Quintessenz Zahntech 2016; 42: 740-765
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T. et al. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29: 22-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Worni A, Katsoulis J, Kolgeci L. et al. Monolithic zirconia reconstructions supported by teeth and implants: 1- to 3-year results of a case series. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 459-467
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015; 35: 315-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1165-1172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gherlone E, Mandelli F, Capparè P. et al. A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. J Dent 2014; 42: 1151-1155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Selz CF, Bogler J, Vach K. et al. Veneered anatomically designed zirconia FDPs resulting from digital intraoral scans: Preliminary results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent 2015; 43: 1428-1435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Wittneben JG, Wright RF, Weber HP. et al. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 466-471
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS. et al. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31: 603-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Aldegheishem A, Ioannidis G, Att W. et al. Success and survival of various types of all-ceramic single crowns: A critical review and analysis of studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years or longer. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30: 168-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rauch A, Reich S, Schierz O. Chair-side generated posterior monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: clinical survival after 6 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 2083-2089
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Spies BC, Pieralli S, Vach K. et al. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: Final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 876-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Joda T, Ferrari M, Brägger U. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 505-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 908-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schwindling FS, Rues S, Schmitter M. Fracture resistance of glazed, full-contour ZLS incisor crowns. J Prosthodont Res 2017; 61: 344-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Zimmermann M, Koller C, Mehl A. et al. Indirect zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic CAD/CAM restorations: Preliminary clinical results after 12 months. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 19-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Saavedra GSFA, Rodrigues FP, Bottino MA. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic – a 2-year follow-up of a clinical experience with anterior crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 25: 57-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M. et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015; 18: 9-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016; 32: e275-e283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lin XY, Zhang P, Lin ZT. et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.022.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chirumamilla G, Goldstein CE, Lawson NC. A 2-year retrospective clinical study of enamic crowns performed in a private practice setting. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 231-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M. et al. Clinical evaluation ofindirect particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM partial crowns after 24 months. J Prosthodont 2017; DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12582.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM. et al. Clinical bonding of resin nano ceramic restorations to zirconia abutments: A case series within a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 984-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar