CAD/CAM-gefertigte Einzelzahnrestaurationen: Empfehlungen zur Materialauswahl

Die Herstellung von Einzelzahnrestauration im digitalen Workflow kann heute mit einer vergleichbaren Präzision wie bei analoger Fertigung erfolgen. Aus der Vielzahl der zur Verfügung stehenden Materialien sind derzeit insbesondere monolithische und teilverblendete Zirkonoxidkeramiken sowie monolithische Restaurationen aus hochfesten Glaskeramiken durch klinische Studien abgesichert. Auch für die Hybridkeramik Vita Enamic liegen erste Daten aus klinischen Beobachtungen vor, die eine klinische Anwendung rechtfertigen. Die Gruppe der industriell polymerisierten Hochleistungskomposite ist vor allem für die Chairside-Anwendung interessant, bislang fehlen jedoch noch Daten, die Aussagen zur klinischen Bewährung erlauben.

• Literatur

• 1 Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015; 24: 313-321
• 2 Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F. et al. Assessment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: A review of the literature. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7: 96-104
• 3 Zaruba M, Mehl A. Chairside systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent 2017; 20: 123-149
• 4 Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO. et al. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 836-845
• 5 Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P. et al. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: A review. J Prosthodont 2016;
• 6 Khraishi H, Duane B. Evidence for use of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions for obtaining full-arch digital impressions is insufficient. Evid Based Dent 2017; 18: 24-25
• 7 Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Kriterien für die Auswahl rekonstruktiver Materialien. Quintessenz Zahntech 2013; 39: 462-470
• 8 Boldt J, Vuck A, Horvarth S. Digitaler Workflow bei Implantat-Einzelzahnversorgungen. Implantologie 2017; 25: 147-161
• 9 Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D. et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 84-98
• 10 Wendler M, Belli R, Petschelt A. et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 2: Flexural strength testing. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 99-109
• 11 Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P. et al. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent 2017;
• 12 Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M. et al. Werkstoffkunde-Update: Zirkonoxid und seine Generationen von verblendet bis monolithisch. Quintessenz Zahntech 2016; 42: 740-765
• 13 Bömicke W, Rammelsberg P, Stober T. et al. Short-term prospective clinical evaluation of monolithic and partially veneered zirconia single crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29: 22-30
• 14 Worni A, Katsoulis J, Kolgeci L. et al. Monolithic zirconia reconstructions supported by teeth and implants: 1- to 3-year results of a case series. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 459-467
• 15 Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015; 35: 315-323
• 16 Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1165-1172
• 17 Gherlone E, Mandelli F, Capparè P. et al. A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. J Dent 2014; 42: 1151-1155
• 18 Selz CF, Bogler J, Vach K. et al. Veneered anatomically designed zirconia FDPs resulting from digital intraoral scans: Preliminary results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent 2015; 43: 1428-1435
• 19 Wittneben JG, Wright RF, Weber HP. et al. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22: 466-471
• 20 Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS. et al. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater 2015; 31: 603-623
• 21 Aldegheishem A, Ioannidis G, Att W. et al. Success and survival of various types of all-ceramic single crowns: A critical review and analysis of studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years or longer. Int J Prosthodont 2017; 30: 168-181
• 22 Rauch A, Reich S, Schierz O. Chair-side generated posterior monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: clinical survival after 6 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 2083-2089
• 23 Spies BC, Pieralli S, Vach K. et al. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: Final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 876-883
• 24 Joda T, Ferrari M, Brägger U. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017; 19: 505-511
• 25 Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016; 32: 908-914
• 26 Schwindling FS, Rues S, Schmitter M. Fracture resistance of glazed, full-contour ZLS incisor crowns. J Prosthodont Res 2017; 61: 344-349
• 27 Zimmermann M, Koller C, Mehl A. et al. Indirect zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic CAD/CAM restorations: Preliminary clinical results after 12 months. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 19-25
• 28 Saavedra GSFA, Rodrigues FP, Bottino MA. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic – a 2-year follow-up of a clinical experience with anterior crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2017; 25: 57-63
• 29 Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M. et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2015; 18: 9-20
• 30 Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater 2016; 32: e275-e283
• 31 Lin XY, Zhang P, Lin ZT. et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent 2017;
• 32 Chirumamilla G, Goldstein CE, Lawson NC. A 2-year retrospective clinical study of enamic crowns performed in a private practice setting. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 231-237
• 33 Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M. et al. Clinical evaluation ofindirect particle-filled composite resin CAD/CAM partial crowns after 24 months. J Prosthodont 2017;
• 34 Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Vermeulen KM. et al. Clinical bonding of resin nano ceramic restorations to zirconia abutments: A case series within a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 984-992