A functional MRI Exploration of Hamstring Activation During the Supine Bridge Exercise

Matthew Bourne; Morgan Williams; Tania Pizzari; Anthony Shield

doi:10.1055/s-0043-121150

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int J Sports Med 2018; 39(02): 104-109
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121150

Orthopedics & Biomechanics

A functional MRI Exploration of Hamstring Activation During the Supine Bridge Exercise

Matthew Bourne

¹Department of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University College of Science Health and Engineering, Nutrition and Sport, Bundoora, Australia

,

Morgan Williams

²School of Sport and Professional Practice, University of South Wales, Wales, United Kingdom, School of Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, Cardiff, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

,

Tania Pizzari

¹Department of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University College of Science Health and Engineering, Nutrition and Sport, Bundoora, Australia

,

Anthony Shield

³School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The single leg supine bridge (SLB) is a commonly employed strengthening exercise and is used as a clinical test for hamstring function in sports, however, little is known about the patterns of muscle activation in this task. To explore these activation patterns, nine healthy, recreationally active males underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of their thighs at rest and immediately after 5 sets of 10 repetitions of the SLB exercise. Exercise-induced increases in the transverse (T2) relaxation time of the biceps femoris long and short heads, semitendinosus and semimembranosus, were determined via signal intensity changes in pre- and post-exercise images and used as an index of muscle activation. The Bonferroni adjusted alpha was set at p<0.008. The semitendinosus exhibited a greater T2 increase than the biceps femoris short head (p<0.001, d=2.0) and semimembranosus (p=0.001, d=1.2), but not biceps femoris long head (p=0.029, d=0.9). Furthermore, the percentage change in T2 for biceps femoris long head was greater than its short head (p=0.003, d=1.4). During the SLB exercise, the semitendinosus is most selectively targeted and the biceps femoris long head is preferentially activated over its short head. These findings may have implications for the use of the SLB in hamstring injury prevention and rehabilitation programs.

Key words

functional magnetic resonance imaging - injury prevention - strength training - rehabilitation

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Adams GR, Duvoisin MR, Dudley GA. Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography as indexes of muscle function. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 1578-1583
2 Arnason A, Andersen TE, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Prevention of hamstring strains in elite soccer: An intervention study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008; 18: 40-48
3 Bourne M, Opar DA, Williams MD, Al Najjar A, Shield AJ. Muscle activation patterns in the Nordic hamstring exercise. Impact of prior strain injury Scand J Med Sci Sports 2016; 26: 666-674
4 Bourne MN. DS Timmins RG, Williams MD, Opar DA, Al Najjar A, Kerr GK, Shield AJ. Impact of the Nordic hamstring and hip extension exercises on hamstring architecture and morphology: Implications for injury prevention. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51: 469-477
5 Bourne MN. WM Opar DA, Al Najjar A, Shield AJ. Impact of exercise selection on hamstring muscle activation. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51: 1021-1028
6 Daly C, McCarthy Persson U, Twycross-Lewis R, Woledge RC, Morrissey D. The biomechanics of running in athletes with previous hamstring injury: A case-control study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2016; 26: 413-420
7 Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J App Physiol 2004; 96: 1486-1495
8 Fisher MJ, Meyer RA, Adams GR, Foley JM. EJ P Direct relationship between proton T2 and exercise intensity in skeletal muscle MR images. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 480-485
9 Fleckenstein JL, Canby RC, Parkey RW, Peshock RM. Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle in normal volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 231-237
10 Freckleton G, Cook J, Pizzari T. The predictive validity of a single leg bridge test for hamstring injuries in Australian Rules Football Players. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 713-717
11 Fyfe JJ, Opar DA, Williams MD, Shield AJ. The role of neuromuscular inhibition in hamstring strain injury recurrence. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013; 23: 523-530
12 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 1121-1124
13 Koulouris G, Connell DA, Brukner P, Schneider-Kolsky M. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters for assessing risk of recurrent hamstring injuries in elite athletes. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35: 1500-1506
14 Lynn SK, Costigan PA. Changes in the medial-lateral hamstring activation ratio with foot rotation during lower limb exercise. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; 19: e197-e205
15 Mendiguchia J, Garrues MA, Cronin JB. et al. Nonuniform changes in MRI measurements of the thigh muscles after two hamstring strengthening exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 574-581
16 Ono T, Higashihara A, Fukubayashi T. Hamstring functions during hip-extension exercise assessed with electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging. Res Sport Med 2011; 19: 42-52
17 Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Dear NM, Shield AJ. Knee flexor strength and bicep femoris electromyographical activity is lower in previously strained hamstrings. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013; 23: 696-703
18 Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Dear NM, Shield AJ. Rate of torque and electromyographic development during anticipated eccentric contraction is lower in previously strained hamstrings. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 116-125
19 Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Hickey J, Duhig SJ, Shield AJ. Eccentric Hamstring Strength and Hamstring Injury Risk in Australian Footballers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015; 47: 857-865
20 Patten C, Meyer RA, Fleckenstein JL. T2 mapping of muscle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2003; 7: 297-305
21 Petersen J, Thorborg K, Nielsen MB, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Hölmich P. Preventive effect of eccentric training on acute hamstring injuries in men’s soccer a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 2296-2303
22 Schuermans J, Van Tiggelen D, Danneels L, Witvrouw E. Biceps femoris and semitendinosus-teammates or competitors? New insights into hamstring injury mechanisms in male football players: A muscle functional MRI study. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 1599-1606
23 Schuermans J, Van Tiggelen D, Danneels L, Witvrouw E. Susceptibility to hamstring injuries in soccer: A prospective study using muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44: 1276-1285
24 Silder A, Heiderscheit B, Thelen D, Enright T, Tuite M. MR observations of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 1101-1109
25 Thelen DG, Chumanov ES, Hoerth DM. et al. Hamstring muscle kinematics during treadmill sprinting. Med Sci Sports Ex 2005; 37: 108-114
26 Timmins R, Bourne M, Shield A. et al. Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the risk of hamstring injury in elite football (soccer): A prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 1524-1535
27 van der Horst N, Smits DW, Petersen J, Goedhart EA, Backx FJ. The preventive effect of the nordic hamstring exercise on hamstring injuries in amateur soccer players: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 1316-1323
28 Wakahara T, Fukutani A, Kawakami Y, Yanai T. Nonuniform muscle hypertrophy: Its relation to muscle activation in training session. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45: 2158-2165
29 Wakahara T, Miyamoto N, Sugisaki N. et al. Association between regional differences in muscle activation in one session of resistance exercise and in muscle hypertrophy after resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 1569-1576