Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777112
Radiographic Evolution of Scaphotrapezium Coalition Trough Carpal Ossificaction
Article in several languages: español | EnglishAbstract
Carpal coalitions are anatomy variants, consisting of the union of two or more carpal bones. The incidence is low, usually being an incidental diagnosis. Describing the radiographic development through carpal ossification is our objective concerning a clinical case. Our patient is a 15-year-old male, who suffers repeated scaphoid fractures. He was diagnosed with bilateral non-osseous carpal coalitions in the follow-up. The patient had previous radiographs of his left wrist through infancy until skeletal maturation was observed. Thus, it was possible to compare them to reference images of normal skeletal maturation, showing the strongest differences after carpal ossification. Carpal coalitions are scarce, and the diagnosis is only possible after skeletal maturation, showing a higher risk of mechanical stress and present fractures than the general population.
#
Introduction
A carpal coalition is the union of two or more carpal bones.[1] They are considered anatomical variations present in a low percentage of the population, around 0.1%, reaching a prevalence of up to 9% in the west of the African continent.[2] It is more common in women, generally bilaterally and symmetrically affected, and is a genetically hereditary entity, following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern.[1] Its appearance is related to failures in the joint cavitation process,[3] [4] so More frequently it affects bones in the same carpal row and bilaterally. The most common are those that appear between semilunar - pyramidal,[3] [4] and between large - hamate.[1] The least common is the scaphoid-trapezoidal, which usually appears in the context of malformation syndromes.[3]
The diagnosis of these entities is usually incidental, being a casual finding when performing a wrist x-ray after a trauma,[5] therefore their evolution throughout growth has not been previously described. We intend to present the radiographic evolution of this malformation regarding a case, considering the theories proposed for the appearance of this malformation in the available literature.
#
Clinical Case
The patient is a 15-year-old white male, referred to the trauma clinic diagnosed in the emergency room with a fracture of the right scaphoid, after suffering a casual fall on that extremity. In less than 1 year he suffered another trauma to the same wrist, again presenting a fracture of the right scaphoid. Both episodes received conservative management by placing the corresponding closed casts. During follow-up, a non-bony carpal coalition was detected between the scaphoid and trapezius ([Figure 1]). Furthermore, the appearance of a scaphoid pseudoarthrosis developed after the second traumatic event on the scaphoid is notable, requiring an MRI of the right wrist ([Figure 2]).
When radiographs of the contralateral wrist were requested, a carpal coalition between the scaphoid and trapezius was also seen. Reviewing the history, the patient was treated with growth hormone (GH) for years from the age of 6 to 17 due to hypogrowth. During this time, he was subjected to periodic bone age controls using x-rays of the hand and wrist of the left upper limb, where the development of the carpus and the scapho-trapezoidal coalition can be seen upon reaching bone maturity ([Figure 3]). To confirm the diagnosis of bilateral non-osseous scaphotrapezius carpal coalition, an MRI of the left wrist is requested, for a better assessment of the relationship between the two bones ([Figure 4]). Furthermore, scaphoid pseudoarthrosis is also observed in its proximal region, despite the lack of previous trauma reported by the patient in the left extremity. This pseudoarthrosis was a chance finding, without the patient showing related symptoms, so it was decided to opt for expectant management with follow-up consultations.
#
Discussion
The appearance of coalitions is related to the failure in the separation process of the cartilaginous interzone between the adjacent carpal bones, which occurs between 4–8 weeks of gestation. This interface is made up of 3 layers: two denser ones, which will become the articular cartilage, separated by one of lower density, from which the synovial and intracapsular structures will be formed. This theory is applied to those collations that affect bones of the same carpal row and to those that share the same ossification rhythm. For the pisiform bone, which appears between 9–14 years in children, the previously described theory is not accepted; For those coalitions that affect this bone with the adjacent ones, it is related to a transformation of derivatives of the mesoderm.[2]
There are different types of coalitions between the carpal bones, the simplest classification being Brunnet's, which is divided into two groups depending on whether the coalition is bony or not[4]; In the latter case, the coalition can be made of cartilaginous tissue, also known as synchondrosis, or fibrous.[1] Concerning the rest of the classifications, as Defazio explained, both the first classification described by Minaar and that of Singh are not useful for coalitions not bony as they are not included.[1] [4]
All carpal bones ossify from a primary ossification center. In the full-term newborn, none of the carpal bones are ossified.[5] [6] The large and pyramidal bones become visible at 3 months of age, with the large one appearing, which has a larger and more rounded ossification nucleus; these are the only ossification nucleus visible for the next 6 months in the wrist. Between 14 months and 3 years, 3 or 4 carpal bones are recognized; to the large and pyramidal, the semilunar and the trapezoidal are added.[5]
This sequential appearance of the carpal bones allows bone age to be determined by comparison with standardized radiographs of carpal bones by age and sex, following the method of Greulich and Pyle. This is the most used method for determining bone age.[7] In the case of the patient studied, differences can be observed in the skeletal maturation of the carpal bones concerning the standard shown in the Greulich and Pyle method ([Figure 5]), from the age of 12, where the lower edge of the trapezius extends to the scaphoid and, clearly at the age of 14, the alteration of the morphology of the scaphoid and the trapezius can be seen. In the case of our patient, we also observed a complication that patients with carpal coalitions usually have, especially in non-bony ones,[4] which is a bone fracture. Although it has been theorized that the increase in fractures in this pathology may be related to the area where the fibrous tissue joins an area of weakness, in our case, we see that the bilateral fracture takes place in the middle third of the scaphoid.[7] This same pattern of fracture, has already been previously described by Noureldin, in this case, a percutaneous osteosynthesis with a compression screw was performed acutely, observing adequate consolidation after 8 months.[8]
A higher proportion of acute and chronic complications, such as chronic wrist pain, has been observed in patient series in patients with carpal coalitions than we found in the general population, which may be related to the alteration of the biomechanics of the wrist.[1]
#
Conclusion
Carpal coalitions are a rare entity, which appears due to cavitation between the carpal bones between the 4th and 8th week of gestation, but which goes unnoticed until skeletal maturation of the carpus occurs; especially, considering the lack of symptoms that accompany this condition, whose diagnosis is usually a coincidence. Despite this, it has been seen that they are related to a greater susceptibility to mechanical stress, and a greater risk of presenting fractures after suffering trauma.
#
#
-
Bibliography
- 1 Defazio MV, Cousins BJ, Miversuski Jr RA, Cardoso R. Carpal coalition: A review of current knowledge and report of a single institution's experience with asymptomatic intercarpal fusion. Hand (N Y) 2013; 8 (02) 157-163
- 2 Gottschalk MB, Danilevich M, Gottschalk HP. Carpal Coalitions and Metacarpal Synostoses: A Review. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (03) 271-277
- 3 van Hoorn BT, Pong T, van Leeuwen WF, Ring D. Carpal Coalitions on Radiographs: Prevalence and Association With Ordering Indication. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (05) 329-334
- 4 Burnett SE. Hamate-pisiform coalition: morphology, clinical significance, and a simplified classification scheme for carpal coalition. Clin Anat 2011; 24 (02) 188-196
- 5 Vicente Gilsanz OR. Hand Bone Age - A Digital Atlas of Skeletal Maturity. Springer; 2005
- 6 Navarro M.M., Tejedor B.M., López Siguero J.P.. (2014, noviembre). El uso de la edad ósea en la práctica clínica. Anales de pediatria continuada 12 (06) 275-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1696-2818(14)70204-5
- 7 Resnik CS, Grizzard JD, Simmons BP, Yaghmai I. Incomplete carpal coalition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147 (02) 301-304
- 8 Noureldin S, Ali M, Fallahi F, Dehler T. Scaphoid Fracture in a Patient with a Scaphotrapezial Synostosis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Case Rep Orthop 2017; 2017: 1941750
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 20 October 2022
Accepted: 09 October 2023
Article published online:
05 December 2023
© 2023. SECMA Foundation. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil
-
Bibliography
- 1 Defazio MV, Cousins BJ, Miversuski Jr RA, Cardoso R. Carpal coalition: A review of current knowledge and report of a single institution's experience with asymptomatic intercarpal fusion. Hand (N Y) 2013; 8 (02) 157-163
- 2 Gottschalk MB, Danilevich M, Gottschalk HP. Carpal Coalitions and Metacarpal Synostoses: A Review. Hand (N Y) 2016; 11 (03) 271-277
- 3 van Hoorn BT, Pong T, van Leeuwen WF, Ring D. Carpal Coalitions on Radiographs: Prevalence and Association With Ordering Indication. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (05) 329-334
- 4 Burnett SE. Hamate-pisiform coalition: morphology, clinical significance, and a simplified classification scheme for carpal coalition. Clin Anat 2011; 24 (02) 188-196
- 5 Vicente Gilsanz OR. Hand Bone Age - A Digital Atlas of Skeletal Maturity. Springer; 2005
- 6 Navarro M.M., Tejedor B.M., López Siguero J.P.. (2014, noviembre). El uso de la edad ósea en la práctica clínica. Anales de pediatria continuada 12 (06) 275-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1696-2818(14)70204-5
- 7 Resnik CS, Grizzard JD, Simmons BP, Yaghmai I. Incomplete carpal coalition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147 (02) 301-304
- 8 Noureldin S, Ali M, Fallahi F, Dehler T. Scaphoid Fracture in a Patient with a Scaphotrapezial Synostosis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Case Rep Orthop 2017; 2017: 1941750