Kinetic Study of the Acylation Reaction of Dibutylcarbamyl Chloride and Dibutylamine

Abstract

Tetrabutylurea (TBU) is mainly used as a working liquid in the preparation of hydrogen peroxide via the anthraquinone process. It is reported that dibutylamine (A) reacts with dibutylcarbamyl chloride (B) to produce TBU in the presence of triphosgene, which is the decisive step of the reaction. In this study, we aimed to investigate the reaction kinetics of the decisive step to gain more insight into the reaction. The reaction order as well as the pre-exponential factors (A) and the activation energies (E _a) were determined. The kinetic study suggested that the total order of the reaction is second. E _a = 5.4 × 10⁴ J/mol, A = 1.5257 × 10⁷ L/(mol × min), calculated through a second-order kinetics model. The accuracy and applicability of the kinetic model were verified by serval experiments, showing that enhancing reaction temperature could shorten the reaction time and increase the conversion rate.

Keywords

tetrabutylurea - dibutylamine - dibutylcarbamyl chloride - kinetics - acylation

Introduction

Urea has a wide range of applications in pharmacology, agriculture, and industry. Urea structural fragments are important dominant backbones in the field of medicinal chemistry. A compound containing an appropriate amount of urea is often associated with multiple biological activities,[1] [2] thus, urea fragments, as one of the most commonly used dominant fragments, play a pivotal role in drug design.[3] [4]

Ertl et al considered urea as the 14th most common functional group in biologically active molecules mentioned in the medicinal chemistry literature.[5] The formation of H-bonding interactions between a carbonyl hydrogen bond acceptor and up to two hydrogen bond donors (for disubstituted derivatives) allows modulating a pharmacophore's properties and subsequently influences the drug potency or acceptor–target interactions. Given this significant importance, the incorporation of urea functionality has been employed to modulate drug potency and selectivity, as well as enhance the properties of anticancer, antibacterial, anticonvulsive, anti-human immunodeficiency virus, antidiabetic agents, and other medicinal compounds.[6] [7] [8] Then a variety of urea or thiourea-containing compounds have received market approval from regulatory agencies (Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) for the treatment of various human diseases. These drugs include sorafenib (a kinase inhibitor),[9] flibanserin (used for treating female hypoactive sexual desire disorder),[10] and cariprazine (an antipsychotic drug),[11] as shown in [Fig. 1].

Fig. 1 Chemical structure of cariprazine, sorafenib, and celiprolol.

The synthesis of urea derivatives has been explored. As shown in [Fig. 2], the traditional method involved the toxic step, including the use of phosgene (BTC),[12] t-Boc deprotection reaction,[13] the rearrangement reaction,[14] [15] [16] [17] the acylation of carbamoyl chloride and amines,[18] [19] as well as the participation of isocyanates. Encouragingly, there are also alternative routes to synthesize urea derivatives, involving the use of less toxic agents like ethylene carbonate or diethyl carbonate, and the direct synthesis of urea derivatives from amines and CO₂ in the presence of numerous catalysts. Interestingly, several ionic liquids were also examined as suitable solvents for the synthesis of the kind of compounds.[20]

Fig. 2 Traditional synthesis route of urea compounds.

Tetrabutylurea (TBU), as a urea derivative, is an extremely versatile intermediate in organic synthesis and used for preparing pesticides, pharmaceuticals, dyes, plastics, plasticizers, and stabilizers, catalysts for photo-gasification reactions, as well as solvents and lubricants. Among those, the most important role of TBU is playing as a solvent to partially or entirely replace trioctyl phosphate in the synthesis of hydrogen peroxide by the anthraquinone process.[21]

TBU is obtained through the reaction of dibutylamine (A) with phosgene, biphosgene, or triphosgene in the industry.[22] The route has two steps in turn. First, A and triphosgene react quickly to generate the intermediate dibutylcarbamyl chloride (B). The reaction time is relatively fast and could be ignored. Then, the intermediate B reacts with A, forming TBU, and this is the decisive step of the reaction. However, its kinetics remains rarely studied. In addition, the conduction of the reaction also faces many problems, such as the adoption of a liquid–liquid heterogeneous system, the mass transfer performance, three waste treatments, and the safe use of phosgene. Therefore, the kinetics of TBU synthesis from A and B should be investigated to achieve a better understanding of the essential reaction process of TBU.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The reagents used in the study were: dibutylamine (A, 99.0 wt%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Shanghai Co., Ltd.), toluene (analytical grade, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Shanghai Co., Ltd.), sodium hydroxide (99.0 wt.%, Aladdin Industrial Shanghai, China), acetonitrile (analytical grade, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Shanghai Co., Ltd.), and dibutylcarbamyl chloride (B, 99.0 wt.% Shanghai Experimental Reagent Co., Ltd.). The reagents were used directly without further purification. A gas chromatograph (GC 9720, Fuli Analytical Instruments Co., Ltd.) equipped with an SE-54 GC column was used for sample analysis.

Synthetic Route

The synthetic route of TBU is shown in [Fig. 3]; compounds A and B were heated at 90°C for 6 hours to produce TBU with a yield of 95%. During the process, HCl and B formed an amino hydrochloride, which was neutralized in NaOH (aq) to produce NaCl. NaOH (aq) prevents salt formation of HCl and A which affects the accuracy of the reaction. Thus, A could be dissociated, allowing the reaction to continue. Complex B, as the secondary amine, is stable in water and almost no hydrolysis reaction occurs in water.[18]

Fig. 3 Synthesis route of TBU and the pathway of each substance. TBU, tetrabutylurea.

Sample Analysis

Collect a small amount of the reaction mixture when the reaction has reached a stable state. After cooling the reaction mixture, the organic layer was separated and diluted 10 times with acetonitrile. With sufficient cooling and dilution, the reaction no longer proceeds. To avoid inaccuracy, the diluted sample is analyzed with GC immediately. The reaction conversion is obtained by an external standard method. Each sample is tested three times to ensure the accuracy of the results.

Experiment

An intermittent reaction was performed using a magnetic stirring device (MR Hei-Tec, Heidolph) with a heating function. The reaction order of compound A was determined as follows: the toluene solution of compound A and the NaOH (aq) was heated to reaction temperature in a three-necked flask, and the toluene solution of compound B was preheated to the reaction temperature, then poured into the three-necked flask at one time quickly. The whole process was carried out at a stirring speed of 800 rpm, and samples were taken regularly during the reaction period to calculate the conversion rate of the reaction.

The fluctuation range of the reaction temperature was less than 1°C, suggesting an isothermal process of the batch reaction. After sampling, the samples were diluted and cooled to ensure that the reaction did not continue.

Results and Discussion

Reaction Route and Mixing Performance Analysis

As shown in [Fig. 3], acylation was the reaction type and TBU was formed by nucleophilic addition of A and B under high-temperature conditions. The HCl, produced by the nucleophilic addition of A and B, forms a dibutylamine hydrochloride with A that may influence the proceeding of the reaction. However, with the presence of NaOH (aq), dibutylamine hydrochloride was neutralized to release compound A, which nucleophilic attacks the carbonyl carbon of compound B to form the target product.

A better mixing between aqueous and organic phases led to a higher reaction efficiency and a lower experimental error. The reaction was carried out in a liquid–liquid two-phase reaction system, thus, an efficient mixing performance was crucial for the study of the intrinsic kinetics of the reaction. [Fig. 4] demonstrates the conversion rate of B at different speeds with the same residence time. Our data showed that when magnetic stirring speed exceeded 600 rpm, mass transfer effects were considered eliminated, reaching an ideal mixing state controlled only by reaction kinetics.

Fig. 4 Effect of the external diffusion in batch reaction. Reaction conditions: 30 mL of solutions A, B, and NaOH (aq) in 250 mL three-necked flask; initial concentrations of A, B, and NaOH (aq) in the reaction mixture were 0.5, 0.5, and 0.5 mol/L, respectively; reaction temperature = 80°C; reaction time = 1 hour.

After the reaction reaches a better mixed state, the kinetic study of the reaction was determined according to [Equation (1)]:

where α and β represent the reaction order.

The Reaction Orders

The reaction order of B was assessed. The initial concentration of A was set to 10 times the initial concentration of B, at which point it was considered that the concentration of A does not affect the rate of reaction. Therefore, the reaction rate (r ₁) of the thermal reaction stage was calculated as [Equation (2)]. Similarly, when the number of reaction stages of A was determined, the reaction rate (r ₂) was calculated as [Equation (3)].

If the reaction order of B was zero, the integral equation of the rate equation can be written as [Equation (4)], and the plot of C _B versus t should also be a straight line. If the reaction order of B was first, the integral equation of the rate equation can be written as [Equation (5)], and the plot of ln(C _B) versus t should also be a straight line. If the reaction order of B was second, the integral equation of the rate equation can be written as [Equation (6)], and the plot of 1/C_B versus t should also be a straight line.

where C _B0 is the initial concentration of B and C _B is the concentration of B at different times. C _A0 is the initial concentration of A and C _A is the concentration of A at different times. Similarly, the reaction order (α) of A is found in the same way as β.

To avoid a mistaken judgment caused by the short sampling range, the experiment was preferred in a batch reaction at a low concentration and low temperature, thus, the conversion rates could be determined continuously and conveniently until the conversion rates reached about 90%. The reaction order was an intrinsic property, irrelevant to the reaction mode.

A plot of ln(C _B) and t is shown in [Fig. 5]; compound B obtained the highest linear correlation coefficient in the first-order kinetic fit model (R ² = 0.999); however, an obvious deviation was observed between the data and the fitting line in the zero and second order of B (R ² = 0.938 and 0.963, respectively). The kinetic model of first-order concerning B concentration seemed more suitable to represent the reaction, thus β = 1.

Fig. 5 Kinetic fitting curves under each reaction order of B. Reaction conditions: initial concentration of A, B, and NaOH (aq) in the reaction mixture was 0.7, 0.07, and 0.07 mol/L respectively; reaction temperature = 70°C; stirring rate = 800 rpm.

A plot of ln(C _A) and t is shown in [Fig. 6]; compound A also obtained the highest linear correlation coefficient in the first-order kinetic fit model (R ² = 0.999); however, a bad correlation level between the zero and second order of B (R ² = 0.933 and 0.965) was observed. The kinetic model of first-order concerning A concentration seemed more suitable to represent the reaction; therefore, α = 1 should be considered.

Fig. 6 Kinetic fitting curves under each reaction order of A. Reaction conditions: initial concentration of A, B, and NaOH (aq) in the reaction mixture was 0.07, 0.7, and 0.07 mol/L respectively; reaction temperature = 70°C; stirring rate = 800 rpm.

The reaction orders for both A and B were the first order. Therefore, the reaction behaves kinetically as a secondary reaction, and its reaction kinetic equation could be written as [Equation (7)].

As mentioned above, a wide range of the conversion rates is very necessary, if the range of the conversion rates was only from 0 to about 50%, the three fitting parameters of correlation coefficient R ² were similar, and we may achieve a wrong conclusion.

Rate Constant (k ₁), Activation Energy, and Pre-exponential Factor

The kinetic data were collected at different temperatures and residence times and the results are shown in [Fig. 7A]. Our data showed that the trend of the conversion rate of the reaction with time was consistent with the secondary reaction law.

Fig. 7 (A) Conversion rate of A under different temperatures. Reaction conditions: the initial concentration of A, B, and NaOH (aq) in the reaction mixture was 0.5, 0.5, and 0.5 mol/L, respectively; stirring rate = 800 rpm. (B) The plot of ln(k ₁) and 1/T. T, temperature.

The initial concentrations of A and B were the same; therefore, the reaction kinetic equation could be written as [Equation (8)], and its integral equation expressed by the conversion rate of A (x _A) can be expressed as [Equation (9)], k ₁ = K/C _A0. x_A/(1−x_A) had a linear relationship with t. Values of K and k ₁ at different temperatures can be easily calculated and the results are shown in [Table 1]. According to the Arrhenius equation ([Equation 10)], 1/T and ln(k ₁) can be linearly fitted, as shown in [Fig. 7B]. E _a and A can be obtained through calculation and the results are shown in [Table 2]. The A and E _a values of the reaction between A and B as we have known were first reported.

Table 1 The value of k ₁ at different temperatures

T (°C)	1/T (K −1)	k 1 (L mol−1 min−1)	lnk 1
51	0.003084	0.0284	−3.5620
61	0.002992	0.0521	−2.9551
73	0.002888	0.1018	−2.2843

Abbreviation: T, temperature.

Table 2 Values of A and E _a

Factors	A (L mol−1 min−1)	E a (J/mol)
Values	1.5257 × 107	5.4 × 104

Abbreviations: A, pre-exponential factor; E _a, activation energy.

Kinetic Model Validation

Based on the kinetic study, we obtained the kinetic parameters of k ₁, E _a, and A, and the reaction rate expression for the thermal reaction phase could be derived as [Equation (11)]. Therefore, a complete reaction kinetic model was established. To test the accuracy and applicability range (concentration and temperature) of the kinetic model, a series of validation experiments were designed. The concentration range of A and B was 1.2 to 1.6 mol/L and the reaction temperature was 30 to 90°C. The reaction time was within 1 hour and the results are shown in [Table 3]. The conversion rate of this reaction increased with the increased temperature and substrate concentration and the deviations between the calculated and experimental values of x _A were all around 1%, indicating that the kinetic model was valid. Thus, changing the parameters in the applied range in theory, the kinetic model simulation can be used to assess the effect of each reaction parameter on selectivity and an excellent yield could be obtained by calculating the residence time in an optimized condition.

Table 3 The experimental data and calculated data of x _A under different conditions

C A0 (mol/L)	T (°C)	t (min)	Experimental data (%)	Calculated data (%)	Deviations (%)
1.2	30	60	33.3	33.7	1.2
1.4	60	50	76.7	77.4	0.9
1.6	90	40	93.2	94.0	0.8

Reaction conditions: The initial concentrations of A, B, and NaOH (aq) in the reaction mixture were the same; stirring rate = 800 rpm.

Conclusion

In this work, we have successfully investigated the kinetics of the reaction between dibutylamine and B to form TBU. From the results of the kinetic study, the total order of the reaction is second with E _a being 5.4 × 10⁴ J/mol and A being 1.5257 × 10⁷ L mol⁻¹ min⁻¹. From the kinetic study, we derived the reaction rate expression that can serve as a useful guide for optimizing reaction conditions. Validation experiments demonstrated good agreement between our kinetic model and experimental results across a wide range of concentrations and temperatures. The model simulations indicated that increasing the reaction temperature could shorten the reaction time while increasing the conversion rate. Overall, the acylation reaction kinetic model has important implications for synthesizing drugs containing urea structures.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

• References

• 1 Ghosh AK, Kovela S, Osswald HL. et al. Structure-based design of highly potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors containing new tricyclic ring P2-ligands: design, synthesis, biological, and X-ray structural studies. J Med Chem 2020; 63 (09) 4867-4879
• 2 Garuti L, Roberti M, Bottegoni G, Ferraro M. Diaryl urea: a privileged structure in anticancer agents. Curr Med Chem 2016; 23 (15) 1528-1548
• 3 Ronchetti R, Moroni G, Carotti A, Gioiello A, Camaioni E. Recent advances in urea- and thiourea-containing compounds: focus on innovative approaches in medicinal chemistry and organic synthesis. RSC Med Chem 2021; 12 (07) 1046-1064
• 4 Siddiqui N, Alam MS, Stables JP. Synthesis and anticonvulsant properties of 1-(amino-N-arylmethanethio)-3-(1-substituted benzyl-2, 3-dioxoindolin-5-yl) urea derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 2011; 46 (06) 2236-2242
• 5 Ertl P, Altmann E, McKenna JM. The most common functional groups in bioactive molecules and how their popularity has evolved over time. J Med Chem 2020; 63 (15) 8408-8418
• 6 Li HQ, Lv PC, Yan T, Zhu HL. Urea derivatives as anticancer agents. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2009; 9 (04) 471-480
• 7 Batra S, Tusi Z, Madapa S. Medicinal chemistry of ureido derivatives as anti-infectives. Anti-Cancer Agent Me 2006; 5 (02) 135-160
• 8 Hodge CN, Aldrich PE, Bacheler LT. et al. Improved cyclic urea inhibitors of the HIV-1 protease: synthesis, potency, resistance profile, human pharmacokinetics and X-ray crystal structure of DMP 450. Chem Biol 1996; 3 (04) 301-314
• 9 Wilhelm S, Carter C, Lynch M. et al. Discovery and development of sorafenib: a multikinase inhibitor for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006; 5 (10) 835-844
• 10 Borsini F, Evans K, Jason K, Rohde F, Alexander B, Pollentier S. Pharmacology of flibanserin. CNS Drug Rev 2002; 8 (02) 117-142
• 11 Agai-Csongor E, Domány G, Nógrádi K. et al. Discovery of cariprazine (RGH-188): a novel antipsychotic acting on dopamine D3/D2 receptors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2012; 22 (10) 3437-3440
• 12 Lemoucheux L, Rouden J, Ibazizene M, Sobrio F, Lasne MC. Debenzylation of tertiary amines using phosgene or triphosgene: an efficient and rapid procedure for the preparation of carbamoyl chlorides and unsymmetrical ureas. Application in carbon-11 chemistry. J Org Chem 2003; 68 (19) 7289-7297
• 13 Bana P, Lakó A, Kiss NZ. Synthesis of urea derivatives in two sequential continuous-flow reactors. Org Process Res Dev 2017; 21 (04) 611-622
• 14 Liu P, Wang Z, Hu X. Highly efficient synthesis of ureas and carbamates from amides by iodosylbenzene-induced hofmann rearrangement. Eur J Org Chem 2012; 10: 1994-2000
• 15 Liang J, Cochran JE, Dorsch WA. et al. Development of a scalable synthesis of an azaindolyl-pyrimidine inhibitor of influenza virus replication. Org Process Res Dev 2016; 20 (05) 965-969
• 16 Narendra N, Chennakrishnareddy G, Sureshbabu VV. Application of carbodiimide mediated Lossen rearrangement for the synthesis of alpha-ureidopeptides and peptidyl ureas employing N-urethane alpha-amino/peptidyl hydroxamic acids. Org Biomol Chem 2009; 7 (17) 3520-3526
• 17 Wang CH, Hsieh TH, Lin CC. et al. One-Pot synthesis of N-monosubstituted ureas from nitriles via tiemann rearrangement. Synlett 2015; 26 (13) 1823-1826
• 18 Nishizawa A, Takahira T, Yasui K. et al. Nickel-catalyzed decarboxylation of aryl carbamates for converting phenols into aromatic amines. J Am Chem Soc 2019; 141 (18) 7261-7265
• 19 Singh DV, Adeppa K, Misra K. Mechanism of isoproturon resistance in Phalaris minor: in silico design, synthesis and testing of some novel herbicides for regaining sensitivity. J Mol Model 2012; 18 (04) 1431-1445
• 20 Wu CY, Cheng HY, Liu RX. et al. Synthesis of urea derivatives from amines and CO₂ in the absence of catalyst and solvent. Green Chem 2010; 12: 1811-1816
• 21 Ma HQ, Shen C, Feng B. et al. Research progress in synthesis of tetrabutylurea and its application in production of hydrogen peroxide. Chem Propell Polym Mater 2021; 19 (04) 26-31
• 22 Ma HQ, Ma YH, Zhao XD. et al. The invention relates to a method for preparing tetrabutylurea by aqueous phase method. CN Patent 108329238B. October, 2020

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. Juli 2023

Angenommen: 01. November 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Dezember 2023