Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777341
Linear Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination of the Biliary System and Its Clinical Applications
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Technique of Imaging
- Bile Duct Examination
- Gallbladder
- Examination of the Gallbladder from the Duodenal Bulb
- Examination of the Gallbladder from the Antrum
- Conclusions
- References
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination of the biliary system plays pivotal role in pancreatobiliary studies. EUS offers a safe and noninvasive method of the biliary tract disorder evaluation. Although radial EUS provides a straightforward orientation, practicing biliary system examination with a curvilinear echoendoscope is advisable because of its added therapeutic benefits. Linear EUS may pose challenge in understanding the orientation and tracing nondilated bile duct in the beginning. However, adopting a systematic station-wise approach can help in comprehending the orientation and effectively tracing the entire bile duct. In this review, we have discussed linear EUS examination of the bile duct and gallbladder from various stations and its clinical applications.
#
Introduction
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an important tool in the evaluation of the biliary system. It is safe and effective compared with the other imaging modality for the biliary tract disorder.[1] [2] Both radial and linear EUS can be used for the diagnostic purpose; however, only linear echoendoscope is used for therapeutic interventions. Radial echoendoscope can provide a comprehensive view of the entire bile duct (BD) from the duodenal bulb/antrum, while linear echoendoscope necessitates more maneuvering to achieve a complete view.[3] [4] The utility of forward view echoendoscope in the evaluation and management of biliary tract disorder is still under the assessment. A station-wise approach aids in understanding orientation as well as it will allows complete examination of the biliary system. EUS examinations of the biliary system are performed from the stomach, duodenal bulb, and duodenum part 2 ([Fig. 1]). Parts of biliary system examined from various station on EUS are mentioned in [Table 1].
Abbreviations: CBD, common bile duct; CHD, common hepatic duct; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; GB, gallbladder; LHD, left hepatic duct.
#
Technique of Imaging
Before the procedure, a preprocedural assessment including history, clinical examination, and indication of EUS was performed, along with interpretation of cross-sectional imaging. The procedure was performed with a curvilinear echoendoscope (GF180, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with the patient under deep sedation and in left lateral position. EUS image orientation is on the right side. The basic principles of linear EUS and related terminologies have been discussed in our previous article.[5] Maneuvers used during EUS examination are clockwise and anticlockwise rotation, as well as pull and push movements of the scope to trace the structure. “Maintain clockwise or anticlockwise torque” refers to stabilizing the scope position without excessive rotation in either direction while tracing the structure.
#
Bile Duct Examination
The biliary tree is formed by system of ducts and these are classified into intrahepatic and extrahepatic tracts. The intrahepatic tract comprises biliary radicles, segmental ducts, and sectoral ducts. The extrahepatic tract comprises the right hepatic duct (RHD), left hepatic duct (LHD), common hepatic duct (CHD), common bile duct (CBD), cystic duct, and gallbladder (GB).[6] CBD is further divided into supraduodenal, retroduodenal, and intrapancreatic (rarely retropancreatic in 13%) part. On EUS it is challenging to identify supraduodenal and retroduodenal part of the CBD, so here we have divided CBD simply into suprapancreatic and intrapancreatic part.
CBD examination is performed from three stations; 1) the stomach, 2) the duodenal bulb, and 3) the duodenum part 2. CBD is situated closest to the duodenal bulb, and whole CBD can be traced from the ampulla to the liver hilum from the duodenal bulb. However, the left-sided segmental ducts are well visualized from the stomach, and the ampullary region is better seen from the duodenum part 2. Therefore, it is recommended to scan CBD from all three station. The CBD is long tubular anechoic structure, measuring 6 to 8 cm in length and 4 to 6 mm in diameter. As CBD is smaller diameter structure, initially it can be challenging to trace normal CBD. Dilated biliary system are more easily appreciated on EUS compared with the normal. Enrolling in hands on training program and adopting a systematic approach of documenting classical images from different stations can expedite the learning.[7] [8] We have discussed tracing of both dilated and nondilated biliary system to enhance understanding.
Examination of Bile Duct from the Stomach
Tracing the biliary tract from stomach is anchored to the left lobe of the liver. From gastroesophageal (GE) junction locate the liver hilum and follow the portal vein (PV) to trace the CBD. In the liver, multiple structures including ligaments, PV tributaries, biliary radicles, and hepatic veins are visualized.[9] [10] Color Doppler flow helps in differentiation of dilated biliary radicles from hepatic veins and PV tributaries.
At the GE junction, the left lobe of the liver is visible on the EUS view in the neutral position ([Fig. 2A–H]). The peripheral branch of left hepatic vein (LHV) is seen traversing through segment 2 and 3. On clockwise rotation, the umbilical portion of the left portal vein (UPV) along with ligamentum teres and ligamentum venosum is visualized. Segment 3 is seen above the UPV and segment 4 is seen below it. Nondilated intrahepatic biliary radicles may not be clearly visible. On further clockwise direction (<45) from the UPV, a round-shaped left portal vein (LPV) becomes visible, and the LHD can be seen adjacent to the LPV. From LPV, push down the echoendoscope to visualize liver hilum. At liver hilum, main portal vein (MPV), right hepatic artery, and CHD are visualized in sequence. From the CHD, push the echoendoscope while maintaining clockwise torque to trace the portal vein confluence (PVC). The CBD runs parallel to the MPV till the PVC. If the CBD is not visible from the PVC, follow the superior mesenteric vein to visualize intrapancreatic CBD by keeping clockwise torque and pushing down the echoendoscope. Full clockwise rotation of echoendoscope should be avoided when tracing the CBD from the PV. The pancreatic duct (PD) in the head of pancreas (HOP) can also be visualized on minimal clockwise rotation from intrapancreatic CBD. On further tracing, joining of the CBD and PD becomes visible in second part of the duodenum from the stomach body. During CBD examination, the cystic duct and GB can also be seen from the stomach body. This method allows whole BD examination from the left liver segments to the ampulla ([Fig. 2A–H]).[11] It is important to push echoendoscope down while tracing CBD as ampulla is located caudal to the liver hilum ([Fig. 2E]).
Variation in anatomy can be observed from patients to patient. Tracing dilated biliary tract is straightforward; however, landmarks and PV branches should be followed for accurate characterization. From GE junction on anticlockwise rotation segment 2 of liver becomes visible. On clockwise rotation, segment 3 will start appearing. Segment 2 duct will be seen on right side and segment 3 duct on left side of the image. Continuing clockwise rotation, segment 2 and 3 ducts can be seen forming partial “V” pattern, with segment 3 duct as running from the left upper quadrant to the right lower and segment 2 duct running from the right upper quadrant to the left lower. This can be the ideal position for puncturing segment 3 duct for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Segment 3 duct puncture is recommended for EUS HGS as well as for EUS-guided antegrade stenting, while segment 2 duct puncture for antegrade stenting only.[12]
Further clockwise rotation, union of segment 2 and 3 duct can be seen below the UPV. From the union on minimal clockwise rotation, LHD and LPV become visible. Push down the echoendoscope to see the liver hilum, where the biliary confluence can be seen. In some cases, a trifurcation branching pattern is observed, with right posterior sectoral duct (RPSD) directly emptying into the confluence.[13] Maintain clockwise torque and follow the CHD. On maintaining clockwise torque and pushing down echoendoscope large hypoechoic lesion was seen in HOP in this case. The mass was causing distal CBD obstruction and it was also abutting the PVC ([Fig. 3A–H]). The HOP mass can also be detected from the stomach by following the CBD from the liver hilum. This technique is particularly useful in patients with gastric outlet obstruction preventing the passage of scope in the bulb, as well as in patients with surgically altered anatomy.
#
Examination of Bile Duct from the Duodenal Bulb
In the duodenal bulb, wedge the echoendoscope at the apex.[6] The echoendoscope will be in the long position with transducer facing posteriorly ([Fig. 4A–H]). PV is the homebase in the duodenal bulb. When MPV is visible, CBD is visualized anterior to the MPV. If the CBD is not visible, releasing pressure on the transducer by turning big wheal up (away from you) and instilling some water can help in visualizing the CBD, as normal CBD is often compressed by the transducer.[5] Occasionally, extreme clockwise rotation from the MPV may be required to visualize the CBD.
In the duodenal bulb suprapancreatic CBD, PV and CHA are seen stacked, presenting the reverse sequence of the image seen from the stomach ([Figs. 2G] and [4B]). Once suprapancreatic CBD is visible, it can be traced to the ampulla on clockwise rotation and to the liver hilum on anticlockwise rotation. On clockwise rotation intrapancreatic CBD, PD, PVC and HOP will be seen. On further clockwise rotation, superior mesenteric vessels will start appearing along with the HOP. On continuing clockwise rotation, the distal most part of intrapancreatic CBD, PD, posterior part of the pancreas head, inferior vena cava (IVC), right renal artery (RRA) and aorta become visible. IVC and RRA are sometime mistaken for MPV and CHA, respectively. To differentiate, the echoendoscope should be pulled and trace the MPV to the PVC, and vice versa ([Fig. 4B–G]). On further clockwise rotation from the distal intrapancreatic CBD, the ampulla becomes visible along with duodenal lumen.
From the ampulla, the entire CBD can be traced to the hilum on anticlockwise rotation ([Fig. 5A–H]). Along with anticlockwise rotation minimal withdrawal of scope is required in some cases (long patient) as the liver hilum is positioned higher up to the ampulla. On anticlockwise rotation, structures that were seen during clockwise rotations become visible. While tracing the CBD, cystic duct insertion can be seen. Additionally, the hepatic artery proper and gastroduodenal artery emerge from the CHA, forming an “arterial vascular seagull” can also be visualized.[14] Further anticlockwise rotation, division of the CHD into RHD and LHD will be seen, with the RHD runs closer to the transducer. The confluence is clearly visible when it is dilated. The division of CHD occurs in front of the right portal vein (RPV).[15] A part of the GB can also be visualized near the liver hilum on anticlockwise rotation.
Tracing a dilated CBD from the duodenal bulb is simple. Dilated CBD due to ampullary tumor was traced to the liver hilum on anticlockwise rotation ([Fig. 6A–H]). The dilated suprapancreatic CBD is seen in front of the PVC. As CBD is situated closer to the bulb, accessing it is easier for EUS-guided biliary drainage. If there are no intervening vessel and cystic duct insertion is not nearby, EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy can be performed with ease. EUS-guided rendezvous from the duodenal bulb is preferred over the intrahepatic route because the papilla is closely positioned, making guidewire maneuvering simpler.[12] [16]
On anticlockwise rotation, the junction of cystic duct with CBD appears as “flask” shape. On further anticlockwise rotation, the cystic duct becomes more visible, separated from the CHD. The confluence also begins to appear. At the confluence, RHD is seen closer to the transducer and running from right to the left of the image; however, LHD runs downwards. This can be a suitable site for EUS-guided hepaticoduodenostomy. On further anticlockwise rotation, the right sectoral ducts—right anterior sectoral duct and RPSD will be seen arising from the RHD. PV branches can be followed for segmental identification. On anticlockwise rotation without withdrawal, the RPV can be followed to the branching of right anterior and posterior veins. The right anterior vein further divides into segmental branches 5 and 8, and right posterior vein into segment 6 and 7. Following LPV from hilum left lobe can be visualized from the duodenal bulb.
#
Examination of Bile Duct from Duodenum Part 2
In the descending duodenum, echoendoscope should be shortened to achieve straight position with the transducer facing posteriorly.[5] [17] The aorta is the homebase in descending duodenum ([Fig. 7A–J]). In deep descending duodenum, the IVC and aorta are visualized. Start withdrawing the scope and rotate scope in clockwise rotation, first mesenteric vessels and then HOP with uncinate process will start appearing. Further withdraw and maintain clockwise torque to visualize the ampulla (usually hypoechoic) along with HOP. At the ampulla, release the big wheel and inject 50 to 100cc of water. Carefully inspect the ampulla for any lesions or stones. After ampulla examination, keep the big wheel down (toward you) to visualize the CBD and PD, this position of echoendoscope referred as “kissing the papilla position.” Often, both ducts are seen joining the ampulla. If either duct is not visible, slight maneuvering of scope is required to visualize them, such as anticlockwise rotation is required to see the CBD from the PD and clockwise rotation to see the PD from the CBD. Once the CBD is visible, gradually withdraw the echoendoscope while maintaining anticlockwise torque to trace the entire CBD from the ampulla to the hilum. Always keep the CBD in view while tracing. If it disappears, follow the HOP and mesenteric vessels to bring the CBD back into view. While withdrawing, the echoendoscope may slip back into the stomach, causing the CBD to disappear from view. When superior mesenteric vessels come into view, rotate the scope in anticlockwise direction to bring the CBD into view and begin withdrawing to trace it up to the liver hilum. While tracing the CBD, PVC, and IVC can also be seen. At liver hilum, division of PV into RPV and LPV becomes visible.
Ampullary lesions are best visualized from duodenum part 2. A small ampullary tumor can be seen after distending the duodenum with 50 to 100cc of water. In this case, a small ampullary tumor was causing dilatation of the CBD and PD. A dilated CBD was traced from the ampulla to the left liver segment from duodenum part 2 by maintaining anticlockwise torque and gradually withdrawing the echoendoscope ([Fig. 8A–H]).
#
#
Gallbladder
The GB is a balloon-shaped, halo organ appears anechoic on EUS. GB has 3 parts: the fundus, body, and neck.[18] A Hartmann's pouch is an outpouching of the GB wall at the junction of the neck. It is a frequent but inconstant feature of normal and pathologic human GB.[19]
Examination of the GB is typically performed from the antrum and duodenal bulb. However, it can also be visualized from the mid-body of stomach and the descending duodenum. The interesting aspect of GB examination is that it frequently appears in view when it is not intended focus, and it can be challenging to visualize when it is intended.
#
Examination of the Gallbladder from the Duodenal Bulb
While tracing the CBD, locate the cystic duct. Once the cystic duct is visible, visualizing the GB is easy. The cystic duct appears as a spiral, corrugated, anechoic tube due to valves of Heister. The cystic duct insertion with CBD can vary and it can be right lateral (commonest), medial, proximal, low medial, and parallel insertion with common sheath ([Fig. 9A–C]).[13] Low insertion of cystic duct is considered when it joins with the CBD in the HOP, which is observed in 10% of the population.[13] Knowledge of the cystic duct insertion location is vital for choosing self-expandable metallic stents and the route of EUS-guided biliary drainage.
Once the cystic duct is visualized, maintain clockwise (without any rotation) torque and gradually withdraw echoendoscope to visualize the GB. ([Fig. 9D]–[F]). Scan the whole GB until it is no longer visible. Tracing the GB following the cystic duct visualization is advantageous, as it ensures that any pathology in the cystic duct or the neck, such as stones or malignancies, is not overlooked.
Examining the GB from the duodenal bulb reveals an image opposite to that seen from the stomach ([Fig. 10A–F]). A complete examination of the GB should be performed from all stations, as small stones or lesions in the fundus may be missed without a thorough examination.
#
Examination of the Gallbladder from the Antrum
Examination of the GB from the antrum is easy when it is distended. Occasionally, it can be challenging to visualize the GB when it is contracted or intrahepatic. In such cases tracing, the cystic duct can help in the GB visualization.
The GB can also be visualized from the mid-body of stomach while tracing the CBD from the liver hilum ([Fig. 2F] and [G]). In the descending duodenum, on slight anticlockwise rotation from the aorta and IVC, the GB may become visible. In descending duodenum, on anticlockwise rotation structures right to the IVC like right kidney and GB, and on clockwise rotation structure left to the IVC, that is, aorta and pancreas can be visualized.
EUS-guided GB drainage can be performed from the antrum or duodenal bulb by puncturing body region of the GB and placing a lumen apposing metal stent or tubular stent.[20] Adequately distended GBs are easier to drain than minimally distended GB ([Fig. 9E]).
#
Conclusions
Linear EUS examination of biliary tract is feasible and effective following the station wise approach. A deep understanding of biliary anatomy, stations, and the required maneuvers is essential for a thorough examination of the biliary system from various stations. Practicing BD examination from all stations should be a routine part of every EUS examination. Mastering biliary anatomy with linear EUS will definitely aid in executing EUS-guided biliary drainage procedures.
#
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
-
References
- 1 Safari MT, Miri MB, Ebadi S, Shahrokh S, Mohammad Alizadeh AH. Comparing the roles of EUS, ERCP and MRCP in idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol 2016; 9: 35-39
- 2 Jagtap N, Kumar JK, Chavan R. et al. EUS versus MRCP to perform ERCP in patients with intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2022:gutjnl-2021-325080
- 3 Hawes Rh, Fockens P, Varadarajulu S. . In: Hawes RH, Fockens P, Varadarajulu S. (eds). Endosonography. Fourth Edition. Elsevier:; Philadelphia: 2019: 129-39.e2
- 4 Gupta K. Bile Duct: Radial and Linear. Atlas of Endoscopic Ultrasonography, 2011: 21-23
- 5 Chavan R, Rajput S. Pictorial essay of linear endoscopic ultrasound examination of pancreas anatomy. J Dig Endosc 2023; 14: 88-98
- 6 Sharma M, Pathak A, Shoukat A. et al. Imaging of common bile duct by linear endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7 (15) 1170-1180
- 7 Ligresti D, Kuo YT, Baraldo S. et al. EUS anatomy of the pancreatobiliary system in a swine model: the WISE experience. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8 (04) 249-254
- 8 Omoto S, Takenaka M, Maluf-Filho F, Kudo M. A novel and effective EUS training program that enables visualization of the learning curve: educational Program of Kindai system (EPOK). VideoGIE 2022; 7 (05) 165-168
- 9 Sharma M, Rameshbabu CS, Dietrich CF, Rai P, Bansal R. Endoscopic ultrasound of the hepatoduodenal ligament and liver hilum. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7 (03) 168-174
- 10 Bhatia V, Hijioka S, Hara K, Mizuno N, Imaoka H, Yamao K. Endoscopic ultrasound description of liver segmentation and anatomy. Dig Endosc 2014; 26 (03) 482-490
- 11 Dhir V, Adler DG, Pausawasdi N, Maydeo A, Ho KY. Feasibility of a complete pancreatobiliary linear endoscopic ultrasound examination from the stomach. Endoscopy 2018; 50 (01) 22-32
- 12 Samanta J, Udawat P, Chowdhary SD. et al. Society of gastrointestinal endoscopy of India consensus guidelines on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: part II (technical aspects). J Digest Endosc 2023; 14: 74-87
- 13 Sureka B, Bansal K, Patidar Y, Arora A. Magnetic resonance cholangiographic evaluation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct variations. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26 (01) 22-32
- 14 Pathak A, Shoukat A, Thomas NS, Mehta D, Sharma M. Seagulls of endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6 (04) 231-234
- 15 Ramesh Babu CS, Sharma M. Biliary tract anatomy and its relationship with venous drainage. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2014; 4 (Suppl. 01) S18-S26
- 16 Rai P, Udawat P, Chowdhary SD. et al. Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India Consensus Guidelines on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: part I (indications, outcomes, comparative evaluations, training). J Dig Endosc 2023; 14: 30-40
- 17 Committee E-FS, Yamao K, Irisawa A. et al. Standard imaging techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using a curved linear array echoendoscope. Dig Endosc 2007; 19: S180-S205
- 18 Sharma M, Somani P, Sunkara T. Imaging of gall bladder by endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10 (01) 10-15
- 19 van Eijck FC, van Veen RN, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF. Hartmann's gallbladder pouch revisited 60 years later. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (07) 1122-1125
- 20 James TW, Baron TH. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: A review of current practices and procedures. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8 (Suppl. 01) S28-S34
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
06 December 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Safari MT, Miri MB, Ebadi S, Shahrokh S, Mohammad Alizadeh AH. Comparing the roles of EUS, ERCP and MRCP in idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis. Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol 2016; 9: 35-39
- 2 Jagtap N, Kumar JK, Chavan R. et al. EUS versus MRCP to perform ERCP in patients with intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2022:gutjnl-2021-325080
- 3 Hawes Rh, Fockens P, Varadarajulu S. . In: Hawes RH, Fockens P, Varadarajulu S. (eds). Endosonography. Fourth Edition. Elsevier:; Philadelphia: 2019: 129-39.e2
- 4 Gupta K. Bile Duct: Radial and Linear. Atlas of Endoscopic Ultrasonography, 2011: 21-23
- 5 Chavan R, Rajput S. Pictorial essay of linear endoscopic ultrasound examination of pancreas anatomy. J Dig Endosc 2023; 14: 88-98
- 6 Sharma M, Pathak A, Shoukat A. et al. Imaging of common bile duct by linear endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7 (15) 1170-1180
- 7 Ligresti D, Kuo YT, Baraldo S. et al. EUS anatomy of the pancreatobiliary system in a swine model: the WISE experience. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8 (04) 249-254
- 8 Omoto S, Takenaka M, Maluf-Filho F, Kudo M. A novel and effective EUS training program that enables visualization of the learning curve: educational Program of Kindai system (EPOK). VideoGIE 2022; 7 (05) 165-168
- 9 Sharma M, Rameshbabu CS, Dietrich CF, Rai P, Bansal R. Endoscopic ultrasound of the hepatoduodenal ligament and liver hilum. Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7 (03) 168-174
- 10 Bhatia V, Hijioka S, Hara K, Mizuno N, Imaoka H, Yamao K. Endoscopic ultrasound description of liver segmentation and anatomy. Dig Endosc 2014; 26 (03) 482-490
- 11 Dhir V, Adler DG, Pausawasdi N, Maydeo A, Ho KY. Feasibility of a complete pancreatobiliary linear endoscopic ultrasound examination from the stomach. Endoscopy 2018; 50 (01) 22-32
- 12 Samanta J, Udawat P, Chowdhary SD. et al. Society of gastrointestinal endoscopy of India consensus guidelines on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: part II (technical aspects). J Digest Endosc 2023; 14: 74-87
- 13 Sureka B, Bansal K, Patidar Y, Arora A. Magnetic resonance cholangiographic evaluation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct variations. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26 (01) 22-32
- 14 Pathak A, Shoukat A, Thomas NS, Mehta D, Sharma M. Seagulls of endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6 (04) 231-234
- 15 Ramesh Babu CS, Sharma M. Biliary tract anatomy and its relationship with venous drainage. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2014; 4 (Suppl. 01) S18-S26
- 16 Rai P, Udawat P, Chowdhary SD. et al. Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India Consensus Guidelines on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: part I (indications, outcomes, comparative evaluations, training). J Dig Endosc 2023; 14: 30-40
- 17 Committee E-FS, Yamao K, Irisawa A. et al. Standard imaging techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using a curved linear array echoendoscope. Dig Endosc 2007; 19: S180-S205
- 18 Sharma M, Somani P, Sunkara T. Imaging of gall bladder by endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10 (01) 10-15
- 19 van Eijck FC, van Veen RN, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF. Hartmann's gallbladder pouch revisited 60 years later. Surg Endosc 2007; 21 (07) 1122-1125
- 20 James TW, Baron TH. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: A review of current practices and procedures. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8 (Suppl. 01) S28-S34