CC BY 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2024; 21(02): 151-155
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777680
Original Article

Neglected Cervical Facet Dislocation without Neurological Deficit: A Simple Solution to a Complex Problem—A Case Series and Review

Vishal Kumar
1   Department Of Orthopedics Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
,
1   Department Of Orthopedics Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
,
Sarvdeep Singh Dhatt
1   Department Of Orthopedics Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Cervical facet dislocation is a disastrous injury. Delayed presentation is not uncommon owing to various reasons in developing countries. Autofusion and a halt in progression are seen in spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Conservative treatment with close observation can be offered to the carefully selected patients with neglected cervical facet dislocations with intact neurology, as the injury is stable after autofusion. We registered eight male patients with cervical facet dislocation with delayed presentation for various reasons. Dynamic radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were done to rule out any instability, cord compression, or bony fusion. Patients were followed up for 6 months clinically and radiologically. A total of eight patients presented with cervical facet dislocation, with a mean delay in presentation of 33 weeks (range: 14–54 weeks). Postinjury, all the patients were neurologically intact, with the only complaint of cervical pain at presentation. Dynamic radiographs did not show any instability. No cord compression or changes were noted on the MRI. Conservative management was advised for all eight patients. A subsequent follow-up CT scan demonstrated bony fusion at the dislocated facets in three of these patients. All the patients remained neurologically intact, with no further progression of the deformity. Surgical management is the mainstay of treatment for neglected facet dislocations. A combined approach has been advocated in most of the studies for proper reduction and alignment in these cases, which is quite extensive and has its own morbidity. A trial of conservative treatment can be offered to selected patients with intact neurology.


#

Introduction

Bilateral facet dislocation in the subaxial spine is a flexion distraction injury that usually culminates in weakness of the limbs and respiratory distress.[1] In acute injuries, closed or open reduction and spinal fixation are routinely advocated treatments.[2] But in in third-world countries, neglected spinal injuries are not uncommon owing to the lack of facilities, delayed diagnosis, and poor socioeconomic status.[3] Patients presenting after 3 to 8 weeks of injury are considered delayed or neglected facet dislocation.[4] Previous studies have advocated surgical management in view of developing neurological deficits and progressive deformity over time.[5] [6] [7] Although spontaneous fusion is documented in spondylolisthesis in the lumbar spine, there are not many studies suggesting the same in the cervical spine. We present our experience of eight cases of neglected cervical facet dislocation with no neurological deficit and managed conservatively with careful observation.


#

Materials and Methods

We registered patients with cervical facet dislocation from June 2021 to May 2022 who presented to us after more than 3 weeks of initial trauma. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. All radiological investigations done and treatments received were reviewed. A thorough clinical examination was carried out on all patients.

On presentation, all patients had dynamic cervical radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to rule out cervical instability and cord compression. CT scan was assessed for cervical fusion. All the patients had residual axial cervical pain at presentation. After a thorough clinical and radiological assessment, all the patients were put on anti-inflammatory medications and physiotherapy. Patients were counseled regarding the need for surgical management based on their worsening deformity or neurology. All the patients were followed up for 6 months after their initial presentation to us for worsening symptoms or progression of deformity.


#

Results

We registered in total eight male patients with neglected cervical facet dislocation in this study. The mode of injury was a fall from height in six cases and a road traffic accident in two cases. All the patients had intact neurology at the time of injury and had only cervical pain. Low suspicion of injury and delayed presentation to the health care facility were the main factors of the missed injury. The mean delay in presentation was 33 weeks (range: 14–54 weeks). All the patients presented with cervical pain. The neurological examination was unremarkable. The cervical spine range of motion was within normal limits in all patients ([Fig. 1]). Dynamic X-rays, a CT scan, and an MRI were done to detect any instability, bony fusion, or cord compression. No instability or cord compression was noticed in any patient on dynamic radiographs and MRI ([Fig. 2]). Bony fusion was evident in three patients on CT scan ([Fig. 3]). Patients were managed conservatively and explained the need for surgical intervention if deformity increased or any neurological compromise developed. Patients were followed for 6 months. At the final follow-up, all the patients had decreased cervical pain. We did not notice any significant increase in the kyphotic deformity or the development of any neurological deficit on follow-up.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 A 40-year-old man with C4–C5 facet dislocation after 3 months of injury with normal cervical range of motion.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the same patient depicting no significant cervical cord compression at C4–C5.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Computed tomography (CT) scan imaging at final follow-up with no instability and bony fusion at C4–C5.

#

Discussion

Cervical facet dislocation is a very disastrous injury, often resulting in quadriplegia. A delayed presentation of cervical facet dislocation is not uncommon, especially if it is not associated with a neurological deficit. Bohlman noted that one-third of cervical spine injuries are not recognized initially. Lack of infrastructure and skilled spine surgeons contributes to this burden further.[8] Poor health infrastructure, lack of proper radiology, and low suspicion are the most important factors for the missed cervical facet dislocation injuries.[9] [10] Closed reduction with surgical stabilization is the established treatment protocol for acute injuries. Early decompression and fixation offer the best chance of neurological recovery and rehabilitation.[11] [12] The management of cervical facet dislocations presenting more than 3 weeks after the initial trauma is uncertain and complicated. Surgical management is further complicated by the choice and sequence of approaches.[13] [14] [15] [16] [17] Here we have reviewed published literature on both surgical ([Table 1]) and nonsurgical ([Table 2]) management of neglected cervical facet dislocations.

Table 1

Published studies on surgical management of neglected cervical facet dislocation

Study

N

Delay in diagnosis

Preoperative neurological deficit

Approach

Outcome

Bartels and Donk[14]

3

3 mo

Present

Posterior-anterior-posterior release and fusion

Anterior-posterior-anterior release and fusion

Neurological improvement

Hassan[16]

3.5 mo

Absent

Posterior + anterior release and fusion

Neurological improvement + bony fusion

Payer and Tessitore[10]

1

2.5 mo

Absent

Anterior-posterior-anterior

Bony fusion

Rajasekaran et al[6]

1

2 mo

Present

Closed traction + posterior fixation

Neurological improvement + bony fusion

Goni et al[7]

6

8.5 wk

Absent

Closed traction + posterior + anterior fixation

Neurological deterioration in one patient

Basu et al[5]

19

21 d

Present

Preoperative traction + anterior/posterior fusion

Neurological recovery

Srivastava et al[24]

1

14 mo

Absent

Posterior-anterior-posterior release and fusion

Bony fusion

Farooque et al[15]

2

4 mo

Absent

Anterior-posterior-anterior

Prabhat et al[12]

15

63 d

Present

Closed reduction + ACDF/posterior anterior

Neurological recovery

Table 2

Studies with nonoperative management and their outcome in neglected cervical facet dislocation

Study

N

Delay in diagnosis

Management

Outcome

Shah et al[21]

2

> 2 y

Physiotherapy

Bony fusion; no neurological worsening

Bodman and Chin[22]

1

1 y

Oral medications

Bony fusion; no neurological worsening

Sulla and Mach[23]

1

4 wk

Oral medications

Bony fusion; no neurological worsening

Many published studies emphasized surgical intervention in neglected facet dislocations due to the imminent risk of deformity progression and development of neurological deficit. Although the choice of approach and use of initial closed reduction are debatable, most of the authors have stressed the need for both anterior and posterior approaches for alignment and stabilization.[18] The extensive combined approach increases the duration of the surgery, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and risk of neurological injury. A high rate of dysphagia has been seen in the combined anterior and posterior approaches.[19]

A halt in progression is seen in the natural history of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, thus ruling out the need for surgery in many cases.[20] Fibrosis and bony fusion around facet joints, vertebral bodies, and uncovertebral joints have also been found in neglected cervical facet dislocations.[17] Shah et al reported two cases with delayed presentation of cervical facet dislocation and observed autostabilization without any progression of deformity.[21] Bodman and Chin and Sulla and Mach made similar observations.[22] [23] They concluded that once healed, these injuries are stable without surgical intervention. In this study, we managed eight patients who presented late after cervical facet dislocation with careful observation, anti-inflammatory medication, and physiotherapy. Although we informed the patient that surgery would be necessary if their neurology got worse or the deformity progressed, we never saw any of these in any of our patients. At the last follow-up, bony fusion was visible in three patients.


#

Conclusion

Although surgical intervention is strongly indicated in delayed cervical facet dislocations, keeping in view the risks of instability and late progression of the deformity, a trial of conservative management with closed observation can be given in carefully selected patients with intact neurology. Many of these patients develop autofusion and stabilization over the course of time, with no further increase in kyphosis.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Patients' Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the participants and attached to their case file. Patients who did not wish to give informed consent were not included in this study.


Authors' Contributions

VK and SD analyzed and interpreted the patient data. AR and VK drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


  • References

  • 1 Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR. NEXUS Group. Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38 (01) 17-21
  • 2 Mubark I, Abouelela A, Hassan M, Genena A, Ashwood N. Sub-axial cervical facet dislocation: a review of current concepts. Cureus 2021; 13 (01) e12581
  • 3 Sengupta DK. Neglected spinal injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 431 (431) 93-103
  • 4 Roy-Camille R, Berteaux D, Saillant G. Fractures instables du rachis. Les Méthodes Chirurgicales. Synthèse du rachis dorso-lombaire traumatique par plaques vissées Dans Les pédicules Vertébraux. Rev Chir Orthoped Traumatol 2014; 100 (01) 22-24
  • 5 Basu S, Malik FH, Ghosh JD, Tikoo A. Delayed presentation of cervical facet dislocations. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011; 19 (03) 331-335
  • 6 Rajasekaran S, Subbiah M, Shetty AP. Computer navigation assisted fixation in neglected C2-C3 dislocation in an adult. Indian J Orthop 2011; 45 (05) 465-469
  • 7 Goni V, Gopinathan NR, Krishnan V, Kumar R, Kumar A. Management of neglected cervical spine dislocation: a study of six cases. Chin J Traumatol 2013; 16 (04) 212-215
  • 8 Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61 (08) 1119-1142
  • 9 Gerrelts BD, Petersen EU, Mabry J, Petersen SR. Delayed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1991; 31 (12) 1622-1626
  • 10 Payer M, Tessitore E. Delayed surgical management of a traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation by an anterior-posterior-anterior approach. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14 (08) 782-786
  • 11 Greg Anderson D, Voets C, Ropiak R. et al. Analysis of patient variables affecting neurologic outcome after traumatic cervical facet dislocation. Spine J 2004; 4 (05) 506-512
  • 12 Prabhat V, Boruah T, Lal H, Kumar R, Dagar A, Sahu H. Management of post-traumatic neglected cervical facet dislocation. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (02) 125-130
  • 13 Liu P, Zhao J, Liu F, Liu M, Fan W. A novel operative approach for the treatment of old distractive flexion injuries of subaxial cervical spine. Spine 2008; 33 (13) 1459-1464
  • 14 Bartels RH, Donk R. Delayed management of traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation: surgical strategy. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (3, suppl): 362-365
  • 15 Farooque K, Khatri K, Gupta B, Sharma V. Management of neglected traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocations without neurological deficit. Trauma Mon 2015; 20 (03) e18385
  • 16 Hassan MG. Treatment of old dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Int Orthop 2002; 26 (05) 263-267
  • 17 Jain AK, Dhammi IK, Singh AP, Mishra P. Neglected traumatic dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (02) 246-249
  • 18 Jain M, Khuntia S, Rao BP. Neglected bilateral facet dislocation of the cervical spine with intact neurology: reduction technique. Asian J Neurosurg 2020; 15 (03) 773-776
  • 19 Reinard KA, Cook DM, Zakaria HM, Basheer AM, Chang VW, Abdulhak MM. A cohort study of the morbidity of combined anterior-posterior cervical spinal fusions: incidence and predictors of postoperative dysphagia. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (07) 2068-2077
  • 20 Beutler WJ, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A, Sweeney CA, Grant WD, Baker D. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine 2003; 28 (10) 1027-1035 , discussion 1035
  • 21 Shah K, Gadiya A, Nene A. Autostabilization of neglected high-grade fracture-dislocation in the cervical spine. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2018; 9 (04) 274-276
  • 22 Bodman A, Chin L. Bony fusion in a chronic cervical bilateral facet dislocation. Am J Case Rep 2015; 16: 104-108
  • 23 Sulla I, Mach P. A patient with spontaneous healing of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the cervical vertebrae. Rozhl Chir 2001; 80 (04) 217-219
  • 24 Srivastava A, Soh RC, Ee GW, Tan SB, Tow BP. Management of the neglected and healed bilateral cervical facet dislocation. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (08) 1612-1616

Address for correspondence

Ankit Rai, MBBS, MS
Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh 160012
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
31 January 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR. NEXUS Group. Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38 (01) 17-21
  • 2 Mubark I, Abouelela A, Hassan M, Genena A, Ashwood N. Sub-axial cervical facet dislocation: a review of current concepts. Cureus 2021; 13 (01) e12581
  • 3 Sengupta DK. Neglected spinal injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 431 (431) 93-103
  • 4 Roy-Camille R, Berteaux D, Saillant G. Fractures instables du rachis. Les Méthodes Chirurgicales. Synthèse du rachis dorso-lombaire traumatique par plaques vissées Dans Les pédicules Vertébraux. Rev Chir Orthoped Traumatol 2014; 100 (01) 22-24
  • 5 Basu S, Malik FH, Ghosh JD, Tikoo A. Delayed presentation of cervical facet dislocations. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011; 19 (03) 331-335
  • 6 Rajasekaran S, Subbiah M, Shetty AP. Computer navigation assisted fixation in neglected C2-C3 dislocation in an adult. Indian J Orthop 2011; 45 (05) 465-469
  • 7 Goni V, Gopinathan NR, Krishnan V, Kumar R, Kumar A. Management of neglected cervical spine dislocation: a study of six cases. Chin J Traumatol 2013; 16 (04) 212-215
  • 8 Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61 (08) 1119-1142
  • 9 Gerrelts BD, Petersen EU, Mabry J, Petersen SR. Delayed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1991; 31 (12) 1622-1626
  • 10 Payer M, Tessitore E. Delayed surgical management of a traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation by an anterior-posterior-anterior approach. J Clin Neurosci 2007; 14 (08) 782-786
  • 11 Greg Anderson D, Voets C, Ropiak R. et al. Analysis of patient variables affecting neurologic outcome after traumatic cervical facet dislocation. Spine J 2004; 4 (05) 506-512
  • 12 Prabhat V, Boruah T, Lal H, Kumar R, Dagar A, Sahu H. Management of post-traumatic neglected cervical facet dislocation. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017; 8 (02) 125-130
  • 13 Liu P, Zhao J, Liu F, Liu M, Fan W. A novel operative approach for the treatment of old distractive flexion injuries of subaxial cervical spine. Spine 2008; 33 (13) 1459-1464
  • 14 Bartels RH, Donk R. Delayed management of traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocation: surgical strategy. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (3, suppl): 362-365
  • 15 Farooque K, Khatri K, Gupta B, Sharma V. Management of neglected traumatic bilateral cervical facet dislocations without neurological deficit. Trauma Mon 2015; 20 (03) e18385
  • 16 Hassan MG. Treatment of old dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Int Orthop 2002; 26 (05) 263-267
  • 17 Jain AK, Dhammi IK, Singh AP, Mishra P. Neglected traumatic dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (02) 246-249
  • 18 Jain M, Khuntia S, Rao BP. Neglected bilateral facet dislocation of the cervical spine with intact neurology: reduction technique. Asian J Neurosurg 2020; 15 (03) 773-776
  • 19 Reinard KA, Cook DM, Zakaria HM, Basheer AM, Chang VW, Abdulhak MM. A cohort study of the morbidity of combined anterior-posterior cervical spinal fusions: incidence and predictors of postoperative dysphagia. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (07) 2068-2077
  • 20 Beutler WJ, Fredrickson BE, Murtland A, Sweeney CA, Grant WD, Baker D. The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: 45-year follow-up evaluation. Spine 2003; 28 (10) 1027-1035 , discussion 1035
  • 21 Shah K, Gadiya A, Nene A. Autostabilization of neglected high-grade fracture-dislocation in the cervical spine. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2018; 9 (04) 274-276
  • 22 Bodman A, Chin L. Bony fusion in a chronic cervical bilateral facet dislocation. Am J Case Rep 2015; 16: 104-108
  • 23 Sulla I, Mach P. A patient with spontaneous healing of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the cervical vertebrae. Rozhl Chir 2001; 80 (04) 217-219
  • 24 Srivastava A, Soh RC, Ee GW, Tan SB, Tow BP. Management of the neglected and healed bilateral cervical facet dislocation. Eur Spine J 2014; 23 (08) 1612-1616

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 A 40-year-old man with C4–C5 facet dislocation after 3 months of injury with normal cervical range of motion.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the same patient depicting no significant cervical cord compression at C4–C5.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Computed tomography (CT) scan imaging at final follow-up with no instability and bony fusion at C4–C5.