Keywords
split ALT - donor site - trunk reconstruction
Introduction
Anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap is one of the most utilized flaps by modern day plastic surgeons. Its reliability and ability to incorporate large amount of tissue in the flap makes it the flap of choice for reconstruction of almost all areas of human body. Though it is desirable to close the flap donor site primarily, it becomes difficult when flap width exceeds 7.5 to 8 cm. In this case we used a technique wherein a 16 × 14 cm2 defect was covered and primary closure of the donor site was achieved. The elliptical-shaped flap was geometrically split into two triangles based on perforators to fit into the round defect.
Discussion
After initial description of anatomy by Song et al[1] in 1984, ALT perforator flap has been used as a workhorse flap by most of modern day plastic surgeons. Being a very reliable and versatile flap, this flap is used to cover defects in the head and neck, trunk, and extremity reconstruction frequently. Though the flap donor site is frequently closed primarily, it is difficult whenever a flap wider than 6 to 9 cm is planned. Boca et al[2] suggested that a flap width to thigh circumference ratio should be less than or equal to 16% for achieving primary donor site closure. However, it also depends on the patient's body mass index, age, and sex. Failure to achieve primary closure of donor site adds greatly to morbidity both in terms of functional and aesthetic outcome. Kimata et al[3] reported that patients who underwent primary donor site closure could perform activities of daily life normally; 87.5% of patients were satisfied with their donor site aesthetic results and only 3.1% had limited range of motion at the hip and knee. Whereas limited range of motion at the hip and knee was found in 60% of patients where donor site was skin grafted.[3] Mureau et al reported cold intolerance to be more common in skin grafted patients.[4] In summary, achieving primary closure avoids a lot of donor site morbidity in these patients.
To achieve this even on the face of wide defects, many authors have planned to split the flap on its perforators. Initial description is found in sporadic cases where such technique was used to cover rectangular and oval defects.[5]
[6] Zhang et al[7] in 2016 have described the so-called “kiss” technique to harvest multiple skin paddles (smaller than those harvested with traditional techniques), and then rearrange them side-by-side at the recipient siteto exactly match the size of a large defect. Xiong et al[8] have used this technique for reconstructing a large oncological scalp defect. Chang et al[9] in their case series have described 31 such cases from 2002 to 2010 which includes triangular-, arrow-, and hourglass-shaped defects. Scaglioni et al[10] reported a case of split ALT flap covering a 16-cm wide defect in upper posterior thigh in 2018. We have also used similar principle in our case, wherein an oblong-shaped defect has been simulated as two triangular defects and covered by splitting the ALT flap on two perforators, achieving primary closure of the donor thigh ([Fig. 6]). The key points to be concerned are the presence, location, and size of the perforators which are of utmost importance for execution of this plan.
Conclusion
ALT flap is a versatile flap able to cover all types of defects. If properly planned, even large round or oblong defects can be covered with elliptical flap and donor site morbidity can be significantly reduced by closing it primarily.
