An Applied Model of Interprofessional Collaboration—Assessment (AMIC–A): A Process-Based Approach to Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists and board-certified behavior analysts both provide important support services to children who are candidates for augmentative and alternative communication. Current assessment practices neglect critical socioecological factors that are necessary to inform communication-based interventions. By leveraging the unique knowledge, research, and expertise of both disciplines, an interprofessional approach to assessment may help realize individualized or precision interventions and personalized supports that address the unique communication needs of each person. The purpose of this article is to introduce a process-based approach to assessment called the “Applied Model of Interprofessional Collaboration—Assessment (AMIC–A).” The AMIC–A will be defined and detailed including the rationale for development, a description of the approach, and recommendations for implementation. A case study example is provided to illustrate implementation of the AMIC–A.

Keywords

augmentative and alternative communication - interprofessional collaboration - AAC assessment

Conflict of Interest

As a part of their job role, several authors engage in frequent lectures, presentations, and consultations relating to AAC and collaboration.

¹ For the purposes of this article, “early communicator” is intended to refer to the spectrum of individuals who are learning to communicate for the first time and considered candidates for AAC. Authors acknowledge other labels that are used in the extant literature including, but not limited to, individuals with complex communication needs, emergent communicators, and pre-symbolic communicators.

Publication History

Article published online:
01 July 2024

• References

• Allen, K. D., & Warzak, W. J. (2000). The problem of parental nonadherence in clinical behavior analysis: effective treatment is not enough. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(3), 373–391
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2023). Code of ethics. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://www.asha.org/policy/
• Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://bacb.com/wp-content/ethics-code-for-behavior-analysts/
• Beukelman, D., Bornman, J., & Light, J. (2016). Reflections from fellows of ISAAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 233–240
• Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2020). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Brookes Publishing Company
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative & alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults. Brookes Publishing Company
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Brookes Publishing Company
• Brodhead, M. T. (2015). Maintaining professional relationships in an interdisciplinary setting: strategies for navigating nonbehavioral treatment recommendations for individuals with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(1), 70–78
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: a bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568–586
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In: W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Wiley
• Bruinsma, Y., Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2004). Joint attention and children with autism: a review of the literature. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10, 169–175
• Burches, E., & Burches, M. (2020). Efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency in the health care: the need for an agreement to clarify its meaning. International Archives of Public Health and Community Medicine, 4, 035
• Erickson, K., & Quick, N. (2017). The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and known hearing loss. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(1), 35–48
• Garbacz, S. A., Kaul, M., Zahn, M., Godfrey, E., & Flack, C. (2022). Examining conjoint behavioral consultation to support students in middle school with social, emotional, and behavior concerns. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2022(183-184), 71–90
• Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Kuhn, M., Mills, K., Ferguson, R., Watkins, L., Sigafoos, J., Lang, R., Rojeski, L., & Lancioni, G. E. (2016). Increasing the vocalizations of individuals with autism during intervention with a speech-generating device. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.270
• Gerenser, J. E., & Koenig, M. A. (2019). ABA for SLPs: Interprofessional collaboration for autism support teams. [eTextbook]. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://www.etextbooksforstudents.org/item/133
• Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2007). Verbal Behavior Analysis: Inducing and Expanding New Verbal Capabilities in Children with Language Delays. Pearson
• Greer, R. D. (2002). Designing Teaching Strategies: An Applied Behavior Analysis Systems Approach. Academic Press
• Gutié Rrez-Clellen, V. F., & Peña, E. (2001). Dynamic assessment of diverse children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32(4), 212–224
• Hahn, H. (1986). Public support for rehabilitation programs: the analysis of U.S. disability policy. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1(2), 121–137
• Harms, G. (2020). The role of joint attention in the verbal behavior development trajectory. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University
• Hailemariam, M., Bustos, T., Montgomery, B., Barajas, R., Evans, L. B., & Drahota, A. (2019). Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 14(1), 57
• Hsieh, H. H., Wilder, D. A., & Abellon, O. E. (2011). The effects of training on caregiver implementation of incidental teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(1), 199–203
• Huntington, R. N., Badgett, N. M., Rosenberg, N. E., Greeny, K., Bravo, A., Bristol, R. M., Byun, Y. H., & Park, M. S. (2022). Social validity in behavioral research: a selective review. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 46(1), 201–215
• Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://hsc.unm.edu/ipe/resources/ipec-2016-core-competencies.pdf
• Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2023). IPEC core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Version 3. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
• Kasper, T., Slim, L., & Reuter-Yuill, L. (2024). Buckle up! Steering towards effective SLP collaboration. Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI), Verbal Behavior Matters Blog; March 6, 2024
• Light, J., Barwise, A., Gardner, A. M., & Flynn, M. (2021). Personalized early AAC intervention to build language and literacy skills: A case study of a 3-year-old with complex communication needs. Topics in Language Disorders, 41, 209–231.
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 85–96
• Millar, D. C., Light, J. C., & Schlosser, R. W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 49(2), 248–264
• Moorcroft, A., Scarinci, N., & Meyer, C. (2019). A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 14(7), 710–731
• Muller, K., Brady, N. C., Fleming, K. K., & Matthews, K. (2020). Communication assessment for individuals with minimal verbal skills: a survey of current practices and satisfaction. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(4), 1997–2011
• Newhouse-Oisten, M. K., Peck, K. M., Conway, A. A., & Frieder, J. E. (2017). Ethical considerations for interdisciplinary collaboration with prescribing professionals. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(2), 145–153
• Olkin, R. (2022). Conceptualizing disability: Three models of disability. American Psychological Association. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://apa.org
• Orellana, C. I., Wada, R., & Gillam, R. B. (2019). The use of dynamic assessment for the diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1298–1317
• Ouyang, Y., Feng, J., Wang, T., Xue, Y., Mohamed, Z. A., & Jia, F. (2024). Comparison of the efficacy of parent-mediated NDBIs on developmental skills in children with ASD and fidelity in parents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Pediatrics, 24(1), 270
• Peña, E. (n.d.-a). Module 1: What is dynamic Assessment? Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://asha.org/practice/multicultural /dynamic-assessment/module-1/
• Peña, E. D., Gillam, R. B., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C., & Sabel, T. (2006). Dynamic assessment of school-age children's narrative ability: An experimental investigation of classification accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 49(5), 1037–1057
• Peters, Betts; Wiedrick, Jack; Baylor, Carolyn (2023). AAC and communicative participation for PALS (Peters et al., 2023). ASHA journals. Online resource. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22782986.v1
• Petersen, D. B., Chanthongthip, H., Ukrainetz, T. A., Spencer, T. D., & Steeve, R. W. (2017). Dynamic assessment of narratives: efficient, accurate identification of language impairment in bilingual students. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 60(4), 983–998
• Schreibman, L., Dawson, G., Stahmer, A. C., Landa, R., Rogers, S. J., McGee, G. G., Kasari, C., Ingersoll, B., Kaiser, A. P., Bruinsma, Y., McNerney, E., Wetherby, A., & Halladay, A. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(8), 2411–2428
• Shapiro, M., & Kazemi, E. (2017). A review of training strategies to teach individuals implementation of behavioral interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(1), 32–62
• Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., & Doll, B. (2006). An examination of the efficacy of conjoint behavioral consultation with diverse clients. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 396–417
• Sheridan, S. M., Holmes, S. R., Coutts, M. J., Smith, T. E., Kunz, G. M., & Witte, A. L. (2013). CBC in rural schools: Preliminary results of a randomized trial (CYFS Working Paper No. 2013-1). Retrieved from the Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools website: cyfs.unl.edu
• Sheridan, S. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2007). Conjoint behavioral consultation: Promoting family-school connections and interventions (2nd ed.). Springer
• Sheridan, S. M., Clarke, B. L., & Burt, J. D. (2008). Conjoint behavioral consultation: What do we know and what do we need to know? In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of Research in School Consultation: Empirical Foundations for The Field. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
• Sheridan, S. M., Holmes, S. R., Coutts, M. J., & Smith, T. E. (2012). Preliminary effects of conjoint behavioral consultation in rural communities (CYFS Working Paper No. 2012–8). Retrieved from the Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools website. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://cyfs.unl.edu
• Sievers, S. B., Trembath, D., & Westerveld, M. (2018). A systematic review of predictors, moderators, and mediators of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(3), 219–229
• Slim, L., & Reuter-Yuill, L. M. (2021). A behavior-analytic perspective on interprofessional collaboration. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4), 1238–1248.
• Slim, L., & Strömberg, D. (in press, 2025). Considerations for enhancing SLP and ABA practices. In: S. Halder, H-T. Wang, & K. Dillenburger (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Behaviour Analysis-Based Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorder: Bridging Theory and Practice. Routledge Publishing
• Spencer, T., Slim, L., Cardon, T., & Morgan L. (2020). ABAI interprofessional collaborative practice between behavior analysts and speech-language pathology. Workgroup of ABAI Practice Board. https://www.abainternational.org/constituents/practitioners/interprofessional-collaborative-practice.aspx
• Sundberg, M. L. (2008) Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
• Tabatabaei, S. H., Shahrokhi, H., Gholipour, K., Iezadi, S., Rezapour, R., Naghibi, D., & Azami-Aghdash, S. (2022). The characteristics and results of parent training interventions in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 51(3), 518–530
• Tonge, B., Brereton, A., Kiomall, M., Mackinnon, A., & Rinehart, N. J. (2014). A randomised group comparison controlled trial of 'preschoolers with autism': a parent education and skills training intervention for young children with autistic disorder. Autism, 18(2), 166–177
• Vidal, V. G., Wachholtz, D. P., Mattie, L. J., & DeThorne, L. S. (2023). It takes a community: How environmental systems construct (in) competence in autistic peer interactions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(1), 63–81.
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214
• World Health Organization. (2007). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. (2007). Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
• World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Accessed May 20, 2024 at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70185/?sequence=1