Keywords
chronic pancreatitis - endotherapy - stent
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) results in prolonged inflammation of the pancreatic tissue
resulting in ductal abnormalities and pancreatic fibrosis.[1]
[2] These changes contribute to the development of chronic pain through different mechanisms.
In patients of CP, pain is the most dominant symptom and impacts their quality of
life.[3] Because of multiple mechanisms and the contribution of psychosocial factors, the
management of pain in CP is challenging. In addition to structural causes of pain,
central sensitization, along with psychosocial factors, also contributes to pain.
Medical and psychosocial management often needs to be supplemented with structural
interventions. Structural interventions target intraductal hypertension and these
may be endoscopic, interventional, or surgical.[4]
[5]
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) fragments the intraductal calculi and
is useful in clearing of larger main duct calculi and the consequent duct obstruction.
Excellent results and minimum adverse effects with ESWL have been reported in multiple
observational studies and comparative randomized controlled trials (RCTs).[6]
[7]
[8]
[9] The precise role of interventional procedure in a complex disease like CP with multiple
pathogenic mechanisms requires a prospective comparative study with a sham group and
there are no such comparative studies in the literature. A recently published sham-controlled
randomized trial (SCHOKE trial) examined the efficacy of ESWL and endoscopic retrograde
pancreatography (ERP) compared with the sham procedure.[10] This study is notable for its inclusion of a sham comparison.
The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center, involving 106 patients of
CP with chronic pain. Patients with previous interventions and with contraindications
to endotherapy and ESWL were excluded. They were randomly assigned to the ESWL and
ERP group (n = 52) or the sham group (n = 54), and three patients each were excluded from both groups. In the ESWL group,
complete stone fragmentation was achieved with the initial ESWL session in 32/52 (62%)
patients and in 17/52 (33%) patients by the second session. None of the studied patients
required more than three sessions. This clearance was followed by a single ERP procedure
where 46/52 (88%) patients achieved complete ductal clearance. Pancreatic duct stenting
was done in all these patients after ERP. No intervention was done in the sham group
and these patients continued their usual medical treatment, including antioxidants
and pancreatic enzyme supplements.
When followed up after 12 weeks, patients in the ESWL/ERP group had better pain relief
as compared with the sham group (mean difference in change, –0.7 [95% confidence interval
(CI), –1.3 to 0] on the visual analog scale [VAS]; P = 0.039). However, the difference
between the two groups was not sustained at the 24-week follow-up, and no differences
were seen for 30% pain relief at the 12- or 24-week follow-up. This improvement in
pain score was accompanied by a decrease in the requirement of opioid-based analgesics,
lower frequency of depression, and overall better-perceived health status after the
12-week follow-up. However, the difference between groups was not sustained at the
24-week follow-up. The average change in pain-diary score (VAS) at the 12-week follow-up
was –5.0 (95% CI, –5.4 to –4.5) in the ESWL/ERP group and –4.3 (CI, –4.7 to –3.8)
in the sham group, with a mean difference of –0.7 (CI, –1.3 to 0; p = 0.039), suggesting a modest pain relief with intervention. The adverse effects
were similar between the two groups. Importantly, significant pain reduction was seen
in both treatment groups, with significant and long-lasting pain relief in the sham
group. The authors concluded that compared with a sham procedure, pancreatic ductal
clearance using combined ESWL/ERP provided modest short-term pain relief in patients
with CP and intraductal stones.
Commentary
Interventional therapy for the relief of ductal hypertension has been shown to be
an efficacious management option for painful CP.[1]
[11]
[12] ESWL is an accepted interventional option, especially recommended for larger pancreatic
duct stones, by various guidelines.[13]
[14] However, the SCHOKE trial has raised questions on the efficacy of pancreatic endotherapy
for the relief of pain in CP. It showed a modest improvement in pain, which, importantly,
was not sustained at 6 months of follow-up. An interesting observation was significant
pain relief seen in patients randomized to the sham procedure group (91% of patients).
The study is commendable for the use of a sham procedure for comparison with ESWL/ERP
as intervention procedures have been shown to have significant sham effects.[15] This study reiterates that management of pain in CP requires both plumbing to correct
the anatomical abnormality and management of neurogenic component of pain by altering
the wiring problem. This study also underscores the importance of a sham group in
studies evaluating the efficacy of interventions in complex multifactorial diseases
like CP.
Does this sham-controlled randomized study suggest that endotherapy has a limited
role in the management of painful CP? CP is an enigmatic disease with a poorly understood
pathogenesis of pain and therefore a short-term follow-up of 6 months cannot assess
the complete spectrum of efficacy of any intervention. Further follow-up of the studied
patients may provide more insights into the long-term effects of tackling ductal hypertension.
Moreover, the mean score of pain in the included patients was 5 and it is possible
that the difference in the efficacy between endotherapy and sham might have been greater
if patients with severe pain were included. Also, the authors studied only the intensity
of pain as the outcome measure, whereas pain is a composite measure of affective and
cognitive components, and instruments/scores including these measures provide a more
composite assessment of pain. Moreover, patients in the sham group continued with
medical therapy including analgesics, antioxidants, and pancreatic enzyme supplements,
and this could have contributed to pain relief in the sham group.
In conclusion, endotherapy is an important component of the comprehensive management
of pain in CP, and studies evaluating the efficacy of interventions/drugs in pain
in CP should have a sham comparator group.
