CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice 2024; 07(04): 168-175
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1790536
Original Article

A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of Genotype–Phenotype Correlation of Osteogenesis Imperfecta in UAE

Abdulqader Al Zubaidi
1   Department of Academic Affairs, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
,
Noura Al Hassani
2   Division of Pediatric Endocrine, Department of Pediatric, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
3   Department of Paediatrics, College of Medicine and Health Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
,
4   Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
5   Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
,
6   Division of Genetic, Department of Pediatrics, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Background Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of inherited connective tissue disorders characterized by skeletal fragility. Patients with OI suffer recurrent fractures, limb deformities, and kyphoscoliosis. Multiple extraskeletal manifestations might also be present. Autosomal dominant variants in the COL1A1 or COL1A2 genes account for approximately 90% of cases.

Objective The aim of the study was to describe the variant spectrum and genotype–phenotype correlations in patients with OI seen in Tawam Hospital in the UAE.

Methods The authors conducted a retrospective chart review for all patients with OI assessed by geneticists at Tawam Hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. They retrieved each patient's baseline characteristics, detailed history and physical examination, laboratory, imaging, and genetic results.

Results A total of 40 patients with OI were found and included in this study. The majority (80%) were Emirati, and 57.5% were females. Consanguinity was documented in 24.3%. Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) had positive molecular testing; 28 patients (75.7%) had an autosomal dominant inheritance, and 9 patients (24.3%) had an autosomal recessive inheritance. The majority had missense variants. Four variants were novel. A high prevalence of pathogenic variants in the COL1A1 gene (57%) was found. Patients with variants in the LEPRE1 gene had early and severe phenotypes, while patients with variants in the TMEM38B gene had variable presentations. The majority of patients (85%) had skeletal phenotypes: fractures, bone deformity, scoliosis, and osteopenia. Extraskeletal phenotypes included blue sclera, dentinogenesis imperfecta, hearing loss, and dysmorphic features.

Conclusion This study reports the genotype–phenotype correlation of OI patients from the UAE. A high prevalence of pathogenic variants in the COL1A1 gene with OI type IV phenotype was found. Further multicenter more extensive studies are recommended.


#

Introduction

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare heterogeneous group of inherited connective tissue disorders characterized by skeletal fragility. Its frequency varies from 1:15,000 to 1:20,000.[1] Clinical features of OI are highly variable, ranging from stillbirth to lifelong absence of fractures. More severely affected patients with nonlethal OI suffer from recurrent limb fractures, limb deformities, vertebral compression fractures, and kyphoscoliosis.

Most OI cases are caused by an inherited defect affecting the production or modification of type 1 collagen, a major structural protein found in bones, teeth, ligaments, tendons, skin, sclera, and blood vessels. Besides the history of fragility fractures, patients with OI may also exhibit extraskeletal features such as blue or gray sclera, fragile skin, easy bruising, hernias, dentinogenesis imperfecta, joint laxity, short stature, deafness, and cardiac valve abnormalities.[2]

In 1979, Sillence et al classified OI into four types (types I, II, III, and IV) based on severity, phenotype, and radiological findings.[3] According to the modern classification, the disease is divided into five types. OI type V is caused by heterozygous variants in the interferon-induced transmembrane protein 5 (IFITM5) gene.[4] Patients with this form of OI tend to form a hyperplastic callus after fractures with a characteristic radiological feature of calcification of the interosseous membrane between the forearm bones. With the discovery of new causative variants, the Sillence classification has been expanded to OI type XXIII.[5]

Most OI forms (∼90% of cases) are caused by autosomal dominant variants in COL1A1 or COL1A2 genes, which encode the polypeptide chains of type I collagen.[6] It is worth knowing that up to 25% of children have de novo OI in the absence of affected parents/family members. On the other hand, the variants in autosomal recessive genes are implicated in encoding proteins involved in the posttranslational modification, processing, transport, and cross-linking of collagen type I.[7] Generally, children with these variants tend to have moderate to severe forms of OI.

Nearly 20 new genes responsible for dominant, recessive, and X-linked forms of OI have been described.[5] The COL1A2 gene has approximately 600 variants. According to the international database on OI, most of the variants in the COL1A2 gene are missense, accounting for approximately 74% of the cases.[8]

The only consistent genotype–phenotype correlation is with COL1A1 variants causing haploinsufficiency of the collagen type 1 α1 chain associated with OI type I.[9] Besides COL1A1 and COL1A2, genetic variants are primarily associated with moderate to severe phenotypes with some exceptions.[10]

To our knowledge, no previous published studies have addressed the clinical features and genetic variants of patients with OI from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Our study aimed to describe the variant spectrum and genotype–phenotype correlations in patients with OI seen in Tawam Hospital, a tertiary hospital in the UAE.


#

Methods

This study was approved by the Tawam Medical Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No.: AA/AJ/809). It is a descriptive retrospective study of all patients with OI who the clinical geneticists assessed between January 2010 and December 2021 in Tawam Hospital, UAE. The authors retrieved all the data from each patient's electronic medical record, including baseline characteristics, detailed history, three-generation family history, and detailed clinical examination involving hearing test and ophthalmological examination looking at skeletal and extraskeletal manifestations. Radiological investigations, including echocardiogram, skeletal X-ray, and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, and the results of genetic tests were included. The genetic tests were done based on the clinical phenotypes of the patient and family history, including targeted variant testing, next-generation sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing (solo or trio). All identified variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All variants are categorized into five classes (pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance, likely benign, and benign) using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines for classification and by ClinVar, provided family history and clinical information are used to evaluate identified variants for their pathogenicity. Consent for genetic tests was obtained upon evaluations by the clinical geneticists. Data were analyzed and represented using Microsoft Excel 2022.


#

Results

A total of 40 patients with OI were found and included in this study. Thirty-seven patients had performed genetic tests. The remaining three patients who did not (due to financial/insurance issues) were included in the baseline patient demographics and clinical features but not in molecular analysis.

Patients' Demographics

Our cohort study revealed 40 patients with OI. The youngest patient was diagnosed at birth, while the oldest was at 37 years. Seventeen (42.5%) were males and 23 (57.5%) were females. Consanguinity was documented in nine patients (24.3%). The majority of the studied patients were Emirati (32, 80%). A positive family history of OI was found in 21 patients (52.5%). Positive molecular diagnosis was found in 37 patients (92.5%), and those were of interest to this study.


#

Molecular Analysis

Thirty-seven (92.5%) patients had positive molecular testing; 28 patients (75.67%) had an autosomal dominant inheritance, and 9 patients (24.3%) had an autosomal recessive inheritance. No patients with X-linked variants were found in this study. A total of four variants reported here were novel ([Table 1]). The type of variants found in this study included 24 missense, 2 nonsense, 5 frameshift, 3 deletion, and 3 splice site variants ([Fig. 1]).

Table 1

Summary of variants detected in studied samples

Demographics

Phenotypical features

Genetic results

Pt

Gender

Ethnicity

Family history

Age at diagnosis

Fracture frequency

Lumbar Z-score

Physical features around time of diagnosis

Variant in gene

1

Female

UAE

Yes

26 y

None

−2.8

Lax joints, short stature

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

2

Female

UAE

Yes

3 mo

1 in 3 y

NA

Blue sclera, lax joints, short stature, scoliosis, dentinogenesis imperfecta

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

3

Female

UAE

Yes

2 y

None

−3.3

Blue sclera

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

4

Male

UAE

Yes

12 mo

None

Blue sclera, hearing loss, scoliosis, dentinogenesis imperfecta, lax joints

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

5

Male

UAE

Yes

37 y

NA

Blue sclera

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

6

Male

UAE

Yes

NA

NA

−1.9

Hearing loss

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

7

Female

UAE

Yes

26 y

NA

−2.7

Normal

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

8

Female

UAE

Yes

23 y

NA

−2.3

Blue sclera

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

9

Female

UAE

Yes

16 y

NA

−3.1

Short stature, joint laxity, hearing loss, blue sclera

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

10

Male

Egypt

No

1 mo

4 in 3 mo

Short stature, blue sclera

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

11

Male

UAE

Yes

4 mo

None

Blue sclera, short stature

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

12

Female

UAE

Yes

Birth

NA

Blue sclera, joint laxity, short stature, dentinogenesis imperfecta

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

13

Female

UAE

No

2 y

NA

−1

Hearing loss, short stature

Heterozygous c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) in COL1A1

14

Female

UAE

No

9 mo

3 in 1 y

−7

Hearing loss

Heterozygous c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala) in COL1A1

15

Male

UAE

No

37 y

3 in 37 y

−2.6

NA

Heterozygous c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala) in COL1A1

16

Female

UAE

Yes

14 y

NA

−0.5

Normal

Heterozygous c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala) in COL1A1

17

Male

UAE

Yes

2 mo

None

−0.7

Normal

Heterozygous c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala) in COL1A1

18

Female

UAE

Yes

3 mo

NA

Normal

Heterozygous c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala) in COL1A1

19

Male

UAE

No

3 y

7 in 3 y

−3.1

Blue sclera

Heterozygous c.104–2A > G in COL1A1

20

Female

UAE

No

24 y

NA

−3.1

Dysmorphic features, blue sclera, hearing loss, dentinogenesis imperfecta, lax joints

Heterozygous c.3076C > T (p.Arg1026Ter) in COL1A1

21

Female

Yemen

Yes

1 mo

3 in 2 y

−3.4

Blue sclera, short stature

Heterozygous c.3076C > T (p.Arg1026Ter) in COL1A1

22

Male

Syria

No

4 y

7 in 4 y

−2.1

Blue sclera, hearing loss, lax joints

Heterozygous c.3272delG in COL1A1

23

Female

Sudan

No

NA

NA

–-2.1

Short stature

Heterozygous c.4237G > A (p.Asp1413Asn) in COL1A1

24

Male

UAE

No

34 y

None

NA

Heterozygous c.1127G > T (p.Gly376Val) in COL1A2

25

Male

UAE

No

8 y

2 in 8 y

Normal

Heterozygous c.1127G > T (p.Gly376Val) in COL1A2

26

Male

UAE

No

Birth

Antenatally

−7.1

Blue sclera, hearing loss

Heterozygous c.2456G > A (p.Arg819His) in COL1A2

27

Male

UAE

No

3 y

2 in 3 y

−1.8

Normal

Heterozygous c.910G > A (p.Gly304Ser) in COL1A2

28

Female

UAE

No

1 mo

5 in 1 mo

Blue sclera, hearing loss, mitral valve prolapse

Heterozygous c.1505G>A (p.Gly502Asp) in COL1A2

29

Male

UAE

Yes

2 wk

4 in 5 mo

Dysmorphic features, short stature, scoliosis

Homozygous c.831dup (p.Gly278fs) in FKBP10

30

Female

UAE

No

Birth

Antenatally

Blue sclera, short stature

Homozygous c.831dup (p.Gly278fs) in FKBP10

31

Female

UAE

No

6 y

None

−6

Short stature, scoliosis

Homozygous c.972dup (p.G325fs) in FKBP10

32

Male

UAE

No

16 mo

None

Normal

Homozygous c.1034dup (p.His346fs*27) in FKBP10

33

Female

UAE

Yes

2 mo

2 in 2 mo

Blue sclera, short stature

Homozygous c.354del (p.Ile118fs) in FKBP10

34

Female

Yemen

Yes

9 y

NA

Short stature, blue sclera

Two-copy loss on long arm of chr9 encompassing exon 4 of TMEM38B

35

Female

Yemen

No

Birth

Antenatally

Dysmorphic features, short stature

Large 2 copy loss on long arm of chr9 encompassing exon 4 of TMEM38B

36

Female

UAE

Yes

Birth

Antenatally

−8.2

Blue sclera, short stature, bone deformity, scoliosis

Homozygous c.2056–1G>A in intron 14 of LEPRE1

37

Female

UAE

Yes

Birth

Antenatally

−4.1

Short stature, scoliosis, bone deformity

Homozygous c.2056–1G>A in intron 14 of LEPRE1

38

Female

UAE

Yes

Birth

Antenatally

Short stature

No genetic testing

39

Male

Egypt

No

7 y

3 in 7 y

−4.1

Blue sclera

No genetic testing

40

Male

India

No

8 y

NA

−6.2

Dysmorphic features, short stature

No genetic testing

Abbreviation: NA, not available.


Note: Variants in italics and bold font are the novel variants reported in this study.


Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Variant types found in the studied population in this study.

[Table 1] summarizes all variants found in this study. The most commonly identified gene was COL1A1 (57%), followed by COL1A2 and FKBP10 (12.5% each; [Fig. 2]). In the COL1A1 gene, the variant most frequently identified was c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser), followed by c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala).

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Frequency of disease-causing variants according to affected genes.

The novel variants found in this study include c.3272delG in the COL1A1 gene, variant c.972dup (p.G325fs) in FKBP10 gene, and variant c.2056–1G > A in intron 14 of LEPRE1 gene. Chromosomal microdeletions encompassing genes causing OI were found in two patients; both patients had a two-copy loss of chromosomal region chr9:108484798–108484918 encompassing exon 4 of the TMEM38B gene.

The rest of the variants with minor contributions to OI in the UAE are illustrated in [Table 1].


#

Clinical Features

The majority (85%) of the studied patients had skeletal phenotypes in the form of fractures, bone deformity, short stature, joint laxity, scoliosis, and low bone density. Patients carrying variants in the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes exhibit a spectrum of age-related manifestations, often correlated with familial predisposition manifested with a family history of the disease. The phenotypic variability encompasses a broad range, from early-onset presentation with recurrent fractures and diminished bone density to delayed onset with osteoporosis.

The extraskeletal phenotypes reported in the studied patients were blue sclera, dentinogenesis imperfecta, hearing loss (22.5%), and dysmorphic features. Only one patient (2.5%) had mitral valve prolapse ([Table 1]). Patients with variants in the LEPRE1 gene were found to show early and severe phenotypes marked by clinical signs of OI, such as antenatal fractures, severe scoliosis, bone deformity, and short stature. On the other hand, patients with TMEM38B gene variants had variable presentations; one patient presented with antenatal manifestations and dysmorphic features, while another patient had only short stature and blue sclera. The predominant features noted in this study were blue sclera, short stature, scoliosis, and severe low bone density below expected for age in the DXA scan.

Other clinical manifestations of interest that were not reported or documented in the studied patients' charts included basilar invagination, macrocephaly, coxa vara, olecranon apophyseal avulsion, codfish vertebra, and pulmonary complications.


#
#

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to correlate the genotype and phenotype of OI patients from the UAE. This study shows a predominance of pathogenic variants in the COL1A1 gene (57%), with variant c.3235G > A (p.Gly1079Ser) being the most frequently detected. This could be due to the inclusion of a cluster of familial cases, or this variant could be a founder variant among the UAE population. This is followed by pathogenic variants in COL1A2 and FKBP10 genes (12.8% each).

It is worth mentioning here that the variant c.1249C > G (p.Pro417Ala) in the COL1A1 gene (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/284534/) and the variant c.2456G > A (p.Arg819His) in the COL1A2 gene are classified as likely benign and as of uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/360962/). However, given the fact that the studied patients here showed phenotypes that fit with OI, we can consider these variants as possibly or likely causative variants.

It is well known that collagen type I pathogenic variants reflect the dominant variants associated with OI worldwide, with variable percentages that range between 60 and 90% as reported previously.[11] Our finding is almost close to the reported findings from Ukraine (63%),[12] Turkey (62.4%),[13] Taiwan (51%), Korea (52%), and Vietnam (59%).[14] [15] [16] A lower proportion of collagen type I pathogenic variants were reported in Russia (41%).[17] On the other hand, reports from Europe showed a higher proportion of those variants, 87% from Sweden and Estonia.[18] [19] Asian populations from Japan and China also showed a high proportion of COL1A1/A2 variants (73.3 and 97.7%, respectively).[20] [21]

In Saudi Arabia, 64% of OI-reported cases were secondary to autosomal recessive variants.[22] Similarly, in the Palestinian population, where the consanguinity rate is estimated to be 40%, around 60% of reported cases were due to autosomal recessive forms of OI.[23]

Despite the fact that UAE has a high prevalence of autosomal recessive (AR) disorders due to the high level of consanguinity (54%),[24] our study found that only 24.3% of OI cases are due to AR variants, which is lower than the reported percentages in Saudi Arabia and Palestine.

The phenotype of the identified genetic variants in our patients in this study is consistent with the phenotypic features and presentations reported in previous studies, that is, ranging from mild to severe OI.[25] The most common skeletal manifestations reported here are recurrent fractures, short stature, scoliosis, and low bone density and bone deformity. This is almost similar to what is already known about OI skeletal manifestations. The extraskeletal manifestations of OI were not highly reported in our studied population, that is, 22.5% with hearing loss and 2.5% with mitral valve prolapse, while no pulmonary complications were reported. This is lower compared with the extraskeletal manifestations reported from Saudi patients with OI, where 53% hearing loss, 26% congenital heart malformations, and 70% restrictive lung disease were observed.[26]

Our findings can be explained by the predominance of young patients in our cohort as hearing loss and cardiac and pulmonary complications are known to present more in adulthood. The other possibility is that it is underestimated in our patients due to a lack of adherence to surveillance screening protocols for extraskeletal manifestations.

Our patients showed phenotypes consistent with OI type IV due to variable presentations, mild to moderate in severity ([Table 1]). None of our patients had lethal phenotypes. The phenotypic severity has been correlated to the affected gene, helical location, resulting residue, and predicted final protein product[21]; however, phenotypic variability is broad, and the full extent of genotype–phenotype correlations remains to be elucidated. Interestingly, variants in the majority of the newly described OI genes are associated with phenotypes that cannot clinically be distinguished from those described by the traditional classification.[21]

The main limitations of our study include single-center data, which contributed to the small sample size, and it is a retrospective study with the possibility of missing reported clinical features or missed follow-ups. Therefore, further prospective multicenter larger studies are recommended for proper assessment of all skeletal and extraskeletal manifestations as well as longer follow-ups for complication surveillance and management based on different causative variants.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank the patients for their contributions to this work.

Authors' Contribution

All the authors contributed to the concept and design of the study. A.Q.A.Z. collected data. A.Q.A.Z. and A.A.S. reviewed and analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. All the authors contributed to the acquisition of data and revision of the manuscript, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring integrity and accuracy.


Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals. This study is approved by the Tawam Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No.: AA/AJ/809).


Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained during clinical evaluations to proceed with genetic tests.


  • References

  • 1 Forlino A, Marini JC. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet 2016; 387 (10028): 1657-1671
  • 2 Marini JC, Forlino A, Bächinger HP. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3: 17052
  • 3 Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM. Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1979; 16 (02) 101-116
  • 4 Cho TJ, Lee KE, Lee SK. et al. A single recurrent mutation in the 5′-UTR of IFITM5 causes osteogenesis imperfecta type V. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 91 (02) 343-348
  • 5 Unger S, Ferreira CR, Mortier GR. et al. Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision. Am J Med Genet A 2023; 191 (05) 1164-1209
  • 6 Bardai G, Moffatt P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. DNA sequence analysis in 598 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta: diagnostic yield and mutation spectrum. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27 (12) 3607-3613
  • 7 Trejo P, Rauch F. Osteogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents-new developments in diagnosis and treatment. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27 (12) 3427-3437
  • 8 Nadyrshina D, Zaripova A, Tyurin A, Minniakhmetov I, Zakharova E, Khusainova R. Osteogenesis imperfecta: search for mutations in patients from the Republic of Bashkortostan (Russia). Genes (Basel) 2022; 13 (01) 12
  • 9 Willing MC, Deschenes SP, Scott DA. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta type I: molecular heterogeneity for COL1A1 null alleles of type I collagen. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 55 (04) 638-647
  • 10 Tauer JT, Robinson ME, Rauch F. Osteogenesis imperfecta: new perspectives from clinical and translational research. JBMR Plus 2019; 3 (08) e10174
  • 11 Lin X, Hu J, Zhou B. et al. Genotype-phenotype relationship and comparison between eastern and western patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Endocrinol Invest 2024; 47 (01) 67-77
  • 12 Zhytnik L, Maasalu K, Pashenko A. et al. COL1A1/2 pathogenic variants and phenotype characteristics in Ukrainian osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Front Genet 2019; 10: 722
  • 13 Tüysüz B, Elkanova L, Uludağ Alkaya D. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta in 140 Turkish families: molecular spectrum and, comparison of long-term clinical outcome of those with COL1A1/A2 and biallelic variants. Bone 2022; 155: 116293
  • 14 Lin H-Y, Chuang C-K, Su Y-N. et al. Genotype and phenotype analysis of Taiwanese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015; 10: 152
  • 15 Lee K-S, Song H-R, Cho T-J. et al. Mutational spectrum of type I collagen genes in Korean patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mutat 2006; 27 (06) 599-599
  • 16 Ho Duy B, Zhytnik L, Maasalu K. et al. Mutation analysis of the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes in Vietnamese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Genomics 2016; 10 (01) 27
  • 17 Khusainova R, Nadyrshina D, Gilyazova I. et al. Analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes in osteogenesis imperfecta patients from Russia. Bone 2012; 50: S109
  • 18 Lindahl K, Åström E, Rubin CJ. et al. Genetic epidemiology, prevalence, and genotype-phenotype correlations in the Swedish population with osteogenesis imperfecta. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23 (08) 1042-1050
  • 19 Zhytnik L, Maasalu K, Reimann E, Prans E, Kõks S, Märtson A. Mutational analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes among Estonian osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Hum Genomics 2017; 11 (01) 19
  • 20 Ohata Y, Takeyari S, Nakano Y. et al. Comprehensive genetic analyses using targeted next-generation sequencing and genotype-phenotype correlations in 53 Japanese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30 (11) 2333-2342
  • 21 Liu Y, Asan MD, Ma D. et al. Gene mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of Chinese osteogenesis imperfecta patients revealed by targeted next generation sequencing. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28 (10) 2985-2995
  • 22 Alfares A, Alkuraya F. An overview of Mendelian disorders in Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In: El-Hayek S, Ali MTA, Khaja NA. eds. Genetic Disorders in the Arab World. Dubai: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 2016: 26-37
  • 23 Essawi O, Symoens S, Fannana M. et al. Genetic analysis of osteogenesis imperfecta in the Palestinian population: molecular screening of 49 affected families. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018; 6 (01) 15-26
  • 24 Saleh S, Beyyumi E, Al Kaabi A. et al. Spectrum of neuro-genetic disorders in the United Arab Emirates national population. Clin Genet 2021; 100 (05) 573-600
  • 25 Ben Amor IM, Roughley P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. Skeletal clinical characteristics of osteogenesis imperfecta caused by haploinsufficiency mutations in COL1A1. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28 (09) 2001-2007
  • 26 Ahmad N, Aleysae NA, Sobaihi M. et al. A single-centre study of genetic mutations, audiology, echocardiogram and pulmonary function in Saudi children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2021; 35 (03) 355-362

Address for correspondence

Aisha AlShamsi, MD
Division of Genetic, Department of Pediatrics, Tawam Hospital
Al Ain
United Arab Emirates   

Publication History

Article published online:
17 September 2024

© 2024. Gulf Association of Endocrinology and Diabetes (GAED). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Forlino A, Marini JC. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet 2016; 387 (10028): 1657-1671
  • 2 Marini JC, Forlino A, Bächinger HP. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3: 17052
  • 3 Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM. Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 1979; 16 (02) 101-116
  • 4 Cho TJ, Lee KE, Lee SK. et al. A single recurrent mutation in the 5′-UTR of IFITM5 causes osteogenesis imperfecta type V. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 91 (02) 343-348
  • 5 Unger S, Ferreira CR, Mortier GR. et al. Nosology of genetic skeletal disorders: 2023 revision. Am J Med Genet A 2023; 191 (05) 1164-1209
  • 6 Bardai G, Moffatt P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. DNA sequence analysis in 598 individuals with a clinical diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta: diagnostic yield and mutation spectrum. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27 (12) 3607-3613
  • 7 Trejo P, Rauch F. Osteogenesis imperfecta in children and adolescents-new developments in diagnosis and treatment. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27 (12) 3427-3437
  • 8 Nadyrshina D, Zaripova A, Tyurin A, Minniakhmetov I, Zakharova E, Khusainova R. Osteogenesis imperfecta: search for mutations in patients from the Republic of Bashkortostan (Russia). Genes (Basel) 2022; 13 (01) 12
  • 9 Willing MC, Deschenes SP, Scott DA. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta type I: molecular heterogeneity for COL1A1 null alleles of type I collagen. Am J Hum Genet 1994; 55 (04) 638-647
  • 10 Tauer JT, Robinson ME, Rauch F. Osteogenesis imperfecta: new perspectives from clinical and translational research. JBMR Plus 2019; 3 (08) e10174
  • 11 Lin X, Hu J, Zhou B. et al. Genotype-phenotype relationship and comparison between eastern and western patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Endocrinol Invest 2024; 47 (01) 67-77
  • 12 Zhytnik L, Maasalu K, Pashenko A. et al. COL1A1/2 pathogenic variants and phenotype characteristics in Ukrainian osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Front Genet 2019; 10: 722
  • 13 Tüysüz B, Elkanova L, Uludağ Alkaya D. et al. Osteogenesis imperfecta in 140 Turkish families: molecular spectrum and, comparison of long-term clinical outcome of those with COL1A1/A2 and biallelic variants. Bone 2022; 155: 116293
  • 14 Lin H-Y, Chuang C-K, Su Y-N. et al. Genotype and phenotype analysis of Taiwanese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2015; 10: 152
  • 15 Lee K-S, Song H-R, Cho T-J. et al. Mutational spectrum of type I collagen genes in Korean patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mutat 2006; 27 (06) 599-599
  • 16 Ho Duy B, Zhytnik L, Maasalu K. et al. Mutation analysis of the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes in Vietnamese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Genomics 2016; 10 (01) 27
  • 17 Khusainova R, Nadyrshina D, Gilyazova I. et al. Analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes in osteogenesis imperfecta patients from Russia. Bone 2012; 50: S109
  • 18 Lindahl K, Åström E, Rubin CJ. et al. Genetic epidemiology, prevalence, and genotype-phenotype correlations in the Swedish population with osteogenesis imperfecta. Eur J Hum Genet 2015; 23 (08) 1042-1050
  • 19 Zhytnik L, Maasalu K, Reimann E, Prans E, Kõks S, Märtson A. Mutational analysis of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes among Estonian osteogenesis imperfecta patients. Hum Genomics 2017; 11 (01) 19
  • 20 Ohata Y, Takeyari S, Nakano Y. et al. Comprehensive genetic analyses using targeted next-generation sequencing and genotype-phenotype correlations in 53 Japanese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30 (11) 2333-2342
  • 21 Liu Y, Asan MD, Ma D. et al. Gene mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of Chinese osteogenesis imperfecta patients revealed by targeted next generation sequencing. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28 (10) 2985-2995
  • 22 Alfares A, Alkuraya F. An overview of Mendelian disorders in Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In: El-Hayek S, Ali MTA, Khaja NA. eds. Genetic Disorders in the Arab World. Dubai: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 2016: 26-37
  • 23 Essawi O, Symoens S, Fannana M. et al. Genetic analysis of osteogenesis imperfecta in the Palestinian population: molecular screening of 49 affected families. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018; 6 (01) 15-26
  • 24 Saleh S, Beyyumi E, Al Kaabi A. et al. Spectrum of neuro-genetic disorders in the United Arab Emirates national population. Clin Genet 2021; 100 (05) 573-600
  • 25 Ben Amor IM, Roughley P, Glorieux FH, Rauch F. Skeletal clinical characteristics of osteogenesis imperfecta caused by haploinsufficiency mutations in COL1A1. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28 (09) 2001-2007
  • 26 Ahmad N, Aleysae NA, Sobaihi M. et al. A single-centre study of genetic mutations, audiology, echocardiogram and pulmonary function in Saudi children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2021; 35 (03) 355-362

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Variant types found in the studied population in this study.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Frequency of disease-causing variants according to affected genes.