Study of the Prevalence of Atypical Scheuermann's Kyphosis Using Computed Tomography Scans

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to detect atypical Scheuermann's disease through computed tomography scans and estimate its prevalence.

Methods This cross-sectional observational study involved 1,287 computed tomography scans from patients aged 18 to 40 years of both genders. The criteria for diagnosing atypical Scheuermann's disease included wedging of 5° in 3 consecutive vertebrae, combined with a total Cobb angle of 10° or more within the thoracolumbar interval from T8 to L2. Positive cases were assessed for kyphosis severity, presence of Schmorl's nodes, and scoliosis. Prevalence estimation and correlation analysis with age and sex were performed.

Results The study identified 28 cases of atypical Scheuermann's kyphosis, indicating a prevalence of 2.8%.

Conclusion The current research, utilizing abdominal tomography, offers valuable insights into the prevalence of Scheuermann's disease in its atypical form within the sampled population.

Keywords

abdomen - adolescent - prevalence - Scheuermann disease - scoliosis

Introduction

Scheuermann's disease (SD) was defined by Holger Werfel Scheuermann in 1920 and is also known as osteochondritis juvenile dorsi or kyphosis dorsalis juvenilis.[1] Sorensen described the radiographic criteria for typical SD, including anterior wedging greater than 5° in at least 3 adjacent vertebral bodies.[2]

Schmorl's nodes, irregular and flattened vertebral endplates, narrowed intervertebral disc spaces, and anteroposterior elongation of the apical vertebral bodies are other associated radiological features of SD.[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] The affection leads to rigid kyphosis of the median and lower thoracic, or upper lumbar regions.[7]

Two patterns have been defined in SD based on the affected area of the vertebra.[7] [8]

In the typical or classic form, the thoracic region is frequently affected and is characterized by thoracic kyphosis increase and wedging of the vertebral bodies. This pattern is also accompanied by nonstructural hyperlordosis of the cervical and lumbar spine.[7] [9] [10] [11] On the other hand, SD of atypical pattern (thoracolumbar or lumbar) has been defined later and is distinguished from the typical one by lack of thoracic kyphosis and evident wedging of the vertebrae.[4] [12] [13] Also, the apex of the kyphosis is located at the thoracolumbar junction (T11–T12) in an atypical pattern of the disease.[4] Such pathologies account for 25 to 80% of SD.[4]

Despite the importance of SD, knowledge of its epidemiology needs to be improved. Most articles mention that the prevalence varies from 0.4 to 8.0%,[2] [7] [14] and a few recent studies have examined the prevalence of SD, but only in individuals aged from either 45 or 50 to 80 years or older, with a reported prevalence of 4.0 to 8.0%.[15] Besides, these studies are contradictory regarding the prevalence between the genders. Some studies have suggested that the prevalence in men may be higher than in women,[3] [8] [16] [17] [18] [19] while other publications suggest that it involves each gender equally.[15] [20]

Furthermore, previous studies on the prevalence of SD did not evaluate the atypical pattern of the condition separately.[7] [15] [20]

Thus, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of atypical SD in patients aged between 18 and 40 years using abdomen tomography as a screening tool.

Material and Methods

Study Design and Patient Population

This is a cross-sectional study. The hospital's Ethics Committee and Internal Review Board approved the study protocol before initiation under number (CAAE: 51849821.6.0000.5440). The study design was based on evaluating tomographic images of the abdomen. The exclusion criteria used in the present study were patients aged < 18 years old or > 40 years old, with previous spine surgery, presence of thoracolumbar spine diseases such as fractures, tumors, infections, ankylosing spondylitis, and familial hyperostotic disease. The inclusion criteria were patients aged between 18 and 40 years old and the presence of adequate images for analysis according to previously established parameters.

Retrospectively, we selected abdomen tomographic images of 1,287 individuals (756 females and 531 males) obtained from a database of patients referred to a radiologic private clinic from October 2021 to August 2022.

Computed Tomography (CT) Acquisition

Imaging exams were performed using a GE LightSpeed VCT device. The CT images obtained were reconstructed with 1.25-mm thick slices for the axial plane. The reading and reproduction of the images, as well as their reconstructions, were carried out using the Carestream PACS software system, version 12.1.5.1156 (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA).

Image Analysis

The parameter to identify patients with atypical SD was wedging in 3 consecutive vertebrae by 5° or more (measurement of the Cobb angle in each vertebra), with a total Cobb angle of 10° or higher in the sagittal-plane tomographic images. The thoracolumbar segment considered in our study was the one from T8 to L2 (thoracolumbar transition) ([Figs. 1] [2]).

Fig. 1 Individual Cobb angle measurement in vertebra with wedging.

Fig. 2 Total Cobb angle measurement after identifying wedging greater than 5° in 3 consecutive vertebrae (T10–T12).

As coronal image visualization was available in all the exams evaluated, in which it was possible to observe the spine from the sacrum until the thoracic segment, it was also possible to evaluate the presence or absence of scoliosis in patients. Therefore, scoliosis was investigated using the CT coronal images. The method used for this was the evaluation of the coronal alignment between the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae and the Cobb angle measurement ([Fig. 3]).

Fig. 3 Coronal slice used for diagnosing scoliosis in positive cases of atypical Scheuermann's disease, as present in the above-mentioned case.

In cases classified as positive for atypical SD, the level of kyphosis and the presence of Schmorl's nodules and scoliosis were also assessed. These patients were identified according to sex and age to correlate the tomographic findings ([Fig. 4]). Data collection, through analysis of image exams, was carried out by a team composed of 3 researchers using the Carestream PACS system software version 12.1.5.1156..

Fig. 4 Sagittal cut used for diagnosing Schmorl's nodes (at the level of L1) in positive cases of the disease.

Statistical Analysis

The data were compiled into a Microsoft Excel software spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using the R software version 4.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous data were expressed as mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range (IQR), and categorical data were described as absolute values and percentages.

The T-test or Yuen-Welch robust test was used to compare the mean between the two groups, depending on the variable's distribution. Similarly, to compare three or more groups of continuous data, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or the robust one-way ANOVA test was used, with a trim of 0.2, depending on the distribution of the variable. In situations of p < 0.05, multiple paired tests were performed with p-value adjustment using the Bejanmini-Yuketieli method, to verify which groups had a significant difference.

The Shapiro-Francia test was used to test the distribution of variables. To compare categorical variables, with only two groups, the Fisher or Chi-squared test was used, according to the following rule: if more than 20% of the expected values of the counting cells were greater than 5, the Fisher test was used, otherwise the Chi-squared test was used (Kim, 2017).[26] In the case of categorical variables with more than 3 levels, the Chi-squared test was used. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Tomographic images from 1,287 patients were randomly selected, with a median age of 33 (IQR: 5) years old (18–40 years old), 756 (58.8%) male and 531 (41.2%) female patients. The median age among the men was 33 (IQR: 6) years old (19–40 years old), and among the women, it was 33 (IQR: 10) years old (19–40 years old). There was no excluded patient. Out of the 1,287 CT scans evaluated, 28 patients were diagnosed with atypical SD, representing 2.2% of the total patients included in this study.

Age

Regarding patient age, younger patients (18–29 years old) presented higher Cobb values than older patients (30–40 years old), with an average of 17.4° and 15°, respectively ([Fig. 5]). However, when evaluated by the Spearman correlation test, the groups had no significant difference (p = 0.28).

Fig. 5 Prevalence of atypical Scheuermann's disease according to age.

Gender

When differentiating regarding gender, a significant difference was observed, with a higher prevalence of atypical SD in male patients, representing 4.7% of the condition among men and 1.1% among women (p < 0.01) ([Fig. 6]).

Fig. 6 Prevalence of atypical Scheuermann's disease according to gender.

Spine Level

When stratifying the levels of spinal involvement in atypical SD ([Fig. 7]), the T10-to-T12 level was the most prevalent one, representing 50% (n = 14) of the total positive cases. For conducting the one-way ANOVA test and comparing multiple groups with the linear contrasts test, the T9-to-T11 and the T8-to-T10 interval groups were combined into a single group (T8–10/T9–T11). It was observed that there was a significant difference in the total Cobb angle value between the 3 groups (p = 0.02, effect size = 0.68 [0.21–1.58]). Moreover, when the linear contrasts test was performed, a significant difference was found between the T10-to-T12 and the T11-to-L1 groups (p = 0.046). In contrast, no significant difference was found when comparing other groups.

Fig. 7 Prevalence of atypical Scheuermann's disease according to the level of spinal involvement.

Scoliosis

When comparing the presence of scoliosis in patients with atypical SD according to gender, there was no significant difference. Scoliosis among women was found in 14% of the patients and 25% among the male patients (Fisher's exact test; p = 1) ([Fig. 8]).

Fig. 8 Comparison of scoliosis presence and patient sex in atypical Scheuermann's disease.

Schmorl Nodes

Of the 28 patients with atypical SD, 10 (37%) presented Schmorl's nodules on tomographic examination ([Fig. 9]). No association was found between age groups or gender and the presence of Schmorl's nodules (p = 1).

Fig. 9 Presence of Schmorl's nodes in patients with atypical Scheuermann's disease.

Discussion

In this epidemiological study of the Brazilian population, we found a prevalence of atypical SD of 2.8%, utilizing the criteria defined by Sorensen.[2]

Since there is no uniform standard for the radiological diagnosis of the atypical form of the disease, we chose to use the Sorensen criteria as it is the standard most used in other previous research.[15] [20]

The design of our study based on CT allowed us to identify atypical SD in patients without clinical complaints, which would otherwise be missed in a study based on the patient's clinical complaints. As the demand for the tomography exam was due to complaints other than the spine, we reduced the presence of selection bias in our sample since the selection of patients from a spine surgery office would include a selection criterion, that is complaining of deformity or spine pain.

Typically, patients present Scheuermann's kyphosis during the bone growth phase of adolescence.[5] [7] [8] Thus, all patients presenting the radiological characteristics of the disease already had it at the time of our evaluation. Furthermore, to avoid the possibility of false positive cases resulting from degenerative disc disease, we limited the age criteria for including patients in our study. Therefore, none of the cases diagnosed with atypical SD may correspond to patients with degenerative disc disease, and we have not failed to identify any patient who has not yet developed the disease.

There is still controversy in the literature regarding the prevalence of SD according to patients' gender. Thus, some studies showed a similar prevalence in both genders,[3] [15] [20] [21] [22] [23] but most previous research demonstrated a higher incidence in men.[1] [3] [8] [17]

However, none of these studies evaluated separately patients diagnosed with atypical SD. Thus, despite agreeing with most studies, our results with a higher prevalence of SD in males only represent patients with the atypical form of the disease.

Sorensen described radiographic criteria for typical SD, including anterior wedging greater than 5° in at least 3 adjacent vertebral bodies.[2] Schmorl's nodes, irregular vertebral endplates, narrowed intervertebral disc, and anteroposterior elongation of the apical vertebral bodies are other radiological features associated with MS. On the other hand, Blumenthal et al.[24] described the criteria for atypical MS, including wedging in one or two vertebral bodies, changes in the vertebral endplate, narrowing of the disc space, and anterior Schmorl's nodes.

We chose to use Sorensen's criterion of anterior vertebral wedging of more than 5° because it is a more objective criterion than simply using vertebral wedging as suggested by Blumenthal et al.[24] We were also able to investigate the presence of scoliosis and Schmorl's nodules, and just as previous studies have shown, the prevalence of scoliosis was around a third of cases.[25] In around 40% of the exams, we could identify the presence of Schmorl's nodules, which agree with the findings of Heithoff et al.,[12] according to which the presence of Schmorl's nodules would be just one of the diagnostic criteria for atypical DS.

The main limitation of the present study lies in the fact that we used the CT exam to identify the presence of SD since the exam of choice is the full spine X-ray. However, as the diagnosis of atypical SD is based on the individual wedging of each vertebra, the chosen exam did not affect our results. Furthermore, we reduced the possibility of selection bias since patients underwent the examination for reasons other than the spine.

Conclusion

Scheuermann's kyphosis is a frequent spinal deformity. Our study, obtained from a large convenience sample of patients evaluated with abdomen tomography, allows a better understanding of the actual prevalence of the atypical pattern of this condition. The CT examination made it possible to study a population sample without selection bias and to find a prevalence of 2.8% of atypical SD in the selected sample.

Conflito de Interesses

Os autores declaram não haver conflito de interesses.

Work carried out at the Ribeirão Preto Medical School of Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

• Referências

• 1 Scheuermann HW. The classic: kyphosis dorsalis juvenilis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977; (128) 5-7
• 2 Sorensen KH. Scheuermann's juvenile kyphosis: clinical appearances, radiography, aetiology and prognosis. Copenhagen:: Munksgaard; 1964
• 3 Murray PM, Weinstein SL, Spratt KF. The natural history and long-term follow-up of Scheuermann kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (02) 236-248
• 4 Palazzo C, Sailhan F, Revel M. Scheuermann's disease: an update. Joint Bone Spine 2014; 81 (03) 209-214
• 5 Lucas-García FJ, Vicent-Carsí V, Sánchez-González M. Enfermedad de Scheuermann lumbar atípica: a propósito de 6 casos. [Atypical lumbar Schuermann's disease: a presentation of 6 cases] Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2013; 57 (02) 135-139
• 6 Singh M, Bansal M, Singh A, Bharwani N, Bhati M. Atypical Lumbar Scheuermann's Disease: A Rare Entity and Literature Review. J Orthop Case Rep 2023; 13 (02) 48-50
• 7 Bezalel T, Carmeli E, Kalichman L. Scheuermann's Disease: Radiographic Pathomorphology and Association with Clinical Features. Asian Spine J 2019; 13 (01) 86-95
• 8 Gokce E, Beyhan M. Radiological imaging findings of scheuermann disease. World J Radiol 2016; 8 (11) 895-901
• 9 Yaman O, Dalbayrak S. Kyphosis and review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2014; 24 (04) 455-465
• 10 Lowe TG. Scheuermann's kyphosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007; 18 (02) 305-315
• 11 Tyrakowski M, Mardjetko S, Siemionow K. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters in skeletally mature patients with Scheuermann disease. Spine 2014; 39 (18) E1080-E1085
• 12 Heithoff KB, Gundry CR, Burton CV, Winter RB. Juvenile discogenic disease. Spine 1994; 19 (03) 335-340
• 13 Edgren W, Vainio S. Osteochondrosis juvenilis lumbalis. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1957; 227: 1-47
• 14 Ristolainen L, Kettunen JA, Heliövaara M, Kujala UM, Heinonen A, Schlenzka D. Untreated Scheuermann's disease: a 37-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 2012; 21 (05) 819-824
• 15 Urrutia J, Narvaez F, Besa P, Meissner-Haecker A, Rios C, Piza C. Scheuermann's disease in patients 15-40 years old: A study to determine its prevalence and its relationship with age and sex using chest radiographs as screening tool. J Orthop Sci 2019; 24 (05) 776-779
• 16 Scheuermann HW. Kyphosis dorsalis juvenilis. Z Orthop Chir 1921; 41: 305-307
• 17 Damborg F, Engell V, Nielsen J, Kyvik KO, Andersen MO, Thomsen K. Genetic epidemiology of Scheuermann's disease. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (05) 602-605
• 18 Gavin TM. The etiology and natural history of Scheuermann's kyphosis. J Prosthet Orthot 2003; 15: S11-S14
• 19 Damborg F, Engell V, Andersen M, Kyvik KO, Thomsen K. Prevalence, concordance, and heritability of Scheuermann kyphosis based on a study of twins. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (10) 2133-2136
• 20 Makurthou AA, Oei L, El Saddy S. et al. Scheuermann disease: evaluation of radiological criteria and population prevalence. Spine 2013; 38 (19) 1690-1694
• 21 Montgomery SP, Erwin WE. Scheuermann's kyphosis–long-term results of Milwaukee braces treatment. Spine 1981; 6 (01) 5-8
• 22 Bridwell KH, DeWald RL. , Eds. Scheuermann's disease. In: Textbook of Spine Surgery. Philadelphia, PA:: Lippincott-Raven; 1997: 1173-1198
• 23 Scheuermann disease: current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; •••: 72
• 24 Blumenthal SL, Roach J, Herring JA. Lumbar Scheuermann's. A clinical series and classification. Spine 1987; 12 (09) 929-932
• 25 Tomé-Bermejo F, Tsirikos AI. [Current concepts on Scheuermann kyphosis: clinical presentation, diagnosis and controversies around treatment]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2012; 56 (06) 491-505
• 26 Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. Restor Dent Endod 2017; 42 (02) 152-155

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. Juli 2024

Angenommen: 05. September 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. Dezember 2024