CC BY 4.0 · Eur J Dent
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1801301
Original Article

Perception and Attitudes of Dental Professionals on Teledentistry: A Cross-Sectional Study

1   Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
2   Department of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
3   Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
,
1   Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
› Institutsangaben
 

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to explore the beliefs and attitudes related to the adoption of teledentistry among Pakistani dental professionals, focusing on data security, practice enhancement, and patient benefits.

Material and Methods A cross-sectional study on a 5-point Likert scale assessed four domains of teledentistry: data security and patient consent, practice improvement capabilities, usefulness for dental practice, and patient benefits, among dental professionals through electronic forms. Demographic data and items from four domains were analyzed by descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and Pearson's correlation tests, respectively, using SPSS, with a p-value of < 0.05 set as statistically significant.

Results A large percentage (59.8%) of the 408 dental professionals raised issues related to data security with 52% showing concerns about securing patient consent. Most professionals (61.8%) acknowledged the potential of teledentistry in reducing waiting times. Gender, age, qualifications, and work experience were found to be associated with individual perceptions of teledentistry. Females were more skeptical on teledentistry capabilities (p < 0.000) while younger, more than the older professionals had heightened worries about data security (p < 0.000). Specialists viewed teledentistry favorably compared with other professionals (p < 0.000). Professionals with more than 5 years of experience expressed optimism, on how teledentistry could improve practice efficiency and patient outcomes (p < 0.000).

Conclusion This report on the views and attitudes of Pakistani dental professionals toward teledentistry indicates their positive perception of teledentistry, citing its potential to enhance practice and benefit patients. Overcoming data security concerns and improving education on teledentistry benefits could foster broader acceptance and utilization of this technology.


#

Introduction

Teledentistry can be defined as the utilization of advanced technology to provide remote dental care and consultation. In recent years, there has been a significant evolution in the approach to dental care with the emergence of teledentistry.[1] Teledentistry essentially entails utilization of advanced digital technologies for offering remote dental care, consultation, and services.[2] Thus, teledentistry will facilitate dental care in people living in remote rural areas with limited access to dental services.

For instance, instead of traveling long distances for checkups that are costly, patients are now able to consult their dentists using teledentistry tools such as online consultations or video calls from the comfort of their homes or local clinics where such facilities are available.[3] Teledentistry also plays a crucial role in facilitating teleconsultations and reducing waiting times for dental care by enabling off-site decision-making and treatment planning, with remote, streamlined appointments. This leads to shorter appointment durations, ultimately expediting oral health assistance for patients in need.[4] [5] [6] [7] Furthermore, teledentistry could be used for dental education eventually resulting in improved patient care.[8] However, many practitioners are unaware of its benefits for their clinical practice and patient health.[9] These benefits include increased access to care, enhanced productivity, and efficient treatment delivery to underserved populations.[8]

In developing jurisdictions, mainly in Asia, the utilization of teledentistry, despite its advantages, has been limited. Challenges reported include obtaining approvals from authorities, financing infrastructure, and technology setup.[10] Technical issues including slow Internet and connectivity problems pose significant hurdles,[11] and patient privacy concerns and varying levels of technology literacy further complicate matters.[12] There are also some risks associated with remote consultations, such as potential failure to capture all patient complaints or misinterpretation of communications.[13]

Several studies including those from Australia,[14] Canada,[15] Saudi Arabia,[16] and France[17] have been conducted at a national level to explore perceptions, effectiveness, and utilization of teledentistry. Nonetheless, there is a critical gap in applying these findings to other geographic regions, particularly South Asia. The lack of sufficient data from this region limits our understanding of teledentistry applicability and effectiveness. Therefore, bridging this gap becomes essential.

In Pakistan, a country the size of over 881,913 square kilometers (the size of France and the United Kingdom combined) with numerous remote and inaccessible areas, the delivery of dental care faces challenges due to its vast and remote terrain. The population's sparse distribution contributes to issues such as a shortage of dentists, unaffordability of dental care, and long distances to health care facilities providing dental services.[18] The Pakistan government's National Health Vision 2025,[19] aimed at enhancing the nation's health by improving access to quality health care services and utilizing information technology in the sector, now presents opportunities for the development of teledentistry in the country. To effectively implement teledentistry and align with such a national vision, it is crucial to understand the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of dental professionals in Pakistan toward teledentistry, as well as the perceived challenges in its implementation. However, there has been a lack of studies evaluating the level of awareness of teledentistry among dental personnel in Pakistan. Obtaining this information will provide valuable insights for planning and implementing teledentistry initiatives in the region.

Hence, the purpose of this study was to analyze the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes related to teledentistry, in a cohort of dental professionals working in the city of Karachi, Pakistan.


#

Materials and Methods

This study was conducted from November 2023 through April 2024 among undergraduate and postgraduate dental professionals, postgraduate trainees, and dental hygienists. The sample size was calculated[20] as follows: n = z 2 × p × [1 − p]/e 2 (z = 1.96 for a confidence level of 95%, p = proportion [50% expressed as a decimal 0.50], e = margin of error [0.05]), thus, n = 1.962 × 0.5 × (1–0.5)/0.05[2] = 384.16 ≈ 385. A convenient sampling method was used for the study. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Muhammad Dental College (Reference number: MDC/0713) to conduct the study.

The study involved distributing questionnaires via Google Form to dental professionals in Karachi city of Sindh province, Pakistan within our network using WhatsApp and email. These participants were requested to share the Google Form link with other dental professionals to broaden participation. The questionnaire was an adaptation modified from a previous study by Al-Khalifa and AlSheikh, and included demographic and professional data, preferred communication methods in teledentistry, and four separate domains of teledentistry, including (1) data security and patient consent, (2) the potential of teledentistry to improve dental care, (3) usefulness of teledentistry for dental practice, and (4) usefulness of teledentistry for patients ([Fig. 1]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 The evaluated domains of teledentistry and their subsets.

In response to reviewer feedback, we classified the questionnaire items based on “knowledge,” “awareness,” and “attitude,” as shown in [Supplementary Table S1] (available in the online version). This classification helped clarify the focus of each item with our original domains.

Each domain comprised multiple items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from a score of 1 for not concerned at all, to 5 for extremely concerned. The questionnaire began with an introduction to teledentistry, its advantages, applications, and a consent agreement outlining the study's purpose. All responses were collected anonymously to ensure confidentiality, and permission from institutions or clinics was not sought, as participants were approached as individuals.


#

Data Analysis

Data was downloaded from Google Forms into MS Excel 2016 for coding based on a 5-point Likert scale, then analyzed using IBM SPSS version 29. A pilot test with 20 dentists was conducted to determine internal consistency using Cronbach's α, yielding a satisfactory value of 0.85. These were not included in the final analysis of the study. Descriptive statistics analyzed means, standard deviations, and frequencies for demographic variables and the four domains of teledentistry. A normality test confirmed the data were normally distributed ([Fig. 2]). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze mean score differences of independent variables, and Pearson's correlation assessed the linear correlation between all domains, with p-values less than 0.05 considered significant.

Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Frequency of the items evaluated in the four domains of teledentistry.

#

Results

Demographic Data

The final cohort sampled were 408 dental professionals and comprised 80.4% (n = 328) females. A vast majority (83.3%; n = 340) fell within the 20 to 34 age group. General dentists constituted the largest cohort (66.7%; n = 272), followed by residents (15.7%; n = 64). The majority of participants (69.6%; n = 284) reported having 0 to 5 years of experience. A significant proportion (58.8%, n = 240) were engaged in private practice. Note that 44.1% (n = 180) reported working 1 to 19 hours per week ([Table 1]).

Table 1

Demographic data

Variables

Frequency (n)

%

Gender

Male

80

19.6

Female

328

80.4

Age group

20–34

340

83.3

35–44

60

14.7

45–54

8

2.0

> 55

0

0

Qualification

General dental practitioner

272

66.7

Resident/Graduate

64

15.7

Specialist

34

8.3

Dental hygienist/assistant

38

9.3

Work experience (in years)

0–5

284

69.6

6–10

72

17.6

11–15

40

9.8

> 16

12

2.9

Work setting

Private

240

58.8

Governmental

64

15.7

Both (private and governmental)

32

7.8

Academic

44

10.8

No job

28

6.9

Working hours per week

1–19 h

180

44.1

20–34 h

76

18.6

35–49 h

84

20.6

50–64 h

54

13.2

> 65 h

14

3.4

Daily use of the Internet for

general purposes (in hours)

< 1

24

5.9

2–4

240

58.8

5–7

124

30.4

8–10

20

4.9

> 11

0

0.0

Daily use of the Internet in dental

practice (in hours)

< 1

224

54.9

2–4

152

37.3

5–7

28

6.9

8–10

4

1.0

> 11

0

0.0

The preferred communication tools for teledentistry among dental professionals revealed interesting trends ([Fig. 3]). Thus, only a minority, 29.6% (n = 236), preferred digital radiographs, followed by photographic images (20.1%; n = 160) and teleconference participation (24.6%; n = 196), and finally, phone calls (12.5%; n = 100). Email and social media were the least preferred media tools, each chosen by 6.5% (n = 52). Fax/letters were not selected by any dental professionals.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Preferred communication tool for teledentistry among dental professionals.

#

Domain 1: Data Security Concerns

The concerns of dental professionals on teledentistry including confidentiality and security are shown in [Table 2]. The most significant concern expressed by the majority (59.8%; n = 244) was ensuring patient data confidentiality online, while a fifth of the respondents (19.6%; n = 80) were somewhat concerned. Obtaining patient consent for teleconsultation was another major concern, with 52.0% (n = 212) very concerned and 27.5% (n = 112) somewhat concerned. Concerns about hardware and software incompatibility were reported by 43.1% (n = 176), while 31.4% (n = 128) were somewhat concerned. Finally, the reliability of teledental equipment was a significant issue, with 52.9% (n = 216) very concerned and 28.4% (n = 116) somewhat concerned.

Table 2

Responses of domain 1 to 4 items among dental professionals (n = 408)

Domain 1. Understanding of data security and patient consent

Items

Very concerned

Little concerned

Not feeling either way

Not particularly concerned

Not concerned at all

Obtaining patient consent for teleconsultation

Count

Row, N %

212

52

112

27.5

48

11.8

20

4.9

16

3.9

Ensuring confidentiality when sending data online

Count

Row, N %

244

59.8

80

19.6

40

9.8

32

7.8

12

2.9

Potential for digital forgery

Count

Row, N %

192

47.1

116

28.4

52

12.7

24

5.9

24

5.9

Hardware and software incompatibility

Count

Row, N %

176

43.1

128

31.4

64

15.7

20

4.9

20

4.9

Reliability of teledental equipment

Count

Row, N %

216

52.9

116

28.4

28

6.9

48

11.8

0

0

Domain 2. Capability of Teledentistry to Improve Practice

Items

Disagree strongly

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Agree strongly

Teledentistry could offer precise diagnoses within a clinical environment

Count

Row, N %

56

13.7

36

8.8

176

43.1

128

31.4

12

2.9

Teledentistry could assist in reducing the waiting list

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

28

6.9

108

26.5

228

55.9

24

5.9

Teledentistry could improve guidance and recommendations

Count

Row. N %

16

3.9

16

3.9

116

28.4

244

59.8

16

3.9

Teledentistry could enhance engagement among colleagues

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

24

5.9

104

25.5

240

58.8

20

4.9

Teledentistry offers a secure environment for the practice of dental care

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

12

2.9

136

33.3

220

53.9

24

5.9

The utilization of teledentistry would enhance the efficiency of patient referrals

Count

Row, N %

12

2.9

16

3.9

112

27.5

232

56.9

36

8.8

Domain 3. Teledentistry Usefulness for Dental Practice

Items

Disagree strongly

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Agree strongly

Teledentistry could improve clinical training and ongoing education

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

24

5.9

112

27.5

236

57.8

20

4.9

Teledentistry could lead to decreased expenses for dental clinics

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

40

9.8

116

28.4

220

53.9

12

2.9

Teledentistry could extend the duration of treatment interactions with the patient

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

44

10.8

144

35.3

184

45.1

16

3.9

Teledentistry would require an additional appointment for capturing photographs

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

60

14.7

140

34.3

188

46.1

4

1.0

Compared with a referral letter, teledentistry could result in time savings

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

16

3.9

112

27.5

236

57.8

28

6.9

The setup costs for teledentistry might be expensive

Count

Row, N %

24

5.9

72

17.6

144

35.3

152

37.3

16

3.9

Teledentistry would offer sufficient diagnostic information

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

44

10.8

172

42.2

160

39.2

12

2.9

Domain 4. Teledentistry Usefulness for Dental Patients

Items

Disagree strongly

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Agree strongly

Teledentistry could lead to cost savings for patients

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

40

9.8

128

31.4

208

51

16

3.9

Teledentistry could enhance the communication with patients

Count

Row, N %

12

2.9

12

2.9

112

27.5

244

59.8

28

6.9

Teledentistry could serve as a valuable tool for patient education

Count

Row, N %

12

2.9

8

2

108

26.5

232

56.9

48

11.8

Teledentistry could assist in preventing the need for unnecessary travel to the dental clinic

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

8

2

96

23.5

252

61.8

36

8.8

Teledentistry could be beneficial for monitoring the patient's condition

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

12

2.9

104

25.5

228

55.9

44

10.8

Teledentistry would offer convenience and be positively received by patients

Count

Row, N %

16

3.9

8

2

104

25.5

248

60.8

32

7.8

Teledentistry could prove valuable for patients residing in remote areas

Count

Row, N %

12

2.9

16

3.9

72

17.6

248

60.8

60

14.7

Dental insurance plans should include coverage for teledentistry

Count

Row, N %

20

4.9

28

6.9

136

33.3

180

44.1

44

10.8

Note: Descriptive statistics.



#

Domain 2: Capability of Teledentistry to Improve Practice

The potential for teledentistry to offer precise diagnoses elicited varied responses, with 43.1% (n = 176) being neutral, 31.4% (n = 128) agreeing, and 2.9% (n = 12) strongly agreeing on this element. Regarding the reduction of waiting lists, a majority viewed teledentistry positively, with 55.9% (n = 228) agreeing and 5.9% (n = 24) strongly agreeing. The improvement of guidance and recommendations through teledentistry was supported by 59.8% (n = 244) of participants agreeing.

Enhancing engagement among colleagues was another perceived benefit, with 58.8% (n = 240) agreeing. In terms of offering a secure environment for dental care, 53.9% (n = 220) affirmed this to be the case. Finally, the use of teledentistry to enhance the efficiency of patient referrals was positively received, with 56.9% (n = 232) agreeing with this issue ([Table 2]). These results indicated that dental professionals generally perceived teledentistry as having the potential to enhance differing aspects of dental practice.


#

Domain 3: Teledentistry Usefulness for Dental Practice

The opinions of dental professionals on the effectiveness of teledentistry in dental practice are presented in [Table 2]. Accordingly, 57.8% (n = 236) viewed teledentistry as a very positive medium for advancing clinical training and continuing education. Additionally, 53.9% (220) agreed that teledentistry could decrease dental clinic expenditure, while 45.1% (n = 184) believed that teledentistry will be of use for extending interaction duration with patients.

A significant percentage of participants (57.8%; n = 236) perceived that teledentistry saves time compared with referral letters. Concerns regarding the expensive setup costs for teledentistry were acknowledged by 37.3% (n = 152) of respondents. On the other hand, 39.2% (n = 160) had a positive view of the diagnostic information provided by teledentistry, considering it sufficient.


#

Domain 4: Teledentistry Usefulness for Dental Patients

The perspectives of dental professionals on the implementation and advantages of teledentistry for dental professionals are presented in [Table 2]. Just over one-half of the respondents (51%; n = 208) thought that teledentistry can lead to cost savings for patients, and improve communication with patients (59.8%; n = 244). Additionally, 56.9% considered it to be a valuable tool for patient education, and 61.8% (n = 252) acknowledged its role in reducing unnecessary travel to the dental clinic.

Furthermore, 55.9% (n = 228) acknowledged its benefits for monitoring patients health, and 60.8% agreed the convenience of the technology and positive reception by patients. A majority, 60.8% (n = 248), also recognized its value for patients residing in remote areas, while 44.1% (n = 180) believed that dental insurance plans should include coverage for teledentistry.


#

Comparisons in the Mean Scores of Independent Variables across the Four Domains of Teledentistry

ANOVA test was used to analyze the demographic variables versus the dental professionals' perceptions of teledentistry ([Table 3]). Significant differences were found based on gender and age in the domain of data security and patient consent (p < 0.000), with females and older participants expressing higher concerns. In terms of the capability of teledentistry to improve practice, specialists rated it higher than residents and general dentists (p < 0.000). Those with more work experience rated teledentistry lower across most variables.

Table 3

Dental professionals' demographic variables related to the evaluated four domains of teledentistry

Variables

Data security and patient consent,

mean (SD)

The capability of teledentistry to improve practice,

mean (SD)

The usefulness of teledentistry for dental practice, mean (SD)

The usefulness of teledentistry for patients, mean (SD)

Gender

 Male

1.55 ± 0.62

3.41 ± 0.92

3.10 ± 0.86

3.50 ± 0.92

 Female

1.92 ± 0.90

3.47 ± 0.57

3.42 ± 0.54

3.66 ± 0.60

p-Value

< 0.001[a]

0.441

< 0.001[a]

0.047

Age group

 20–34

1.94 ± 0.89

3.50 ± 0.58

3.39 ± 0.55

3.66 ± 0.59

 35–44

1.42 ± 0.52

3.24 ± 0.95

3.13 ± 0.94

3.50 ± 1.07

 45–54

1.20 ± 0.21

3.58 ± 0.89

3.42 ± 0.15

3.56 ± 0.20

p-Value

< 0.001[a]

0.016 [a]

0.010 [a]

0.228

Qualification

 Resident/Graduate

2.03 ± 0.91

3.51 + 0.49

3.39 ± 0.41

3.73 ± 0.47

 General dentist

1.87 ± 0.88

3.39 ± 0.69

3.33 ± 0.65

3.54 ± 0.74

 Specialist

1.68 ± 0.77

3.88 ± 0.49

3.45 ± 0.75

4.08 ± 0.43

 Dental hygienist

1.50 ± 0.53

3.54 ± 0.54

3.37 ± 0.60

3.68 ± 0.49

p-Value

0.013[a]

< 0.001[a]

0.737

< 0.001[a]

Work experience (years)

 0–5

1.94 ± 0.90

3.49 ± 0.54

3.41 ± 0.50

3.65 ± 0.60

 6–10

1.87 ± 0.76

3.38 ± 0.87

3.19 ± 0.86

3.56 ± 0.82

 11–15

1.34 ± 0.48

3.63 ± 0.43

3.51 ± 0.49

3.86 ± 0.45

 > 16

1.13 ± 0.19

2.83 ± 1.37

2.76 ± 1.30

2.91 ± 1.41

p-Value

< 0.001[a]

< 0.001[a]

< 0.001[a]

< 0.001[a]

Abbreviation: ANOVA, analysis of variance; SD, standard deviation.


a ANOVA, α = 0.05,


Pearson's correlation analysis indicated a strong positive correlation between the domains related to the capability of teledentistry to improve practice and its usefulness for dental practice and patients (p < 0.000; [Table 4]).

Table 4

Pearson's correlation among each of the domains evaluated clinical parameters

Domains

Domain 1

Domain 2

Domain 3

Domain 4

Domain 1

Pearson's correlation

0.068

0.001

-0.089

Domain 2

Pearson's correlation

0.068

0.742[a]

0.796[a]

Domain 3

Pearson's correlation

0.001

0.742[a]

0.754[a]

Domain 4

Pearson's correlation

–0.089

0.796[a]

0.754[a]

Domain 1: Data security and patient consent.


Domain 2: The capability of teledentistry to improve practice.


Domain 3: The usefulness of teledentistry for dental practice.


Domain 4: The usefulness of teledentistry for patients.


a Correlation is significant at the p-value < 0.05.


With regard to clinical application of teledentistry varied views were noted among specialties, with dental hygienists showing the highest interest, in contrast to low interest shown by oral surgeons and prosthodontists ([Fig. 4]). On the other hand, periodontics, oral medicine, orthodontics, operative dentistry, and endodontics personnel showed a moderate interest in utilizing teledentistry. Finally, our data should help policymakers and health care providers in Pakistan develop tailored strategies to address concerns, such as data security, and maximize the benefits of teledentistry across diverse user groups.

Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Responses on the application of teledentistry in different dental disciplines.

#
#

Discussion

This survey represents one of the first attempts to investigate the perception of teledentistry among dental professionals in Pakistan. Access to such technology, especially when diseases such as coronavirus disease 2019 and various viral infections are spreading in the community, has led to the realization by the dental professionals of the importance of teledentistry as a highly useful clinical communication tool. This is particularly relevant in countries like Pakistan, where a significant proportion of the population resides in remote areas, far from major urban centers, and lacks adequate access to dental care.

The study findings unveiled significant variations in perceptions toward different aspects of teledentistry. Gender was identified as a notable determinant, with females expressing heightened concerns regarding data security and patient consent. This observation aligns with prior research that highlights gender differences in technology adoption and privacy concerns among health care professionals in general.[21] [22]

Age was also found to play a role, as older professionals exhibited lower levels of concern but higher perceptions of teledentistry's potential to enhance dental practice and benefit patients. These age-related differences reflect findings from previous studies emphasizing generational variations in technology acceptance and perceived benefits within health care contexts.[23] [24]

The analysis of teledentistry domains revealed nuanced perspectives among dental professionals. Concerns related to confidentiality and security issues were prevalent, with participants expressing varying levels of apprehension, particularly on obtaining patient consent and ensuring confidentiality when sending data online. Similar findings have been reported in studies investigating health care professionals' perceptions of telemedicine and data security where 80 to 84% of the respondents worried about the confidentiality of patient data when transmitted online.[25] [26] Issues such as digital forgery (90%), incompatible software and hardware, and the accuracy of equipment (80%) were also major concerns in another study.[27] However, there was a strong consensus on the potential benefits of teledentistry for improving practice efficiency, reducing waiting lists, enhancing guidance and recommendations, and offering a secure environment for dental care in all the studies including ours. These positive perceptions align with literature highlighting the transformative impact of telehealth technologies on health care delivery and patient outcomes.[28] [29] [30] [31]

Integrating multiple communication platforms can cater to varied preferences, enhance the adoption of teledentistry, and improve remote dental care. Our data showed diverse preferences for communication tools in teledentistry, with dental professionals favoring digital radiographs, video conferencing, and photos, highlighting a clear shift toward more modern, digital communication methods in teledentistry. In a previous study, 16 and 22% of respondents preferred audio calls and email, respectively.[32]

The ANOVA analyses conducted on independent variables (gender, age, qualification, and duration of work experience) revealed statistically significant associations with perceptions of teledentistry across different domains. Specialists demonstrated higher levels of perceived capability and usefulness of teledentistry compared with general dentists and residents, suggesting a greater enthusiasm for integrating teledentistry into clinical practice. In another study,[32] residents/graduate researchers rated data security and patient consent the highest, and dental therapists rated the capability to improve practice the highest. Female participants perceived teledentistry as more useful for patients compared with males, highlighting potential gender-related differences in the perceived benefits of teledentistry. These findings align with studies exploring health care professionals' attitudes and adoption of telehealth technologies based on professional roles and gender differences.[33] [34]

Moreover, Pearson's correlation analysis between all four domains revealed a strong and positive correlation between domains 2 and 4 (capability of teledentistry to improve practice, teledentistry usefulness for dental practice, and teledentistry usefulness for dental patients), which aligns with a previous study by Al-Khalifa and AlSheikh.[32]

Our findings have several implications for the successful implementation of teledentistry in dental practice particularly in Pakistan. Addressing specific concerns related to data security, confidentiality, and patient consent is crucial for fostering trust and acceptance among dental professionals. Emphasizing the practice-enhancing effects and patient benefits of teledentistry can promote its adoption and utilization across different professional groups. Additionally, integrating preferred communication tools identified by participants can optimize the usability and effectiveness of teledentistry platforms in clinical settings. These implications aligned with the recommendations reported in studies emphasizing the importance of addressing barriers and adapting interventions to promote the adoption of telehealth technologies in health care.[35] [36] [37] [38]


#

Study Limitations and Future Directions

Our study has some limitations. First, the sample size was small, not randomized, and limited to Karachi and second, the regional-specific study may limit its generalizability to the whole country. A bigger sample size from various regions of Pakistan would have resulted in more country-specific data. Additionally, relying on information provided by the participants themselves, the research might be biased if they give socially preferred answers rather than expressing what they believe and what they do in reality. Further studies with qualitative methods are needed to determine various other factors influencing the use of teledentistry, such as technological literacy, access to technology, and specific barriers, compare the perception of teledentistry with traditional dental practice, and to look at how the views and experiences of dental professionals change with time as teledentistry progresses and becomes more integrated into everyday practice, and finally, longitudinal studies will also be of interest.


#

Conclusion

Teledentistry was viewed favorably by dental professionals, mainly female and young, although there were concerns about patient consent, data privacy, and implementation costs. Teledentistry has been perceived as useful for accurate diagnosis, reduction of waiting times, improvement of guidance, as well as the advancement of clinical education and communication. We noted teledentistry was preferred by less experienced, female and younger professionals. To ensure a seamless transition to the use of teledentistry, future research should attempt to address the issues and obstacles found in this study.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Acknowledgment

This research project is supported by the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University; L.S. was also supported by the Chulalongkorn University, Second Century High Potential Professor Fund and the Faculty of Dentistry.

Principle Findings

A cohort of Pakistani dental professionals expressed positive views of teledentistry, despite concerns over data security. They recognized its potential for reducing patient waiting periods and improving clinical care.


Authors' Contribution

Y.M.: Writing–original draft, methodology, investigation, data curation, and conceptualization. L.P.S.: Writing–review and editing, visualization, validation, and formal analysis. P.P.P.: Writing–review and editing, visualization, validation, supervision, methodology, and investigation.


Supplementary Material

  • References

  • 1 Giudice A, Bennardo F, Antonelli A, Barone S, Fortunato L. COVID-19 is a new challenge for dental practitioners: advice on patients' management from prevention of cross infections to telemedicine. Open Dent J 2020; 14 (01) 298-304
  • 2 Abbas B, Wajahat M, Saleem Z, Imran E, Sajjad M, Khurshid Z. Role of teledentistry in COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide comparative analysis among dental professionals. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (S 01): S116-S122
  • 3 Wheeler T. Smile for the camera: telemedicine comes to your local dentist's office. Telemed Today 1999; 7 (01) 14-15 , 42
  • 4 Alabdullah JH, Daniel SJ. A systematic review on the validity of teledentistry. Telemed J E Health 2018; 24 (08) 639-648
  • 5 Mandall NA, O'Brien KD, Brady J, Worthington HV, Harvey L. Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 1: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J 2005; 199 (10) 659-662 , discussion 653
  • 6 Rocca MA, Kudryk VL, Pajak JC, Morris T. The evolution of a teledentistry system within the Department of Defense. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 921-924
  • 7 AlShaya MS, Assery MK, Pani SC. Reliability of mobile phone teledentistry in dental diagnosis and treatment planning in mixed dentition. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26 (1-2): 45-52
  • 8 Khan SA, Omar H. Teledentistry in practice: literature review. Telemed J E Health 2013; 19 (07) 565-567
  • 9 AlKlayb SA, Assery MK, AlQahtani A, AlAnazi M, Pani SC. Comparison of the effectiveness of a mobile phone-based education program in educating mothers as oral health providers in two regions of Saudi Arabia. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017; 7 (03) 110-115
  • 10 Zailani S, Gilani MS, Nikbin D, Iranmanesh M. Determinants of telemedicine acceptance in selected public hospitals in Malaysia: clinical perspective. J Med Syst 2014; 38 (09) 111
  • 11 Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24 (01) 4-12
  • 12 Aboalshamat KT. Awareness of, beliefs about, practices of, and barriers to teledentistry among dental students and the implications for Saudi Arabia Vision 2030 and coronavirus pandemic. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2020; 10 (04) 431-437
  • 13 Mihailovic B, Miladinovic M, Vujicic B. Telemedicine in dentistry (Teledentistry). Advances in Telemedicine: Applications in Various Medical Disciplines and Geographical Areas. 2011 :215–230. Accessed May 5, 2024 at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-telemedicine-applications-in-various-medical-disciplines-andgeographical-regions/telemedicine-in-dentistry-teledentistryInTech
  • 14 Estai M, Kruger E, Tennant M. Perceptions of Australian dental practitioners about using telemedicine in dental practice. Br Dent J 2016; 220 (01) 25-29
  • 15 Palmer NG, Yacyshyn JR, Northcott HC, Nebbe B, Major PW. Perceptions and attitudes of Canadian orthodontists regarding digital and electronic technology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (02) 163-167
  • 16 AlShaya M, Farsi D, Farsi N. Perception, awareness and knowledge of dental professionals about teledentistry in Saudi Arabia—a literature review. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun 2021; 14: 1393-1397
  • 17 Golder DT, Brennan KA. Practicing dentistry in the age of telemedicine. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131 (06) 734-744
  • 18 Jawaid SA. Plight of dentistry in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36 (03) 299-302
  • 19 Chaudhary FA, Ahmad B, Javed MQ. et al. Teledentistry awareness, its usefulness, and challenges among dental professionals in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Digit Health 2022; 8: 20 552076221089776
  • 20 Moosa Y, Samaranayake L, Pisarnturakit PP. The gingival phenotypes and related clinical periodontal parameters in a cohort of Pakistani young adults. Heliyon 2024; 10 (02) e24219
  • 21 Soegyanto AI, Wimardhani YS, Maharani DA, Tennant M. Indonesian dentists' perception of the use of teledentistry. Int Dent J 2022; 72 (05) 674-681
  • 22 Cheuk R, Adeniyi A, Farmer J, Singhal S, Jessani A. Teledentistry use during the COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions and practices of Ontario dentists. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 72
  • 23 Prasidhati SK, Ramadhani A, Setiawati F. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding teledentistry among dentists in Jakarta during the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic: a crosssectional study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2024; 24: e230071
  • 24 Németh O, Uhrin E, Girasek E, Boros J, Győrffy Z. The impact of digital healthcare and teledentistry on dentistry in the 21st century: a survey of Hungarian dentists. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 1025
  • 25 Mariño RJ, Zaror C. Legal issues in digital oral health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24 (01) 6
  • 26 Bassan S. Data privacy considerations for telehealth consumers amid COVID-19. J Law Biosci 2020; 7 (01) lsaa075
  • 27 Khokhar RA, Ismail WA, Sunny A. et al. Awareness regarding teledentistry among dental professionals in Malaysia. BioMed Res Int 2022; 2022 (01) 3750556
  • 28 Tiwari T, Diep V, Tranby E, Thakkar-Samtani M, Frantsve-Hawley J. Dentist perceptions about the value of teledentistry. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22 (01) 176
  • 29 Mariño R, Tonmukayakul U, Manton D, Stranieri A, Clarke K. Cost-analysis of teledentistry in residential aged care facilities. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22 (06) 326-332
  • 30 Islam MRR, Islam R, Ferdous S. et al. Teledentistry as an effective tool for the communication improvement between dentists and patients: an overview. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10 (08) 1586
  • 31 Kui A, Popescu C, Labuneț A. et al. Is teledentistry a method for optimizing dental practice, even in the post-pandemic period? An integrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (13) 7609
  • 32 Al-Khalifa KS, AlSheikh R. Teledentistry awareness among dental professionals in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One 2020; 15 (10) e0240825
  • 33 Alsharif AT, Al-Harbi SS. Dentists' self-perception on teledentistry: the changing landscape driven by technological booming in the 21st century. Open Dent J 2020; 14 (01) 291-297
  • 34 van Elburg FRT, Klaver NS, Nieboer AP, Askari M. Gender differences regarding intention to use mHealth applications in the Dutch elderly population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22 (01) 449
  • 35 Taylor J, Coates E, Wessels B, Mountain G, Hawley MS. Implementing solutions to improve and expand telehealth adoption: participatory action research in four community healthcare settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 529
  • 36 Mathew S, Fitts MS, Liddle Z. et al. Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23 (01) 341
  • 37 Kengne Talla P, Inquimbert C, Dawson A, Zidarov D, Bergeron F, Chandad F. Barriers and enablers to implementing teledentistry from the perspective of dental health care professionals: protocol for a systematic quantitative, qualitative, and mixed studies review. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12 (01) e44218
  • 38 Maqsood A, Sadiq MSK, Mirza D. et al. The teledentistry, impact, current trends, and application in dentistry: a global study. BioMed Res Int 2021; 2021 (01) 5437237

Address for correspondence

Pagaporn Pantuwadee Pisarnturakit, DDS, MSc, DrPH
Department of Community Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
34 Henry Dunant Road, Patumwan, Bangkok, 10330
Thailand   

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. März 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Giudice A, Bennardo F, Antonelli A, Barone S, Fortunato L. COVID-19 is a new challenge for dental practitioners: advice on patients' management from prevention of cross infections to telemedicine. Open Dent J 2020; 14 (01) 298-304
  • 2 Abbas B, Wajahat M, Saleem Z, Imran E, Sajjad M, Khurshid Z. Role of teledentistry in COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide comparative analysis among dental professionals. Eur J Dent 2020; 14 (S 01): S116-S122
  • 3 Wheeler T. Smile for the camera: telemedicine comes to your local dentist's office. Telemed Today 1999; 7 (01) 14-15 , 42
  • 4 Alabdullah JH, Daniel SJ. A systematic review on the validity of teledentistry. Telemed J E Health 2018; 24 (08) 639-648
  • 5 Mandall NA, O'Brien KD, Brady J, Worthington HV, Harvey L. Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 1: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J 2005; 199 (10) 659-662 , discussion 653
  • 6 Rocca MA, Kudryk VL, Pajak JC, Morris T. The evolution of a teledentistry system within the Department of Defense. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 921-924
  • 7 AlShaya MS, Assery MK, Pani SC. Reliability of mobile phone teledentistry in dental diagnosis and treatment planning in mixed dentition. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 26 (1-2): 45-52
  • 8 Khan SA, Omar H. Teledentistry in practice: literature review. Telemed J E Health 2013; 19 (07) 565-567
  • 9 AlKlayb SA, Assery MK, AlQahtani A, AlAnazi M, Pani SC. Comparison of the effectiveness of a mobile phone-based education program in educating mothers as oral health providers in two regions of Saudi Arabia. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2017; 7 (03) 110-115
  • 10 Zailani S, Gilani MS, Nikbin D, Iranmanesh M. Determinants of telemedicine acceptance in selected public hospitals in Malaysia: clinical perspective. J Med Syst 2014; 38 (09) 111
  • 11 Scott Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, Vegi L, Ravi K, Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24 (01) 4-12
  • 12 Aboalshamat KT. Awareness of, beliefs about, practices of, and barriers to teledentistry among dental students and the implications for Saudi Arabia Vision 2030 and coronavirus pandemic. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2020; 10 (04) 431-437
  • 13 Mihailovic B, Miladinovic M, Vujicic B. Telemedicine in dentistry (Teledentistry). Advances in Telemedicine: Applications in Various Medical Disciplines and Geographical Areas. 2011 :215–230. Accessed May 5, 2024 at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-telemedicine-applications-in-various-medical-disciplines-andgeographical-regions/telemedicine-in-dentistry-teledentistryInTech
  • 14 Estai M, Kruger E, Tennant M. Perceptions of Australian dental practitioners about using telemedicine in dental practice. Br Dent J 2016; 220 (01) 25-29
  • 15 Palmer NG, Yacyshyn JR, Northcott HC, Nebbe B, Major PW. Perceptions and attitudes of Canadian orthodontists regarding digital and electronic technology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (02) 163-167
  • 16 AlShaya M, Farsi D, Farsi N. Perception, awareness and knowledge of dental professionals about teledentistry in Saudi Arabia—a literature review. Biosci Biotechnol Res Commun 2021; 14: 1393-1397
  • 17 Golder DT, Brennan KA. Practicing dentistry in the age of telemedicine. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131 (06) 734-744
  • 18 Jawaid SA. Plight of dentistry in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36 (03) 299-302
  • 19 Chaudhary FA, Ahmad B, Javed MQ. et al. Teledentistry awareness, its usefulness, and challenges among dental professionals in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Digit Health 2022; 8: 20 552076221089776
  • 20 Moosa Y, Samaranayake L, Pisarnturakit PP. The gingival phenotypes and related clinical periodontal parameters in a cohort of Pakistani young adults. Heliyon 2024; 10 (02) e24219
  • 21 Soegyanto AI, Wimardhani YS, Maharani DA, Tennant M. Indonesian dentists' perception of the use of teledentistry. Int Dent J 2022; 72 (05) 674-681
  • 22 Cheuk R, Adeniyi A, Farmer J, Singhal S, Jessani A. Teledentistry use during the COVID-19 pandemic: perceptions and practices of Ontario dentists. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 72
  • 23 Prasidhati SK, Ramadhani A, Setiawati F. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding teledentistry among dentists in Jakarta during the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic: a crosssectional study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2024; 24: e230071
  • 24 Németh O, Uhrin E, Girasek E, Boros J, Győrffy Z. The impact of digital healthcare and teledentistry on dentistry in the 21st century: a survey of Hungarian dentists. BMC Oral Health 2023; 23 (01) 1025
  • 25 Mariño RJ, Zaror C. Legal issues in digital oral health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24 (01) 6
  • 26 Bassan S. Data privacy considerations for telehealth consumers amid COVID-19. J Law Biosci 2020; 7 (01) lsaa075
  • 27 Khokhar RA, Ismail WA, Sunny A. et al. Awareness regarding teledentistry among dental professionals in Malaysia. BioMed Res Int 2022; 2022 (01) 3750556
  • 28 Tiwari T, Diep V, Tranby E, Thakkar-Samtani M, Frantsve-Hawley J. Dentist perceptions about the value of teledentistry. BMC Oral Health 2022; 22 (01) 176
  • 29 Mariño R, Tonmukayakul U, Manton D, Stranieri A, Clarke K. Cost-analysis of teledentistry in residential aged care facilities. J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22 (06) 326-332
  • 30 Islam MRR, Islam R, Ferdous S. et al. Teledentistry as an effective tool for the communication improvement between dentists and patients: an overview. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10 (08) 1586
  • 31 Kui A, Popescu C, Labuneț A. et al. Is teledentistry a method for optimizing dental practice, even in the post-pandemic period? An integrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (13) 7609
  • 32 Al-Khalifa KS, AlSheikh R. Teledentistry awareness among dental professionals in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One 2020; 15 (10) e0240825
  • 33 Alsharif AT, Al-Harbi SS. Dentists' self-perception on teledentistry: the changing landscape driven by technological booming in the 21st century. Open Dent J 2020; 14 (01) 291-297
  • 34 van Elburg FRT, Klaver NS, Nieboer AP, Askari M. Gender differences regarding intention to use mHealth applications in the Dutch elderly population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22 (01) 449
  • 35 Taylor J, Coates E, Wessels B, Mountain G, Hawley MS. Implementing solutions to improve and expand telehealth adoption: participatory action research in four community healthcare settings. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 529
  • 36 Mathew S, Fitts MS, Liddle Z. et al. Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23 (01) 341
  • 37 Kengne Talla P, Inquimbert C, Dawson A, Zidarov D, Bergeron F, Chandad F. Barriers and enablers to implementing teledentistry from the perspective of dental health care professionals: protocol for a systematic quantitative, qualitative, and mixed studies review. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12 (01) e44218
  • 38 Maqsood A, Sadiq MSK, Mirza D. et al. The teledentistry, impact, current trends, and application in dentistry: a global study. BioMed Res Int 2021; 2021 (01) 5437237

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 The evaluated domains of teledentistry and their subsets.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Frequency of the items evaluated in the four domains of teledentistry.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Preferred communication tool for teledentistry among dental professionals.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Responses on the application of teledentistry in different dental disciplines.