Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1805003
Maldeployed Hepaticogastrostomy Stent—Rescue by a Novel Technique (with Video)
Abstract
A 69-year-old female with pancreatic head malignancy with obstructive jaundice and duodenal bulb infiltration underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS). During stent placement, proximal end of the metal stent got maldeployed inside the peritoneal cavity along with loss of guidewire access. Multiple attempts to cannulate the proximal end of stent through the puncture site were unsuccessful. Considering the morbid nature of potential surgical option, a novel EUS-guided rescue technique was performed. Body of previously maldeployed stent was identified with EUS examination and was punctured with 19 G needle (transgastric route) followed by guidewire negotiation in common hepatic duct. Sequential dilatation of gastric puncture site and stent was performed. A fully covered self-expandable metallic stent was placed with the distal end in previously maldeployed stent and the proximal end inside gastric lumen and free flow of bile could be established. The present case highlights that stent maldeployment can be a serious complication during EUS-HGS, which can occur even in expert hands. Loss of proximal end in the peritoneal cavity may lead to a challenging situation, which may be rescued by puncture of the maldeployed stent with the placement of additional stent.
#
A 69-year-old lady with pancreatic head malignancy with obstructive jaundice and duodenal bulb infiltration underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) ([Fig. 1]). The procedure was performed under general anesthesia, and a linear EUS examination (GF UCT 180, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was performed through proximal stomach. A segment 3 duct was punctured with a fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle (19G, Expect Slimline, Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, United States), guidewire (0.025, VisiGlide, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was negotiated into proximal bile duct, followed by dilatation with 6Fr cystotome with endocut mode (ERBE VIOD300, Tübingen, Germany) and 4 mm biliary balloon (Hurricane, 4 mm × 4 cm, Boston Scientific, Cork, Ireland). During stent placement, the proximal end of stent (10 mm × 10 cm, partially covered Hanarostent biliary NC, M.I.Tech, Korea) got maldeployed inside the peritoneal cavity, along with loss of guidewire access. Multiple attempts to cannulate the proximal end of stent through the puncture site were unsuccessful. Considering the morbid nature of potential surgical option, an EUS-guided rescue technique was performed. The body of previously maldeployed stent was punctured with an EUS-guided 19 G needle (transgastric route) followed by guidewire negotiation in the common hepatic duct ([Fig. 2]). Sequential dilatation of gastric puncture site and stent was performed with 6 Fr cystotome, 4 mm hurricane balloon, and 10 Fr cystotome ([Fig. 3]). A fully covered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS; 10 mm × 8 cm WallFlex, biliary; Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, United States) was placed with the distal end in the previously maldeployed stent and the proximal end inside the gastric lumen and free flow of bile could be established ([Fig. 4]). A double pigtail plastic stent was placed inside the SEMS for anchoring. A duodenal SEMS was also placed in the same setting ([Figs. 5] and [6]). The patient was extubated and shifted to ward ([Video 1]). The patient developed segmental cholangitis (Segment 2) and liver abscess during follow-up, which responded to intravenous antibiotics and single-time aspiration of liver abscess ([Fig. 7]). The patient has been under follow-up for 6 months without any biliary complications.












Video 1 Maldeployed hepaticogastrostomy stent—rescue by a novel technique.
Quality:


Stent maldeployment has been reported as a serious complication during EUS-HGS.[1] Stent placement through the end of maldeployed stent is the most commonly used rescue technique.[2] Loss of proximal end in the peritoneal cavity may lead to challenging situations,[3] which may be rescued by puncture of the maldeployed stent with the placement of additional stent.
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
-
References
- 1 Ochiai K, Fujisawa T, Ishii S. et al. Risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (14) 3111
- 2 Martins FP, Rossini LG, Ferrari AP. Migration of a covered metallic stent following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: fatal complication. Endoscopy 2010; 42 (Suppl. 02) E126-E127
- 3 Hamada T, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Koike K. Tandem stent placement as a rescue for stent misplacement in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Dig Endosc 2013; 25 (03) 340-341
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
19 March 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Ochiai K, Fujisawa T, Ishii S. et al. Risk factors for stent migration into the abdominal cavity after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (14) 3111
- 2 Martins FP, Rossini LG, Ferrari AP. Migration of a covered metallic stent following endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: fatal complication. Endoscopy 2010; 42 (Suppl. 02) E126-E127
- 3 Hamada T, Nakai Y, Isayama H, Koike K. Tandem stent placement as a rescue for stent misplacement in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Dig Endosc 2013; 25 (03) 340-341













