Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol 1999; 30(5): 345-346
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-9229
EDITORIAL
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Trends und Indikationen der radikalen perinealen Prostatektomie

Trends and Indications of Radical Perineal ProstatectomyPh Dahm, J. Vieweg, A. Gregori, D. F. Paulson
  • Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Key words

perineal prostatectomy - PSA - Gleason score

Literatur

  • 1 Bishoff J T, Motley G, Optenberg S A, Stein C R, Moon K A, Browning S M, Sabanegh E, Foley J P, Thompson I M. Incidence of Fecal and Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Perineal and Retropubic Prostatectomy in a National Population.  J Urol. 1998;  160 454-458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Boccon-Gibod L, Ravery V, Vordos D, Toublanc M, Delmas V, Boccon-Gibod L. Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: The Perineal Approach Increases the Risk of Surgically Induced Positive Margins And Capsular Incisions.  J Urol. 1998;  160 1383-1385
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Dees J W. Radical Perineal Prostatectomy for Carcinoma.  J Urol. 1970;  104 160-162
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Frazier H A, Robertson J E, Paulson D F. Radical Prostatectomy: The Pros and Cons of the Perineal versus Retropubic Approach.  J Urol. 1992;  147 888-890
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gingrich J R, Paulson D F. The Impact of PSA on Prostate Cancer Management. Can We Abandon Routine Staging Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.  Surg Onc Clin N America. 1995;  4 335-344
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ohori M, Wheeler T M, Kattan M W, Goto Y, Scardino P T. Prognostic Significance of Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.  J Urol. 1995;  154 1818-1824
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Stamey T A, Villers A A, Mcneal J E, Link P C, Freiha F S. Positive Surgical Margins at Radical Prostatectomy: Importance of The Apical Dissection.  J Urol. 1990;  143 1166-1172
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Thrasher J B, Paulson D F. Reappraisal of Radical Perineal Prostatectomy.  Europ Urol. 1992;  22 1-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Vest S A. Radical Perineal Prostatectomy, Modification of Closure.  Surg Gynec Obstet. 1940;  40 935-937
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Zincke H, Oesterling J E, Blute M L, Bergstralh E J, Myers R P, Barrett D M. Long-Term (15 Years) Results after Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized (Stage T2c Or Lower) Prostate Cancer.  J Urol. 1994;  152 1850-1857
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. David F. Paulson

Chief, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Duke University Medical Center

Box 2977

Durham, NC 27710, USA