Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17(1): 067-078
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16367
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Augmentation of the Cheeks, Chin and Pre-jowl Sulcus, and Nasolabial Folds

Thomas Romo III1,2 , Jonathan Z. Baskin3 , Anthony P. Sclafani1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, New York
  • 2Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

ABSTRACT

The demand for augmentation of central and lower facial features continues to increase. There are several safe and effective materials available for this purpose, and techniques have become highly refined. The relative strengths and weaknesses of silicone, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and merseline mesh are discussed for augmentation of the chin/pre-jowl sulcus and cheek. Materials for augmentation of the nasolabial folds (NLF) are also discussed. There are various forms of solid ePTFE that have been developed for soft tissue augmentation. These are particularly well suited for the NLF. Techniques for facial skeletal and soft tissue augmentation are presented.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Rubin J P, Yaremchuk M J. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1997;  100 1336-1353
  • 2 Constantinides M S, Doud-Galli S K, Miller P J, Adamson P A. Malar, submalar, and midfacial implants.  Fac Plast Surg . 2000;  16 35-44
  • 3 Sclafani A P, Romo T. Biology and chemistry of facial implants.  Fac Plast Surg . 2000;  16 3-6
  • 4 Ellenbogen R, Rubin L R. Toxicity associated with injectable silicone. In: Rubin LR, ed. Biomaterials in Reconstructive Surgery St. Louis: Mosby 1983: 252-259
  • 5 Silver F H, Maas C S. Biology of synthetic facial implant materials.  Fac Plast Surg Clin NA . 1994;  2 241-254
  • 6 Constantino P D. Synthetic biomaterials for soft tissue augmentation and replacement in the head and neck.  Otolaryngol Clin NA . 1994;  27 223-262
  • 7 Gabriel S E, O'Fallon W M, Kurland L T, Beard C M, Woods J E, Melton III J L. Risk of connective-tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation.  N Engl J Med . 1994;  330 1697-1702
  • 8 Sanchez-Guerrero J, Colditz G A, Karlson E W, Hunter D J, Speizer F E, Liang M H. Silicone breast implants and the risk of connective-tissue diseases and symptoms.  N Engl J Med . 1995;  332 1666-1670
  • 9 Metzinger S E, McCollough E G, Campbell J P, Rousso D E. Malar augmentation: a 5-year retrospective review of the silastic midfacial malar implant.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg . 1999;  125 980-987
  • 10 Terino E O. Facial contouring with alloplastic implants: aesthetic surgery that creates three dimensions.  Fac Plast Surg . 1999;  7 55-83
  • 11 Ersek R A, Beisang III A A. Bioplastique: a new biphasic polymer for minimally invasive injection implantation.  Aesthet Plast Surg . 1992;  16 59-65
  • 12 Mladick R A. Twelve months of experience with Bioplastique.  Aesthet Plast Surg . 1992;  16 69-76
  • 13 Simons G, Mazaleyrat P, Masurel T. Utilization of injectable microimplants in aesthetic facial surgery.  Aesthet Plast Surg . 1992;  16 77-82
  • 14 Sykes J M, Strong E B. Mentoplasty.  Fac Plast Surg Clin NA . 1999;  7 85-94
  • 15 Neel III B H. Implants of Gore-Tex.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1983;  109 427-433
  • 16 Spector M, Flemming W R, Sauer B W. Early tissue infiltrate in porous polyethylene implants into bone: a scanning electron microscope study.  J Biomed Mater Res . 1975;  9 537-542
  • 17 Wellisz T. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant.  Aesthet Plast Surg . 1993;  17 339-344
  • 18 Romo T, Fozo M S, Sclafani A P. Microtia reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework.  Fac Plast Surg . 2000;  16 15-22
  • 19 Malaisrie S C, Malekzadeh S, Biedlingmaier J F. In vivo analysis of bacterial biofilm formation on facial plastic bioimplants.  Laryngoscope . 1998;  108 1733-1738
  • 20 Robinson M. Bone resorption under plastic chin implants: follow-up of a preliminary report.  Arch Otolaryngol . 1972;  95 30-32
  • 21 Choe K S, Stucki-McCormick S U. Chin augmentation.  Fac Plast Surg . 2000;  16 45-54
  • 22 Colton J J. Augmentation with mersilene mesh.  Arch Fac Plast Surg . 1999;  1 190
  • 23 Gross E J, Hamilton M M, Ackermann K, Perkins S W. Mersilene mesh chin augmentation: a 14-year experience.  Arch Fac Plast Surg . 1999;  1 183-189
  • 24 Ahn M S, Monihan N, Maas C S. Soft tissue augmentation.  Fac Plast Surg Clin NA . 1999;  7 35-41
  • 25 Miller P J, Levine J, Ahn M S, Maas C S, Constantinides M. Softform for facial rejuvenation: historical review, operative techniques, and recent advances.  Fac Plast Surg . 2000;  16 23-28
    >