Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002; 06(1): 067-078
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23165
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Musculoskeletal Sonography of the Postoperative Orthopedic Patient

Jon A. Jacobson1 , Matthew J. Lax2
  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • 2Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 March 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Musculoskeletal sonography has an important role in the evaluation of the postoperative orthopedic patient. One major advantage of sonography over magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography is that artifact from metal, which is common after orthopedic surgery, is relatively limited. This allows a clear assessment of the soft tissues for abnormalities such as tendon tear, tenosynovitis, joint effusion, and soft tissue infection. Sonography also has a role in evaluation of recurrent soft tissue tumor, bone healing, and limb amputation. This article first discusses the basic technical aspects of musculoskeletal sonography and is followed by sonographic examples of normal anatomy. Common applications of musculoskeletal sonography in evaluation of the postoperative orthopedic patient are reviewed, including sonography after tendon surgery, assessment of soft tissues adjacent to orthopedic hardware, recurrent musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors, sonography of bone healing, and evaluation of limb amputation. Guidelines and pitfalls of these applications are reviewed.

KEYWORD

Ultrasound - soft tissues - surgery - complications

REFERENCES

  • 1 Erickson S J. High-resolution imaging of the musculoskeletal system.  Radiology . 1997;  205 593-618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jacobson J A. Musculoskeletal sonography and MR imaging. A role for both imaging methods.  Radiol Clin North Am . 1999;  37 713-735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shapiro R S, Wagreich J, Parsons R B, Stancato-Pasik A, Yeh H C, Lao R. Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography.  Am J Roentgenol . 1998;  171 1203-1206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bude R O, Rubin J M. Power Doppler sonography.  Radiology . 1996;  200 21-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Crass J R, van de Vegte L G, Harkavy L A. Tendon echogenicity: ex vivo study.  Radiology . 1988;  167 499-501
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Craig J G, Jacobson J A, Moed B R. Ultrasound of fracture and bone healing.  Radiol Clin North Am . 1999;  37 737-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jacobson J A, van Holsbeeck T M. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography.  Orthop Clin North Am . 1998;  29 135-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Silvestri E, Martinoli C, Derchi L E, Bertolotto M, Chiaramondia M, Rosenberg I. Echotexture of peripheral nerves: correlation between US and histologic findings and criteria to differentiate tendons.  Radiology . 1995;  197 291-296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jamadar J D, Jacobson J A, Hayes C W. Sonographic evaluation of the median nerve at the wrist.  J Ultrasound Med . 2001;  20 1011-1014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Crass J R, Craig E V, Feinberg S B. Sonography of the postoperative rotator cuff.  Am J Roentgenol . 1986;  146 561-564
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mack L A, Nyberg D A, Matsen F R, Kilcoyne R F, Harvey D. Sonography of the postoperative shoulder.  Am J Roentgenol . 1988;  150 1089-1093
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Winter T C, Richardson M L, Matsen F A. Ultrasound of the shoulder.  RSNA Radiogr Electr J . 1997;  1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Khoury N J, El-Khoury G Y, Saltzman C L, Brandser E A. MR imaging of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.  Am J Roentgenol . 1996;  167 675-682
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fessell D P, Jacobson J A, Craig J. Using sonography to reveal and aspirate joint effusions.  Am J Roentgenol . 2000;  174 1353-1362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van Holsbeeck T M, Eyler W R, Sherman L S. Detection of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of sonography.  Am J Roentgenol . 1994;  163 381-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bureau N J, Chhem R K, Cardinal E. Musculoskeletal infections: US manifestations.  Radiographics . 1999;  19 1585-1592
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pino G, Conzi G F, Murolo C. Sonographic evaluation of local recurrences of soft tissue sarcoma.  J Ultrasound Med . 1993;  12 23-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Choi H, Varma D GK, Fornage B D, Kim E E, Johnston D A. Soft-tissue sarcoma: MR imaging vs sonography for detection of local recurrence after surgery.  Am J Roentgenol . 1991;  157 353-358
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Arya S, Nagarkatti D G, Dudhat S B, Nadkarni K S, Joshi M S, Shinde S R. Soft tissue sarcomas: ultrasonographic evaluation of local recurrences.  Clin Radiol . 2000;  55 193-197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Alexander A A, Nazarian L N, Feld R I. Superficial soft-tissue masses suggestive of recurrent malignancy: sonographic localization and biopsy.  Am J Roentgenol . 1997;  169 1449-1451
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Jacobson J A, Starok M, Pathria M, Garfin S R. Pseudarthrosis: US evaluation after posterolateral spinal fusion.  Radiology . 1997;  204 853-858
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Thomas A J, Bull M J, Howard A C, Saleh M. Peri operative ultrasound guided needle localization of amputation stump neuroma.  Injury . 1999;  30 689-691
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Provost N, Bonaldi V M, Sarazin L, Cho K H, Chhem R K. Amputation stump neuroma: ultrasound features.  J Clin Ultrasound . 1997;  25 85-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar