Zusammenfassung
Die Axilladissektion stellt einen allgemeinen Standard in der operativen Therapie des invasiven Mammakarzinoms dar. Die wichtigsten hierdurch verfolgten Ziele sind die Bestimmung des Lymphknotenstatus, eine Verbesserung der lokoregionären Tumorkontrolle und konsekutiv damit auch des Überlebens der Patienten [1 ]. Mit der Sentinel-Lymphknoten-Biopsie wird eine Individualisierung der Therapie angestrebt, ohne die Ziele der ALND außer Acht zu lassen [2 ]. Nachfolgend sollen die Vor- und Nachteile der beiden Vorgehensweisen und deren Einbindungsmöglichkeiten in ein modernes multimodales Konzept aufgezeigt werden.
Abstract
Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a therapeutic standard in the operative therapy of invasive breast cancer. The major goals of ALND are the determination of the nodal status, local tumor control and the potentially resulting improvement of disease-free survival. The introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in the therapeutic concept is one step further into the individualization of therapy without neglecting the goals of ALND. In the following, the advantages of both methods are discussed in the context of an interdisciplinary approach.
Schlüsselwörter
Sentinel Lymphknoten - Axilladissektion - Sentinel Lymphknotenbiopsie - Brustkrebs - Mammakarzinom - multimodale Therapie
Key words
Sentinel lymph node - sentinel lymph node biopsy - breast cancer - carcinoma of the breas - axillary lymph node dissection - interdisciplinary therapy
Literatur
1
Bembenek A, Schlag P M.
Lymph node dissection in breast cancer.
Langenbeck's Arch Surg.
1999;
385
236-245
2 Schlag P M. Sentinel Lymphknoten Biopsie. Landsberg; ecomed Verlagsgesellschaft 2001
3
Graversen H P, Blichert-Toft M, Andersen J A, Zedeler K. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group .
Breast cancer: risk of axillary recurrence in nodal-negative patients following partitial dissection of the axilla.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
1988;
14
407-412
4
International Breast Cancer Study Group .
Prognostic importance of occult axillary lymph node micrometastases from breast cancers.
Lancet.
1990;
335
1565-1568
5
Cote J R, Peterson H F, Chaiwun P, et al.
Role of immunohistochemical detection of lymph-node metastases in management of breast cancer.
Lancet.
1999;
354
896-900
6
Turner R R, Ollila D S, Krasne D L, Giuliano A E.
Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma.
Ann Surg.
1997;
226
271-278
7
Chu K U, Turner R R, Hansen N M, Brennan M B, Bilchik A, Giuliano A E.
Do all patients with sentinel node metastasis from breast carcinoma need complete axillary node dissection?.
Ann Surg.
1999;
229
536-541
8
van Diest P J, Torrenga H, Meijer S, Meijer C JLM.
Pathological analysis of sentinel lymph nodes.
Sem Surg Oncol.
2001;
20
238-245
9
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, et al.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1999;
91
368-373
10
Bembenek A, Reuhl T, Markwardt J, Schneider U, Schlag P M.
Sentinel lymph node dissection in breast cancer.
Swiss Surg.
1999;
5
217-221
11
McMasters K M, Wong S L, Chao C, et al.
Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph nodde biopsy: A model for implementation of new surgical techniques.
Ann Surg.
2001;
234
292-300
12
Van der Ent F WC, Kengen R AM, Van der Pool H AG, Povel J AC, Stroeken H JG, Hoofwijk A GM.
Halsted revisited: Internal mammary sentinel lymph node Biopsy in breast cancer.
Ann Surg.
2001;
234
79-84
13
Byrd D B, Dunnwald L K, Mankoff D A, et al.
Internal mammary lymph node drainage patterns in patients with breast cancer documented by lymphscintigraphy.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2001;
8
234-240
14
Borgstein P J, Meijer S, Pijpers R J, van Diest P J.
Functional lymphatic anatomy for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Echoes from the past and the periareolar blue method.
Ann Surg.
2000;
232
81-89
15
Fischer B, Redmond C, Fisher E R, et al.
Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comapring radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation.
N Engl J Med.
1985;
312
674-681
16
Osborne M P, Ormiston N, Harmer C L, McKinna J A, Baker J, Greening P.
Breast conservation in the treatment of early breast cancer.
Cancer.
1984;
53
349-355
17
Orr R K.
The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival - a Bayesian meta-analysis.
Ann Surg Oncol.
1999;
6
109-116
18
Bland K I, Scott-Conner C E, Menck H, Winchester D P.
Axillary dissection in breast-conserving surgery for stage I and II breast cancer: A national cancer data base study of patterns of commission and implications for survival.
J Am Coll Surg.
1999;
188
586-596
19
Shetty M R, Reiman H M.
Tumor size and axillary metastases, a correlation occurrence in 1244 cases of breast cancer between 1980 and 1995.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
1997;
23
139-141
20
Ververs J M, Roumen R M, Vingerhoets A J, Vreugdenhil G, Coebergh J W, Crommelin M A, Luiten E J, Repelaer van Driel O J, Schijven M, Wissing J C, Voogd A C.
Risk, severity and predictors of physical and psychological morbidity after axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.
Europ J Cancer.
2001;
37
(8)
991-999
21
Petrek J A, Senie R T, Peters M, Rosen P P.
Lymphedema in a cohort of breast carcinoma survivors 20 years after diagnosis.
Cancer.
2001;
92
(6)
1368-1377
22
Kuehn T, Vogl F D, Pueckler S, et al.
Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer - technical performance is more important than patient selection to avoid false-negative findings.
Eur J Cancer.
2001;
37
Abstract 994
23
Sener S F, Winchester D J, Martz C H, et al.
Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma.
Cancer.
2001;
92
748-752
24
Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group .
Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen and of cytotoxic therapy on mortality in early breast cancer.
N Engl J Med.
1988;
319
1681-1692
25
Dees E C, Shulman L N, Souba W W, Smith B L.
Does information from axillary dissection change treatment in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer?.
Ann Surg.
1997;
226
279-287
26
Goldhirsch A, Glick J H, Gelber R D, Senn H J.
International consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer: V: update 1998.
Rec Res Cancer Res.
1998;
152
481-497
27
Goldhirsch A, Glick J H, Gelber R D, Coates A S, Senn H J.
Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the treatment of primary Brest cancer: Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;
19
3817-3827
28
Levine M N, Bramwell V H, Pritchard K I, Norris B D, Shepherd L E, Abu-Zahra H, Findlay B, Warr D, Bowman D, Myles J, Arnold A, Vandenberg T, MacKenzie R, Ottaway J, Burnell M, Williams C K, Tu D.
Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
J Clin Oncol.
1998;
16
(8)
2651-2658
29
Goldhirsch A, Francis P, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber R D, Coates A S.
Taxanes as adjuvant for breast cancer.
Lancet.
2000;
356
(9228)
507-508
30
Ragaz J, Jackson S M, Plenderleith I H, Spinelli J J, Basco V E, Wilson K S, Knowling M A, Coppin C ML, Paradis M, Coldman A J, Olivotto I A.
Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer.
New Engl J Med.
1997;
337
956-962
31
Dowlatsahi K, Fan M, Anderson J M, Bloem K J.
Occult metastases in sentinel nodes of 200 patients with operable breast cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2001;
8
675-682
32
Ross M I.
Sentinel node dissection in early-stage breast cancer: Ongoing prospective randomized trials in the USA.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2001;
8
77-81
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. P. M. Schlag
Klinik für Chirurgie und Chirurgische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Buch, Robert-Rössle-Klinik im HELIOS Klinikum Berlin
Lindenberger Weg 80
13125 Berlin
Telefon: + 49-30-9417-1400
Fax: + 49-30-9417-1404
eMail: schlag@rrk-berlin.de