Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting for CABG - a Randomized, Prospective Trial

U. P. Schurr; M. L. Lachat; O. Reuthebuch; A. Kadner; M. Mäder; B. Seiffert; S. P. Hoerstrup; G. Zünd; M. Genoni; M. I. Turina

doi:10.1055/s-2002-32412

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Table of Contents

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50(3): 160-163
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32412

Original Cardiovascular

Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting for CABG -
a Randomized, Prospective Trial

U. P. Schurr¹ , M. L. Lachat¹ , O. Reuthebuch¹ , A. Kadner¹ , M. Mäder¹ , B. Seiffert² , S. P. Hoerstrup¹ , G. Zünd¹ , M. Genoni³ , M. I. Turina¹

¹Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery
²Institute of Biostatistics, University Hospital Zurich
³Department of Cardiac Surgery, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

This paper was presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Leipzig, February 18 - 21, 2001

Abstract

All articles of this category

Abstract

Background: The saphenous vein is an established conduit for coronary revascularization. Disadvantages of traditional harvest technique are significant pain and morbidity. We compared the endoscopic harvest technique with the traditional method. Method: 140 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients were randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH; n = 80) and traditional open vein harvesting (OVH; n = 60). Analysis included preoperative risk factors for wound complication, harvesting time, graft injury, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patient follow-up lasted 3 months. Results: The preoperative risk profiles of the groups were comparable. In the EVH group, 5 patients (7.1 %) had to be switched to the open technique. EVH time was 45 ± 6.2 min vs. 31.1 ± 6.5 min. Two patients (2.5 %) had to be revised because of bleeding complication vs. 6 (10 %) in the OVH group. No local infections or wound complications were observed in the EVH group vs. 11 (18 %) cases in the OVH group. Two OVH cases (3.6 %) were readmitted for wound debridement. All EVH patients reported less pain and were completely satisfied by the cosmetic results. Conclusion: EVH is a safe and efficient technique for CABG. Morbidity was significantly lower, with reduced pain and better cosmetic results. EVH time was significantly longer compared to the traditional harvesting technique.

Key words

Vein harvesting, endoscopic - CABG, cardiac

Full Text

References

1 Lumsden A B, Eaves F FIII. Endoscopic vein harvest. Bostwick J III. Eaves FF III, Nahai Endoscopic Plastic Surgery, St. Louis, Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. 1997: 535-547
2 Wipke-Tevis D B, Stotts N A, Skov P, Carrieri-Kohlmann V. Frequency, manifestations and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions. Heart & Lung. 1996; 25 108-116
3 Delaria G A, Hunter J A, Goldin M D, Serry C, Javid H, Najafi H. Leg wound complications associated with coronary revascularisation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981; 81 403-407
4 Allen K B, Griffith G L, Heimansohn D A. et al . Endoscopic vs. traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66 26-32
5 Carrizo G J, Livesay J J, Luy L. Endoscopic harvesting of the greater saphenous vein for aortocoronary bypass grafting. Tex Heart Inst J.. 1999; 26 120-123
6 Utley J R, Thomason M E, Wallace D J. Preoperative correlates of impaired wound healing after saphenous vein excision. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 98 47-49
7 Slaughter M S, Olson M M, Lee J T, Ward H B. A fifteen year wound surveillance study after coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993; 56 1063-1068
8 Wilson A P, Livesey S A, Treasure T, Gruneberg R N, Sturridge M F. Factors predisposing to wound infections in cardiac surgery. A prospective study of 517 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1987; 1 158-164
9 Crouch J D, O'Hair D P, Keuler J P, Kleinmann L H. Open vs. Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting: Wound complications and vein quality. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 68 1513-1516
10 Folliguet T A, Le B ret, Moneta A, Musumeci S, Laborde F. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting vs. open technique. A prospective study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998; 13 662-666
11 Davis Z, Jacobs K H, Zhang M, Thomas C, Castallenos Y. Endoscopic vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Technique and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 116 228-235
12 Isgro F, Weisse U, Voss B, Kiessling A H, Saggau W. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: is there an improvement of the results with the endoscopic approach?. Euro J Cardio-thorac Surg. 1999; 16 (Suppl 2) S58-S60
13 Caprino P A, Khabbaz K R, Bojar R, Rastegar H, Warner K G, Murphy R E, Payne D. Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 119 69-79
14 Vrancic J M, Piccinini , Vaccarino G, Iparraguirre E, Albertal J, Navia D. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: Initial experience and learning curve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 70 1086-1089
15 Cable D G, Dearani J A, Pfeiffer E A, Daly R C, Schaff H V. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: endothelial integrity and early clinical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66 139-143

MD Ulrich PF Schurr

Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich

Raemistrasse 100

8091 Zurich

Switzerland

Phone: +41 (1) 2551111

Fax: +41 (1) 2554369

Email: ulrich.schurr@chi.usz.ch