Mode of Delivery Following Successful External Cephalic Version

ABSTRACT

Mode of delivery of pregnancies following successful external cephalic version (ECV) was evaluated in a retrospective case-controlled study. Successful ECV was performed in 105 of 223 (47%) attempts. Data were obtained in 96 of 105 (91.4%) pregnancies that were matched 1:2 fashion to the next consecutive singleton deliveries for maternal age, gravidity, parity, and ethnic origin. The groups were compared for mode of delivery, indications for cesarean section (CS) and instrumental delivery, gestational age at delivery, birth weight and Apgar score. There was no significant difference between the groups in maternal age or the rates of low 5-minute Apgar score (≤7) and instrumental delivery. The rate of intrapartum CS in the study group was 19.8% (19 of 96), which was 3.2 times higher than that of the control group (12 of 192, 6.25%, p <0.001). Gestational age at delivery was significantly higher in the study group (40.0 ± 1.2 vs. 39.3 ± 1.5 weeks, p <0.001) as was the birth weight (3411 ± 426 vs. 3291 ± 490 g, p = 0.041). There was no significant difference in the rate of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns, but the rates of labor dystocia and malpresentation were higher in the study group. Patients in the study group who underwent CS and instrumental delivery (n = 24) were characterized by a significantly higher nulliparity rate and birth weight and a near-significantly longer interval from ECV to delivery. In conclusion, pregnancies after a successful ECV are at higher risk of CS, which is not associated with fetal distress, but might be attributable to higher rates of labor dystocia and malpresentation, higher nulliparity rate birth weight, and gestational age at delivery. ECV to delivery interval may also be an important factor.

KEYWORDS

External cephalic version - delivery - cesarean section

REFERENCES

• 1 Hannah M E, Hannah W J, Hewson S A, Hodnett E D, Saigal S, Willan A R. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial.  Lancet . 2000;  356 1375-1383
• 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. External cephalic version. Practice Bulletin no. 13, 2000
• 3 Lau T K, Lo K WK, Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1997;  176 218-223
• 4 Stine L E, Phelan J P, Wallace R, Egilton G S, van Dorsten P J. Update on external cephalic version performed at term.  Obstet Gynecol . 1985;  65 642-646
• 5 Laros Jr K R, Flanagan T A, Kilpatrick S J. Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  172 1916-1923
• 6 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and the augmentation of labor. Technical Bulletin no. 218, 1995
• 7 Egge T, Schauberger C, Schaper A. Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version.  Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  83 771-773
• 8 Lau T K, Leung T Y, Lo K WK, Fox W Y, Rogers M. Effect of external cephalic version at term on fetal circulation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2000;  182 1239-1242
• 9 Lau T K, Lo K WK, Chan L YS, Leung T Y, Lo Y MD. Cell-free fetal deoxyribonucleic acid in maternal circulation as a marker of fetal-maternal hemorrhage in patients undergoing external cephalic version near term.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2000;  183 712-716
• 10 Diro M, Puangsricharern A, Royer L, O'Sullivan M J, Burkett G. Singleton term breech deliveries in nulliparous and multiparous woman: a 5-year experience at the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1999;  181 247-252