Background and Study Aims: The risk of variceal bleeding cannot be accurately predicted using endoscopy alone. Although variceal pressure has been demonstrated to be a major determinant for the rupture of esophageal varices, direct determination by needle puncture is unsuitable for routine clinical use. Due to their operator-dependency, current noninvasive endoscopic methods for determination of variceal pressure have not gained wide acceptance. We have developed a new method of measuring variceal pressure, using endoscopic power Doppler imaging to monitor the manometry of esophageal varices. The aims of this study were to test in vitro the accuracy of Doppler-guided manometry and to assess the clinical feasibility of this method.
Materials and Methods: Experimental validation of this technique was performed using an in vitro model of artificial varices of different sizes. A linear-array endosonography (EUS) probe with power Doppler capability was used to assess flow in the varices and a balloon for manometry of esophageal varices was attached to the tip of the probe. Pressure readings were made at the time of disappearance of the Doppler signal during variceal compression by the balloon. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the results of Doppler-guided and direct intraluminal pressure measurement in the artificial varices. Variceal pressure was then measured with this technique in 28 patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices without previous bleeding, and the results were compared with portal pressure assessed according to the hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG).
Results: In vitro studies demonstrated a good correlation between the pressure measured with Doppler monitoring and the actual intravariceal pressure (r ≥ 0.922; P < 0.001). The determination of variceal pressure with this method was technically successful in 26/28 patients (93 %). The intraoperator variance was 9.3 ± 8.6 %. Overall, the mean variceal pressure was significantly lower than the mean HVPG (21.2 ± 5.3 mmHg vs. 24.3 ± 7.8 mmHg; P < 0.01). Variceal pressure and portal pressure (as assessed by the HVPG) correlated significantly (r = 0.64; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Our preliminary results indicate that EUS Doppler-guided manometry of esophageal varices is feasible and accurate. This technique may become a more reliable method for noninvasive measurement of variceal pressure and warrants further investigation.
References
-
1
The North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices.
Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study.
N Engl J Med.
1988;
319
983-989
-
2
Merkel C, Zoli M, Siringo S. et al .
Prognostic indicators of the risk of first variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a multicenter study in 711 patients to validate and improve the North Italian Endoscopic Club (NIEC) index.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2000;
95
2915-2920
-
3
Lebrec D, Fleury P, Rueff B. et al .
Portal hypertension, size of esophageal varices and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in alcoholic cirrhosis.
Gastroenterology.
1980;
79
1139-1144
-
4
Garcia-Tsao G, Groszman R J, Fisher R L. et al .
Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding.
Hepatology.
1985;
5
419-424
-
5
Feu F, García-Pagán J C, Bosch J. et al .
Relation between portal pressure response to pharmacotherapy and risk of recurrent variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis.
Lancet.
1995;
346
1056-1059
-
6
Armonis A, Patch D, Burroughs A.
Hepatic venous pressure measurement: an old test as a new prognostic marker in cirrhosis?.
Hepatology.
1997;
25
245-248
-
7
Kleber G, Sauerbruch T, Fischer G. et al .
Pressure of intraoesophageal varices assessed by fine needle puncture: its relation to endoscopic signs and severity of liver disease in patients with cirrhosis.
Gut.
1989;
30
228-232
-
8
Nevens F, Bustami R, Scheys I. et al .
Variceal pressure is a factor predicting the risk of a first variceal bleeding: a prospective cohort study in cirrhotic patients.
Hepatology.
1998;
27
15-19
-
9
Gertsch P, Fischer G, Kleber G. et al .
Manometry of esophageal varices: comparison of an endoscopic balloon technique with needle puncture.
Gastroenterology.
1993;
105
1159-1166
-
10
Escorsell A, Bordas J M, Castañeda B. et al .
Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
Hepatology.
2000;
31
1061-1067
-
11
Hou M C, Lin H C, Kuo B IT. et al .
Sequential variceal pressure measurement by endoscopic needle puncture during maintenance sclerotherapy: the correlation between variceal pressure and variceal bleeding.
J Hepatol.
1998;
29
772-778
-
12
Atti E AE, Nevens F, Bogaerts K. et al .
Variceal pressure is a strong predictor of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis as well as in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.
Gut.
1999;
45
618-621
-
13
Rigau J, Bosch J, Bordas J. et al .
Endoscopic measurement of variceal pressure in cirrhosis: correlation with portal pressure and variceal hemorrhage.
Gastroenterology.
1989;
96
873-880
-
14
Gertsch P, Wheatley A M, Maibach R. et al .
Experimental evaluation of an endoscopic balloon for manometry of esophageal varices.
Gastroenterology.
1991;
101
1692-1700
-
15
Bosch J, Bordas J, Rigau J. et al .
Noninvasive measurement of the pressure of esophageal varices using an endoscopic gauge: comparison by variceal puncture in patients undergoing endoscopic sclerotherapy.
Hepatology.
1986;
6
667-672
-
16
Gertsch P H, Meister J-J.
Pressure measurements in oesophageal varices: preliminary report on a new non-invasive method.
Gut.
1987;
28
1162-1165
-
17
Polio J, Hanson J, Sikuler E. et al .
Critical evaluation of a pressure-sensitive capsule for measurement of esophageal varix puncture. Studies in vitro and in canine mesenteric vessels.
Gastroenterology.
1987;
92
1109-1115
-
18
Polio J, Leonard R, Groszman R J. et al .
An improved pressure-sensitive capsule for endoscopic measurement of esophageal variceal pressure.
Dig Dis Sci.
1998;
33
737-740
-
19
Nevens F, Sprengers D, Feu F. et al .
Measurement of variceal pressure with an endoscopic pressure sensitive gauge: validation and effect of propranolol therapy in chronic conditions.
J Hepatol.
1996;
24
66-73
-
20
Brensing K A, Neubrand M, Textor J. et al .
Endoscopic manometry of esophageal varices: evaluation of a balloon technique compared with direct portal pressure measurement.
J Hepatol.
1998;
29
94-102
-
21
Scheurlen C, Roleff A, Neubrand M. et al .
Noninvasive endoscopic determination of intravariceal pressure in patients with portal hypertension: clinical experience with a new balloon technique.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
326-332
-
22
Staritz M, Gertsch P.
Pressure measurements in oesophageal varices: first comparison of two techniques.
Endoscopy.
1986;
18
253-254
-
23
Bland J, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements.
Lancet.
1986;
1
307-310
-
24
Burroughs A K.
The natural history of varices.
J Hepatol.
1993;
17 (Suppl. 2)
S10-S13
-
25
Graham D Y, Smith J L.
The course of patients after variceal hemorrhage.
Gastroenterology.
1981;
80
800-809
-
26
Burroughs A K, McCormick P A.
Natural history and prognosis of variceal bleeding.
Baillière’s Clin Gastroenterol.
1992;
6
437-450
J. M. Pontes, M.D.
Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology
Av Bissaya Barreto · Apartado 2005 · 3003 Coimbra · Portugal
Fax: + 351-239-484317
Email: jmpontes@mail.telepac.pt
