Preparation of Sialyl Donors Carrying Functionalized Ester Substituents: Effects on the Selectivity of Glycosylation

Abstract

Methylthio sialyl donors having various ester substituents were prepared systematically. Nucleophilic displacement of methyl ester with Ph₃SiSH and Cs₂CO₃ followed by in situ alkylation with RX or esterification with R-OH/DCC afforded these compounds in good yields. Glycosylations promoted by NIS-TfOH were examined in order to examine the effect of substituent of the ester portion. When conducted in CH₃CN, enhanced α-selectivities were observed for cyanomethyl, 2-cyanoethyl, 2-cyanobenzyl, and 2-nitrobenzyl esters, implying that these substituents are effective enhancing the solvent effect of acetonitrile, possibly by stabilizing the β-oriented nitrilium ion.

sialic acid - glycosylation - stereoselective - substituent effect - selective deprotection

References

1 Angata T. Varki A. Chem. Rev.  2002,  102:  439 

Recent review:

2a Boons G.-J. Demchnko AV. Chem. Rev.  2000,  100:  4539 

2b Halcomb RL. Chappell MD. J. Carbohydr. Chem.  2002,  21:  723 

3a Kanie O. Kiso M. Hasegawa A. J. Carbohydr. Chem.  1988,  7:  501 

3b Hasegawa A. Ohki H. Nagahama T. Ishida H. Kiso M. Carbohydr. Res.  1991,  212:  277 

3c Schmidt RR. Behrendt M. Toepfer A. Synlett  1990,  694 

3d Vankar YD. Vankar PS. Behrendt M. Schmidt RR. Tetrahedron  1991,  47:  9985 

3e Schmidt RR. Rücker E. Tetrahedron Lett.  1980,  21:  1421 

3f Birberg W. Lönn H. Tetrahedron Lett.  1991,  32:  7457 

4a Ito Y. Numata M. Sugimoto M. Ogawa T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1989,  111:  8508 

4b Ito Y. Ogawa T. Tetrahedron Lett.  1988,  29:  3987 

4c Kondo T. Abe H. Goto T. Chem. Lett.  1988,  1657 

4d Ercégovec T. Magnusson G. J. Org. Chem.  1995,  60:  3378 

4e Martichonok V. Whitesides GM. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  8187 

4f Ercégovec T. Magnusson G. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  179 

4g Castro-Palomino JC. Tsvetkov YE. Schmidt RR. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1998,  120:  5434 

5 Demchenko AV. Boons G.-J. Chem.-Eur. J.  1999,  5:  1278 

6 Yu C.-S. Niikura K. Lin C.-C. Wong C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2001,  40:  2900 

7 De Meo C. Demchenko AV. Boons G.-J. Aust. J. Chem.  2002,  55:  131 

8 Takahashi T. Tsukamoto H. Yamada H. Tetrahedron Lett.  1997,  38:  8223 

9 Haberman JM. Gin DY. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  1665 

10a This compound was prepared from corresponding 2-SAc derivative: Hasegawa A. Nakamura J. Kiso M. J. Carbohydr. Chem.  1986,  5:  11 

10b With Et₂NH and MeI in DMF: Angus DI. von Itzstaein M. Kiefel MJ. Carbohydr. Res.  1994,  259:  293 

11 Salomon CJ. Matta EG. Mascaretti OA. Tetrahedron  1993,  49:  3691 

12 Birkofer L. Ritter A. Goller H. Chem. Ber.  1963,  3289 

13 Brittain J. Gareau Y. Tetrahedron Lett.  1993,  34:  3363 

14

Typical procedure (compound 1h): To the solution of compound 1a (209 mg, 0.401 mmol), 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-cresol (18 mg, 0.08 mmol) and Ph₃SiSH (352 mg, 1.20 mmol) in dry DMF (5 mL) was added Cs₂CO₃ (352 mg, 1.08 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 8 h. After cooling down to ice-water temperature, 2-nitrobenzyl bromide (261 mg, 1.21 mmol) was added and stirring continued for 4 h at 0 °C. The reaction was saturated aq KHSO₄ and extracted with EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried (Na₂SO₄), and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane-EtOAc, 10:1-1:2) to give compound 1h (212 mg, 82%).

15 Petit JM. Jaquinet J.-C. Sinaӱ P. Carbohydr. Res.  1980,  82:  130 

16 Honeyman J. Methods in Carbohydr. Chem.  1962,  1:  116 

17a Pougny J.-R. Sinaӱ P. Tetrahedron Lett.  1976,  4073 

17b Schmidt RR. Rücker E. Tetrahedron Lett.  1980,  21:  1421 

17c Ratcliffe AJ. Fraser-Reid B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1990,  747 

17d Braccini I. Derouet C. Esnault J. Hervé du Penhoat C. Mallet J.-M. Michon V. Sinaӱ P. Carbohydr. Res.  1993,  246:  23 

18

Stabilization of anomeric cation by multiple molecules of acetonitrile was proposed. See refs. [3c] [d]

19 Nakahara Y. Iijima H. Ogawa T. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  3321 

20 Paulsen H. Paar M. Hadamczvk D. Steiger K.-M. Carbohydr. Res.  1984,  131:  C1 

21 Sato S. Ito Y. Ogawa T. Tetrahedron Lett.  1988,  29:  4759 

22

NMR (CD₃OD, 400 MHz) δ 1.72 (1 H, t, J = 12.0 Hz, H-3_Neu5Ac), 1.85, 1,86, 1.97, 1.98, 1.99, and 2.10 (each 3 H, s, 6Ac), 2.71 (1 H, dd, J = 12.0 Hz, 4.0 Hz, H-3_Neu5Ac), 3.37-3.42 (1 H, m, H-6_Gal), 3.52-3.60 (3 H, m, H-5_Gal, H-6_Glc, H-2_Gal), 3.83-3.88 (3 H, m, H-6_Glc, H-6′_Glc, H-5_Gal), 3.97-4.09 (3 H, m, H-4_Glc, CH ₂=CHCH₂, H-5_Neu5Ac), 4.09 (1 H, dd, J = 11.2 Hz, 8.4 Hz, H-2_Gal), 4.14 (1 H, dd, J = 12.4 Hz, 5.2 Hz, H-9_Neu5Ac), 4.14 (1 H, dd, J = 12.4 Hz, 5.2 Hz, H-9_Neu5Ac), 4.17-4.25 (2 H, m, H-9_Neu5Ac, CH ₂CH=CH₂), 4.28 (1 H, dd, J = 11.2 Hz, 8.4 Hz), 4.39 (1 H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, Bn), 4.41 (1 H, dd, J = 12.4 Hz, 3.2 Hz, H-9_Neu5Ac), 4.49 (1 H, d, J = 12.4 Hz, Bn), 4.54 (1 H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, Bn), 4.59 (1 H, d, J = 12.0 Hz, Bn), 4.69 (1 H, dd, J = 9.6 Hz, 2.4 Hz, H-3_Gal), 4.76 (1 H, d, J = 12. 0 Hz, Bn), 4.81 (1 H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, H-1_Gal), 4.88-4.96 (2 H, m, Bn), 4.98-5.03 (1 H, m, CH₂CH=CH ₂), 5.03-5.23 (2 H, m, CH₂CH=CH ₂, H-4_Neu5Ac), 5.16 (1 H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-1_Gal), 5.18 (1 H, d, J = 12.4 Hz, Bn), 5.38 (1 H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-4_Gal), 5.39 (1 H, dd, J = 8.0, 2.4 Hz, H-7_Neu5Ac), 5.66-5.77 (2 H, m, H-8_Neu5Ac, CH₂CH=CH₂), 6.82-7.90 (24 H, m, Ar).