References
1a
Kirschning A.
Jesberger M.
Schöning K.-U.
Synthesis
2001,
507
1b
Veyrières A. In Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology
Part I, Vol. 1:
Ernst B.
Hart GW.
Sinaӱ P.
Wiley;
Weinheim:
2000.
p.367
1c
Marzabadi H.
Franck RW.
Tetrahedron
2000,
56:
8385
1d
Castro-Palomino JC.
Schmidt RR.
Synlett
1998,
501
1e
Toshima K.
Tatsuta K.
Chem. Rev.
1993,
93:
1503
2a
Lemieux RU.
Levine S.
Can. J. Chem.
1964,
42:
1473
2b
Lemieux RU.
Morgan AR.
Can. J. Chem.
1965,
43:
2190
2c
Thiem J.
Karl H.
Schwentner J.
Synthesis
1978,
696
2d
Thiem J.
Klaffke W.
Top. Curr. Chem.
1990,
154:
285
2e
Danishesky S.
Bilodeau MT.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996,
35:
1380
3a
Ito Y.
Ogawa T.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1987,
28:
4701
3b
Ramesh S.
Franck SW.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1989,
960
3c
Preuss R.
Schmidt RR.
Synthesis
1988,
694
3d
Grewal G.
Kaila N.
Franck RW.
J. Org. Chem.
1992,
57:
2084
4
Perez M.
Beau JM.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1989,
30:
75
5a
Chong PY.
Roush WR.
Org. Lett.
2002,
4:
4523
5b
Kirschning A.
Jesberger M.
Schöning K.-U.
Org. Lett.
2001,
53:
3623
5c
Roush WR.
Narayan S.
Bennett CE.
Briner K.
Org. Lett.
1999,
1:
895
5d
McDonald FE.
Reddy KS.
Díaz Y.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000,
122:
4304
5e
Blanchard N.
Roush WR.
Org. Lett.
1999,
1:
895
5f
Kirschning A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1998,
63:
2267
5g
Roush WR.
Sebesta DP.
James RA.
Tetrahedron
1997,
53:
8837
5h
Roush WR.
Sebesta DP.
Bennett CE.
Tetrahedron
1997,
53:
8825
5i
Roush WR.
Bennett CE.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999,
121:
3541
6
McDonald FE.
Reddy KS.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2001,
40:
3653
7
Hashimoto SI.
Sano A.
Sakamoto H.
Nakajima I.
Yanagiya Y.
Ikegami S.
Synlett
1995,
1271
8
Li H.
Chan M.
Zhao K.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1997,
38:
6143
9
Bielawska H.
Michalska M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
9761
10a
Oscarson S. In Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology
Part I, Vol. 1:
Ernst B.
Hart GW.
Sinaӱ P.
Wiley;
Weinheim:
2000.
p.93
10b
Garegg PJ.
Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
1997,
52:
172
11
Jaumzens J.
Hofer E.
Jesberger M.
Sourkouni-Argirusi G.
Kirschning A.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2003,
42:
1166
12
Compound 2: To a solution of 4 mmol of the phosphine oxide in 26 mL of THF at -78 ºC, 4.2 mmol of BuLi were added. The mixture was left to stir at low temperature for 30 min. A solution of 1 mmol of 1 in 2 mL of THF was then added dropwise. The mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. overnight. A sat. solution of NH4Cl was then added and the olefination product extrated with Et2O. The combination of ethereal layers was dried with MgSO4 and concentrated. The reaction crude was purified by MPLC (hexane to EtOAc/hexane = 1:3) to render 2 (80% yield) as a mixture of diastereoisomers (E/Z-ratio = 87:13) as a syrup. Compound 2
E: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.40-7.15 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 6.46 (d, 1 H, J
2,1 = 15.2 Hz, H-1), 5.87 (dd, 1 H, J
1,2 = 15.2 Hz, J
3,2 = 7.6 Hz, H-2), 4.65 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.57 (d, 1 H, J = 11.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.52 (d, 1 H, J = 11.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.49 (s, 2 H, CH2Ph), 4.38 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.16 (dd, 1 H, J
5,4 = 8.0 Hz, J
3,4 = 3.6 Hz, H-4), 4.00 (m, 1 H, H-5), 3.58 (m, 3 H, H-3, H-6), 2.76 (d, 1 H, J = 5.2 Hz, OH). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 140.8, 137.7, 137.5, 134.0 (C, aromatics), 130.2-126.0 (CH aromatics, C-1, C-2), 80.4 (C-3), 79.1 (C-4), 74.1, 73.2, 70.7 (CH2Ph), 70.1 (C-6), 69.9 (C-5). Compound 2
Z:
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.50-7.15 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 6.67 (d, 1 H, J
2,1 = 9.9 Hz, H-1), 6.12 (dd, 1 H, J
1,2 = 9.9 Hz, J
3,2 = 9.3 Hz, H-2), 4.88 (d, 1 H, J = 11.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.84 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.73 (d, 1 H, J = 11.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.68 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.63 (d, 1 H, J = 11.5 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.58 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.21 (m, 1 H, H-5), 3.85 (dd, 1 H, J
5,4 = 6.9 Hz, J
3,4 = 3.9 Hz, H-4), 3.77 (m, 3 H, H-3, H-6), 3.12 (d, 1 H, J = 5.1 Hz, OH). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 140.8, 137.7, 137.5, 134.0 (C, aromatics), 130.2-126.0 (CH aromatics, C-1, C-2), 80.4 (C-3), 79.1 (C-4), 74.1, 73.2, 70.7 (CH2Ph), 70.1 (C-5), 64.9 (C-6).
13
Compound 3: A 0.175 M suspension of 1.3 mol of KH 30% in dry Et2O was added dropwise to a 0.085 M solution of 2 (1 mol) in dry Et2O at 0 ºC, and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 30 min until complete formation of the alcoholate. The mixture was cooled to -78 ºC and a 0.43 M solution of iodine (3 mol) in Et2O was then added. The reaction was allowed to stir at low temperature for 1 h. A solution of Na2S3O3 was then added and the reaction product extracted with Et2O. The combination of the etheral layers was concentrated and the residue purified by radial chromatography to afford 3 (61%) as a yellowish syrup. Compound 3: [α]D
25 +67.8 (c 0.0217, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70-7.10 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 5.68 (s, 1 H, H-1), 4.88 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.87 (d, 1 H, J
3,2 = 3.6 Hz, H-2), 4.72 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.70 (d, 1 H, J = 11.6 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.54 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.52 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.48 (d, 1 H, J = 11.6 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.41 (ddd, 1 H, J
4,5 = 8.8 Hz, J
6a,5 = 4.4 Hz, J
6b,5 = 1.6 Hz, H-5), 3.99 (dd, 1 H, J
5,4 = 8.8 Hz, J
3,4 = 8.4 Hz, H-4), 3.85 (dd, 1 H, J
6b,6a = 10.8 Hz, J
5,6a = 4.4 Hz, H-6a), 3.73 (dd, 1 H, J
6a,6b = 10.8 Hz, J
5,6b = 1.6 Hz, H-6b), 3.10 (dd, 1 H, J
4,3 = 8.4 Hz, J
2,3 = 3.6 Hz, H-3). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.0, 137.2, 133.9 (C, aromatics), 132.0-127.4 (CH, aromatics), 89.6 (C-1), 77.5 (C-3), 76.2 (C-4), 75.3 (CH2Ph), 73.3 (CH2Ph, C-5), 71.0 (CH2Ph), 68.7 (C-6), 34.8 (C-2).
14a
Landais Y.
Panchenault D.
Synlett
1995,
1191
14b
Bravo F.
Castillón S.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001,
507
15
Suzuki K.
Mukaiyama T.
Chem. Lett.
1982,
1525
16
Compound 5: To a solution of 4 mmol of the phosphine oxide in 26 mL of THF at -78 ºC, 4.2 mmol of BuLi were added. The mixture was left to stir at low temperature for 30 min. A solution of 1 mmol of the 4 in 2 mL of THF was then added dropwise. The mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. first and then heated to reflux. A sat. solution of NH4Cl was then added and the olefination product extrated with Et2O. The combination of ethereal layers was dried with MgSO4 and concentrated. The reaction crude was purified by MPLC (hexane to EtOAc/hexane = 1:3) to render 5 (72% yield) as a mixture of diastereoisomers (E/Z-ratio = 80:20) as a syrup. Compound 5
E: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.39-7.25 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 6.54 (d, 1 H, J
2,1 = 15.1 Hz, H-1), 5.94 (dd, 1 H, J
1,2 = 15.1 Hz, J
3,2 = 8.4 Hz, H-2), 4.75 (d, 1 H, J = 10.8 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.67 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.56 (d, 1 H, J = 10.8 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.51 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.48 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.40 (d, 1 H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.22 (dd, 1 H, J
2,3 = 8.4 Hz, J
4,3 = 4.4 Hz, H-3), 3.82 (m, 1 H, H-5), 3.69 (dd, 1 H, J
5,4 = 7.6 Hz, J
3,4 = 4.4 Hz, H-4), 3.61 (m, 2 H, H-6), 2.78 (bs, 1 H, OH). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.2, 138.1, 137.8, 134.6 (C, aromatics), 129.1-126.9 (CH, aromatics), 128.8 (C-1), 128.4 (C-2), 81.3 (C-3), 80.8 (C-4), 74.2, 73.4 (CH2Ph), 70.9 (C-6), 70.8 (C-5), 70.5 (CH2Ph). Compound 5
Z: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.39-7.25 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 6.62 (d, 1 H, J
21 = 9.6 Hz, H-1), 6.00 (pseudo t, 1 H, J
12 = J
32 = 9.6 Hz, H-2), 4.89-4.35 (m, 6 H, CH2Ph), 3.91 (m, 1 H, H-5), 3.83 (dd, 1 H, J
54 = 7.6 Hz, J
34 = 3.4 Hz, H-4), 3.71 (dd, 1 H, J
23 = 9.6 Hz, J
43 = 3.4 Hz, H-3), 3.67 (m, 2 H, H-6), 2.85 (bs, 1 H, OH). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.1, 137.8, 135.5, 134.4 (C, aromatics), 129.8-126.5 (CH, aromatics, C-1, C-2), 80.9 (C-3), 77.1 (C-4), 74.1, 73.3 (CH2Ph), 71.0, 70.8, 70.5 (C-5, C-6, CH2Ph).
17
Freeman F.
Robarge KD.
Carbohydr. Res.
1986,
154:
270
18
Compound 6: To a 0.5 M solution of 5 (0.084 g, 0.16 mmol) (E/Z = 2:3) in CH3CN, NaHCO3 (0.48 mmol) was added. The mixture was cooled to 0 ºC and left to stir at this temperature for 5 min. NIS (0.48 mol) was then added and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. and stirred for 8 h. The mixture was diluted with Et2O and washed with a sat. solution of Na2S3O3. The combined aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combination of ethereal layers was dried with MgSO4 and concentrated. The residue was purified by radial chromatography to afford 0.060 g (58% yield) as a β/α mixture = 2:3. Compound 6β: [α]D
25 +16.0 (c 0.7708, CH2Cl2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70-7.20 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 5.11 (d, 1 H, J
2,1 = 10.6 Hz, H-1), 4.92 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.75 (d, 1 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.62 (d, 1 H, J = 11.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.60 (d, 1 H, J = 12.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.52 (d, 1 H, J = 11.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.51 (d, 1 H, J = 12.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.18 (m, 1 H, H-3, H-5), 4.02 (dd, 1 H, J
1,2 = 10.4 Hz, J
3,2 = 2.4 Hz, H-2), 3.72 (m, 1 H, H-4, H-6a, H-6b). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 138.4, 138.1, 137.6 (C, aromatics), 133.2 (CH, aromatic), 131.7 (C, aromatic), 128.7-127.4 (CH, aromatics), 84.3
(C-1), 78.7 (C-3), 76.1 (C-4), 75.9 (C-5), 75.7, 73.3, 72.2 (CH2Ph), 69.3 (C-6), 31.8 (C-2). Compound 6α (spectroscopical data extracted from the α/β-mixture spectrum): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.70-7.20 (m, 20 H, aromatics), 5.32 (d, 1 H, J
2,1 = 5.4 Hz, H-1), 4.91 (d, 1 H, J = 11.6 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.79 (d, 1 H, J = 10.8 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.68 (ddd, 1 H, J
4,5 = 10.0 Hz, J
6a,5 = 2.8 Hz, J
6b,5 = 2.4 Hz, H-5), 4.57 (dd, J
1,2 = 5.6 Hz, J
3,2 = 2.4 Hz, H-2), 4.52 (d, 2 H, J = 10.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.42 (d, 1 H, J = 11.2 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.40 (d, 1 H, J = 12.4 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.09 (dd, 1 H, J
2,3 = 2.4 Hz, J
4,3 = 2.4 Hz, H-3), 3.77 (m, 2 H, H-4, H-6a), 3.62 (dd, 1 H, J
6a,6b = 10.8 Hz, J
5,6b = 2.4 Hz, H-6b). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 131.4-126.8 (C, CH, aromatics), 90.0 (C-1), 78.1, 76.3, 75.6, 73.5, 72.0, 68.8, 67.7 (C-3, C-4, C-5, C-6, 3 × CH2Ph), 27.0 (C-2).
19
General Procedure of Glycosylation: A solution of the glycosyl donor (1 mmol) and the glycosyl acceptor (2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (4 mL) were allowed to stir with 4 Å molecular sieves for 2 h. The mixture was then cooled to -78 ºC, and NIS (3 mmol) and TfOH (0.2 mmol) were added. The mixture was allowed to warm to -40 ºC and stirred for 2-4 h. The reaction mixture was then diluted with CH2Cl2 and washed with a solution of Na2S3O3. The ethereal layer was dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated. The residue was then purified by radial chromatography.
20
Veeneman GH.
van Leeuwen SH.
van Boom JH.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1990,
31:
1331