Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46(4): 235-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-42355
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Micromanipulator: Effectiveness in Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery

R.  Jain1 , Y.  Kato1 , H.  Sano1 , S.  Imizu1 , S.  Watanabe1 , S.  Yamaguchi1 , N.  Shinya1 , V.  Jindal1 , T.  Kanno1
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 September 2003 (online)

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgeries by innovative approaches are practiced in all fields. The evolution of microneurosurgery has revolutionized the results in neurosurgery. Use of endoscopes and navigation has made microsurgery less invasive. Another development to make minimally invasive microneurosurgery further lesser invasive is the use of micromanipulator. The use and effectiveness of manually controlled micromanipulator system is presented. The manually controlled micromanipulator system consists of three parts, i.e., a basic micromanipulator, manipulator supporting device and the manual control. The micromanipulator fitted in supporting device is arranged before the start of surgery. The supporting device used is pneumatically driven powered endoscopic holding device (Mitaka Kohki Co., Tokyo) In maximum number of times we used the system for endoscopic assisted cerebrovascular microneurosurgery. In a span of two months we used it in thirty aneurysm clipping surgeries. The endoscope fitted in system has three ranges of motions (forward/backward, upside/down and sideways). We use MACHIDA rigid endoscope with internal diameter of 2.7 mm (smallest diameter endoscope available). Special features of this endoscope are accurate visualization at a deeper plane, stable movements and availability of single focus point for long time. All these features are valuable during pre- and postoperative clipping observation.

The aim of development of micromanipulator system was to further reduce invasiveness. A significant improvement in manual dexterity is possible when working through the micromanipulator interface, which dampens human physiological tremor. The physiological tremor would render the manual dexterity unsafe at the end of lever arm of long instruments. Thus, the use endoscope becomes practical. The minimally invasive microneurosurgery can be further made lesser invasive by use of micromanipulator and we are convinced that this will facilitate more accurate and promising results in microneurosurgery.

References

  • 1 Andrews R J, Bringas J R. Review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury.  Neurosurgery. 1993;  33 1052-1064
  • 2 Carlo S, Edzard K, Dorothee H, Johannes S, Bernhard M. The transsylvian approach is “minimally invasive” but not “atraumatic”.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 971-977
  • 3 Eby J, Cha S, Shaninian H K. Fully endoscopic vascular decompression of the facial nerve.  Skull Base Surgery. 2001;  11 189-196
  • 4 Hongo K, Kakizawa Y, Koyama J, Nishizawa K, Tajima F, Fujie G, Kobayashi S. Microscopic manipulator system for minimally invasive neurosurgery: Preliminary study for clinical application. In: Lemka HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG, Doi K (eds.). CARS 2001: Computer assisted Radiology and Surgery - Proceedings of the 15th International Congress and Exhibition, Berlin, June 27 - 0, 2001. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2001: 265-269
  • 5 Jarrahy R, Berci G, Shahinian H K. Assessment of the efficacy of endoscopy in pituitary adenoma resection.  Archives of Otolaryngology. 2000;  126 1487-1490
  • 6 Jarrahy R, Cha S, Berci G, Shahinian H K. Fully endoscopic vascular decompression trigeminal nerve.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2002;  45 32-35
  • 7 Jarrahy R, Eby J B, Shahnian H K. A new powered endoscope holding arm for endoscopic surgery of cranial base.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2002;  45 189-192
  • 8 Kivisaari R P, Salonen O, Ohman J. Basal brain injury in aneurysm surgery.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  46 1070-1076
  • 9 Magnan J, Chays A, Lepetre C, Pencroffe E, Locatelli P. Surgical perspectives of endoscopy of the cerebellopontine angle.  Am J Otol. 1994;  15 366-370
  • 10 Sainte-Rose C. Third ventriculostomy. In: Manwaring KH, Crone KR (eds.). Neuroendoscopy. New York: Mary Ann Liebert 1992 1: 47-62
  • 11 Stoniewski P, Zielinski P. Remote effect of brain retraction on cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve on single photon emission computerized tomography.  Surg Neurol. 1997;  48 511-513
  • 12 Taniguchi M, Takimoto H, Yoshimine T. Application of rigid endoscope to the microsurgical management of 54 cerebral aneurysms: results in 48 patients.  J Neurosurgery. 1999;  91 231-237
  • 13 Yoko Kato X, Sano H, Nagahisa S. et al . Endoscope-assisted microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms.   Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2000;  43 91-97
  • 14 Takimoto H. et al . Endoscopic assisted clipping of aneurysms.  Surgery for Apoplexy. 1998;  26 408-412
  • 15 Yundt K D, Grubb R L, Diringer M N, Powers W J. Cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic changes caused by brain retraction after aneurismal subarachanoid hemorrhage.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 442-451

Yoko Kato, M. D., Associate Professor 

Department of Neurosurgery · Fujita Health University School of Medicine

Toyoake, Aichi

Japan

Phone: +81-562-93-9253

Fax: +81-562-93-3118

Email: kyoko@fujita-hu.ac.jp