Endoscopic Closure of Iatrogenic Duodenal Perforation during Endoscopic Ultrasound

Table of Contents

Although oesophageal perforation is a well-recognized complication during endoscopic ultrasonography [1], perforation of the duodenum during the procedure has not previously been reported.

A 66-year-old woman underwent endoscopic ultrasound for staging of a mid-oesophageal tumor. During the procedure, free air became apparent in the retroperitoneum. A straight-viewing standard endoscopy was performed immediately, and a 10-mm perforation was identified in the posterior wall of the duodenal bulb. The tear in the duodenal wall was immediately closed using an Olympus endoclipping device (HX-5LR-1); complete apposition was achieved at the margins of the defect using four Endoclips (Figure [1]). Computed tomography confirmed that there was free air in peritoneal cavity (Figure [2]). The patient was placed on a nil per os regimen with continuous nasogastric tube drainage, intravenous fluids and electrolytes, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and peripheral parenteral nutrition. A Gastrografin meal confirmed successful closure of the defect, with no leakage of contrast into the peritoneal cavity (Figure [3]). The patient resumed a normal diet on day 7, and still had no adverse sequelae of the perforation 2 months later.

Figure 1 Endoscopic view, with clips in place after closure of the perforation.

Figure 2 Abdominal computed tomogram taken soon after closure of the perforation, showing free air in the peritoneum and the clips in place.

Figure 3 Gastrografin meal, showing no leakage of dye into the peritoneal cavity and confirming complete closure of the duodenal tear.

Most cases of iatrogenic duodenal perforation at endoscopy are reported after endoscopic sphincterotomy [2]. The standard treatment for duodenal perforation is surgical closure. Unlike the more common spontaneous perforation resulting from peptic ulcer disease, iatrogenic perforations have a relatively lower chance of bacterial contamination in a fasting patient, and there is therefore sometimes an opportunity to manage these patients by nonsurgical means.

There have been isolated reports of the use of an endoscopic clipping device for closure of iatrogenic perforations in the oesophagus [3], stomach [4], and duodenum [5]. In the present patient, nonsurgical closure was considered appropriate in the context of the patient’s coexistent malignant disease. The present report, along with others, suggests that endoscopic clipping is a useful technique for closure of iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal perforations.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AL_2AB

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AI

References

• 1 Chandrashekhar M V, Richardson D L, Preston S. et al. . Perforation of a nonobstructing gastro-oesophageal carcinoma by oblique-viewing endoscopic ultrasound videoscope: a need for a safe technique.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 934
• 2 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al. . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
• 3 Binmoeller K F, Grimm H, Soehendra N.. Endoscopic closure of a perforation using metallic clips after snare excision of a gastric leiomyoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 172-174
• 4 Kaneko T, Akamatsu T, Shimodaira K. et al. . Non-surgical treatment of duodenal perforation by endoscopic repair using a clipping device.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 410-414
• 5 Wewalka F W, Clodi P H, Hardinger D.. Endoscopic clipping of esophageal perforation after pneumatic dilatation for achalasia.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 608-611