Background and Study Aims: Endosonography (EUS) has been shown to be more accurate than incremental computed tomography (CT) in the local (T) and regional (N) staging of gastric carcinoma; however, EUS has never been compared with helical CT (HCT). The fifth edition of the TNM classification changed the guidelines for N-staging of gastric carcinoma. The accuracy of imaging methods in this new system remains unknown.
Patients and Methods: Staging accuracy of EUS and HCT were compared prospectively with pathological or intraoperative findings in 88 gastric carcinoma patients. Staging was done according to the fourth and fifth editions of the TNM classification. EUS was done with a radial echo endoscope, and HCT with a scanner with two rows of detectors (two-phase contrast-enhanced scanning of a water-filled stomach).
Results: The T-staging accuracy of EUS (63 %, CI 52 - 73 %) was superior to the accuracy of HCT (44 %, CI 34 - 55 %; P = 0.021). N-staging accuracy of both methods was similar when the fourth edition of the TNM classification was used (EUS 47 %, CI 34 - 60 %; HCT 52 %, CI 38 - 65 %). However, HCT was more accurate than EUS when the fifth edition of the classification was applied (EUS 30 %, CI 18 - 43 %, HCT 47 %, CI 34 - 60 %; P = 0.044). The accuracy of detection of lymph node metastases was similar for both methods (EUS 67 %, CI 54 - 78 %; HCT 77 %, CI 64 - 86 %).
Conclusions: EUS is more accurate than HCT in the T-staging of gastric carcinoma. Both methods are comparable for N-staging, when this is done according to the older, fourth edition of the TNM classification. If the fifth edition is used, EUS is less accurate than HCT.
References
-
1
Fink U, Stein H J, Schuhmacher C. et al .
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: update.
World J Surg.
1995;
19
509-516
-
2
Sendler A, Dittler H J, Feussner H. et al .
Preoperative staging of gastric cancer as precondition for multimodal treatment.
World J Surg.
1995;
19
501-508
-
3
Allum W H, Griffin S M, Watson A. et al .
Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.
Gut.
2002;
50
v1-v23
-
4
Botet J F, Lightdale C J, Zauber A G. et al .
Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.
Radiology.
1991;
181
426-432
-
5
Grimm H, Binmoeller K F, Hamper K. et al .
Endosonography for preoperative locoregional staging of esophageal and gastric cancer.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
224-230
-
6
Nattermann C, Galbenu-Grunwald R, Nier H. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasound in TN staging of stomach cancer. A comparison with computerized tomography and conventional ultrasound.
Z Gesamte Inn Med.
1993;
48
60-64
-
7
Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer T. et al .
Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma.
Gut.
1993;
34
604-610
-
8
Greenberg J, Durkin M, van Drunen M. et al .
Computed tomography or endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative staging of gastric and esophageal tumors.
Surgery.
1994;
116
696-701
-
9
Cho J S, Kim J K, Rho S M. et al .
Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical i. v. injection of contrast material.
Am J Roentgenol.
1994;
163
69-75
-
10
Takao M, Fukuda T, Iwanaga S. et al .
Gastric cancer: evaluation of triphasic spiral CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1998;
22
288-294
-
11
Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M.
Assessment of gastric cancer: value of breathhold technique and two-phase spiral CT.
Eur Radiol.
1999;
9
68-72
-
12 Sobin L H, Wittekind C H (eds). UICC. TNM Classification of malignant tumors. 5th edn. New York; John Wiley 1997
-
13 Hermanek P, Sobin L H (eds). UICC: TNM Classification of malignant tumors. 4th edn. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1987
-
14
Hermanek P.
The superiority of the new International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma.
Cancer.
2000;
88
1763-1765
-
15 Rösch T, Classen M. Gastric carcinoma. In: Rösch T, Classen M (eds) Gastroenterologic endosonography. Stuttgart; Georg Thieme Verlag 1992: 71-80
-
16
Perneger T V.
What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.
BMJ.
1998;
316
1236-1238
-
17
Siewert J R, Bottcher K, Roder J D. et al .
Prognostic relevance of systematic lymph node dissection in gastric carcinoma. German Gastric Carcinoma Study Group.
Br J Surg.
1993;
80
1015-1018
-
18
Perng D S, Jan C M, Wang W M. et al .
Computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma.
J Formos Med Assoc.
1996;
95
378-385
-
19
Kienle P, Buhl K, Kuntz C. et al .
Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography for staging of tumors of the oesophagus and gastric cardia.
Digestion.
2002;
66
230-236
-
20
Rösch T.
Endosonographic staging of gastric cancer: a review of literature results.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
1995;
5
549-557
-
21
Mani N B, Suri S, Gupta S. et al .
Two-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography with water-filling method for staging of gastric carcinoma.
J Clin Imaging.
2001;
25
38-43
-
22
Dux M, Richter G M, Hansmann J. et al .
Helical hydro-CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1999;
23
913-922
-
23
D’Elia F, Zingarelli A, Palli D. et al .
Hydro-dynamic CT preoperative staging of gastric cancer: correlation with pathological findings. A prospective study of 107 cases.
Eur Radiol.
2000;
10
1877-1885
-
24
Lee D H, Ko Y T, Park S J. et al .
Comparison of hydro-US and spiral CT in the staging of gastric cancer.
J Clin Imaging.
2001;
25
181-186
-
25
Lee D H, Seo T S, Ko Y T.
Spiral CT of the gastric carcinoma: staging and enhancement pattern.
J Clin Imaging.
2001;
25
32-37
-
26
Fukuya T, Honda H, Kaneko K. et al .
Efficacy of helical CT in T staging of gastric cancer.
J Comput Assist Tomogr.
1997;
21
73-81
-
27
Meining A, Dittler H J, Wolf A. et al .
You get what you expect? A critical appraisal of imaging methodology in endosonographic cancer staging.
Gut.
2002;
50
599-603
-
28
Wang J Y, Hsieh J S, Huang Y S. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative locoregional staging and assessment of resectability in gastric cancer.
J Clin Imaging.
1998;
22
355-359
-
29
Eloubeidi M, Wade S, Provenzale D.
Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
275-282
-
30
Tseng L J, Mo L R, Tio T L. et al .
Video-endoscopic ultrasonography in staging gastric carcinoma.
Hepatogastroenterology.
2000;
47
897-900
-
31
Willis S, Truong S, Gribnitz S. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: accuracy and impact on surgical therapy.
Surg Endosc.
2000;
14
951-954
-
32
Massari M, Cioffi U, de Simone M. et al .
Endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma.
Hepatogastroenterology.
1996;
43
542-546
-
33
Tio T L, Schouwink M H, Cikot R J. et al .
Preoperative TNM classification of gastric carcinoma by endosonography in comparison with the pathological TNM system: a prospective study of 72 cases.
Hepatogastroenterology.
1989;
36
51-56
-
34
Caletti G, Ferrari A, Brocchi E. et al .
Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer and lymphoma.
Surgery.
1993;
113
14-27
-
35
Dittler H J.
Siewert JR. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in gastric carcinoma.
Endoscopy.
1993;
25
162-166
M. Polkowski, M. D.
Department of Gastroenterology
Medical Center for Postgraduate Education · Institute of Oncology · Roentgena 5 · 02-781 Warsaw · Poland
Fax: +48-22-6447601
Email: polek@coi.waw.pl
