Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-832459
Kombinierte Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie/Computertomographie (PET/CT) für die klinische Onkologie: Technische Grundlagen und Akquisitionsprotokolle
Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for Clinical Oncology: Technical Aspects and Acquisition ProtocolsPublication History
Publication Date:
14 February 2005 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die kombinierte PET/CT ist eine nicht-invasive bildgebende Methode zur Darstellung anatomischer und molekularer Zusammenhänge durch eine quasi-simultane Untersuchung. Seit der Einführung des PET/CT-Prototypen im Jahr 1998 hat sich die Technologie dieser Bildgebung rasant entwickelt. Die Einführung schneller PET-Detektormaterialien in die PET/CT-Tomographie sowie die Nutzung des CT zur Schwächungskorrektur erlauben onkologische Ganzkörperuntersuchungen in weniger als 30 min. PET/CT bringt auch einen logistischen Vorteil sowohl für den Partienten als auch für den Kliniker, da beide Untersuchungen - soweit klinisch indiziert - quasi-simultan akquiriert werden können und nur ein einziger, integrierter Befund entsteht. Trotzdem gibt es eine Reihe von möglichen methodischen Fehlerquellen, vorrangig durch die CT-basierte Schwächungskorrektur, die jedoch verstanden sind und durch optimierte Akquisitionsprotokolle adressiert werden können. Mittlerweile ist das PET/CT als Bestandteil der diagnostischen Bildgebung etabliert und führt in vielen Fällen zu einer engen Zusammenarbeit der verschiedenen, aber komplementären diagnostischen und therapeutischen Disziplinen der Medizin.
Abstract
Combined PET/CT imaging is a non-invasive means of reviewing both, the anatomy and the molecular pathways of a patient during a quasi-simultaneous examination. Since the introduction of the prototype PET/CT in 1998 a rapid development of this imaging technology is being witnessed. The incorporation of fast PET detector technology into PET/CT designs and the routine use of the CT transmission images for attenuation correction of the PET allow for anato-metabolic whole-body examinations to be completed in less than 30 min. Thus, PET/CT imaging offers a logistical advantage to both, the patient and the clinicians since the two complementary exams - whenever clinically indicated - can be performed almost at the same time and a single integrated report can be created. Nevertheless, a number of pitfalls, primarily from the use of CT-based attenuation correction, have been identified and are being addressed through optimized acquisiton protocols. It is fair to say, that PET/CT has been integrated in the diagnostic imaging arena, and in many cases has led to a close collaboration between different, yet complementary diagnostic and therapeutic medical disciplines.
Schlüsselwörter
PET/CT - Onkologie - Diagnostik - Protokolle
Key words
PET/CT - oncology - diagnostics - protocols
Literatur
- 1 Antoch G, Freudenberg L S, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin J F. To Enhance or Not to Enhance? 18F-FDG and CT Contrast Agents in Dual-Modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45 (Suppl) 56S-65S
- 2 Antoch G, Freudenberg L S, Egelhof T. et al . Focal Tracer Uptake: A Potential Artifact in Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Modality PET/CT Scans. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43 1339-1342
- 3 Antoch G, Kuehl H, Kanja J. et al . Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: Introduction and evaluation. Radiology. 2004; 230 879-885
- 4 Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H. et al . Accuracy of whole-body PET/CT for tumor staging in solid tumors: Comparison with CT and PET in 260 patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004; 22 4357-4361
- 5 Baum R M, Hofmann M. Nuklearmedizinische Diagnostik neuroendokriner Tumoren. Onkologe. 2004; 6 598-610
-
6 Bendriem B D, Townsend D N. The theory and practice of 3D-PET. In: Cox PH (ed). Developments in Nuclear Medicine. Vol. 32. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1998
- 7 Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T. et al . Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2003; 30 588-596
-
8 Beyer T, Antoch G, Kuehl H, Mueller S P. Acquisition Schemes for Combined F-18-FDG-PET/CT Imaging - A European perspective. In: Czernin J et al. (eds). Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Springer, 2004; 30-45
- 9 Beyer T, Antoch G, Muller S. et al . Acquisition Protocol Considerations for Combined PET/CT Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45 (Suppl 1) 25S-35S
- 10 Beyer T, Antoch G, Rosenbaum S. et al . Optimized i. v. contrast administration protocols for diagnostic PET/CT imaging. European Radiology. 2004; 14 (Suppl 2) 422-423
- 11 Beyer T, Kinahan P E, Townsend D W. Optimization of emission and transmission scan duration in 3D whole-body PET. IEEE Transactions in Nuclear Science. 1997; 44 2400-2407
- 12 Beyer T, Kuehl H, Stattaus J. et al . Respiration artifacts in whole-body studies with 2nd and 3rd generation PET/CT systems employing multi-row CT technology. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 427P
- 13 Beyer T, Lechel U, Mueller S P. et al . Radiation exposure during combined whole-body FDG-PET/CT imaging. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 P426
- 14 Beyer T, Tellmann L, Nickel I. et al . Reduced motion artifacts in the head/neck region of whole-body PET/CT studies through the use of positioning aids. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 P428
- 15 Beyer T, Townsend D W, Brun T. et al . A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2000; 41 1369-1379
- 16 Bockisch A, Beyer T, Antoch G. et al . Positron emission tomography/computed tomography-imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 2004; 6 188-199
- 17 Bradley J D, Perez C A, Dehdashti F, Siegel B A. Implementing Biologic Target Volumes in Radiation Treatment Planning fot Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 (Suppl 1) 96S-101S
-
18 Bruckbauer T, Casey M, Valk P E. et al .Optimizing 3D whole body acquisition for oncologic imaging on the ECAT ACCEL LSO PET system. In EANM, Naples 2001
- 19 Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen N N. et al . Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 2000; 25 905-910
- 20 Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall L T, Wahl R L. PET-CT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003; 30 721-726
- 21 Comtat C, Kinahan P E, Fessler J A. et al . Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2002; 47 1-20
- 22 Dahlbom M, Hoffman E J, Hoh C K. et al . Whole-body Positron Emission Tomography: Part I. Methods and Performance Characteristics. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1992; 33 1191-1199
- 23 Di Filippo F, Brunken R, Neumann D. et al . Initial clinical experience with 82Rb cardiac PET imaging on a PET/CT system. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 117
- 24 Dizendorf E, Hany T F, Buck A, Schulthess G K von, Burger C. Cause and Magnitude of the Error Induced by Oral CT Contrast Agent in CT-Based Attenuation Correction of PET Emission Studies. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44 732-738
- 25 Erdi Y E, Nehmeh S A, Pan T. et al . The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 1287-1292
- 26 Goerres G, Schmid D, Eyrich G. Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer?. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2003; 32 365-371
- 27 Goerres G W, Burger C, Schwitter M R. et al . PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern. European Radiology. 2003; 13 734-739
- 28 Goerres G W, Kamel E, Heidelberg T-N H. et al . PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2002; 29 351-360
- 29 Goerres G W, Ziegler S I, Burger C. et al . Artifacts at PET and PET/CT Caused by Metallic Hip Prosthetic Material. Radiology. 2003; 226 577-584
- 30 Halpern B S, Dahlbom M, Quon A. et al . Impact of patient weight and emission scan time duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 797-801
- 31 Hany T F, Steinert H C, Goerres G W, Buck A, Schulthess G K von. PET Diagnostic Accuracy: Improvement with In-Line PET-CT System: Initial Results. Radiology. 2002; 225 575-581
- 32 Hapdey S, Buvat I, Carrasquillo J, Beegle C, Bacharach S. Characterization of noise induced by CT-based attenuation correction in PET/CT images. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 413P
- 33 Hofmann M, Maecke H, Boerner A R. et al . Biokinetics and imaging with the Somatostatin receptor PET radioligand 68Ga-DOTATOC: Preliminary data. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2001; 28 1751-1757
- 34 Holm S, Toft P, Jensen M. Estimation of the noise contributions from blank, transmission and emission scans in PET. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Sciences. 1996; 43 2285-2291
- 35 Hutton B F, Braun M. Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2003; XXXIII 180-192
- 36 Kinahan P, Hasegawa B, Beyer T. X-ray Based Attenuation Correction for PET/CT Scanners. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2003; XXXIII 166-179
- 37 Kinahan P E, Townsend D W, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Medical Physics. 1998; 25 2046-2053
- 38 LaCroix K J, Tsui B MW, Hasegawa B H, Brown J K. Investigantion of the use of X-ray CT images for attenuation correction in SPECT. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 1994; 41 2793-2799
- 39 Lartizien C, Comtat C, Kinahan P E. et al . Optimization of Injected Dose Based on Noise Equivalent Count Rates for 2- and 3-Dimensional Whole-Body PET. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43 1268-1278
- 40 Ling C C, Humm J, Larson S. et al . Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): Biological imaging and biological conformality. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47 551-560
- 41 Namdar M, Hany T, Siegrist P. et al . Improved CAD assessment using a combined PET/CT scanner. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 117P-118P
- 42 Nehmeh S A, Erdi Y E, Ling C C. et al . Effect of Respiratory Gating on Quantifying PET Images of Lung Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002; 43 876-881
- 43 Nehmeh S A, Erdi Y E, Rosenzweig K E. et al . Reduction of Respiratory Motion Artifacts in PET Imaging of Lung Cancer by Respiratory Correlated Dynamic PET: Methodology and Comparison with Respiratory Gated PET. J Nucl Med. 2003; 44 1644-1648
- 44 Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Fink G. et al . An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: Validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 1994; 35 2011-2018
- 45 Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Heiss W-D. Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1990; 14 51-59
- 46 Schaller S, Semrbitzki O, Beyer T. et al . An algorithm for virtual extension of the CT field of measurement for application in combined PET/CT scanners. Radiology. 2002; 225 (Suppl) 497
-
47 Schelbert H. PET/CT: Imaging function and structure. In: Czernin J (ed). JNM supplement to The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. Vol. 45. Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2004; 1S-103S
- 48 Schulthess G K von. Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system. European Radiology. 2000; 10 (Suppl 3) S377-S380
- 49 Surti S J, Karp J S. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2004; 45 1040-1046
- 50 Tang H R, Brown J K, Silva A JD. et al . Implementation of a combined X-ray CT scintillation camera imaging system for localizing and measuring radionuclide uptake: Experiments in phantoms and patients. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 1999; 46 551-557
- 51 Townsend D W, Beyer T, Jerin J. et al . The ECAT ART scanner for Positron Emission Tomography: 1. Improvements in performance characteristics. Clinical Positron Imaging. 1999; 2 5-15
- 52 Townsend D W, Beyer T, Meltzer C C. et al . The ECAT ART scanner for Positron Emission Tomography: 2. Research and clinical applications. Clinical Positron Imaging. 1999; 2 17-30
- 53 Watson C, Casey M, Bendriem B. et al . A new method for assessing and optimizing clinical 18F-FDG whole-body PET data quality. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2003; 44 110-111
- 54 Woods R P, Cherry S R, Mazziotta J C. Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1992; 16 620-633
- 55 Woods R P, Mazziotta J C, Cherry S R. MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 1993; 17 536-546
- 56 Zasadny K R, Kison P V, Quint L Q, Wahl R L. Untreated lung cancer: Quantification of systematic distortion of tumor size and shape on non-attenuation-corrected 2-[Fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET scans. Radiology. 1996; 201 873-876
Thomas BeyerPh. D.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · Universitätsklinikum Essen
Hufelandstr. 55
45122 Essen
Phone: 02 01/7 23/15 28
Fax: 02 01/7 23/59 64
Email: thomas.beyer@uni-essen.de