References
See the following recent examples, and references therein
1a
Ng D.
Yang Z.
Garcia-Garibay MA.
Org. Lett.
2004,
6:
645
1b
Srikrishna A.
Rao MS.
Synlett
2004,
374
1c
Kuwahara S.
Saito M.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2004,
45:
5047
1d
Srikrishna A.
Babu NC.
Rao MS.
Tetrahedron
2004,
60:
2125
1e
Kita Y.
Futamura J.
Ohba Y.
Sawama Y.
Ganesh JK.
Fujioka H.
J. Org. Chem.
2003,
68:
5917
1f
Zhao XZ.
Jia YX.
Tu YQ.
J. Chem. Res., Synop.
2003,
54
1g
Paul T.
Pal A.
Gupta PD.
Mukherjee D.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2003,
44:
737
1h
Acherar S.
Audran G.
Vanthuyne N.
Monti H.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003,
14:
2413
1i
Satoh T.
Yoshida M.
Takahashi Y.
Ota H.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003,
14:
281
1j
Nayek A.
Drew MGB.
Ghosh S.
Tetrahedron
2003,
59:
5175
1k
Chavan SP.
Kharul RK.
Kale RR.
Khobragade DA.
Tetrahedron
2003,
59:
2737
1l
Srikrishna A.
Rao MS.
Synlett
2002,
340
1m
Nayek A.
Ghosh S.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2002,
43:
1313
1n
Srikrishna A.
Rao MS.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2002,
43:
151
2
Irita H.
Hashimoto T.
Fukuyama Y.
Asakawa Y.
Phytochemistry
2000,
55:
247
3
de la Torre MC.
García I.
Sierra MA.
J. Org. Chem.
2003,
68:
6611 ; and references therein
4 The combination of a Paternò-Büchi reaction and selective oxetane cleavage has found notable application in the synthesis of triquinane natural products. See: Reddy TJ.
Rawal VH.
Org. Lett.
2000,
2:
2711 ; and references therein
5
Grainger RS.
Patel A.
Chem. Commun.
2003,
1072
6
Cohen T.
Mudryk B.
J. Org. Chem.
1991,
56:
5760
7 Recently LDBB has been shown to partially reduce certain electron-deficient aromatic compounds: Donohoe TJ.
House D.
J. Org. Chem.
2002,
67:
5015 . We have not observed formation of any Birch-type products, consistent with the electron-rich nature of the aromatic ring in the systems under investigation
8
Wang M.
Liu SZ.
Liu J.
Hu BF.
J. Org. Chem.
1995,
60:
7364
9
Kabalka GW.
Yu S.
Li N.-S.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1997,
38:
5455
10 Attempted preparation of the photochemical precursor 14 via an analogous sequence of reactions to that described in Scheme
[1 ]
was thwarted by the formation of 19 as the major product upon attempted Wittig olefination of 18 . Alkene 19 is presumably formed by an initial retro-Michael addition under the reactions conditions to reform ketone 8 , which subsequently undergoes Wittig olefination. The sluggish reactivity of hindered aryl ketones to the phosphorus ylide necessitates the high temperature employed, although the difference in reactivity of 2 and 18 under identical reaction conditions is notable. To date, we have been unable to achive methylation of 18 using other methods (Scheme
[3 ]
).
Scheme 3
11 An oven dried Schlenk tube was equipped with a glass stirrer bar and charged with DBB (1.59 g, 5.97 mmol) and THF (10 mL). Lithium wire (83 mg, 11.90 mmol) was added in one portion and the mixture was sonicated for 5 min until a rich turquoise solution was achieved. The resulting solution was stirred for 5 h at r.t., cooled to -78 °C, and a solution of oxetane 15 (295 mg, 1.19 mmol) in THF (3 mL) added. The reaction mixture was then treated dropwise with a solution of diethylaluminium chloride in hexane (1 M, 5.97 mL, 5.97 mmol). Once addition was complete the reaction mixture was stirred at -78 °C for 1.5 h then quenched with 5% HCl (5 mL), and the resulting biphasic solution was allowed to warm to r.t. The aqueous layer was extracted with Et2 O (3 × 15 mL) and the combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4 , and concentrated in vacuo to furnish pale yellow oil. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hexane-EtOAc 95:5) to afford first 2-(2′-methoxy-5′-methylphenyl)-2,3,3-trimethylcyclopentanol 17 as a transparent oil (67 mg, 22%); Rf = 0.30 (hexane-EtOAc 8:2). IR (CDCl3 ): νmax = 3412, 2945, 1498, 1465 and 1246 cm-1 . 1 H NMR (360 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 7.18 (1 H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.06-6.98 (1 H, m), 6.80 (1 H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 5.15 (1 H, s), 3.79 (3 H, s), 2.47-2.32 (1 H, m), 2.29 (3 H, s), 2.09-2.01 (1 H, m), 1.72-1.66 (2 H, m), 1.49-1.44 (1 H, m), 1.29 (3 H, s), 1.16 (3 H, s), 0.64 (3 H, s). 13 C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 21.3 (q), 21.5 (q), 27.2 (q), 27.6 (t), 28.9 (q), 37.2 (t), 44.1 (s), 54.5 (s), 56.0 (q), 76.4 (d), 112.9 (d), 127.9 (d), 130.2 (s), 130.9 (d), 133.6 (s), 156.4 (s). ESI-MS: m/z = 271.1664 (C16 H24 O2 Na requires 271.1669). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 248 (98), 230 (50), 215 (63), 200 (15), 187 (72), 148 (100), 135 (57), 105 (29), 91 (25), 69 (15) and 41 (16). Followed by [1-(2′-methoxy-5′-methylphenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopentyl]-methanol 16 as a pale yellow oil (168 mg, 57%); Rf = 0.24 (hexane-EtOAc 8:2). IR (CDCl3 ): νmax = 3549, 3413, 2952, 1498, 1465, 1240 and 805 cm-1 . 1 H NMR (360 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 7.08 (1 H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.03-7.00 (1 H, m), 6.77 (1 H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 4.60 (1 H, dd, J = 2.7 and 10.5 Hz), 3.77 (3 H, s), 3.49 (1 H, t, J = 10.2 Hz), 2.57-2.52 (1 H, m), 2.28 (3 H, s), 2.17-2.12 (1 H, m), 1.79-1.73 (2 H, m), 1.58-1.53 (2 H, m), 1.30 (1 H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 1.10 (3 H, s), 0.67 (3 H, s). 13 C NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3 ): δ = 21.3 (q), 21.3 (t), 25.2 (q), 27.8 (q), 35.9 (t), 42.7 (t), 44.5 (s), 55.2 (q), 58.2 (s), 66.3 (t), 111.5 (d), 128.4 (d), 129.9 (s), 130.7 (s), 132.2 (d), 156.6 (s). ESI-MS: m/z = 271.1665 (C16 H24 O2 Na requires 271.1669). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 248 (54), 218 (20), 217 (95), 187 (44), 161 (42), 135 (100), 105 (19), 95 (17), 69 (29) and 41 (11).
12a
Fukuyama Y.
Yuasa H.
Tonoi Y.
Harada K.
Wada M.
Asakawa Y.
Hashimoto T.
Tetrahedron
2001,
57:
9299
12b
Srikrishna A.
Satyanarayana G.
Tetrahedron Lett.
2003,
44:
1027
12c
Srikrishna A.
Rao MS.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2004,
499
13
Aristoff PA.
Johnson PD.
Harrison AW.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985,
107:
7967
14 A solution of HPPh2 (0.182 mL, 1.05 mmol) in THF (3 mL) was cooled to 0 °C and a solution of n -BuLi in hexane (2.2 M, 0.47 mL, 1.04 mmol) was added dropwise. The orange solution was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min and then at r.t. for a further 30 min. A solution of alcohol 16 (40 mg, 0.16 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added at r.t. and the resulting solution was refluxed for 45 min, cooled to 0 °C and quenched with 5% HCl (5 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 15 mL) and the combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to furnish a pale yellow oil. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane-EtOAc 9:1) to afford 1,13-herbertenediol as a colourless oil (29 mg, 77%). Analytic data agree with those reported in the literature.2