Clinical, Colonoscopic, and Histological Profile of Colonic Tuberculosis in a Tertiary Hospital

Background and Study Aims: Colonic tuberculosis is not uncommon in developing countries. As emigration to the West increases, it is worthwhile to recall the clinical, colonoscopic, and histopathological features of this condition.
Patients and Methods: The clinical, colonoscopic and histopathological findings were evaluated in 43 patients with colonic tuberculosis.
Results: Abdominal pain, weight loss, diarrhea, fever, and a lump in the abdomen were the commonest symptoms. Extraintestinal tuberculosis was present in 11 patients (26 %). Colonoscopy revealed ulcers in 30 patients (70 %), nodules in 24 (56 %), a deformed cecum and ileocecal valve in 17 (40 %), strictures in 10 (23 %), polypoid lesions in six (14 %), and fibrous bands forming mucosal bridges in three (7 %). The cecum and ascending colon were the commonest sites involved. Segmental tuberculosis was seen in six of the 32 patients (19 %) in whom full-length colonoscopy could be performed. Two or more sites were involved in 19 patients (44 %). Histopathology revealed well-formed granulomas in 23 patients (54 %). Fourteen of the above patients (61 %) had caseation and 11 (48 %) had confluence of the granulomas. Acid-fast bacilli were present in the biopsies from two patients (5 %). Ill-formed granulomas were seen in seven patients (16 %) and chronic inflammatory changes in 13 (30 %). Despite the various histopathological findings, all of the patients responded to antitubercular treatment and continued to remain asymptomatic during the follow-up period.
Conclusions: Colonoscopy with biopsy is a useful method for diagnosing colonic tuberculosis. Even in the absence of the classic histopathological features, a therapeutic trial may be indicated in a given clinical and colonoscopic setting. Follow-up is essential.

References

• 1 Bhansali S K. The challenge of abdominal tuberculosis in 310 cases.  Indian J Surg. 1978;  40 65-77
• 2 Tabrisky J, Lindstrom R R, Peters R, Lachman R S. Tuberculous enteritis: review of a protean disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1975;  63 49-57
• 3 Singh V, Kumar P, Kamal J. et al . Clinicocolonoscopic profile of colonic tuberculosis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 565-568
• 4 Bhargava D K, Tandon H D, Chawla T C. et al . Diagnosis of ileocecal and colonic tuberculosis by colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1985;  31 68-70
• 5 Shah S, Thomas V, Mathan M. et al . Colonoscopic study of 50 patients with colonic tuberculosis.  Gut. 1992;  33 347-351
• 6 Aoki G, Nagasako K, Nakae Y. et al . The fibercolonoscopic diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis.  Endoscopy. 1975;  7 113-121
• 7 Bhargava D K, Kushwaha A KS, Dasarathy S. et al . Endoscopic diagnosis of segmental colonic tuberculosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 571-574
• 8 Kalvaria I, Kottler R E, Marks I N. The role of colonoscopy in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988;  10 516-523
• 9 Pettengell K E, Pirie D, Simjee A E. Colonoscopic features of early intestinal tuberculosis (report of 11 cases ).  S Afr Med J. 1991;  79 279-280
• 10 Ferentzi C V, Sieck J O, Ali M A. Colonoscopic diagnosis and medical treatment of ten patients with colonic tuberculosis.  Endoscopy. 1988;  20 62-65
• 11 Radhakrishnan S, Nakib B, Shaikh H, Menon N K. The value of colonoscopy in schistosomal, tuberculous and amebic colitis: two year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;  29 891-895
• 12 Misra S P, Misra V, Dwivedi M, Gupta S C. Colonic tuberculosis: clinical features, endoscopic appearance and management.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  14 723-729
• 13 Das P, Shukla H S. Clinical diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis.  Br J Surg. 1976;  63 941-946
• 14 Singh V, Jain A K, Agrawal A K. et al . Clinicopathological profile of abdominal tuberculosis.  Br J Clin Pract. 1995;  49 22-24
• 15 Naga M I, Okasha H H, Ismail Z. et al . Endoscopic diagnosis of colonic tuberculosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 789-793
• 16 Dye C, Scheele S, Dolin P. et al . Global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence and mortality by country.  JAMA. 1999;  282 677-686
• 17 Horvath K D, Whelan R L. Intestinal tuberculosis: return of an old disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 692-696
• 18 Kim K M, Lee A, Choi K Y. et al . Intestinal tuberculosis: clinicopathologic analysis and diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 606-609
• 19 Tarumi K, Koga H, Lida M. et al . Colonic aphthoid erosions as the only manifestation of tuberculosis: case report.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 743-745
• 20 Pulimood A B, Ramakrishna B S, Kurian G. et al . Endoscopic mucosal biopsies are useful in distinguishing granulomatous colitis due to Crohn’s disease from tuberculosis.  Gut. 1999;  45 537-541
• 21 Sakai Y. Colonoscopic diagnosis of the intestinal tuberculosis.  Mater Med Pol. 1979;  11 275-278
• 22 Gan H T, Chen Y Q, Ouyang Q. et al . Differentiation between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease in endoscopic biopsy specimens by polymerase chain reaction.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1446-1451
• 23 Anand B S, Schneider F E, El-Zaatari F A. et al . Diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction on endoscopic biopsy specimens.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 2248-2249
• 24 Ha H K, Kim J K. The gastrointestinal tract. In: Haaga JR, Lanzieri CF, Gilkeson RC (eds) CT and MR imaging of the whole body, vol. 2. St. Louis; Mosby 2003: 1154-1169
• 25 Kashima K, Oka S, Tabata A. et al . Detection of anti-cord factor antibodies in intestinal tuberculosis for its differential diagnosis from Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 2630-2634
• 26 Patel N, Amarapurkar D N, Kulshreshta P P. et al . Utility of serological markers in inflammatory bowel disease.  Indian J Gastroenterol. 2002;  21 A37
• 27 Thomas G AO, Swift G L, Green J T. et al . Controlled trial of antituberculous chemotherapy in Crohn’s disease: a five year follow up study.  Gut. 1998;  42 497-500