Management of the Diabetic Foot: Surgical and Organisational Aspects

F. Gottrup

doi:10.1055/s-2005-861377

Hormone and Metabolic Research, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Horm Metab Res 2005; 37: 69-75
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-861377

Review

Management of the Diabetic Foot: Surgical and Organisational Aspects

F. Gottrup¹

¹ The University Center of Wound Healing, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Most patients are older, but increasing numbers of young patients also develop diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) [1]. A third of the patients are under 50 years of age [2]. The prevalence in the Western countries is 4-10 % and the incidence 2-6 % [3]. Only 10-60 % of patients are healed after the first three months [4] and the recurrence rate is 44 %, 61 % and 70 % after one, two and three years, respectively [5]. DFU results in extensive treatment costs, and the hospital treatment cost of DFU counts towards 25-30 % of the total hospital expenses of treatment of patients suffering of diabetes [6].

Recent progress in the treatment of patients with DFU has reduced the number of low-extremity amputation (LEA) cases. These improvements have been achieved through an increasing understanding of the importance of the multifactorial background of DFU, and that there should be a multidisciplinary organ„ised structure behind the treatment of DFU. This used to be a topic of interest, but especially focused on in the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot from 1999 [3]. Our understanding of the importance of surgery in DFU has increased over the last 30 years [7 17]. A simple classification based on presents or absents of neuropathy, open wound or infection has been suggested [16]. Treatment is dependable of the type and classification group of the wound. Various surgical correction techniques are available [18] [19].

The team approach and collaboration between all healthcare professionals is required to facilitate good quality holistic care [20 23]. Recognition of the talent and creativity of all employees in the multidisciplinary team will increase the chance of success in establishment of the concept [24].

This article is based on a presentation focusing on the surgical and organisational aspects in the treatment of DFU.

Key words

Diabetic foot - Surgery - Organisation - Wound centres - Multidisciplinary collaboration

Volltext

Referenzen

References

1 Holstein P E, Lohmann M, Gottrup F. Forbedret behandling af diabetiske fodproblemer. Ugeskr Læg. 2001; 163 3212-3717
2 Larsen K, Holstein P, Deckert T. Limb salvage in diabetes with foot ulcers. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1989; 13 100-103
3 International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot .International Consensus on the Diabeteic Foot. Maastricht; 1999
4 Margolis D J, Kantor J, Berlin J A. Healing of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers receiving standard treatment. Diabetic care. 1999; 22 692-695
5 Apelqvist J, Larsson J, Agardh C D. Long term prognosis for diabetic patients with foot ulcers. J Intern Med. 1993; 233 485-491
6 Apelqvist J. Wound healing in diabetes. Outcome and costs. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1998; 15 21-39
7 Wagner F W. The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle. 1981; 2 64-122
8 Armstrong D G, Lavery L A, Stern S, Harkless L B. Is prophylactic diabetic foot surgery dangerous?. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35 585-589
9 Armstrong D G, Stacpoole-Shea S, Nguyen H C, Harkless L B. Lengthening of the Achilles tendon in diabetic patients who are at high risk for ulceration of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1999; 81A 535-538
10 Gudas C J. Prophylactic surgery in the diabetic foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987; 4 445-458
11 Frykberg R, Giurini J, Habershaw G, Rosenblum B, Chrzan J. Prophylactic surgery in the diabetid foot. In: Kominsky SJ (ed) Medical and surgical management of the diabetic foot. Mosby, St. Louis; 1993
12 Blume P A, Paragas L K, Sumpio B E, Attinger C E. Single-stage surgical treatment of non-infected diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109 601-609
13 Frykberg R G, Armstrong D G, Giurini J M. et al . Diabetic foot disorders: a clinical practice guideline. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000; 39 S2-S60
14 Laing P. Prophylactic orthopaedic surgery - is there a role?. In: Boulton AJM, Connor H, Cavanagh PR (eds) The foot in diabetes, 3rd edn. Chichester; John Wiley & Sons 2002
15 Ha Van G, Siney H, Danan J P, Sachon C, Grimaldi A. Treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: contribution of conservative surgery. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19 1257-1260
16 Armstrong D G, Frykberg R G. Classification of diabetic foot surgery: toward a rational definition. Diabet Med. 2003; 20 329-331
17 Armstrong D G. Diabetic Foot Surgery. In: Teot L, Ban Well PE, Ziegler KE (eds) Surgery in Wounds. Berlin; Springer 2004: 361-366
18 Holstein P. Polyneuropathic ulcer surgery. In: Teot L, Ban Well PE, Ziegler KE (eds) Surgery in Wounds. Berlin; Springer 2004: 367-373
19 Piaggesi A, Schipani E, Campi F. et al . Conservative surgical approach versus non-surgical management for diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers: a randomized trial. Diab Med. 1998; 15 412-417
20 Gray B L. Developing a model for clinical practice. J Wound Care. 1996; 5 428-432
21 Doan-Johnson S. The growing influnce of wound care teams (editorial). Adv Wound Care. 1998; 11 54
22 Frykberg R G. The team approach in diabetic foot management. Adv Wound Care. 1998; 11 71-77
23 Granick M S, Ladin D A. The multidisciplinary In-hospital wound care team: Two models. Adv Wound Care. 1998; 11 80-83
24 Reich R B. Entrepreneurship reconsidered: the team as hero. Harvard Busines review. 1987; 65 77-78
25 Jeffcoate W J, Harding K G. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2003; 361 1545-1551
26 Strandness D E, Priest R E, Gibbons G R. Combined clinical and pathological study of diabetic and non diabetic peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes. 1964; 13 366-372
27 LoGerfo F W, Coffman J D. Vascular and microvascular disease of the foot in diabetes. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311 1615-1619
28 Akbari C M, LoGerfo F W. Diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30 373-384
29 Eneroth M, Apelqvist J. Clinical characteristics and outcome in diabetic patients with deep foot infections. Foot Ankle. 1997; 18 716-722
30 Kumar S, Fernando D JS, Veves A, Knowles E A, Young M J, Boulton A JM. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive streening device for identifying diabetic patients. Diabetic Res Clin Pract. 1991; 13 63-68
31 Holstein P, Lassen N A. Healing of ulcers on the feet correlated with distal blood pressure measurements in occlusive arterial disease. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980; 51 995-1006
32 Gottrup F. Oxygen. Wound healing and the development of infection. Present status. Eur J Surg. 2002; 168 260-263
33 Gottrup F. Oxygen in Wound Healing and infection. World J Surg. 2004; 28 312-315
34 Tateishi-Yuyama E, Matsubara H, Murohara T. et al . Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360 427-435
35 Giurini J M, Basile P, Chrzan J S, Habershaw G M, Rosenblum B I. Panmetatarsal head resection. A viable alternative to the transmetatarsal amputation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1993; 83 101-107
36 Cohen M, Roman A, Malcom W G. Pan-metatarsal head resection and transmetatarsal amputation versus solitary partial ray resection in the neuropathic foot. J Foot Surg. 1991; 30 29-33
37 Rosenblum B I, Pomposelli F B Jr, Giurini J M, Gibbons G W, Freeman D V, Chrzan J S, Campell D R, Habershaw G M, LoGerfo F W. Maximizing foot salvage by a combined approach to foot ischemia and neuropathic ulceration in patients with diabetes. A 5-year experience. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17 983-987
38 Lin S S, Lee T H, Wapner K L. Plantar forefoot ulceration with equines deformity of the ankle in diabetic patients: the effect of tendo-achilles lengthening and total contact casting. Orthopaedics. 1996; 19 465-475
39 Armstrong D G, Lavery L A, Vazques J R. et al . Clinical efficacy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty as a curative procedure for hallux interphalangeal joint wounds in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26 3284-3287
40 Mueller M J, Sinacore D R, Hastings M K, Strube M J, Johnson J E. Effect of Achilles tendon lengthening on neuropathic plantar ulcers. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003; 85A 1436-1445
41 Gottrup F. Wound Debridement. In: The Oxford European Wound Healing Course Handbook. Oxford; Positif Press 2002: 116-120
42 Baharestani M. The clinical relevance of debridement. In: Baharestani M, Gottrup F, Holstein P, Vanscheidt W (eds) The clinical relevance of debridement. Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1999: 1-13
43 Wolff H, Hansson C. Larval therapy - an effective method of ulcer debridement. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003; 28 134-137
44 Wolff H. Studies of chronic ulcers & larval therapy. Gotenborg, Sweden; Theis 2004
45 McGee S R, Boyko E J. Physical examination, chronic lower-extremity ischaemia: a critical review. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158 1357-1364
46 Holstein P E, Sorensen S. Limb salvage experience in a multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic. Diab Care. 1999; 22 (suppl 2) B97-B103
47 Taylor R S, Belli A M, Jacob S. Distal venous arterialisation for salvage of critically ischaemic inoperable limbs. Lancet. 1999; 354 1962-1965
48 Akbari C M, Pomposelli F B Jr, Gibbons G W. et al . Lower extremity revascularisation in diabetes: late observations. Arch Surg. 2000; 135 452-456
49 Holstein P, Ellitsgaard N, Olsen B B. et al . Decreasing incidence of major amputations in people with diabetes. Diabetologia. 2000; 43 844-847
50 Bradbury A W, Ruckley C V. Angioplasty for lower-limb ischaemia: time for randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 1996; 347 277-278
51 Gottrup F, Holstein P, Jørgensen B, Lohmann M, Karlsmark T. A new concept of a multidisciplinary wound healing center and a national expert function of wound healing. Arch Surg,. 2001; 136 765-772
52 Knighton D R, Ciresi K, Fiegel V D, Schumerth S, Butler E, Cerra F. Stimulation of repair in chronic nonhealing cutaneous ulcers using Platelet-derived Wound Healing Formula. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990; 170 56-60
53 Steed D L. Clinical evaluation of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor for the treatment of lower extremity diabetic ulcers. Diabetic Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 21 71-78
54 Gibbons G W, Marcaccio E J, Burgess A M, Pomposelli F B, Freeman D, Campbeli D, Miller A, LoGerfo F. Improved quality of diabetic foot care, 1984 vs 1990; reduced length of stay and costs, insufficient reimbursement. Arch Surg. 1993; 128 576-581
55 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research .Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention. Rockville, Md; USDHHS, AHCPR Pub. No. 92-0047 1992
56 Miller H, Delozier J. Cost implications of the pressure ulcer treatment guideline. Columbia, Md; Center for Health Policy Studies, Contract No. 282-91-0070 (Sponsored by the AHCPR) 1994: 17
57 Motta G J, Thimsen-Whitaker K, Demoor M A. Documenting outcomes of wound care. Contin Care. 1995; 14(8) 16
58 Baharestani M. Clinical decision making in wound care management: the need for a paradigmatic shift. Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice. 1995; 7(suppl A) 84A
59 Hunter S M. et al . The effectiveness of skin care protocols for pressure ulcers. Rehabil Nurs. 1995; 20(5) 250
60 Kresevic D, Naylor M. Preventing pressure ulcers through the use of protocols in a mentoring nursing model. Geriatr Nurs. 1995; 16(5) 225
61 Turnbull G. The international committee on wound management (ICWM) statement on cost-effective wound care: evaluating your supply use to prepare for managed care. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1996; 42(2) 72
62 Gates J. Total quality management: pressure ulcer prevention. Nurs Manage. 1996; 27(4) 48E
63 Lessner W. Small but successful changes prepare MDs for advent of decubitus protocol. Quality Improvement/Total Quality Management. 1996; 6(1) 1
64 Tomaselli N, Oxler K. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital comprehensive skin care program. Philadelphia; Thomas Jefferson University Hospital 1997
65 Thomson F J, Veves A, Ashe H. A team approach to diabetic foot care - the Manchester experience. The Foot. 1991; 2 75-82
66 Bentkover J D, Champion A H. Economical evaluation of alternative methods of treatment for diabetic foot ulcer patients: cost-effectiveness of platelet releasate and wound care clinics. Wounds. 1993; 5 207-215
67 Sibbald R G, Kensholme A, Carter L. Special foot clinics for patients with diabetes. J Wound Care. 1996; 5 238-243
68 Gottrup F. Organization of wound healing services: The Danish experience and the importance of surgery. Wound Rep Reg. 2003; 11 452-457
69 Gottrup F. Optimizing wound treatment through health care structuring and professional education. Wound Rep Reg. 2004; 12 129-133
70 Gottrup F. Multidisciplinary Wound Healing Concepts. EWMA Journal. 2003; 3(1) 5-11
71 Holstein P, Ellitsgaard N, Olsen B B, Ellitsgaard V. Decreasing incidence of major amputations in people with diabetes. Diabetologia. 2000; 43 844-847
72 Holstein P, Lohmann M, Wallø N. Surgical decompression of recalcitrant neuropathic foot ulcerations in patients with diabetes. Abstract in proceedings: 2. joint meeting of the Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group and the Diabetic Foot Study Group of the Eupean Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Balatonfured, Hungary; August-September 2002
73 Holstein P, Lohmann M, Bitsch M, Jørgensen B. Achilles tendon lengthening, the panacea for plantar forefoot ulceration?. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004; 20(suppl 1) S37-S40

F. Gottrup, M.D., DMSci.

The University Center of Wound Healing

Odense University Hospital · 5000 Odense C · Denmark

Telefon: + 45 65413904

eMail: finn.gottrup@ouh.fyns-amt.dk