References
1a
McClintock JB.
Janssen J.
Nature
1990,
346:
462
1b
Bryan PJ.
Yoshida WY.
McClintock JB.
Baker BJ.
Marine Biology
1995,
122:
271
2
Yoshida WY.
Bryan PJ.
Baker BJ.
McClintock JB.
J. Org. Chem.
1995,
60:
780
3
Evans DA.
Tedrow JS.
Shaw JT.
Downey CW.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
392
4a
Patel P.
Pattenden G.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1985,
26:
4789
4b
Bartelt RJ.
Weisleder D.
Plattner RD.
J. Agric. Food Chem.
1990,
38:
2192
5 At first, we tried shortcut routes (Scheme
[2 ]
). The chiral auxiliary was removed by transamidation to afford Weinreb amide 10 , accompanied by undesired ring-opening compound 11 . A variety of conditions were tried but formation of 11 could not be suppressed, and all attempts to convert 11 into 10 or 1 failed. Amide 10 was treated with excess n -PrMgBr without protecting the hydroxy group to give the desired compound 1 , but only in 10% yield. The major impurities were retro-aldol reaction products. Although the hydroxy group was protected, the corresponding TES ether 12 also gave the ketone 9 in low yield, accompanied by the over-reacted tertiary alcohol.
Scheme 2 Other synthetic routes to (+)-1 . Reagents and conditions : a) Me(MeO)NH·HCl (3 equiv), AlCl3 (3 equiv), CH2 Cl2 , -20 °C to 20 °C; b) n -PrMgBr (3 equiv), THF, 0 °C; c) TESOTf (1.2 equiv), 2,6-lutidine (1.2 equiv), CH2 Cl2 , -55 °C; d) n -PrLi (3 equiv), THF, -78 °C.
6
Damon RE.
Coppola GM.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1990,
31:
2849
7a
Tokuyama H.
Yokoshima S.
Yamashita T.
Fukuyama T.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1998,
39:
3189
7b
Mori Y.
Seki M.
J. Org. Chem.
2003,
68:
1571
8
Anderson RJ.
Henrick CA.
Rosenblum LD.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974,
96:
3654
9
Mori K.
Amaike M.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1994,
2727
10 Determined by HPLC analysis (98% ee and 96% de): column, Daicel Chiralcel® OJ (4.6 × 250 mm); solvent, hexane-i -PrOH (100:1) 0.5 mL/min, 20 °C; detection, 234 nm; t
R = 18.9, 19.6 (diastereomers, Σ = 2%), 22.6 (enantiomer, 1%) and 24.7 [(+)-1 , 97%] min. These retention times of the peaks were identified by the separate synthesis of other three diastereomers.
11 Compound (+)-1 : colorless oil, [α]D
26 +47 (c 0.30, hexane) {Lit.2 , [α]D +48 (c 0.6, hexane)}. 1 H NMR (500 MHz, C6 D6 ): δ = 0.82 (3 H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 5-Me), 0.84 (1 H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1), 1.58 (3 H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-11), 1.62 (2 H, sextet, J = 7.5 Hz, H-2), 1.65 (3 H, s, 9-Me), 1.67 (1 H, d, J = 3.5 Hz, OH), 1.71 (3 H, s, 7-Me), 2.19 (1 H, td, J = 7.3, 17.5 Hz, H-3), 2.31 (1 H, td, J = 7.3, 17.5 Hz, H-3), 2.60 (1 H, qd, J = 7.0, 9.5 Hz, H-5), 4.07 (1 H, dd, J = 2.5, 9.0 Hz, H-6), 5.40 (1 H, q, J = 6.7 Hz, H-10), 5.78 (1 H, s, H-8). All the signals were fully assigned by HH-COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra. In the 1 H NMR, signal at δ = 2.31 ppm was misdescribed in ref.2 as 2.21 ppm. 13 C NMR (125 MHz in C6 D6 ): δ = 12.5 (7-Me), 13.7 (C-1), 13.9 (C-11), 14.1 (5-Me), 16.5 (9-Me), 17.0 (C-2), 45.6 (C-3), 48.8 (C-5), 81.3 (C-6), 124.9 (C-10), 132.4 (C-8), 133.2 (C-9), 134.5 (C-7), 213.2 (C-4). HRMS (EI) [M+ ]: m /z calcd for C14 H24 O2 : 224.1776; found: 224.1779.