Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870593
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Cadaveric Dissections Based on Observations of Injuries to the Temporal Bone Structures following Head Trauma
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 June 2005 (online)
ABSTRACT
One hundred temporal bones obtained from forensic autopsies were dissected to expose injured structures. Longitudinal fractures were present in 82%, transverse fractures in 11%, and mixed fractures in 7% of the cases. Facial canal injuries were present in almost half of the bones with longitudinal fractures (36/82), although cuts of the facial nerve stem were rarely encountered. Damages to the facial canal associated with longitudinal fractures were most frequently seen in the region of the geniculum. However, transverse fractures with facial canal involvement (7/11) most frequently occurred in the labyrinthine portion, causing a complete cut of the facial nerve. Injuries to the jugular bulb were also common (21/100) and associated with all types of temporal bone fractures. Observed damages to the auditory ossicles included disconnection of their joints or fractures of the malleus or stapes. Fractures of the incus were not observed. Injuries to the carotid canal were common (52/100), although an injury to the arterial wall was observed in only one specimen. The frequency and nature of damage in temporal bone fractures strictly reflect the type of fracture, especially in terms of facial nerve disorders: the most serious damage is observed with fractures that involve the otic capsule.
KEYWORDS
Temporal bone - fractures - cadavers - anatomy
REFERENCES
- 1 Nosan D K, Benecke J E, Murr A H. Current perspective on temporal bone trauma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 117 67-71
- 2 Brodie H A, Thompson T C. Management of complications from 820 temporal bone fractures. Am J Otol. 1997; 18 188-197
- 3 Cannon C R, Jahrsdoefer R A. Temporal bone fractures: review of 90 cases. Arch Otolaryngol. 1983; 109 285-288
- 4 Ghorayeb B Y, Yeakley J W. Temporal bone fractures: longitudinal or oblique. The case for oblique temporal bone fractures. Laryngoscope. 1992; 102 129-134
- 5 Liu-Shindo M, Hawkins D B. Basilar skull fractures in children. Int J Ped Otolaryngol. 1989; 17 109-117
- 6 Tos M. Course of and sequelae to 248 petrosal fractures. Acta Otolaryngol. 1973; 75 353-354
- 7 Ulrich K. Verletzungen des Gehörorgans bei Schädelbasisfrakturen. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1926; 6 1-150
- 8 Aguilar E A. High resolution CT scan of temporal bone fractures: association of facial nerve paralysis with temporal bone fractures. Head Neck Surg. 1987; 9 162-166
- 9 Fredrickson J M, Griffith A W, Lindsay J R. Transverse fractures of the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol. 1963; 78 770-784
- 10 Hough J VD, Stuart W D. Middle ear injuries in skull trauma. Laryngoscope. 1968; 78 899-937
- 11 Hough J VD, McGee M. Otologic trauma. In: Paparella MM, Shumrick DA, Gluckman JL, Meyerhoff WL Otolaryngology Philadelphia, PA; WB Saunders 1991: 1137-1160
- 12 McHough H E. The surgical treatment of facial paralysis and traumatic conductive deafness in fractures of the temporal bone. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1959; 68 855-889
- 13 Travis L W, Stalnaker R L, Melvin J W. Impact trauma of the human temporal bone. J Trauma. 1977; 17 761-766
- 14 Voss O. Die Chirurgie der Schädelbasisfrakturen auf Grund. 25 jahriger Erfahrungen Leipzig, Germany; Johann Ambrosius Barth 1936: 1-87
- 15 Yanagihara N, Murakami S, Nishihara S. Temporal bone fractures inducing facial nerve paralysis: a new classification and its clinical significance. ENT J. 1997; 76 79-86
- 16 Kelly K E, Tami T A. Temporal bone and skull base trauma. In: Jackler RK, Brackmann DE Neurotology, St Louis, MO; CV Mosby 1994: 340-360
- 17 Kettel K. Peripheral facial paralysis in fractures of the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol. 1950; 51 25-41
- 18 Khan A A, Marion M, Hinojosa R. Temporal bone fractures: a histopathologic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985; 93 177-186
- 19 Goodwin Jr W J. Temporal bone fractures. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1983; 16 651-659
- 20 Kinney S E. Violence and the ear and temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992; 118 581-583
- 21 Griffin J E, Altenau M M, Schaffer S D. Bilateral longitudinal temporal bone fractures: a retrospective review of seventeen cases. Laryngoscope. 1979; 89 1432-1435
- 22 Fisch U. Facial paralysis in fractures of the petrous bone. Laryngoscope. 1974; 84 2141-2154
- 23 Coker N J, Kendall K A, Jenkins H A, Alford B R. Traumatic intratemporal facial nerve injury: management rationale for preservation of function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987; 97 262-269
- 24 Kamerer D B. Intratemporal facial nerve injuries. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1982; 90 612-615
- 25 Lambert P R, Brackmann D E. Facial paralysis in longitudinal temporal bone fractures: a review of 26 cases. Laryngoscope. 1984; 94 1022-1026
- 26 Brawley B W, Kelly W A. Treatment of basal skull fractures with and without cerebrospinal fluid fistulae. J Neurosurg. 1967; 26 57-61
- 27 Glasscock 3rd M E, McKennan K X, Levine S C. Persistent traumatic perilymph fistulas. Laryngoscope. 1987; 97 860-864
- 28 Emmett J R, Shea J J. Traumatic perilymph fistula. Laryngoscope. 1980; 90 1513-1520
- 29 Hall J W, Huang-Fu M, Gennarelli T A. Auditory function in acute severe head injury. Laryngoscope. 1982; 92 883-889
- 30 Tos M. Prognosis of hearing loss in temporal bone fractures. J Laryngol Otol. 1971; 85 1147-1159
- 31 Lyos A T, Marsh M A, Jenkins H A, Coker N J. Progressive hearing loss after transverse temporal bone fracture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 121 795-799
- 32 Makishima K, Sobel S F, Snow J B. Histopathologic correlates of otoneurologic manifestations following head trauma. Laryngoscope. 1976; 86 1303-1314
- 33 Griffiths M V. The incidence of auditory and vestibular concussion following minor head injury. J Laryngol Otol. 1979; 93 253-265
- 34 Goodwin J R, Johnson M H. Carotid injury secondary to blunt head trauma: case report. J Trauma. 1994; 37 119-122
- 35 May M. Trauma to the facial nerve. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1983; 16 661-670
- 36 Resnick D K, Subach B R, Marion D W. The significance of carotid canal involvement in basilar cranial fracture. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40 1177-1181
Jarosławm WysockiM.D. Ph.D.
Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Pstrowskiego Str
1, 01-943 Warsaw, Poland
Email: jwysocki@ib.amwaw.edu.pl
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870593
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel: + 1(212) 584-4662.
Commentary
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 June 2005 (online)
Dr. Wysocki presents a well-done, careful, and systematic microanatomical study on 100 consecutive temporal bone fractures associated with fatal head injury. Autopsy studies with these kind of numbers are becoming increasingly rare, particularly in the United States, yet a tremendous amount of information can come from them. This study is a good example.
He found that 82% of fractures were longitudinal, 11% transverse, and 7% mixed, which is not unexpected. He found a surprising incidence of facial canal disruption (37%) associated with longitudinal fractures, but nerve disruption occurred in only 7% versus 63% of cases of transverse fracture. He also noted a surprising incidence of ossicular disruption, fracture, or both, as well as jugular bulb injury. Both of these latter findings seem significantly higher than clinical experience would suggest and may reflect the severity of temporal bone fractures associated with fatal head injury, as opposed to basilar skull fractures associated with lesser degrees of survivable closed head injury.
The incidence of carotid canal fracture (52%) is very interesting given Dr. Wysocki's finding of carotid artery injury in only 1 case. Clinical experience suggests that angiographic abnormalities will be present in 42% of cases studied for the presence of a basal skull fracture involving the carotid canal,[1] and as many as 18% of patients with carotid canal fractures may develop clinically symptomatic vascular complications.[2] The likely explanation for this discrepancy is that basal skull fractures through the carotid canal probably lead to intimal dissection as the most common injury, subsequently resulting in thrombosis or embolization rather than transmural disruption. I suspect that Dr. Wysocki's autopsy studies are less sensitive to detecting intimal injury as opposed to transmural disruption through the adventitia. From a clinical standpoint, we need to maintain heightened vigilance for vascular sequelae when carotid canal fractures are identified. Whether or not routine further screening (angiography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography) is a cost-effective approach remains the subject of ongoing debate.[1] [3]
REFERENCES
- 1 Kerwin A J, Bynoe R P, Murray J et al.. Liberalized screening for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries is justified. J Trauma. 2001; 51 308-314
- 2 Resnick D K, Subach B R, Marion D W. The significance of carotid canal involvement in basilar cranial fracture. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40 1177-1181
- 3 Mayberry J C, Brown C V, Mullins R J, Velmahos G C. Blunt carotid artery injury: the futility of aggressive screening and diagnosis. Arch Surg. 2004; 139 609-612 , discussion 612-613