An Automated Robotic Approach with Redundant Navigation for Minimal Invasive Extended Transsphenoidal Skull Base Surgery

Abstract

Background: The aim of this work was to determine the feasibility of a robotic-assisted and fully automated approach to the sphenoid sinus. An image-guided robotic system was designed to address potential human errors in performing transsphenoidal sinus surgery by combining the reproducible accuracy of a robotic system with standard computer navigation. Methods: A six-degrees of freedom robotic assistance system and an opto-electrical navigation system were combined for image-guided assistance with redundantly controlled robotics. Newly designed endoscopic instruments for robotic surgery have been developed and are described. Telemanipulatory, as well as fully automated procedures, were tested on cadaveric heads as part of a preclinical trial. Results: A fully automated sphenoidotomy as well as a telemanipulatory sphenoidectomy were performed successfully on cadaveric heads. Intraoperative performance, accuracy assessment studies, as well as possible sources of stereotactic offsets are described. The mean measured robotic reproducibility accuracy was 0.056 mm (range: 0.02 - 0.14 mm) and the mean overall navigated robotic accuracy, including all transformation and registration errors was 1.53 mm (range: 1.13 - 1.89 mm) respectively. Conclusion: A system for robot-guided surgery in combination with redundant navigational control was developed. It allows highly accurate maneuvers, performed either in a telemanipulation mode as master-slave system or in a fully automated fashion. A sphenoidectomy on cadaveric heads was performed in both telemanipulation and fully automated modes. The overall intraoperative accuracy was in the range of the resolution of the CT images and stereotactic offsets were caused mainly due to deflections of the endoscopic operating instrument.

Key words

Endoscopic surgery - extended skull base surgery - robotic assistance - transsphenoidal approach

References

• 1 Laws E R Jr. Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery.  Pituitary. 1999;  2 163-170
• 2 Ciric I, Ragin A, Baumgartner C, Pierce D. Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  40 225-236; discussion: 236 - 237
• 3 Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Komplikationen bei Operationen von Hypophysenadenomen. In: Bock W, Schirmer M (Eds), Komplikationen bei neurochirurgischen Eingriffen. München: Zuckschwerdt 1988: 18-32
• 4 Jho H D, Alfieri A. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: evolution of surgical technique and equipment in 150 operations.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2001;  44 1-12
• 5 Jho H D. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the optic nerve: a technical note.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2001;  44 190-193
• 6 Cappabianca P, Cavallo L M, Colao A, Del Basso De Caro M, Esposito F, Cirillo S, Lombardi G, de Divitiis E. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2002;  45 193-200
• 7 Perneczky A, Fries G. Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 1 - evolution, basic concept, and current technique.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  42 219-224; discussion: 224 - 225
• 8 Fries G, Perneczky A. Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 2 - analysis of 380 procedures.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  42 226-231; discussion: 231 - 232
• 9 Kavanagh K T. Applications of image-directed robotics in otolaryngologic surgery.  Laryngoscope. 1994;  104 (3 Pt 1) 283-293
• 10 Matsen 3rd F A, Garbini J L, Sidles J A, Pratt B, Baumgarten D, Kaiura R. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty.  Clin Orthop. 1993;  296 178-186
• 11 Mathias J M. Robot helps surgeons perform hip surgery.  OR Manager. 1993;  9 10-11
• 12 Haus B M, Kambham N, Le D, Moll F M, Gourin C, Terris D J. Surgical robotic applications in otolaryngology.  Laryngoscope. 2003;  113 1139-1144
• 13 Federspil P A, Plinkert P K. Robotic surgery in otorhinolaryngology.  Otolaryngol Pol. 2004;  58 237-242
• 14 Federspil P A, Plinkert B, Plinkert P K. Experimental robotic milling in skull-base surgery.  Comput Aided Surg. 2003;  8 42-48
• 15 Nimsky C, Rachinger J, Iro H, Fahlbusch R. Adaptation of a hexapod-based robotic system for extended endoscope-assisted transsphenoidal skull base surgery.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2004;  47 41-46
• 16 Varma T R, Eldridge P R, Forster A, Fox S, Fletcher N, Steiger M, Littlechild P, Byrne P, Sinnott A, Tyler K, Flintham S. Use of the NeuroMate stereotactic robot in a frameless mode for movement disorder surgery.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003;  80 132-135
• 17 Goto T, Hongo K, Kakizawa Y, Muraoka H, Miyairi Y, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi S. Clinical application of robotic telemanipulation system in neurosurgery. Case report.  J Neurosurg. 2003;  99 1082-1084
• 18 Zimmermann M, Krishnan R, Raabe A, Seifert V. Robot-assisted navigated neuroendoscopy.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  51 1446-1451; discussion: 1451 - 1452
• 19 Strauss G, Winkler D, Trantakis C, Schulz T, Meixensberger J. Post-processing of radiological data for preoperative planning in skull base surgery.  Laryngorhinootologie. 2004;  83 157-163