Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2005; 114(7/08): 337-341
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-915214
Fortbildung
Zahnerhaltung
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Erste Erfahrungen mit HYPOSEN zur Therapie der Dentinhypersensibilität

Preliminary Results Using HYPOSEN in Dentin Hypersensitivity TreatmentC. R. Gernhardt, H.-G. Schaller
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 August 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Therapie der Dentinhypersensibilität ist nach wie vor ein klinisch äußerst interessantes Thema. Der vorliegende Beitrag stellt erste klinische Erfahrungen mit dem neuen strontiumchloridhaltigen Desensibilisierungsmedikament HYPOSEN vor. Ferner werden erste Ergebnisse einer klinischen Untersuchung, die den Erfolg bei der Behandlung überempfindlicher Zahnflächen in einer prospektiven Untersuchung testete, vorgestellt. Diese Studie zeigt einen signifikant positiven Einfluss der Therapie mit HYPOSEN auf klinische Beschwerden der Patienten.

Summary

Dentin hypersensitivity is an interesting topic in clinical dentistry. Recently the strontiumchloride containing HYPOSEN was introduced to the dental market. The present paper presents preliminary results of a clinical investigation focusing on treatment success of HYPOSEN in patients suffering from dentin hypersensitivity.

This investigation showed that using HYPOSEN has a significant positive effect on patients symptoms of hypersensitivity.

Schlüsselwörter

Dentin - Dentinhypersensibilität - Dentintubuli - Desensitizer - Strontiumchlorid

Key Words

Dentin - Dentin Hypersensitivity - Dentin Tubulus - Desensitizer - Strontium Chloride

Literatur

  • 1 Addy M, Urquhart E. Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, aetiology and clinical management.  Dent Update. 1992;  19 407-408 410-402
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ash MM. Quantification of stimuli.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986;  2 153-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bergenholtz G, Jontell M, Tuttle A, Knutsson G. Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentine following conditioning with GLUMA primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalates.  J Dent. 1993;  21 220-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Brannstrom M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KJ. Transmission and control of dentinal pain: resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;  99 619-623
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chabanski MB, Gillam DG. Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity.  J Oral Rehabil. 1997;  24 15-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Prevalence of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department.  J Clin Periodontol. 1996;  23 993-997
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Collaert B, Fischer C. Dentine hypersensitivity: A review.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991;  7 145-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: A clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin.  J Can Dent Assoc. 1997;  63 42-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dondi G Dall'Orologio, Lorenzi R, Anselmi M, Opisso V. Dentin desensitizing effects of gluma alternate, health-dent desensitizer and scotchbond multi-purpose.  Am J Dent. 1999;  12 103-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dowell P, Addy M, Dummer P. Dentine hypersensitivity: Aetiology, differential diagnosis and management.  Br Dent J. 1985;  158 97-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Duroux P, Cimasoni G. (Dentin hypersensitivities and their treatment. A review of the literature).  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1991;  101 1261-1272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ellingsen JE, Rolla G. Treatment of dentin with stannous fluoride - SEM and electron microprobe study.  Scand J Dent Res. 1987;  95 281-286
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots (In Process Citation).  Am J Dent. 1999;  12 243-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fischer C, Fischer RG, Wennberg A. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  J Dent. 1992;  20 272-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gangarosa LP. Current strategies for dentist-applied treatment in the management of hypersensitive dentine.  Arch Oral Biol. 1994;  39 101-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gillam DG, Seo HS, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Perceptions of dentine hypersensitivity in a general practice population.  J Oral Rehabil. 1999;  26 710-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Grossman L. Systematic method for the treatement of hypersensitive dentin.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1935;  22 592-598
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hansen EK. Dentin hypersensitivity treated with a fluoride-containing varnish or a light-cured glass-ionomer liner.  Scand J Dent Res. 1992;  100 305-309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hernandez F, Mohammed C, Shannon I, Volpe A, King W. Clinical study evaluating the desensitizing effect and duration of two commercially available dentifrices.  J Periodontol. 1972;  43 367-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, Ashley FP. The role of a dentine-bonding agent in reducing cervical dentine sensitivity.  J Clin Periodontol. 1998;  25 286-290
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Inoue M, Yoshikawa K, Okamoto A. et al. . Clinical evaluation of Gluma 3 Primer to dentin hypersensitivity.  Japan J Conserv Dent. 1996;  39 768-776
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Irwin CR, McCusker P. Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population.  J Ir Dent Assoc. 1997;  43 7-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ishikawa K, Suge T, Yoshiyama M. et al. . Occlusion of dentinal tubules with calcium phosphate using acidic calcium phosphate solution followed by neutralization (published erratum appears in J Dent Res 1994 Aug; 73 (8): 1487).  J Dent Res. 1994;  73 1205-1211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Javid B, Barkhordar RA, Bhinda SV. Cyanoacrylate - a new treatment for hypersensitive dentin and cementum.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1987;  114 486-488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kielbassa AM, Attin T, Hellwig E, Schade-Brittinger C. In vivo study on the effectiveness of a laquer containing CaF2/NaF in treating dentine hypersensitivity.  Clin Oral Investig. 1997;  1 95-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Liu HC, Lan WH, Hsieh CC. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a population in Taipei, Taiwan.  J Endod. 1998;  24 48-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lussi AR, Schaffner M, Hotz P, Suter P. Epidemiology and risk factors of wedge-shaped defects in a Swiss population.  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1993;  103 276-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Markowitz K, Kim S. The role of selected cations in the desensitization of intradental nerves.  Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992;  88 39-54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 McFall WJ, Hamrick SW. Clinical effectiveness of a dentifrice containing fluoride and a citrate buffer system for treatment of dentinal sensitivity.  J Periodontol. 1987;  58 701-705
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 McGrath PA. The measurement of human pain.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986;  2 124-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Meurman JH, ten Cate JM. Pathogenesis and modifying factors of dental erosion.  Eur J Oral Sci. 1996;  104 207-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Takatsu T. Effect of pulpal pressure on adhesion of resin composite to dentin: Bovine serum versus saline.  Quintessence Int. 1995;  26 221-226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pashley DH, Galloway SE. The effects of oxalate treatment on the smear layer of ground surfaces of human dentine.  Arch Oral Biol. 1985;  30 731-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Peacock JM, Orchardson R. Effects of potassium ions on action potential conduction in A- and C- fibers of rat spinal nerves.  J Dent Res. 1995;  74 642-648
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Pini G Prato, Clauser C, Cortellini P. et al. . Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study.  J Periodontol. 1996;  67 1216-1223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the „envelope” technique.  J Periodontol. 1985;  56 397-402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Schaller HG, Götze W. Der Einfluß verschiedener Dentinhaftvermittler auf die Dentinpermeabilität.  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1993;  48 728
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Thrash WJ, Jones DL, Dodds WJ. Effect of a fluoride solution on dentinal hypersensitivity.  Am J Dent. 1992;  5 299-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Uchida A, Wakano Y, Fukuyama O. et al. . Controlled clinical evaluation of a 10 % strontium chloride dentifrice in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity following periodontal surgery.  J Periodontol. 1980;  51 578-581
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Verzak Z, Bukovic D, Bagic I. Prevalence and intraoral distribution of dentin hypersensitivity among students.  Coll Antropol. 1998;  22 259-265
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wang HL, Yeh CT, Smith F. et al. . Evaluation of ferric oxalate as an agent for use during surgery to prevent post-operative root hypersensitivity.  J Periodontol. 1993;  64 1040-1044
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Watanabe T, Sano M, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. The effects of primers on the sensitivity of dentin.  Dent Mater. 1991;  7 151-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zinner DD, Duany LF, Lutz HJ. A new desensitizing dentifrice: Preliminary report.  J Am Dent Assoc. 1977;  95 986-990
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Dr. Christian Gernhardt

Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

Universitätspoliklinik für Zahnerhaltungskunde und Parodontologie

Große Steinstraße 19

06108 Halle/ Saale

Email: christian.gernhardt@medizin.uni-halle.de