Perceptual Effort and Apparent Cognitive Decline: Implications for Audiologic Rehabilitation

Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller

doi:10.1055/s-2006-954855

Seminars in Hearing, Table of Contents

Semin Hear 2006; 27(4): 284-293
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-954855

Perceptual Effort and Apparent Cognitive Decline: Implications for Audiologic Rehabilitation

Margaret Kathleen Pichora-Fuller¹

¹Professor, Department of Psychology University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Even when there is no significant threshold elevation in the speech range, age-related changes in auditory processing increase listening effort, especially in noisy situations. Increases in listening effort have deleterious effects on cognitive measures such as comprehension and memory. When young and older adults are tested under the same physical stimulus conditions, age differences on cognitive measures are common. However, when the conditions are equated for young and older adults so that listening effort is matched, many apparent age differences on cognitive measures are minimized. In general, for a given stimulus condition, listening is more effortful for older adults and their performance on cognitive measures resembles that of younger adults tested under more adverse stimulus conditions. Two approaches to equating for listening effort are described: adjustment of signal-to-noise ratio and simulations of the temporal aspects of auditory aging. Experimental findings relating perceptual test conditions to cognitive performance are discussed in light of recent findings that cognitive performance is related to benefit from complex hearing aid processing. A possible role of compensatory brain activation and plasticity is suggested and related to the importance of rehabilitative training.

KEYWORDS

Auditory aging - cognitive aging - information degradation - contextual support - listening effort

Full Text

References

REFERENCES

1 Mills J, Schmiedt R A, Schulte B A, Dubno J R. Age-related hearing loss: a loss of voltage, not hair cells. Semin Hear. 2006; 27 228-236
2 Frisina D R, Frisina R D, Snell K B, Burkhard R, Walton S P, Ison J R. Auditory temporal processing during aging. In: Hof PR, Mobbs CV Functional Neurobiology of Aging. New York; Academic Press 2001: 565-579
3 Schneider B A, Pichora-Fuller M K. Age-related changes in temporal processing: implications for speech perception. Semin Hear. 2001; 22 227-240
4 Gordon-Salant S. Speech perception and auditory temporal processing performance by older listeners: implications for real-world communication. Semin Hear. 2006; 27 264-268
5 Pichora-Fuller M K, Souza P E. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(suppl 2) S11-S16
6 WHO (World Health Organization) .International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001 Available at: http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm Accessed October 24, 2006
7 Kiessling J, Pichora-Fuller M K, Gatehouse S et al.. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(suppl 2) S92-101
8 Wingfield A, Tun P A, McCoy S L, Stewart R A, Cox L C. Sensory and cognitive constraints in comprehension of spoken language in adult aging. Semin Hear. 2006; 27 273-283
9 Wingfield A, Stine-Morrow E. Language and speech. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 2000: 359-416
10 Pichora-Fuller M K, Singh G. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiological rehabilitation. Trends Amplif. 2006; 10 29-59
11 Villaume W A, Brown M H, Darling R. Presbycusis communication and older adults. In: Hummert ML, Weiman JM, Nussbaum JF Interpersonal Communication in Older Adulthood. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage 1994: 83-106
12 Pichora-Fuller M K, Johnson C E, Roodenburg K EJ. The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. J Appl Commun Res. 1998; 26 99-119
13 Schneider B A, Daneman M, Pichora-Fuller M K. Listening in aging adults: from discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics. Can J Exp Psychol. 2002; 56 139-152
14 Pichora-Fuller M K. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(suppl 2) S26-S32
15 CHABA (Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics) . Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 83 859-895
16 Humes L E. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol. 1996; 7 161-167
17 Baltes P B, Lindenberger U. Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging?. Psychol Aging. 1997; 12 12-21
18 Lindenberger U, Baltes P B. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: a strong connection. Psychol Aging. 1994; 9(3) 339-355
19 Schneider B A, Pichora-Fuller M K. Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 2000: 155-219
20 Pichora-Fuller M K, Schneider B A, Daneman M. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97 593-608
21 Cabeza R. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging. 2002; 17 85-100
22 Cabeza R, Anderson N, Locantore J K, McIntosh A R. Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage. 2002; 17 1394-1402
23 Wingfield A, Tun P. Spoken language comprehension in older adults: interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Semin Hear. 2001; 22 287-302
24 Schneider B A, Daneman M, Murphy D R, Kwong See S. Listening to discourse in distracting settings: the effects of aging. Psychol Aging. 2000; 15 110-125
25 Brown S, Pichora-Fuller M K. Temporal jitter mimics the effects of aging on word identification and word recall in noise. Canadian Acoustics. 2000; 28 126-128
26 Bilger R C, Nuetzel J M, Rabinowitz W M, Rzeczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res. 1984; 27 32-48
27 Lunner T. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(suppl 1) S49-S58
28 Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C. Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(suppl 1) S77-S85
29 Venema T. Compression for Clinicians. San Diego, CA; Singular 1998
30 Souza P. New hearing aids for older listeners. Hear J. 2004; 57 10-17
31 Souza P E. Selecting and adjusting amplification for older adults. Semin Hear. 2006; 27 303-310
32 Kricos P B. Audiologic management of older adults with hearing loss and compromised cognitive/psychoacoustic auditory processing capabilities. Trends Amplif. 2006; 10 1-28
33 Pichora-Fuller M K. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(suppl 1) S59-S67
34 Sweetow R W. Training the adult brain to listen. Hear J. 2005; 58 10-16
35 Humes L E. Modeling and predicting hearing-aid outcome. Trends Amplif. 2003; 7 41-75

Margaret Kathleen Pichora-FullerPh.D.

3359 Mississauga Rd.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6

Email: kpfuller@utm.utoronto.ca