ABSTRACT
The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a conceptual framework for assessing and treating individuals with communication disorders. This article provides an explanation and application of the ICF to communication after total laryngectomy. To evaluate outcomes associated with total laryngectomy, common assessment tools used in speech-language pathology are described in relation to communication at the levels of Body Functions and Structures, and Activities and Participation. Assessments for Contextual Factors also are discussed. Post-laryngectomy outcomes, including those related to quality of life, also are described relative to the ICF framework. In particular, the role of Environmental and Personal Factors is summarized, and implications are presented for approaches to assessment and treatment of this clinical population. A concluding case example illustrates how all of these concepts can be applied by speech-language pathologists who provide post-laryngectomy rehabilitation.
KEYWORDS
Laryngectomy - assessment - rehabilitation - ICF
REFERENCES
-
1 World Health Organization (WHO) .ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland; WHO 2001
-
2 American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) .Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology. Rockville, MD; ASHA 2001
-
3
Eadie T L.
The ICF: a proposed framework for comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals who use alaryngeal speech.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2003;
12(2)
189-197
-
4
Eadie T L.
The ICIDH-2: theoretical and clinical implications for speech-language pathology.
J Speech Lang Pathol Aud.
2001;
25(4)
181-200
-
5
Threats T T.
Towards an international framework for communication disorders: use of the ICF.
J Commun Disord.
2006;
39(4)
251-2655
-
6 Ware J E, Snow K K, Kosinski M et al.. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretative Guide. Boston; The Health Institute 1993
-
7 Yorkston K M, Beukelman D R, Tice R. Sentence Intelligibility Test. Lincoln, NE; Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital 1996
-
8
Bennett S, Weinberg B.
Acceptability ratings of normal, esophageal, and artificial larynx speech.
J Speech Hear Res.
1973;
16(4)
608-615
-
9
Eadie T L, Yorkston K M, Klasner E R et al..
Measuring communicative participation: a review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
2006;
15
307-320
-
10
Jacobson B H, Johnson A, Grywalski C et al..
The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and validation.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
1997;
6
66-70
-
11
Hogikyan N D, Sethuraman G.
Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQoL).
J Voice.
1999;
13(4)
557-569
-
12
Hassan S J, Weymuller Jr E A.
Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients.
Head Neck.
1993;
15(6)
485-496
-
13
Terrell J E, Nanavati K, Esclamado R M, Bishop J, Bradford C R, Wolf G.
Head and neck cancer-specific quality of life: instrument validation.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1997;
123
1125-1132
-
14
Aaronson N K, Ahmedazi S, Bergman B et al..
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
1993;
85(5)
365-376
-
15
Dijkers M.
Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components.
Spinal Cord.
1997;
35(12)
829-840
-
16 Rohe D E. Loss, grief, and depression after laryngectomy. In: Keith RL, Darley FL Laryngectomee Rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Austin, TX; Pro Ed 1986
-
17 Doyle P C. Foundations of Voice and Speech Rehabilitation Following Laryngeal Cancer. San Diego, CA; Singular 1994
-
18
Weiss M S, Basili A G.
Electrolaryngeal speech produced by laryngectomized subjects: perceptual characteristics.
J Speech Hear Res.
1985;
28(2)
294-300
-
19
Kalb M B, Carpenter M A.
Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
J Speech Hear Disord.
1981;
26
77-80
-
20
Eadie T L, Doyle P C.
Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
Laryngoscope.
2004;
114(4)
753-759
-
21
Meyer T K, Kuhn J C, Campbell B H, Marbella A M, Myers K B, Layde P M.
Speech intelligibility and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors.
Laryngoscope.
2004;
114(11)
1977-1981
-
22
Carr M M, Schmidbauer J A, Majaess L, Smith R L.
Communication after laryngectomy: an assessment of quality of life.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2000;
122(1)
39-43
-
23
Tardy-Mitzell S, Andrews M L, Bowman S A.
Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech.
Arch Otolaryngol.
1985;
111(4)
213-215
-
24
Finizia C, Dotevall H, Lundstrom E, Lindstrom J.
Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of voice and speech quality: a study of patients with laryngeal cancer treated with laryngectomy vs irradiation.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1999;
125(2)
157-163
-
25
Taylor J C, Terrell J E, Ronis D L et al..
Disability in patients with head and neck cancer.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2004;
130(6)
764-769
-
26
Hillman R E, Walsh M J, Wolf G T, Fisher S G, Hong W K.
Functional outcomes following treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.
1998;
172
1-27
-
27
Deleyiannis F W, Weymuller Jr E A, Coltrera M D, Futran N.
Quality of life after laryngectomy: are functional disabilities important?.
Head Neck.
1999;
21(4)
319-324
-
28 Law I KY. Communication Activity Limitation and Participation Restriction after Laryngectomy [unpublished master's thesis]. Hong Kong; University of Hong Kong 2005
-
29
de Graeff A, de Leeuw J R, Ros W J, Hordijk G J, Blijham G H, Winnubst J A.
Pretreatment factors predicting quality of life after treatment for head and neck cancer.
Head Neck.
2000;
22(4)
398-407
-
30
Terrell J E, Ronis D L, Fowler K E et al..
Clinical predictors of quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2004;
130(4)
401-408
-
31
Finizia C, Hammerlid E, Westin T, Lindstrom J.
Quality of life and voice in patients with laryngeal carcinoma: a posttreatment comparison of laryngectomy (salvage surgery) versus radiotherapy.
Laryngoscope.
1998;
108(10)
1566-1573
-
32
Hanna E, Sherman A, Cash D et al..
Quality of life for patients following total laryngectomy vs chemoradiation for laryngeal preservation.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2004;
130(7)
875-879
-
33
Op de Coul B M, Ackerstaff A H, van As C J et al..
Quality of life assessment in laryngectomized individuals: do we need additions to standard questionnaires in specific clinical research projects?.
Clin Otolaryngol.
2005;
30(2)
169-175
-
34
Friedman L C, Lehane D, Webb J A, Weinberg A D, Cooper H P.
Anxiety and medical situations and chemotherapy-related problems among cancer patients.
J Cancer Educ.
1994;
9(1)
37-41
-
35
Mesters I, van den Borne H, McCormick L, Pruyn J, de Boer M, Imbos T.
Openness to discuss cancer in the nuclear family: scale, development, and validation.
Psychosom Med.
1997;
59(3)
269-279
-
36
Palmer A D, Graham M.
The relationship between communication and quality of life in alaryngeal speakers.
J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol.
2004;
28(1)
6-24
-
37
Blood G W, Luther A R, Stemple J C.
Coping and adjustment in alaryngeal speakers.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
1992;
1
63-69
-
38
Katz M R, Irish J C, Devins G M, Rodin G M, Gullane P J.
Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support.
Head Neck.
2003;
25(2)
103-112
-
39 Meltzner G S, Hillman R E, Heaton J, Houston K, Kobler J B, Qi Y. Electrolarynx speech: The state-of-the-art and future directions for development. In: Doyle PC, Keith RL Contemporary Consideration in the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Head and Neck Cancer: Voice, Speech, and Swallowing. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed 2005
-
40
Hilgers F J, Ackerstaff A H.
Comprehensive rehabilitation after total laryngectomy is more than voice alone.
Folia Phoniatr Logop.
2000;
52(1-3)
65-73
-
41
Salmon S J.
Adjusting to laryngectomy.
Semin Speech Lang.
1986;
7(1)
67-94
-
42 American Cancer Society .Cancer Facts and Figures-2005. Atlanta, GA; American Cancer Society 2005
Tanya L EadiePh.D. CCC/SLP
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington
1417 NE 42nd St., Seattle, WA 98105
eMail: teadie@u.washington.edu
